Newbie 1826 Basketball Game Over

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #725 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 11:58 am

Connections/scum teams same thing. It brings my pov to you, do with it what you will.

mhsmith0 · Post Post #726 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 3:56 pm

Votecount 2.08

CheekyTeeky (1)

Thor665 ,

UC Voyager (3)

Clemency , XnadrojX , CheekyTeeky , L-2

Clemency (2)

Deimos27 , lucca261 ,

XnadrojX (2)

Spartan117 , UC Voyager ,

Day two deadline is Sunday October 22nd, 10 PM PST. (expired on 2017-10-22 22:00:00)

With 8 alive it takes 5 to lynch!

[/size]

Deimos27 · Post Post #727 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 7:19 am

In post 692, Spartan117 wrote:Deimos what do you think of Thor and Luca so far?

Thor is null to me so far. I stated my thoughts on Lucca in my 689.

If resistance to a wagon is alignment indicative what do you think of the fact that despite my clearly stated points, this Clemency wagon hasn't taken off?
If that doesn't make him scum your entire point falls apart. If it does make him scum then you won't mind voting for him, right?

In post 697, CheekyTeeky wrote:Deimos what do you think of my analysis of your entrance, particularly your tunneling on Assemble?

I think it's extremely misrepresentative since I never tunnelled or scumread Assemble. I don't know how you can possibly misinterpret the genuine questioning and sorting seen in 21, 24 and 58 as creating a "subtle mislynch". As stated in my 39 the reason I asked zemaj if his vote on Assemble was serious was because I genuinely couldn't understand how someone could scumread him only for what had happened so far. In the same post I then continue to question and attempt to sort zemaj over his terrible push on Assemble:

In post 39, Deimos27 wrote:@Zemaj, I asked because I thought your vote might've been RVS. Why do you think Assemble's vote on me was OMGUS and not normal RVS? Why do you call my 21 "solid reasoning"? Do you believe that an SE not doing RVS in his first post is alignment indicative?

You say my 54 "continues my push on Assemble" which is ridiculous considering in the vary same post I continue to confront zemaj over his horrible case on Assemble. The only mention of Assemble is me reiterating the question I had already asked because he ignored it for some reason.

As I already told Plotinus the reason I asked Xnadroj and Peaches specifically on their thoughts on Assemble and zemaj was because their interactions was the only event to have happened so far. I considered it unreasonable to expect them to formulate reads on people who had barely even posted yet, and I wanted their thoughts on what

had

happened.
I can't understand how you'd disagree.

Amazingly even more ridiculous, is your incredible misinterpretation of my 62.
You say that I couldn't have read through Assemble's posts at school.
Obviously I didn't, I was at home. When I made that post it was September 28th. The post in which I said I checked some of Assemble's games was September 27th. And what I said was: "Something I noticed

today

at school."
Then you say that I said my meta dive on Assemble made me even more confident he's scum. This is a clear misrepresentation, considering what I said was this:

Deimos wrote:I
never thought that meant it was AI, and now I'm even more confident
.

I

didn't

think it was AI.
In other words, I thought it was null.
I'm not sure how you managed to misunderstand this.

In post 684, Clemency wrote:Oh crap oh fuck im still here I'm doing a disco thing for the 7th graders at my school rn I'll get home and make my case on Deimos being a scummy scum scum in like a few hours

In post 685, Clemency wrote:Or probably like tomorrow I don't know how much time I'll have left

Clemency it's been over two days since you said "today and tomorrow".
That also means you might get prodded, and I'm not sure the mod will tolerate that from someone who was already about to get replaced.
Content, please.

I'll be back after I walk the dog.

Spartan117 · Post Post #728 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 7:48 am

In post 727, Deimos27 wrote:If resistance to a wagon is alignment indicative what do you think of the fact that despite my clearly stated points, this Clemency wagon hasn't taken off?
If that doesn't make him scum your entire point falls apart. If it does make him scum then you won't mind voting for him, right?

I personally am happy to be on a XadrajX or Clemency wagon right now tbh, but I worry that your choice to take me from one to the other could be potentially pulling me off a scum lynch onto a mislynch.

Deimos27 · Post Post #729 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:23 am

In post 698, CheekyTeeky wrote:Could you two please give some points for your reads on each other?

If I had any good points on Xnadj I'd have shared them. He's mainly just null for me right now.

He is a potential partner of Clemency because:
1. PoE. I townread you, townlean Lucca, and Spartan is conftown.
2. He scumreads Clemency but is unwilling to vote him, which is common scum distancing.

The associative tells don't mean anything without us getting a Clemency scumflip first.

In post 703, CheekyTeeky wrote:Ok no time to go further atm. But briefly, a lot of XnadrojX's posts feel like acting instead of natural townie. I will back this up when I'm back.

I'd appreciate if you did this, or pointed out other reasons for your scumread on Xnadj apart from the interactions between me and him.

In post 728, Spartan117 wrote:
In post 727, Deimos27 wrote:If resistance to a wagon is alignment indicative what do you think of the fact that despite my clearly stated points, this Clemency wagon hasn't taken off?
If that doesn't make him scum your entire point falls apart. If it does make him scum then you won't mind voting for him, right?
I personally am happy to be on a XadrajX or Clemency wagon right now tbh, but I worry that your choice to take me from one to the other could be potentially pulling me off a scum lynch onto a mislynch.

Interestingly my feeling is precisely the vice versa.

mhsmith0 · Post Post #730 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:24 am

Prodding clemency

UC Voyager · Post Post #731 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:27 am

Clemency would be my second best choice other than XandrokX

Deimos27 · Post Post #732 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:35 am

Why Xnadroj > Clemency?
You said you're convinced he's scum in 702, and I don't think you ever replied to this:

In post 689, Deimos27 wrote:As I understand it your only reason at the moment for townreading
him
is that you think Xnadroj is scum and wouldn't push his partner like that.
From your perspective, why exactly is Xnadj scummier than Clemency?

"

him

" was referring to Clemency.

Spartan117 · Post Post #733 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:50 am

VOTE: Clemency He aint helping himself activity wise and hasnt contributed hardly at all throughout either Day 1 or 2, if town get blessed with 2 town that are simply inactive, what else are we gonna do.

If he does get lynched pretty soon after this, I want to say it was fun playing with you guys, at least the ones who actually participated, I'm a dead man walking atm, so I guess I may see you guys in another game sometime in the future. I trust the actual townies to do the right thing and try their best to hunt out the scum.

UC Voyager · Post Post #734 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:50 am

In post 732, Deimos27 wrote:Why Xnadroj > Clemency?
You said you're convinced he's scum in 702, and I don't think you ever replied to this:
In post 689, Deimos27 wrote:As I understand it your only reason at the moment for townreading
him
is that you think Xnadroj is scum and wouldn't push his partner like that.
From your perspective, why exactly is Xnadj scummier than Clemency?
"
him
" was referring to Clemency.

[b

well. Here is the thing.
Clemency hasn't contributed much, but also hasnt done things that scum naturally do like try to lead a miss lynch, or make townie's look less bad, but he could be a (try to survive) scum if anything.

XandrojX has tried to get ME lynched, and make Clemency look bad! So that when im lynched, it is easier to start the Clemency wagon! I have looked around and tried to find out how scum naturally act and what is in their best interest. trying to guide miss lynches are better than trying to lay low! Scum knows if they try to lay low, people will find them scummy, so why would they do it!

but the fact Clemency hasn't contributed much also seems scummy, so im considering that to!

UC Voyager · Post Post #735 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:54 am

erg...looks like my one vote on XandrojX wont do it!

I dont mind a Clemency lynch. AS i said. He is my 2ed highest scum read, but if You guys think he is scum so be it.

To be honest. I think i trust Spartan and like to vote with Spartan. Mostly because he is conf town. With anyone else, I don't know if im being miss lead, but i dont want to put Clemency at l-1......I would rather consider a XandrojX

UNVOTE:

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #736 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 9:16 am

I'm not lynching Clemency today. Aren't we waiting for a replacement?

UC Voyager · Post Post #737 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 9:17 am

no. he came back

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #738 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 9:21 am

Are you guys seriously going for another lurker lynch? Did we not learn last time? Make it scum's job to NK them.
VOTE: Deimos

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #739 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:20 pm

Ok we've got just under 2 days. The only wagons going are UCV or Clemency. I'd prefer UCV vs Clemency because of already said reasons. Is anyone willing to move anywhere else or is this it?

UC Voyager · Post Post #740 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:29 pm

CheekyTeeky is more all over the place then me!!!!

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #741 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 9:13 pm

Uh what? I'm discussing the current wagons because the game is stale. Ive said repeatedly my reads and who I'm lynching today. Someone who votes without taking into consideration the likelihood of their wagon going through is not helpful to town. It looks like noone is interested in my Deimos/XnadrojX lynches so of the two wagons going UCV is most likely scum. You're the one who is all over the place

UC Voyager · Post Post #742 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 9:17 pm

In post 741, CheekyTeeky wrote:without taking into consideration the likelihood of their wagon going through is not helpful to town. It looks like noone

i would love a XandrojX lynch tbh. Clemency is my next guess if it isn't XandrojX which i doubt he isn't.

i will make a post later, it is 1:16AM UCV time and im tired as hell.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #743 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 9:24 pm

VOTE: UCV

Anyone else find it weird that UCV wont put Clemency to L1 but didn't have a problem lol-hammering assemble?

Thor665 · Post Post #744 (ISO) » Sat Oct 21, 2017 12:39 am

In post 743, CheekyTeeky wrote:VOTE: UCV

Anyone else find it weird that UCV wont put Clemency to L1 but didn't have a problem lol-hammering assemble?

Doesn't that require both slots to be scum - something you're not arguing?

mhsmith0 · Post Post #745 (ISO) » Sat Oct 21, 2017 4:36 am

Prodding XnadrojX

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #746 (ISO) » Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:53 am

In post 744, Thor665 wrote:
In post 743, CheekyTeeky wrote:VOTE: UCV

Anyone else find it weird that UCV wont put Clemency to L1 but didn't have a problem lol-hammering assemble?
Doesn't that require both slots to be scum - something you're not arguing?

I thought it wasn't scummy to change my mind?

UC Voyager · Post Post #747 (ISO) » Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:54 am

VOTE: Clemency

I wanted an XandrojX lynch, but apparently that cannot happen, so im going here!

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #748 (ISO) » Sat Oct 21, 2017 6:04 am

Clemency is at L-1

Spartan117 · Post Post #749 (ISO) » Sat Oct 21, 2017 7:04 am

Hammer time, I guess its time to End Day 2,
I personally would have been happy for a XandrokX lynch or inviestigate either deimos or the two new subs more, I dont like a UCV lynch, personally at all, you cant critisise him for lol hammering assemble and then say that he shouldnt have a problem with putting clemency to L-1, I believe he is slowly learning things, hes still a beginner dont forget.

Goodnight guys I'll see ya around in another game sometime
VOTE: Clemency