Mini Normal 1952: Dragon's Dance [OVER - PERFECT SCUM WIN]
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Why were you considering claiming right away?In post 25, Lalendra wrote:Not on board with the LQ lunch because I'm also VT and was considering claiming it straight out the gate.
Can someone elaborate on the policy lynch? I must be missing something.
A policy lynch is the act of lynching a player who is not found to be particularly scummy, but because their bad play will hurt the town later on.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Definitely can see Lalendra.In post 29, Errantparabola wrote:I'm feeling Lalendra, LQ town. May commit to a short meta-dive on those players in the early game, in the near future-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Ah. So you essentially wanted to try reaction testing. I can’t say that I dig it. I tend to find it scummy but I know people do it as town enough for it be a null tell. I think as long as you know what you’re trying to accomplish with a reaction test, you’ll do fine.In post 30, Lalendra wrote:
Thank you for the explanation.In post 28, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
Why were you considering claiming right away?In post 25, Lalendra wrote:Not on board with the LQ lunch because I'm also VT and was considering claiming it straight out the gate.
Can someone elaborate on the policy lynch? I must be missing something.
A policy lynch is the act of lynching a player who is not found to be particularly scummy, but because their bad play will hurt the town later on.
I was considering claiming right away because I've never used this tactic before and I wanted to see how it played out. I'm still fairly new to mafia. So, it was interesting to me that someone else had the exact same idea.
What do you think Boon is trying to accomplish with his supposed claim?-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Could you rephrase this?In post 38, LicketyQuickety wrote:
And what makes you think they used it as a reaction test after I brought up what boon was doing could be a reaction test. You think they got anything out of the reaction test they did, cuz I don't.In post 37, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
Ah. So you essentially wanted to try reaction testing. I can’t say that I dig it. I tend to find it scummy but I know people do it as town enough for it be a null tell. I think as long as you know what you’re trying to accomplish with a reaction test, you’ll do fine.In post 30, Lalendra wrote:
Thank you for the explanation.In post 28, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
Why were you considering claiming right away?In post 25, Lalendra wrote:Not on board with the LQ lunch because I'm also VT and was considering claiming it straight out the gate.
Can someone elaborate on the policy lynch? I must be missing something.
A policy lynch is the act of lynching a player who is not found to be particularly scummy, but because their bad play will hurt the town later on.
I was considering claiming right away because I've never used this tactic before and I wanted to see how it played out. I'm still fairly new to mafia. So, it was interesting to me that someone else had the exact same idea.
What do you think Boon is trying to accomplish with his supposed claim?-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
I don’t think she did one unless I’m misunderstanding. I think she wanted to, had some doubt, then saw Boon’s claim didn’t generate much discussion.In post 40, LicketyQuickety wrote:The question, at this point, should be whether Lalendra was truthful in their claim or whether they are Scum. I think this because I think its improbable that Lalendra was doing a reaction test when that was already brought up. Its the fact that her reaction test would be so ineffective that I don't think its likely she takes that course of action. I mean, they already claimed it so there is no sense in hiding it really.
I will say its prolly very unlikely that all of Uzi, EP and Lalendra are all Scum covering for Lalendra. That would group themselves too close together as having the same opinion which I don't think is either an effective strategy as Scum, nor a probable one.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Asectic and Miller claims beg to differIn post 51, Tchill13 wrote:
claims generate discussion on day 2 or 3. not in rvs lol.In post 48, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
I don’t think she did one unless I’m misunderstanding. I think she wanted to, had some doubt, then saw Boon’s claim didn’t generate much discussion.In post 40, LicketyQuickety wrote:The question, at this point, should be whether Lalendra was truthful in their claim or whether they are Scum. I think this because I think its improbable that Lalendra was doing a reaction test when that was already brought up. Its the fact that her reaction test would be so ineffective that I don't think its likely she takes that course of action. I mean, they already claimed it so there is no sense in hiding it really.
I will say its prolly very unlikely that all of Uzi, EP and Lalendra are all Scum covering for Lalendra. That would group themselves too close together as having the same opinion which I don't think is either an effective strategy as Scum, nor a probable one.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Is there something you’d like discussed other than Boon?In post 53, Thestatusquo wrote:
would you care to talk about the game or...?In post 52, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
Asectic and Miller claims beg to differIn post 51, Tchill13 wrote:
claims generate discussion on day 2 or 3. not in rvs lol.In post 48, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
I don’t think she did one unless I’m misunderstanding. I think she wanted to, had some doubt, then saw Boon’s claim didn’t generate much discussion.In post 40, LicketyQuickety wrote:The question, at this point, should be whether Lalendra was truthful in their claim or whether they are Scum. I think this because I think its improbable that Lalendra was doing a reaction test when that was already brought up. Its the fact that her reaction test would be so ineffective that I don't think its likely she takes that course of action. I mean, they already claimed it so there is no sense in hiding it really.
I will say its prolly very unlikely that all of Uzi, EP and Lalendra are all Scum covering for Lalendra. That would group themselves too close together as having the same opinion which I don't think is either an effective strategy as Scum, nor a probable one.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Yeah there’s nothing to talk about there.In post 57, Thestatusquo wrote:you also have not discussed that, either.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
I’m not sure.In post 60, Thestatusquo wrote:
what do you think should be talked about?In post 58, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:In post 56, Thestatusquo wrote:Yes.
So bring it up and let’s talk about.
You just said you wanted to talk about something though. I don’t think this is it but correct me if I’m wrong.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Would you say he fades out or lurks as scum?In post 68, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Good player. Sniffed me out pretty handedly in our second game together on D1. We had quite the 1v1 there. I caught him in the previous game. Its kinda ballsy for Acid to give me a quick Town read unless they don't really respect my play. I think they are a tone reader for the most part, but they are actually good at it.In post 66, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I didn’t even notice he posted to be honest.
Can you talk about your experience with him some LQ?
I just recently finished a game with him where he was super active early on as scum, went on v/LA, came back and for whatever reason started lurking.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
I’ve played with tchill a few times now and this feels a bit different from him just being a VI. Not doing anything is NAI but I know too many players believe it is AI. I voted him however for WMFM after pointing out that the reasoning for Errant voting him applies to two people who hadn’t even checked in.In post 99, Thestatusquo wrote:tchill is reading like Vi to me. I don't see a scum motivation for this latest vote hop specifically.
EPs points are good, but while the pattern of behavior could be consistent with scum trying to active lurk:
a) The behavior could also be consistent with town who legitimately doesnt quite know what is going on.
b) I think scum active lurking is behavior that typically doesn't happen in RVS
i) scum tend to "hide in plain sight" in the later stages of the game, not the RVS.
ii) I think scum are more likely to just lurk, rather than active lurk.
I'm not like town reading them or anything, but I think we have bigger fish to fry. Like LQ.
Can we kill it with fire?-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Could you walk me through this? Was it her read list?
In post 118, Sergtacos wrote:
why not me?In post 117, Tchill13 wrote:Licketey quickety is my strongest and only town read atm.In post 121, Sergtacos wrote:ur obv scum tchillIn post 122, Sergtacos wrote:obv because im easy to town read, and if ur "Struggling to read me" its cuz u scum. u know it urself down inside tchill.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Low post count doesn’t mean lack of content.In post 124, Tchill13 wrote:Only scummy things I've seen so far is errant pushing me for lack of content when most players were around 5ish posts.
Do you think Errant is forcing having a strong read on you or something?-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems like TSQ’s beef with LQ is that he either should’ve picked up that he wasn’t serious about Boon or that he should’ve found his reasoning for voting Boon terrible. If so, I can’t buy the former based on LQ’s breakdown of events and TSQ at one point wanting to talk about something more than Boon which shows TSQ was invested to a degree.
The latter I can buy though as I didn’t get what joke TSQ was referring to at all and one of LQ’s reasons for voting Boon is bordering on policy lynching. However, I don’t buy that this was an elaborate reaction test from TSQ. In other words, I’m stuck there.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
In post 134, Tchill13 wrote:
I just felt like errant brought up an issue that could lead to a lot of momentum on my wagon that could then be pushed to a Lynch.In post 127, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
Low post count doesn’t mean lack of content.In post 124, Tchill13 wrote:Only scummy things I've seen so far is errant pushing me for lack of content when most players were around 5ish posts.
Do you think Errant is forcing having a strong read on you or something?
I think I kind of get what you’re saying here but I also don’t really see it. Errant doesn’t strike me as the careless type.In post 136, Tchill13 wrote:The action isn't scummy it's the timing of it. Pushing someone for lack of content as soon as the game starts? Are you serious? That's why I questioned it because it's a reasonable excuse and the TIMING. Nothing better for scum to find a reasonable excuse to lead a mislynch on someone.
I find that there are players who don’t like a prolonged RVS stage or are just eager to get to game solving. Why is pushing for lack of content so early more likely to come from scum than town?-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
I think you’re playing fucking semantics man. I suspect that was a typo.In post 143, LicketyQuickety wrote:@Uzi @tsq
First, she says lunch, which means she has played before, and its not typical of people on this site to say Lunch as much as elsewhere on the net. Second, She says she is not on board with my lynch... because she was also considering claiming VT straight out of the gate... Wut? Like I feel she is trying to say its Townie of me to point out that it could be a reaction test, but instead she goes into full detail of giving too much info about her role for zero reason. I can see how VT might want to claim to survive longer, but as I already stated, the fact someone else already claimed VT it takes away any ability to use "I'm VT" as a reaction test. So given that she HAS played before (assuming she played a newbie game here) Its likely she already knows not to just claim your role for zero reason. That's why I posited that either she is just a poor player or is Scum in so many words.In post 25, Lalendra wrote:Not on board with the LQ lunch because I'm also VT and was considering claiming it straight out the gate.
Can someone elaborate on the policy lynch? I must be missing something.
Here its like... AGAIN, why claim here when it serves zero purpose? I feel like she is kinda playing up the newb card at this point. She hasn't indicated that she knows what she is doing and is going to pull some gosu fake out shit that she drops on us later.In post 30, Lalendra wrote:
Thank you for the explanation.In post 28, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
Why were you considering claiming right away?In post 25, Lalendra wrote:Not on board with the LQ lunch because I'm also VT and was considering claiming it straight out the gate.
Can someone elaborate on the policy lynch? I must be missing something.
A policy lynch is the act of lynching a player who is not found to be particularly scummy, but because their bad play will hurt the town later on.
I was considering claiming right away because I've never used this tactic before and I wanted to see how it played out. I'm still fairly new to mafia. So, it was interesting to me that someone else had the exact same idea.
"I'm a fan of reads list, especially this early" This is not something a newb should be saying... like.. at all.In post 97, Lalendra wrote:Okay I'm a fan of readlists, especially this early in the game, so here goes.
Spoiler:
I don't have any super strong reads yet but currently, Tacos and Schadd are probably my biggest scumreads simply because they have posted without actually saying or contributing much. Players who have more experience with them (or just in general) are welcome to tell me if they think I'm wrong on those.
Mumble and Egg, where you at?
P-Edit: Not a bad vote from TSQ for LQ. I am open to jumping on this wagon, depending on where it goes.
And then she basically says Boon is Town because he did something she has never tried out and thinks its too ballsy for Scum to do. Way to give yourself a Town read???
In her read on Chill, she is basically saying she disagrees with someone who is much more experienced than herself. Then she says she hasn't done a meta dive on Chill yet. OK, but like, what are you waiting for?
Their read on me... "I'm thinking Town, but not sure" Does it get any more hedgy than that?
Her Toco read is the only one that seems acceptable and its not even a stance on them.
There read on shadd seems a bit IIoA as per my definition. It gives facts without a conclusion in other words. Its smells fishy to me.
tsq... Take not of the "on that one" This looks like it could be a kind of coverup based on word choice. Not to mention that generating content is what you aresupposedto do as either alignment.
How the absolute FUCK is playing as aggressively Pro-Town risky? Like that is what you are supposed to do to get a Town read, right?
Their read on EP is.. "I'm a newb but I know what EP is doing even tho it doesn't make sense is perfectly fine"
She wraps up her reads saying "The people that have contributed a goose egg are my Scum reads" when earlier she said she had no read on those players.
Then in her P-Edit she does exactly what tsq accused me of doing, but does tsq even look at Lalenda? Why not? Because they are a newb so all is forgiven?
Then she takes Acids harmless comment as an accusation and finds the need to defend themselves. Why do you feel the need to defend yourself against that?In post 100, Lalendra wrote:
I don't really have any stronger reasoning at the moment, hence why there isn't much. The readslist was mostly me thinking out loud and hoping that it would generate some discussion.In post 98, acidphoenix wrote:VOTE: tchill
also >explanations with your readslist
unexplained readslist = goat
Why did you vote tchill?
LAMIST.In post 114, Lalendra wrote:Can you elaborate on what this means? I'm also confused about why you voted me and then continue your dialogue with TSQ. If you think what he is doing is scummy/bad play, why wouldn't you vote him instead? (Not saying I think you should, I'm not getting a strong scumlean on him; just trying to understand your thought process here.)
Havo - Are you serious about Mumble? If so, why not vote him?
Even if she has played before, it doesn’t necessarily mean that she isn’t a newbie. She could still not understand a lot of roles or basic mafia terminology. She could have less than 10 games under her belt for all we know.
You do have a point about her claiming but I just don’t see the way she did it coming from scum. What would her scum motivation be to claim like that? It reads more like a rookie mistake.
I’m not following you on why wouldn’t a newbie say that. It feels like you’re reaching again.
As for the reads list itself, I think it’s just a bunch of jumbled up thoughts and reeks of only having half an understanding of what’s going on and what people are doing-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
In post 149, acidphoenix wrote:oh maybe luv too missed him
also carca is lock scum but that's irrelevant
Leave Carcasilly alone! She’s an innocent child
Carcalilly has been revealed as conf scumtown.Last edited by Carcalilly on Tue Oct 10, 2017 12:24 am, edited 1 time in total.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Egg, I was trying to express that I didn’t get Taco saying he should be a strong town read and then using tchill not having him as his strongest town read as a way to further strengthen his scum read on him. I’m not sure what to make of Taco yet but that interaction pinged me.
Why do you think he may be lying about having this stance?In post 155, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Can you point to me where you have said this before?In post 154, Havo wrote:
My biggest pet peeve is when townies post things that create confusionIn post 69, Errantparabola wrote:
2) Havo's 31 is unnecessarily chip-on-shoulder. Unfortunately I couldn't find any scum games from him, so there's really nothing to look into there (and perhaps there wouldn't be anything to look into even if there were scum games to read). But early Havo ISOs in other games have him being pretty personable. Thoughts, Havo?
Huh?
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
So why are you still voting him?In post 208, acidphoenix wrote:i don't remember why i voted boon but iirc i don't have a strong opinion one way or the other on him
also luv viewtopic.php?f=3&t=73390-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Just a bit worried you’re going to stay parked on a slot who’s v/LA and then fade away.In post 211, acidphoenix wrote:because i haven't wanted to put my vote somewhere else-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
In post 212, acidphoenix wrote:luv who on this list would you disagree with (being town):
quick, errant, egg, lalendra,mumble,schadd-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
The lunch thing.In post 222, LicketyQuickety wrote:
What was a typo?In post 205, Lil Uzi Vert wrote: I think you’re playing fucking semantics man. I suspect that was a typo.
Even if she has played before, it doesn’t necessarily mean that she isn’t a newbie. She could still not understand a lot of roles or basic mafia terminology. She could have less than 10 games under her belt for all we know.
You do have a point about her claiming but I just don’t see the way she did it coming from scum. What would her scum motivation be to claim like that? It reads more like a rookie mistake.
I’m not following you on why wouldn’t a newbie say that. It feels like you’re reaching again.
As for the reads list itself, I think it’s just a bunch of jumbled up thoughts and reeks of only having half an understanding of what’s going on and what people are doing
Right, which is why I explicitly asked if she had experience off site.
The way I see a VT claim coming from Scum is to get a quick claim out so they don't have to worry about it later.
You don't get why a Newbie wouldn't say what?
Possible that she doesn't know what's going on with the reads list, but it also looks like some things could be fabricated.
Is it really a worry when you have 2 or 3 people to converse with?
No I don’t get that at all. Explain like I’m 5 because right now it sounds like you’re making something out of nothing.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Yeah I got nothing.In post 224, acidphoenix wrote:i meant mostly in terms of mumble's alignment not agreement with his opinions or whatnot
As I said earlier, he’s null for me.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Nothing? His claim early on isn’t out of the norm for him and he has barely posted.In post 225, acidphoenix wrote:what do you think of boon
Why do I feel like you’re asking aimless question?-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
I know that now. I was saying that I thought you were playing semantics earlier.In post 228, LicketyQuickety wrote:
The lunch thing was cleared up.In post 226, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
The lunch thing.In post 222, LicketyQuickety wrote:
What was a typo?In post 205, Lil Uzi Vert wrote: I think you’re playing fucking semantics man. I suspect that was a typo.
Even if she has played before, it doesn’t necessarily mean that she isn’t a newbie. She could still not understand a lot of roles or basic mafia terminology. She could have less than 10 games under her belt for all we know.
You do have a point about her claiming but I just don’t see the way she did it coming from scum. What would her scum motivation be to claim like that? It reads more like a rookie mistake.
I’m not following you on why wouldn’t a newbie say that. It feels like you’re reaching again.
As for the reads list itself, I think it’s just a bunch of jumbled up thoughts and reeks of only having half an understanding of what’s going on and what people are doing
Right, which is why I explicitly asked if she had experience off site.
The way I see a VT claim coming from Scum is to get a quick claim out so they don't have to worry about it later.
You don't get why a Newbie wouldn't say what?
Possible that she doesn't know what's going on with the reads list, but it also looks like some things could be fabricated.
Is it really a worry when you have 2 or 3 people to converse with?
No I don’t get that at all. Explain like I’m 5 because right now it sounds like you’re making something out of nothing.
IDK what your second sentence is addressing.
I don't feel like explaining a basic tell in simple terms.
I’m referring to her claiming VT and your take on what was her motivation to do that as scum.
What tell? Walk me through man, seriously.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
What I’m saying is, why do you think it is a worry when from your POV, she’ll have 2 or 3 people to discuss and come up with a viable fake claim privately?
I have never heard of that actually. Has anyone else? Fishy reads are fishy reads regardless if you’re just starting out or a vet.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
So adding fuel to the fire? Meh. I’m going to write you off as just paranoid and null for now.In post 237, Tchill13 wrote:
I see much more motivation in that instance from scum rather than town. i believe i had 2 votes on me and errant was already one of them. Errant laid the foundation for some serious momentum. So from that view there wouldn't be much discussion about other players and less stances would have been taken. I haven't played with errant before but since this i've stated a town read on him because his breakdowns make sense and he's looking like he's trying to get multiple reads.In post 204, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:In post 134, Tchill13 wrote:
I just felt like errant brought up an issue that could lead to a lot of momentum on my wagon that could then be pushed to a Lynch.In post 127, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
Low post count doesn’t mean lack of content.In post 124, Tchill13 wrote:Only scummy things I've seen so far is errant pushing me for lack of content when most players were around 5ish posts.
Do you think Errant is forcing having a strong read on you or something?
I think I kind of get what you’re saying here but I also don’t really see it. Errant doesn’t strike me as the careless type.In post 136, Tchill13 wrote:The action isn't scummy it's the timing of it. Pushing someone for lack of content as soon as the game starts? Are you serious? That's why I questioned it because it's a reasonable excuse and the TIMING. Nothing better for scum to find a reasonable excuse to lead a mislynch on someone.
I find that there are players who don’t like a prolonged RVS stage or are just eager to get to game solving. Why is pushing for lack of content so early more likely to come from scum than town?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: LicketyQuickety
Why is Mumble suspicious?In post 240, Tchill13 wrote:Town: Egg, Errant
lean town: Havo, LQ
Null: Schadd, thestatusquo, sergtacos
lean scum: Uzi, mumble, lalendra
Scum: acid-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
What are we missing here?In post 244, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Am I the only one who sees a problem with this?In post 97, Lalendra wrote:LQ pointed out that TSQ vs Uzi is probably not S v S, which I agree with. LQ has also made some good points, despite claiming stupidity earlier. I'm thinking town but not sure.
I don't have any super strong reads yet but currently, Tacos and Schadd are probably my biggest scumreads simply because they have posted without actually saying or contributing much. Players who have more experience with them (or just in general) are welcome to tell me if they think I'm wrong on those.
...
P-Edit: Not a bad vote from TSQ for LQ. I am open to jumping on this wagon, depending on where it goes.
Do you think scum would seriously show struggle like that to keep their story straight? It reads like she found TSQ’s take on your play different from her own and found it made a lot of sense.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
What?In post 295, Sergtacos wrote:Actually like I can see Mumble being scum right now. As town you would also think hey the other could be town too so lets supposed he's town but since he's trying to throw shade on me i dont think thats what town would do?
And the scum motivation for doing that? Do you suspect distancing?In post 297, Thestatusquo wrote:Two players, who have henceforth done absolutely nothing, come into the thread at the exact same time to start a fight over, ultimately NOTHING, with each other.
I’m still not seeing it. Nothing about their interactions scream bringing embarrassing or unnecessary attention to their actions. Neither look better from them either.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
This is currently more of a normal thing than you will realize. See current site meta.In post 303, Sergtacos wrote:
I really don't like this. usually town would answer any question brought up about or against them or whatever. but to be like, im not gonna answer to your question until you answer mine sounds scummy to me.In post 300, Mumble wrote:
To answer your question, since you answered mine,In post 262, Lalendra wrote:Mumble, why don't you think Acid is town? Now that you're here, enlighten us on your reads.
However, I’ve seen town not entertain questions they feel either is self-explanatory or obvious. I’ve seen town throw fits when the script is flipped on them while attempting to sort and won’t answer anything until they’re done. I’ve seen players like Wisdom outright call questions stupid and not answer them
Yeah I can explain. I don’t like your push on Lalendra.
Or I’m not reaching like you and playing by the book?In post 320, LicketyQuickety wrote:
I think you are forgetting that Lalendra is a newb and that Uzi interprets their actions as Townie and doesn't question it.In post 318, Mumble wrote:
If Lalendra is scum, then Serg and Acid have a better than decent change of being scum.In post 316, LicketyQuickety wrote:here is the way I see it: If Lalendra is Scum then Uzi has a better chance to be Scum for defending her, but it looks like Laledra might be Town here, which just makes Uzi's defense seem kinda accurate. That is what I am looking at anyways.
Or maybe and I think more importantly, I understand that we’ve all been in her shoes before?-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Why Boon? He’s v/LA and hardly has posted.In post 350, Havo wrote:
I would be up for a Quick lynch.In post 337, Thestatusquo wrote:Though, to be fair, the first half of it is mostly good. I don't want to lynch any of [EP, Schadd, Lalendra, Luv, egg]
Would be happy to swing quick, though. And only two of those are town reads.
bottom list would be happy to see any of them go besides tchill as I have a strong town VI read on them.
Or Mumbles or Tacos or maybe even Boon.
Huh? When did Havo say he didn’t like your play style?In post 359, LicketyQuickety wrote:
K well like, I get you don't like my playstyle, but that's not really a reason to Scum read me. If this isn't your actual reason, you should prolly state one at some point.In post 350, Havo wrote:
I would be up for a Quick lynch.In post 337, Thestatusquo wrote:Though, to be fair, the first half of it is mostly good. I don't want to lynch any of [EP, Schadd, Lalendra, Luv, egg]
Would be happy to swing quick, though. And only two of those are town reads.
bottom list would be happy to see any of them go besides tchill as I have a strong town VI read on them.
Or Mumbles or Tacos or maybe even Boon.
Could say the same thing for you with LalendraIn post 362, LicketyQuickety wrote:
That is because you are tonally inept or are Scum.In post 356, Havo wrote:
Slight town on Tacos? I don't get that.In post 306, LicketyQuickety wrote:Reads:
Uzi: Prolly Town here. What he says seems to come from Town mindset.
Boon: Who fucking knows. This is prolly my nullest read because of lack of content.
Chill: I can see some Town Mindset, but also some convenient stances (Don't expect people to understand the latter)
Lalendra: I am kinda on the fence about this one. Like most things they say make sense, but I just get a really bad vibe from them that I can't really explain.
Acid: I would be willing to give Acid another look. Will ISO them sometime today.
Toco: Slight Town based on Tone and stances
Shadd: Kinda same as Tocos. Like their tone is not bad at all, can't tell if its faked, but doesn't seem to be
tsq: Mostly null still. I mean I get their perspective and strategy, I just don't know if it comes from Town or Scum
Mumble: They made one post that I really thought sucked, will point that out after this post
Egg: Kinda same as tsq. I feel like both these guys are a little inflexible in their interpretation of things
Havo: Where have he been lately? At this point I see a bit more Scum then Town due to kinda POE, but that is pretty weak admittedly
EP: I like EP as Town. They are putting in effort and what they say makes perfect sense coming from Town-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
More of a reason for why reaction tests don’t work actually.In post 378, LicketyQuickety wrote:
This is one of the worst reasons you could have given to justify a vote on me.In post 371, Havo wrote:
Most Day 1 lynches happen for shit reasons.In post 370, LicketyQuickety wrote:
There already is a wagon on me and those are shit reasons to want to lynch someone.In post 368, Havo wrote:
I'm having a hard problem getting past you calling out Boons reaction test tbh. Couple that with your style and I guess that gets me to my not so fuzzy feel for you. I'm willing to give it time tho, but wouldn't be opposed to a wagon on you right now.In post 359, LicketyQuickety wrote:
K well like, I get you don't like my playstyle, but that's not really a reason to Scum read me. If this isn't your actual reason, you should prolly state one at some point.In post 350, Havo wrote:
I would be up for a Quick lynch.In post 337, Thestatusquo wrote:Though, to be fair, the first half of it is mostly good. I don't want to lynch any of [EP, Schadd, Lalendra, Luv, egg]
Would be happy to swing quick, though. And only two of those are town reads.
bottom list would be happy to see any of them go besides tchill as I have a strong town VI read on them.
Or Mumbles or Tacos or maybe even Boon.
I put words in your mouth, I misrepped you on purpose to see what you would do and you failed. This is the sign of a guilty conscience.
You said you wouldn't mind a wagon on me, not that you would lynch me. This is self evident even if you didn't explicitly state that you would be willing to wagon me specifically by the fact that you said you would be willing to hold off on me and give it time. You failed the reaction test and now I have to vote you.
P-edit: OK was going to vote you but you gave a couple ok follow ups, so I am not going to. But it does make the statement you said at the beginning that you don't like it when people make confusing posts a load of crock. Plus you never linked where you had said that before and never even gave a response so I might vote you anyways and you might still be Scum.
Can town not feel gulity? I think not being combative here is NAI. I don’t know why you aren’t taking into account personality.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
I’m disappointed that they’re not dragons from PokémonIn post 432, Havo wrote:Kudos to Carcalilly for the Awesome Dragon Pics.
Be dissapointed no more!Last edited by Carcalilly on Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:59 am, edited 2 times in total.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Being unable to realize reasons are silly or terrible after it was pointed out is not AI. Town can be illogically. Town can be stubborn. I’m not sure why you think someone who thinks your scum is going to magically believe that your wagon is terrible.In post 441, LicketyQuickety wrote:
We we are now covering old ground.In post 399, Havo wrote:When I posted my reads list I had 2 scum leans, you and TSQ.
I posted why I found you scummy, but my vote was still on TSQ because I was willing to give you some time since your play style was a bit sketchy.
I said I'd be ok with a wagon on you, then you went APESHIT!! At the mere mention of a WAgon on you.
Dude if this is how you're gonna play then Hell yeah, I'd be good with a wagon on You.
Here's what actually happened.
I asked what reasons you had for Scum reading me. You gave your reasons and they were terrible and I said as much. At the same time I did a reaction test to test out if you were actually being serious with your suspicion on me.
Then instead of backing up your logic you completely circumvent the issue by giving an excuse why its not bad to vote for people for shit reasons.
I then explain the reaction test to everyone and explain that your logic doesn't hold up. In my P-Edit, I expressed that I was still unsure on you because of your later responses.
Then you say "where is my vote" like that in any way is some kind of defense about what I said.
Then you follow up with another deflection against my attack.
Then I explain that because your vote is on tsq whom you were talking about voting me with, that this implies that you no longer have any reason to Scum read me considering your reasons for voting me were because I didn't make sense to you which is invalidated because it implies both that you don't know what to do with your vote (a sign of nervousness) and that I am making decent points against you that you cannot contest.
Then you quote two posts. One of which is Acid asking if you can spew your alignment and another that Quotes the conversation you had with tsq about voting me trying to imply that you had reason to vote against me. Neither of these posts are posts that show how my logic is wrong on you.
Then I point out that these do not invalidate my points against you.
Then you acuse me of OMGUSing you, which if you were reading the thread, I said earlier that I am not afraid to OMGUS as Town.
Then you say "nice try" in an attempt to make it look like I am OMGUSing you. But this is invalidated by the P-Edit I made stating what you said previously wasn't enough for a vote.
Then you say I am not understanding something, which doesn't make sense because I had been explaining your actions the entire time.
Then I point out how your "nice try" is actually Scummy.
Then I point out that I actually do understand.
Then I point out that I was Scumhunting and not OMGUSing.
Then you make this post.
Conclusion: Havo never addresses my points head on, but instead deflects at every turn. This is not the sign of someone with sound logic, but someone with something to hide. This is Scum.
I think Havo’s Day 1 comment was trying to say that whining isn’t going to get anyone to realize that there reasons aren’t as good as they think they are.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
It be nice if you can point it out with links or quotes actually because it’s sort of hard to follow without them. The basis of the read is that he failed some sort of reaction test no? Do you not see the issue with thinking someone is scum because of that?In post 464, LicketyQuickety wrote:No one has said a damn thing that invalidates my case on Havo.
And here you go stretching again. There are literally no obstacles to overcome in order to reply here.In post 467, LicketyQuickety wrote:
I love how you made this intentionally difficult to reply to. That's a neat trick that I have seen before. I will let others be the judge because your arguments are still not very good.In post 466, Havo wrote:In post 441, LicketyQuickety wrote:
I asked what reasons you had for Scum reading me. You gave your reasons and they were terrible and I said as much. At the same time I did a reaction test to test out if you were actually being serious with your suspicion on me.
I don't care if you don't like my reasons for scum leaning you
Then instead of backing up your logic you completely circumvent the issue by giving an excuse why its not bad to vote for people for shit reasons.
That's a Lie, here's where you are hard pushing your Agenda to avoid being lynched yourself, You said I had shit reasons for voting you, I said people get lynched on Day 1 for Shit reasons most of the time. Not that I Had Shit reasons
I then explain the reaction test to everyone and explain that your logic doesn't hold up. In my P-Edit, I expressed that I was still unsure on you because of your later responses.
Then you say "where is my vote" like that in any way is some kind of defense about what I said.
I said Where is my Vote, To point out to you that I wasn't voting you, I WASN'T VOTING YOU, I WASN'T VOTING YOU, I WASN'T VOTING YOU. What part of I'm not Voting you do you not get here? At this point my reasons to scum read you were not enough for me to actually vote you. I said I could vote you,
or would be okay with a wagon on you to see what reaction you would have.
Then you follow up with another deflection against my attack.
Then I explain that because your vote is on tsq whom you were talking about voting me with, that this implies that you no longer have any reason to Scum read me considering your reasons for voting me were because I didn't make sense to you which is invalidated because it implies both that you don't know what to do with your vote (a sign of nervousness) and that I am making decent points against you that you cannot contest.
Where my vote was at that time does NOT matter what my opinion or READ of you was, not at all.
Then you quote two posts. One of which is Acid asking if you can spew your alignment and another that Quotes the conversation you had with tsq about voting me trying to imply that you had reason to vote against me. Neither of these posts are posts that show how my logic is wrong on you.
This had NOTHING to do with you, I was answering Acid's Test with that post. It was not directed at you in any way.
Then I point out that these do not invalidate my points against you.
Then you acuse me of OMGUSing you, which if you were reading the thread, I said earlier that I am not afraid to OMGUS as Town.
And how is that town play at all? What is OMGUS voting known for? The fact that you stated your not afraid to do it means nothing,
Then you say "nice try" in an attempt to make it look like I am OMGUSing you. But this is invalidated by the P-Edit I made stating what you said previously wasn't enough for a vote.
What you did was virtually an OMGUS vote.
Then you say I am not understanding something, which doesn't make sense because I had been explaining your actions the entire time.
You are living in your own little scum world here. None of your argument makes sense.
Then I point out how your "nice try" is actually Scummy.
Then I point out that I actually do understand.
Then I point out that I was Scumhunting and not OMGUSing.
Then you make this post.
Conclusion: Havo never addresses my points head on, but instead deflects at every turn. This is not the sign of someone with sound logic, but someone with something to hide. This is Scum.Bottom line is I had FOS'd you and put you as a scum LEAN, so I was not opposed to seeing a wagon on you or voting you to get more info on you, that's how it works, that's how you get reads, But me simply mentioning this caused a HUGE Over reaction on your part. It's obvious you were worried about being lynched so you tried your best to build a counter wagon against me to save your own ass, basically forcing me to vote you.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
So you agree with LQ's case on him? Or are you scum reading him for another reason?
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
I don't get your first line at all honestly. If someone is annoyed as Mumble was back there, you're not going to get anything AI out of them. The way he has played makes me doubt your intentions because your approach looks it isn't trying to get through to the dude at all and get him to actually play.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
Huh? When did I bring up your meta and why are you using it to discredit me?In post 554, LicketyQuickety wrote:Also, Uzi sucks at reading me so I would take his opinion of me with a grain of salt.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
I don’t believe that to be true but even if it was, I’d still be left confused.In post 559, LicketyQuickety wrote:
You DIDN'T bring up my meta. That is my whole point. I am a player that requires meta on me to correctly read as Town.In post 556, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
Huh? When did I bring up your meta and why are you using it to discredit me?In post 554, LicketyQuickety wrote:Also, Uzi sucks at reading me so I would take his opinion of me with a grain of salt.
You just claimed I can’t read you. Was your discrediting apparently to point out that I didn’t bring it up? If you believe what you claimed, wouldn’t you also believe I don’t have a good enough understanding of your meta to factor it into my read on you here?-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
I’ve never been told I play in a boring way so that’s a first.In post 568, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Because you are a square and you play like a square. You don't actually try to understand what I say a lot of the time. Instead what you see is something that doesn't make sense so you think its Scummy, when, when its coming from me, its usually not Scummy.In post 565, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
I don’t believe that to be true but even if it was, I’d still be left confused.In post 559, LicketyQuickety wrote:
You DIDN'T bring up my meta. That is my whole point. I am a player that requires meta on me to correctly read as Town.In post 556, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
Huh? When did I bring up your meta and why are you using it to discredit me?In post 554, LicketyQuickety wrote:Also, Uzi sucks at reading me so I would take his opinion of me with a grain of salt.
You just claimed I can’t read you. Was your discrediting apparently to point out that I didn’t bring it up? If you believe what you claimed, wouldn’t you also believe I don’t have a good enough understanding of your meta to factor it into my read on you here?
It is a two-way street my man. I explained why I found issue with a lot of your pushing on Havo and Lalendra. I’ve attempted to understand how you can have you conclusions on them as well. You’ve left me each time thinking that you’re just scum reaching.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
We’ll be keeping you in our prayers Boon. Stay safe.In post 606, Boonskiies wrote:I didn’t post it in this game, I believe, but I posted it elsewhere. The fires in California started like...at my house. Fortunately, it mostly survived, even though everything around it didn’t, but I’ve been staying at a friends’ house the past few days, so hadn’t really had the time to come on. I almost replaced out, but pretty soon I’ll want the distraction, so I just stayed on VLA. I’ll be in this game pretty soon. I just have a lot to catch up on, but I generally should be able to start catching up.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
I wouldn’t say you lashed out LQ but you definitely reacted in a way that was not positive. The only thing close to justify your reaction in 359 is 34 and 163. I don’t see how being frustrated at putting an end to a reaction test before it even started or a slight scum lean based on your effort bring viewed as not realistic up until that point is someone disliking your play style.
You do pose a good question about why you would be attacking Havo for the threat of a wagon. It’s possible that you partners view Havo as a strong town player and you felt him suspecting you would be the straw that broke the camels back and get you lynched.-
-
Lil Uzi Vert Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16278
- Joined: August 9, 2016
-
-