Newbie 1826 Basketball Game Over

UC Voyager · Post Post #225 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:33 am

VOTE: Peaches

I mean. He is in my scum list

UC Voyager · Post Post #226 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:34 am

Page top

Spartan117 · Post Post #227 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:34 am

Duuuude why do you do this, what you are doing is exactly why I voted for Peaches just now, do some investigation dude, don't just jump on the wagon without even a reason....

Spartan117 · Post Post #228 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:35 am

^ @ both Voyager and Assemble

Spartan117 · Post Post #229 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:44 am

In post 224, Assemblerotws wrote:VOTE: Peaches
I'd do this even if that horrible scumread/vote wasn't on me.

You are suppose to be a semi experienced player and this is all you have to say with your vote... you are just giving people a reason to scum read you

Clemency · Post Post #230 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:47 am

In post 224, Assemblerotws wrote:VOTE: Peaches
I'd do this even if that horrible scumread/vote wasn't on me.

Was there any need to state that?

Deimos27 · Post Post #231 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:50 am

That's L-1 according to my count!

Spartan117 · Post Post #232 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 6:03 am

I believe it is actually yeah, shame that Voyager couldn't have included that in his naked vote.

Clemency · Post Post #233 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 6:13 am

In post 232, Spartan117 wrote:I believe it is actually yeah, shame that Voyager couldn't have included that in his naked vote.

As if that slot couldn't get any more foggy.

Deimos27 · Post Post #234 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 6:50 am

Assemble, how many more times do we need to ask you to share your thoughts on the slots other than zemaj/RC/Voyager before you stop ignoring us?
What's your scumread on Peaches based on?

Spoiler: y u no reply

In post 205, Plotinus wrote:What about his posts feel town to you?

It's an early read based on little content, but I liked his tone in 92 and 104, and I also agree with your interpretation of 90-91. Scum tends to avoid suspicion and be very self-conscious.
I'm interested to see what he brings to the table once he gets back, though.

In post 222, UC Voyager wrote:right off the bat im having scum reads on peaches and Plotinus

Voyager, would you elaborate on your scumreads on Peaches and Plot?

Clemency · Post Post #235 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 6:57 am

In post 119, Clemency wrote:
In post 114, Assemblerotws wrote:Rolling my eyes right now.
I don't like this tone. Don't like it, don't like it, not one bit.

Perhaps a bit hypocritical coming from me, but this makes me feel like you're playing the game as someone trying to defend themselves entirely rather than somebody who wants to catch the scum and win the game. Sure, there can be town motivation in clearing your own slot as town, to help with the process of elimination, but being that condescending clears that thought from my mind. Give us your reads, if you have any.

Add this to the ignored questions list.

UC Voyager · Post Post #236 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 7:09 am

In post 232, Spartan117 wrote:I believe it is actually yeah, shame that Voyager couldn't have included that in his naked vote.

I had reasons but I am at school..... : p .....
I still am, so I only have 5-10 min time frames to make posts.....I will get back and state my reasons during lunch....which is in two periods. So lets not give him another vote until then. I'm just as much as against naked votes than you are.....

Spartan117 · Post Post #237 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 7:09 am

So we have Peaches Voyager and Assemble on the scum list what do you guys think of everyone else?

UC Voyager · Post Post #238 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 7:11 am

Yea. After 5:00-6:00ish I will be more available....

Spartan117 · Post Post #239 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 7:11 am

In post 236, UC Voyager wrote:
In post 232, Spartan117 wrote:I believe it is actually yeah, shame that Voyager couldn't have included that in his naked vote.
I had reasons but I am at school..... : p .....
I still am, so I only have 5-10 min time frames to make posts.....I will get back and state my reasons during lunch....which is in two periods. So lets not give him another vote until then. I'm just as much as against naked votes than you are.....

If you are against naked votes also why did you do one, why not wait till you got home and could provide your vote with solid reasoning?

Spartan117 · Post Post #240 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 7:12 am

In post 238, UC Voyager wrote:Yea. After 5:00-6:00ish I will be more available....

I have absolutely no idea when that is, it is currently 7:11pm for me right now

Spartan117 · Post Post #241 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 7:14 am

I can only assume it is around 10am for you as you said you have 2 periods till lunch which should be roughly an hour long and lunch is around 12 mid day for most people maybe 1ish so im gonna have to wait another 7 hours till I get a response at which point it will be 2am for me so i wont see it till tomorrow

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #242 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 8:45 am

In post 241, Spartan117 wrote:I can only assume it is around 10am for you as you said you have 2 periods till lunch which should be roughly an hour long and lunch is around 12 mid day for most people maybe 1ish so im gonna have to wait another 7 hours till I get a response at which point it will be 2am for me so i wont see it till tomorrow

I'm impressed by your investigative skills lol.

UC Voyager · Post Post #243 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 8:46 am

It is almost lunch. Ours at 1:00ish
It is 12:46 UCV time

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #244 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 8:48 am

In post 234, Deimos27 wrote:What's your scumread on Peaches based on?

How do you feel about peaches relative to your scum read on Assemble?

Pedit it's 8.48am hurr.

UC Voyager · Post Post #245 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 8:53 am

IT is now lunch
12:53 UCV time

UC Voyager · Post Post #246 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 9:00 am

i voted on peaches for the exact same reason you just got a little mad at me.
i am a huge fan of naked votes (which kind of makes me a hypocrite because i did[though it was due to time issues] i dont like to do it myself)

im going to check and make sure i didn't misread earlier post before trying to make a post referring to it.(another thing) (not naked vote)

Spartan117 · Post Post #247 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 9:08 am

In post 244, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 234, Deimos27 wrote:What's your scumread on Peaches based on?
How do you feel about peaches relative to your scum read on Assemble?

Pedit it's 8.48am hurr.

MAD you must be in Australia or New Zealand because you are exactly 12hours away from me xD

UC Voyager · Post Post #248 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 9:12 am

In post 221, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 169, RadiantCowbells wrote:My overall readslist is something like

{Spartan117, RC}
{CheekyTeeky}
{Xnadrojx, Clemency}
{Plotinus}
{Assemblerotws}
{Deimos27, Peaches}

In post 130, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 129, Assemblerotws wrote:see my twice-expressed scumread on zemaj, though I botched it the first time
This is valid. Could you elaborate on the Zemaj read and tell us your thoughts on others at this point? Here's where I am atm - top is town:
Spartan (conf.)
Clemency
Zemaj
Plot
Deimos
Peaches
XnadrojX
Assemblerotws
Two players that scum lean on you are also the two slots you scum lean on. I also remember seeing you regurgitating other people's reads, plus it looks like you're struggling to come up with original thoughts about the game which is why I put your slot where I did. It looks like I could be wrong about the assemble/deimos team.

VOTE: Peaches

this is a good point. he seams to scum lean on people who scum lean on him. Trying to remove the people putting pressure on them. using scum lean so he can use it as an excuse to why he voted. if Peaches flipps town, i would not be all like, ah crap, i knew he was town". i would man up and say i was wrong....i feel if he were to get his way, and the person flipped town, he would say that he knew that i they were just a lean!!!!

other than the last page, he seemed to not be around for like over 5 pages or so.....lurking!!!or IRL issues? i would like to know?

he hasn't seemed to post since we started a push on him either. i find this very weird as well. like "oh crap, they are figuring it out" "lets hide and hope that they turn they're focus to someone else??????"

Spartan117 · Post Post #249 (ISO) » Thu Oct 05, 2017 9:13 am

In post 242, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 241, Spartan117 wrote:I can only assume it is around 10am for you as you said you have 2 periods till lunch which should be roughly an hour long and lunch is around 12 mid day for most people maybe 1ish so im gonna have to wait another 7 hours till I get a response at which point it will be 2am for me so i wont see it till tomorrow
I'm impressed by your investigative skills lol.

Thank you

, I would normally be pretty investigative but as I'm conf town I don't need to prove I'm town in my posts and stuff activity wise etc which is something I'm not used to, plus as I'm kinda a spectator in this game all be it one who can vote and get night killed, I don't want to stand in the way of town doing investigation work, because if I do like I have done in previous games I get really investigaty to the point where I sometimes can look a bit LAMIST, and I don't want to talk about a load of points that will make it seem like to me that town who are speaking about points are actually just repeating the points I have made.