Mini 1947: Board Game uPick: The Expansion! Game Over

[Chickadee]

When I’m gone, quick lynch Actiondan and then consider lynching random.

[morph the cat]

For having 0 votes on me at the end of day one, I was given a 1-shot Roleblock ability. I used it on Chickadee. There was no nightkill.

A lot of us didn't have any votes at the end of day one.

VOTE: Porkens

For what should be exceptionally obvious reasons. If the claim results in a flipped scum, I will discontinue, but this will be a policy placement each day from me until then.

You're assuming this is a mechanics thing and not a role thing. Why?

There's no implied assumption it's a mechanics thing and not a role thing. It is the lower probability possibility, by far. It's almost certainly a role thing, or else why would voting him do anything? If I believed it was a mechanics thing, then I would have to assume some unknown factor that decided Porkens got the reward for not having a vote, or perhaps there's a different mechanic hidden in play every day or ... {insert endless amounts of speculation since one claimed data point isn't enough to actually know}.

So no ... I'm not assuming it's a mechanics thing. [/quote]

Ok, thanks. I feel like there are a lot of reasons to think it's a role thing, not least of which are the number of claimed or demonstrated abilities that revolve around voting/votes. I thought it would be pretty odd if you

were

assuming a mechanical reason.

So here's the rub I've got with your post Morph. I believe town would have said "Why are you assuming it's a mechanics thing?" or "Are you assuming it's a mechanics thing?" -- Instead you chose to assign a belief to me which I did not express, and then pose a question which rests upon the premise that your statement of my belief is correct. A town you has no way to know from my earlier post what I am reasoning about the situation, nor should a town you have any motive to try and put words in my mouth and set up a narrative.

I wasn't trying to put words in your mouth, and either (or any other) way I phrased the question would elicit the info I wanted.

A scum you? A scum you really wants to put me in a specific box you control. If not for what you did yesterday, you would be a scum read now as I find manipulation of posts to try and misrepresent players to be something scum do much more frequently than town. You're still a paranoia/LYLO possibility because busing.

This is the second time in this game someone has accused me of effectively putting them in a box. Something for me to think about.

When I first read it, I felt that this post was almost dramatically paranoid, though. On second readthrough, though some of the words come off as loaded, it's not as dramatic as my first impression.

[morph the cat]

meh. messed up the quote. I think it's reasonably clear. If not, I'll redo if asked.

[morph the cat]

When I’m gone, quick lynch Actiondan and then consider lynching random.

Is random's meta about the Green Haired uPick inaccurate?

[Something_Smart]

V/LA until Monday

[Chickadee]

When I’m gone, quick lynch Actiondan and then consider lynching random.

Is random's meta about the Green Haired uPick inaccurate?

I would say yes. I replaced into that game. I was scum and because uninvested pretty quickly. I’m trying here.

[Randomnamechange]

When I’m gone, quick lynch Actiondan and then consider lynching random.

Is random's meta about the Green Haired uPick inaccurate?

I would say yes. I replaced into that game. I was scum and because uninvested pretty quickly. I’m trying here.

so it is accurate but doesnt apply here
nice shade though
also not being invested after day 1 would make sense here

[Drixx]

meh. messed up the quote. I think it's reasonably clear. If not, I'll redo if asked.

I think it was really clear. It was just a messed up quote tag so everyone can see where my words end and your's start.

As for your observation that some of my post seems loaded. It was. I generally don't make a post without a purpose and expectations for response. I'm what you might call an "efficient" player. I used to write huge walls (literally thousands of words) often. That taught me to be efficient.

[gerryoat]

ccan we just lynch and move on?

[Porkens]

When I’m gone, quick lynch Actiondan and then consider lynching random.

It is striking to me that you did not try to call me scum after I guiltied you. It makes me think you may have "give-up slipped"

meh. messed up the quote. I think it's reasonably clear. If not, I'll redo if asked.

To be honest, I don't get it. But if it's really important, I hope you will break it down for me a bit more?

When I’m gone, quick lynch Actiondan and then consider lynching random.

Is random's meta about the Green Haired uPick inaccurate?

Player A asking player B to invalidate the meta of player C. Weird.

V/LA until Monday

Have a great weakend, friend!

When I’m gone, quick lynch Actiondan and then consider lynching random.

Is random's meta about the Green Haired uPick inaccurate?

I would say yes. I replaced into that game. I was scum and because uninvested pretty quickly. I’m trying here.

so it is accurate but doesnt apply here
nice shade though
also not being invested after day 1 would make sense here

If this were directed towards me, I would feel a liitle hurt.

meh. messed up the quote. I think it's reasonably clear. If not, I'll redo if asked.

I think it was really clear. It was just a messed up quote tag so everyone can see where my words end and your's start.

As for your observation that some of my post seems loaded. It was. I generally don't make a post without a purpose and expectations for response.

I'm what you might call an "efficient" player

. I used to write huge walls (literally thousands of words) often. That taught me to be efficient.

ccan we just lynch and move on?

Gerryoat for president.

[Randomnamechange]

In post 1581, randomidget wrote:
In post 1580, Chickadee wrote:
In post 1578, morph the cat wrote:
In post 1575, Chickadee wrote:
When I’m gone, quick lynch Actiondan and then consider lynching random.


Is random's meta about the Green Haired uPick inaccurate?

I would say yes. I replaced into that game. I was scum and because uninvested pretty quickly. I’m trying here.

so it is accurate but doesnt apply here
nice shade though
also not being invested after day 1 would make sense here


If this were directed towards me, I would feel a liitle hurt.

what do you mean?

[morph the cat]

To be honest, I don't get it. But if it's really important, I hope you will break it down for me a bit more?

Not sure it's all that important, but what part of it do you not get? Where Drixx's quote ended and my reply began? The first words by me began with "Ok, thanks"

[Porkens]

Ehhhhhhhhhh I'm not trying to be difficult, but could you just give it to me in one sentence?

[Porkens]

In post 1581, randomidget wrote:
In post 1580, Chickadee wrote:
In post 1578, morph the cat wrote:
In post 1575, Chickadee wrote:
When I’m gone, quick lynch Actiondan and then consider lynching random.


Is random's meta about the Green Haired uPick inaccurate?

I would say yes. I replaced into that game. I was scum and because uninvested pretty quickly. I’m trying here.

so it is accurate but doesnt apply here
nice shade though
also not being invested after day 1 would make sense here


If this were directed towards me, I would feel a liitle hurt.

what do you mean?

I mean if you had directed that message towards me, I might have interpreted it as coming with an insulting tone. Just an observation. I know it was not directed towards me, and my feelings are not hurt.

[Drixx]

You put that sentence in large and red and bold. Did you have a comment to make Porkens?

[Porkens]

I did not.

[TwoInAMillion]

Anyone not lynching chickadee is looking more like scum imho.

[Porkens]

Now, I'm honestly asking, so please explain if I have it wrong, are you trying to intimidate people with your reads? AGREE WITH ME OR GET LYNCHED. Is that what you are saying?

I agree.

[morph the cat]

Ehhhhhhhhhh I'm not trying to be difficult, but could you just give it to me in one sentence?

How about bullet-points?

- I understand the reasoning behind Drixx voting you now.
- I initially took exception to the tone of his reply to me, but after a second read it's not quite as dramatically accusatory as I thought
- But, I think he used some loaded "you're scummy" words in his reply to me that seem out of phase with how I view our play in this game, which gives me some slight "was that a fabricated reaction?" vibes.
- I am considering the fact that WhyMafia had a similar reaction to a post I made on day 1.
- Not stated in the post but also weighed in my thoughts is the fact that at least one player on MS finds our hydra extra-abrasive, beyond what we are like as separate players. I wonder if my posts take on extra oomph if people aren't sure who's posting.

The result of the last three bullet points is that my read of Drixx remains about where it was before, in the null area I described in our last reads list of day 1. 1125. Maybe a slight townward bounce.

[morph the cat]

What do you think about how ActionDan attacked morph? Was it fake?

What do you think about it?

[Porkens]

morph, you choose.

If you are town, read this:

Spoiler:

LYNCH CHICKADEE, and stop reading this post now

If you are scum, keep reading:

How about bullet-points?

ok, you asked for it.

- I understand the reasoning behind Drixx voting you now.

why is he?

- I initially took exception to the tone of his reply to me, but after a second read it's not quite as dramatically accusatory as I thought

so what?

- But, I think he used some loaded "you're scummy" words in his reply to me that seem out of phase with how I view our play in this game, which gives me some slight "was that a fabricated reaction?" vibes.

he doesn't read you like you read you so he is scummy? I don't know if that makes sense. Help?

- I am considering the fact that WhyMafia had a similar reaction to a post I made on day 1.

id rather not do research if it's not important enough for you to site the information here.

- Not stated in the post but also weighed in my thoughts is the fact that at least one player on MS finds our hydra extra-abrasive, beyond what we are like as separate players. I wonder if my posts take on extra oomph if people aren't sure who's posting.

so you are saying RC suicided on you because one of your heads and RC don't get along?

The result of the last three bullet points is that my read of Drixx remains about where it was before, in the null area I described in our last reads list of day 1. 1125. Maybe a slight townward bounce.

is this the main point? Is this your case for drixtown?

[Porkens]

Inb4 you are tired of my bs for the rest of the day.

[morph the cat]

Inb4 you are tired of my bs for the rest of the day.

More like "When Porkens wants clarification, don't bother to ~effort~.

We're not voting until we have another synch, which might happen later today. In the meanwhile I want to firm up my thoughts on some of the other players I'm not townreading.

[morph the cat]

re your reply, since I'm not townreading Drixx, it's obviously not a case for town-Drixx. As for the rest, meh.

I'm phone posting until I get home in a few hours. Not doing lots of links for you.

[Porkens]

Woah, what happened there? Did it just get a little warmer in here? I might have missed something.