You have a whole post dedicated to whining about my vote on youIn post 555, mozamis wrote:@ Flubber you made 13 posts before this in your catch up. You mention me once.
Now you vote me?
That is some scummy shit lol
And Allo is the main wagon, and you haven't mentioned him AT ALL. (saying Nos' Allo vote is aswful is about Nos).
How can you not mention the main wagon lol
What wagon are you alluding to here?In post 605, Aubrey wrote:I don't have any alignment pull for Flub. I don't understand why it is scummy for him to not mention the main wagon though. What's the scum intention behind that?
I've taken the hard stance that activity tells are fucking dumb. Allo's case is 90% activity tells. What do you think that says about the wagon?In post 611, mozamis wrote:I see Fitz as a bit of a lurker lynch tbh
We could do worse i guess.
About flubber and not mentioning Allomancer, or me, it suggests scum avoiding taking hard stances on anything. I just think if you are town catching up, you would at least say something like "oh, the allomancer wagon is nonsense", "oh sure, like the moz wagon".
Why wouldn't you give out some sort of read on the main wagons? Or at the very least, say "I dont have much of a read on Allo or Moz" etc
And yeah, Formerfish looked scummy.
I'm gonna leave my vote where it is, but obviously I'll vote Fitz if need be, though I think he's a coin flip.
It's not that I'm not willing. I just kind of accepted that it wasn't going to happen today.In post 620, I Am Innocent wrote:I'm not BP either.
Not thrilled how moz ignored all my posts/questions. The fact that it has been near impossible to get his wagon above 3 votes tells me I'm on the right track. Still happy with my vote. Anyone not willing to vote moz I'd like to hear why.
Moz was talking about Allo's wagon followed by his own.In post 626, Flubbernugget wrote:What wagon are you alluding to here?
I'm not going to repeat why for a 3rd time.In post 620, I Am Innocent wrote:Anyone not willing to vote moz I'd like to hear why.
Why not?In post 629, Chickadee wrote:It's not that I'm not willing. I just kind of accepted that it wasn't going to happen today.In post 620, I Am Innocent wrote:I'm not BP either.
Not thrilled how moz ignored all my posts/questions. The fact that it has been near impossible to get his wagon above 3 votes tells me I'm on the right track. Still happy with my vote. Anyone not willing to vote moz I'd like to hear why.
It's directed toward you, so by all means run Moz up if you think that needs to happen.In post 634, Flubbernugget wrote:Is there a reason moz hasn't been run up for 555 alone?
Care if I ask at what point did you realize that his play was reminiscent of a previous game?In post 635, Chickadee wrote:
@Rat, when I was on the wagon, everyone else was looking elsewhere. I also feel I have to take pause, because I've seen mom play exactly like this as town. Granted, I haven't seen his scum game. But still. If there's interest in a Moza wagon, I'll hop back on. Otherwise I've stated my lynch pool.
It's been crossing my mind the whole time. It's why it took me so long to vote him.In post 637, Aubrey wrote:Care if I ask at what point did you realize that his play was reminiscent of a previous game?In post 635, Chickadee wrote:
@Rat, when I was on the wagon, everyone else was looking elsewhere. I also feel I have to take pause, because I've seen mom play exactly like this as town. Granted, I haven't seen his scum game. But still. If there's interest in a Moza wagon, I'll hop back on. Otherwise I've stated my lynch pool.
yes, you voted for me. But that was after you made all your catch up posts, without mentioning me at all.In post 625, Flubbernugget wrote:You have a whole post dedicated to whining about my vote on you
what the actual fuck are you doing
hey chick, I'm still not your mom! (funny what a combination of havig a female avatar and being older than you does lol)In post 635, Chickadee wrote:because I've seen mom play exactly like this as town.
Because I find you super sketchy and suspicious-like.In post 640, mozamis wrote:its been a main wagon for a while...
i get why IAI and Flubber are still on my wagon ,they could be cum.
But radical, why are you still voting me?
Okay then. Question time.In post 643, mozamis wrote:i didnt answer IAI's questions because they seemed "lawyer like" i.e bullshit lol i guess when you think someones scum, you don't want to bother.
I'd rather answer questions from town i.e chick, radical. even Nos, if he can be mature enough to be civil.
I Am Innocent wrote:.In post 543, I Am Innocent wrote:In post 419, mozamis wrote:i think i'm gonna vote for Formerfish.In post 409, Mjollnir wrote:Mozamis:If you had to vote for someone right now, who would it be, and very importantly why?
1) He's been in my p.o.e pile since early on
2) He's catch up posts had no reads at all as far as i could see. Lot of info, questions, but tno real analysis/reads.
Allomancer is another possibility but he is posting very little, i'm worried that he is lynch bait.What changed between these posts, from him being lynch bait to having an air of noob scum?In post 473, mozamis wrote:Guy has the air of noob scum to me.
Worse case he isn't going to contribute much as town.
Happy with lynching him today.
VOTE ALLOMANCER
this is unfair. i keep giving out reads, reasons for reads. (unlike IAI who tunnelled Chci, gave up, and has OMGUsed me ever since?) Where are his reads, aprt form his MOz tunnel/In post 644, Radical Rat wrote:Because I find you super sketchy and suspicious-like.
I don't get any sense of sincerity from your posts