Open 695: Making Friends and Enemies [Mafia Win!]
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Are you?In post 16, CheekyTeeky wrote:Hi Chisa, are you an alt?-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Just going to repost this for the new people in the game: viewtopic.php?p=9681842#p9681842-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Because I assume he has Some kind of reason judging based on what I know of them. I know he's a lurker. I know he is logical. That means he theoreticallyIn post 24, Aubrey wrote:
Eh. It's a Friday, and the weekend. Not to mention this game is pretty straight forward, so there is little need to discuss game mechanics. Ultimately this game is going to come down to good ol' raw scumhunting!In post 13, Quick wrote:Slow game. Looks like everyone has confirmed? Why the lack of posts?
Assemblrotws, any reason for the vote? Anything at all?
By the way, why are you asking Assembl for reasons for his vote when the person he is voting has yet to even comment?shouldmake every vote count.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
PostIn post 25, Quick wrote:
Because I assume he has Some kind of reason judging based on what I know of them. I know he's a lurker. I know he is logical. That means he theoreticallyIn post 24, Aubrey wrote:
Eh. It's a Friday, and the weekend. Not to mention this game is pretty straight forward, so there is little need to discuss game mechanics. Ultimately this game is going to come down to good ol' raw scumhunting!In post 13, Quick wrote:Slow game. Looks like everyone has confirmed? Why the lack of posts?
Assemblrotws, any reason for the vote? Anything at all?
By the way, why are you asking Assembl for reasons for his vote when the person he is voting has yet to even comment?shouldmake every post count.
EBWOP Not that vote doesn't apply, but it wasn't what I meant originally.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Kinda wish I hadn't read that.In post 23, CheekyTeeky wrote:Riiight, so do you have a waifu pillow? Or are you only semi-weeb?
https://www.google.co.nz/amp/s/www.urba ... b&=true-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Well, this at the very least means they were not posting in the Scum chat.In post 33, Torque wrote:Epic Fial is having some problems with the site, so he cannot post yet. We are working with him to try to resolve the issue. In the mean time, he will not be prodded for not posting.
CommKnight wrote:VOTE: Chisa Weebs are just a no from me.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
I'm inclined to agree actually.In post 43, Jamiet99uk wrote:Also, you guys, I'm sorry if I'm coming across badly because I'm new, but there are now 5 votes on me and two more would end the day while it's still in the random shitposting phase. I don't think that's a good idea.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
I've seen quicklynches happen and Scum got away with it because "oh I didn't know that was the hammer". I have this policy in all my games and its not because I am Scum. On top of that, I have never seen a quick wagon really amount to anything significant in a game. Some people will Town read the slot that is Quickwagoned, some will Scum read it. It just sucks for reading people actually, and there is the chance it ends in a quick lynch so I just try and avoid them altogether.In post 48, Awoo wrote:Why would you post that, quick? You should know RVS wagons are for gathering information, not for quicklynching.
Nice, looks like the game is on, babyI am going to VOTE: Awoo for piling onto an easy wagon formed during the shitposting phase. Scum love easy lynches.
VOTE: Quick-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
This is a horrible vote. Like you didn't even talk about Lucca in this post and yet you "seriously OMGUS" them.In post 72, CheekyTeeky wrote:
So you're voting quick for being too precious? Agree Jamie feels town this time.In post 64, Awoo wrote:I hopped off of a random wagon onto a serious vote. Got a problem with that, collegeboy?
Not to mention jamiett has a towny vote on me. Even though he's completely wrong about the site meta, it's a town thought process.
VOTE: lucca serious omgus vote.
VOTE: CheekyTeeky-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
OK. What did you want Lucca to answer?In post 87, CheekyTeeky wrote:
Uh Quick have you read this? Maybe have a little think about why instead of being so opportunistic. I want a response from Lucca so I'm not moving my vote so FoS Quick.In post 59, lucca261 wrote:
was that the one that Grey got force replaced and everybody was fighting everyone? I think I remember that. it made me quit mafia, for like, six months. so, how are ya? any reads so far?In post 35, Aubrey wrote:I knew your name looked familiar. You were in that unpleasant Watchman game.
VOTE: Cheeky
serious vote.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
What information could you possibly get for a naked OMGUS?In post 89, CheekyTeeky wrote:
That kinda defeats the purpose of the excercise.In post 88, Quick wrote:OK. What did you want Lucca to answer?-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
I think you could be Scum. Besides that, no I don't really have any reads. Should I have reads at this stage?In post 91, CheekyTeeky wrote:
You're just rephrasing your original question. I get my best reads from OMGUS reactions. Your continued interference is weird. Why aren't you scum hunting instead of calling me scum for scum hunting? Do you even have any reads?In post 90, Quick wrote:
What information could you possibly get for a naked OMGUS?In post 89, CheekyTeeky wrote:
That kinda defeats the purpose of the excercise.In post 88, Quick wrote:OK. What did you want Lucca to answer?-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Like I said, I have seen someone claim "oops" and got away with it. Its easy to say the correct theory, but the correct theory doesn't necessary get implemented.In post 94, Chisa Yukizome wrote:VOTE: commknight
also quick the tldr of rvs wagons since I just reread #49
announce your l-1s and policy lynch anyone who hammers-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
What do you mean?In post 102, Jamiet99uk wrote:I'm thinking about our Masons. Important we keep them alive if we can.They effectively have a 1-shot copscan.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
K.In post 111, Aubrey wrote:X person, scummy as hell. Masons attempt to recruit, and see if it is successful. Yes, town. No, scum.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Its a legit concern, period and I would prolly say the same the same thing as both Town and Scum.In post 103, CommKnight wrote:
This could be legit town concern or it could be afraid his buddy gets lynched.In post 49, Quick wrote:
I've seen quicklynches happen and Scum got away with it because "oh I didn't know that was the hammer". I have this policy in all my games and its not because I am Scum. On top of that, I have never seen a quick wagon really amount to anything significant in a game. Some people will Town read the slot that is Quickwagoned, some will Scum read it. It just sucks for reading people actually, and there is the chance it ends in a quick lynch so I just try and avoid them altogether.In post 48, Awoo wrote:Why would you post that, quick? You should know RVS wagons are for gathering information, not for quicklynching.
Nice, looks like the game is on, babyI am going to VOTE: Awoo for piling onto an easy wagon formed during the shitposting phase. Scum love easy lynches.
VOTE: Quick-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
So, what did you learn from your OMGUS again?In post 124, CheekyTeeky wrote:
Well glad to see I'm going to be playing with a brick wall Awoo.In post 122, Awoo wrote:He's scumhunting, town usually does that.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
I will try.In post 126, Chisa Yukizome wrote:please halt stupid needless attacks that are hardly designed to figure out alignment
now bye im out-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
I have WAY WAY more posts that have quotes in them. I think it's important for context. Granted I prolly didn't need to quote there, but someone could have posted in between my post and theirs, which then people would have to try and figure out who I was responding to. I guess I just got into the habit early to quote people rather than just replying. People have a hard enough time understanding me as it is, I don't need another reason for people to wonder what the hell I am doing.In post 128, Jamiet99uk wrote:Why do you all quote each other all the time??
Quick, you were literally replying to the post above yours just there. We can see what Chisa wrote. If it was a quote from 3 pages ago, sure. But I don't get why you constantly cut and paste each other's quotes?
What am I missing?
P-Edit: Phones are the devil.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Taking up less space on the page isn't really a concern of mine.In post 131, Jamiet99uk wrote:@Quick:
"someone could have posted in between my post and theirs, which then people would have to try and figure out who I was responding to"
You could just start your reply with "@Chisa", like I just did with you. That would make it just as clear you were responding to Chisa, and would take up less space on the page.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
How sure of these reads are you at this time?In post 136, Jamiet99uk wrote:Current Townreads:
Jamiet99uk
CheekyTeeky
Quick
Cheesy Yukizone
Current Scumreads:
Awoo
Lucca261
Assemblerot
Current Nullreads:
Aubrey
CommKnight
Non-posters-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
If you could please clean up quotes after yourself, I would really appreciate it. If you are wondering why I think its "ok" for me to quote posts against Jamie's wishes while asking Maki to clean up their quotes, I will say that when ISOing people, context is important. And if you have all the context in the ISO already, it saves time.
Nope! The opposite of that.In post 158, Maki Harukawa wrote:In post 47, Quick wrote:
I'm inclined to agree actually.In post 43, Jamiet99uk wrote:Also, you guys, I'm sorry if I'm coming across badly because I'm new, but there are now 5 votes on me and two more would end the day while it's still in the random shitposting phase. I don't think that's a good idea.
Correct me if I'm wrong here but the way this is put makes it sound like you think sometimes rvs wagons going through are alright? Or am I reading into this too much?
I am inclined to agree.In post 158, Maki Harukawa wrote:
This feels gross the comment is question didn't really feel that bad at allIn post 51, CheekyTeeky wrote:You killed it Awoo :/
Jamie's reaction did feel pretty town, albeit delayed. Not sure what to make of Quick getting all high and mighty. I'll lean town on that for now.
Why did you let quick influence you Awoo?
VOTE: Awoo-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
I didn't see anything Scummy in what Maki posted. Looked to just be feeling things out.In post 169, northsidegal wrote:alright, full reread complete. to address a few of the more prominent discussions at hand, i townread jamie, don't like lucca's posting and think this is probably cheeky's towngame. also, i find myself agreeing with awoo's 164. maki's questions / comments seem rather empty and her vote seems relatively weak. out of the entire thread the thing you vote someone for is a comment about getting the game moving on page two?
VOTE: maki
@mod, any word on epic fial?-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
OK, that is funny.In post 185, Epic Fial wrote:MY NAME IS ERIC BUT POEPLE CALL ME EPIC BECAUSE OF MY LAST NAME.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
A lot of people went into some depth about things like reads and such. This is good.
I am kinda torn on Assembler atm. He isn't posting, which makes me think he might possibly be Scum lurking. That said, he's fell under some suspicion for that so given that he is yet to post that kinda makes the first point moot.
Due to the good content a lot of people are producing (which makes me think either Town is doing well or Scum is playing well), I think Aubrey is kinda suspect for not giving as good of content. I kinda feel the same way about Jamie, but its not as severe. Still think I like Jamie for Town, but this read can change.
I still am Scum reading Cheeky and I don't have a reason not to move my vote right now.
Lucca kinda a little reminds me of a game a played with them under a hydra with Transcend. I don't remember if they were Scum or not in that game, but it looks pretty similar nonetheless. I will have to hunt for the game and will come back with hopefully some more info on this.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
You can unvote?In post 212, Lalendra wrote:You're right, I missed it. My vote was on you at the beginning and I have yet to change it because I have yet to decide on a better place to park it.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
I think its better to have an Unvote than to have your vote on someone who you don't think is Scum.In post 230, northsidegal wrote:
would you say that unvoting is necessarily better than leaving it where it is?In post 229, Quick wrote:
You can unvote?In post 212, Lalendra wrote:You're right, I missed it. My vote was on you at the beginning and I have yet to change it because I have yet to decide on a better place to park it.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
This is so weak...In post 246, CommKnight wrote:Maki HarukawaVadim
Lalendra
Awoo
Epic Fial
Gut is telling me that 2/4 of the above are scum. The other remains in the ones not on this list.
VOTE: Awoo
Your comments thus far have been bugging something in the back of my head. I can't quite place it but I know it's usually right.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
No I think you have it confused.In post 269, CommKnight wrote:In post 250, Maki Harukawa wrote:
Why do you think Lalendra could be scum really not getting that readIn post 246, CommKnight wrote:Maki HarukawaVadim
Lalendra
Awoo
Epic Fial
Gut is telling me that 2/4 of the above are scum. The other remains in the ones not on this list.
VOTE: Awoo
Your comments thus far have been bugging something in the back of my head. I can't quite place it but I know it's usually right.Gut is telling me that 2/4 of the above are scum. The other remains in the ones not on this list.
Gut is telling me that 2/4 of the above are scum.
Gut
I know, crazy right? Ask Assemble, it's pretty dangerous (my gut feelings that is). Even if I can't logically argue it out, it's the vibe I get from people.
Also Quick is weak. Can't even read gut and feels the need to comment on it like he's adding some value. Either say why Awoo is town or gtfo.
What does your gut Pre-Flip really add to the game?-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
It was mostly these posts that were right in the middle of where a lot of heavy stuff was being discussed. Looking back on it now, it doesn't look as bad.In post 273, Awoo wrote:Quick, you suspect aubrey on account of having low content, could you explain that? I can point to numerous other cases of lower content in the game. Why him/Any other reasons you suspect him specifically?
In post 189, Aubrey wrote:
Understanding how the world perceives oneself is typical, and all that really read as.In post 159, Maki Harukawa wrote:Was this topic important what so ever or more so banter for you Chisa?
In post 159, Maki Harukawa wrote:I'm scared that I agree with most of this (my) post.
......Okay.In post 166, Maki Harukawa wrote:need to see more from Aubrey
I initially had some town vibes from this, but then paranoia set in. Whatever happened to this, "In post 176, Maki Harukawa wrote:I don't know who I want to vote in the 2 because I doubt it's scum vs scum (Cheeky and Awoo)I feel good about my vote on Awoo" thing. I can't help but wonder if this is just a tactic to see how the positions of these two players develop down the line.
Firts. Poeple. Fial. All caps.In post 185, Epic Fial wrote:MY NAME IS ERIC BUT POEPLE CALL ME EPIC BECAUSE OF MY LAST NAME.
I'm onto you.In post 204, Aubrey wrote:In post 194, Epic Fial wrote:Maybe scum are lurking weebs in this game. Another possibility is that they are posting a lot but are not weebs. So I'm going to be considering both weebs and non-weebs, and people who are lurking and people doing the opposite of that, whatever it is called. On the other hand, they might be in the middle somewhere. Nearly certain we can hit scum in one of those groups.
I don't like Epic Fial having tunnel vision. His points are not terrible, but you should really be interacting with more than like 2 people.In post 206, Aubrey wrote:Sass overload.
I will try and fully catch up and give my thoughts. This is a pretty heavy game and I am not used to that kind of play. I will try and provide some thoughts on things when I get caught up.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
I totally agree with Lucca on this. Like its not that difficult to just ask a question to someone. Instead they think they are going to get more out of a naked OMGUS vote. I just cannot understand that.In post 226, northsidegal wrote:
i think i'd like to hear cheeky's point of view with regard to this. anyone else can chime in, as well, if you've got something to add!In post 225, lucca261 wrote:cheeky really did that, and she say it herself on 87, when pressured by quick. openly saying she wants a response from me = openly saying her vote is a reaction test. my point is: if cheeky wanted to have a response from me, putting a vote on my slot and then saying she wants a response is counter productive, it redirects the discussion away from why I voted her. she could've, you know, just asked.
It kinda like you are looking for reasons to Scum read Lucca. You point about Lucca inferring that he knows for a fact that that Cheeky is Scum is kinda bogus. Like the only way that happens is if those two are teamed. I guess that is something to consider, but ATM I am Town reading lucca and we haven't had a flip so I am not going to focus on that and I think its incorrect to do that.In post 226, northsidegal wrote:
you may not have said that you know she's scum, but from your actions it certainly appears that way. i'm thinking more and more that it's a meta thing, but it seemed to me to be unusual behavior towards someone you scumread. when i see someone pushing someone else as scummy and it appears fake or strange, i'm more inclined to think that they're pushing a mislynch. from what i'm gathering from this conversation you further your reads in ways that i can't easily pick up on, so i'm going to keep that in mind going forward as well as when reviewing previous posts.there was nothing spetacular, it was my first non-rvs vote, on page 5. I don't need a full case on somebody. my reasons for voting her were expressed on post 206. at the time, it was the scummiest thing on the game. so I voted her. I never said I know for a fact that cheeky is scum. in fact, I quote: "because I think you are scum". where did I say I know she is scum or that I don't need evidence? I was engaging with her at that moment. I was furthering my read at that moment.
so, let's talk: what's my motivation as scum to accuse cheeky without any reasons here?
in response to your last line, that's what i've been turning over in my head. you'll note that i've never explicitly said i scumread you, even if i find it hard to find town motivation in some of your actions. mainly i disagree with the wagon you've started.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Yeah, this is like really bizarre to me. I have no idea what you are trying to say. I think you were being serious here which makes this really fucking confusing.In post 238, Epic Fial wrote:In post 234, Aubrey wrote: Epic comes off as a joke account. If he doesn't start taking the game semi seriously, he'll probably need to be exterminated at some point. Scum will keep problematic slots around, and problematic slots are not good for the town to have around for the later game. Take that for what you will. I'm not above lynching slots that I think will be unreadable.
Could be that scum lives in a gingerbread house, the forest is dark, and everywhere looks like everywhere else. Really, there is only one way to prepare for that and survive. Understand that, and you are halfway home. Maybe you think I am a joke. But I am not.In post 237, Quick wrote:I really want to see more from Epic Fial because I forgot they were in the game until I saw the joke for the second time.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
In post 252, Jamiet99uk wrote:In post 240, Epic Fial wrote:
What steps shall we take to keep the masons alive?In post 102, Jamiet99uk wrote:I'm thinking about our Masons. Important we keep them alive if we can. They effectively have a 1-shot copscan.
Let's try not to lynch them.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
This is interesting because I sometimes am OK saying what is NOT SvS. I am wondering if you look at the same kind of things as I do.In post 279, Maki Harukawa wrote:I think 1 is most likely scum but given interactions I don't think BOTH are scum.
Basically, can you talk more about why you think Awoo and Cheeky can't be teamed?-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
IDK where you are getting this from. In my last few posts I have pointed out things I didn't like from North, Epic, and Jamie as well. So no, I don't think all I am doing is defending/Townreading people.In post 287, Awoo wrote:Quick, you're doing a lot of defending/townreading, do you have any other scumreads besides cheeky?-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Can you please mention who you are quoting?In post 283, Awoo wrote:
*Trying to get into the game and make some actual readsthis last post feels like someone who is trying to participate, rather than trying to scumhunt.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Can you do this without me having to ask? Its really hard to follow. I am in like 5-6 games right now so I can't just remember what everyone says when someone quotes something without a name.In post 293, Awoo wrote:his name is lucca-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Also, you have Cheeky voting twice. There might be other errors.
triple midterm in one day messing me up. Thanks for point it out ;3 ~ TLast edited by Torque on Thu Oct 26, 2017 3:40 am, edited 1 time in total.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
This is such bullshit.In post 301, CommKnight wrote:In post 272, Maki Harukawa wrote:
I understood you said gut but you must have some reasoning for any of these reads yes?In post 269, CommKnight wrote:In post 250, Maki Harukawa wrote:
Why do you think Lalendra could be scum really not getting that readIn post 246, CommKnight wrote:Maki HarukawaVadim
Lalendra
Awoo
Epic Fial
Gut is telling me that 2/4 of the above are scum. The other remains in the ones not on this list.
VOTE: Awoo
Your comments thus far have been bugging something in the back of my head. I can't quite place it but I know it's usually right.Gut is telling me that 2/4 of the above are scum. The other remains in the ones not on this list.
Gut is telling me that 2/4 of the above are scum.
Gut
I know, crazy right? Ask Assemble, it's pretty dangerous (my gut feelings that is).Even if I can't logically argue it out, it's the vibe I get from people.
Also Quick is weak. Can't even read gut and feels the need to comment on it like he's adding some value. Either say why Awoo is town or gtfo.Even if I can't logically argue it out, it's the vibe I get from people.
it's the vibe I get from people.
vibe
I feel like this is an effective form of communication with this group. Even the limited amount of what I have said is being overlooked, so pointing it out by breaking down my own posts might help.
@Quick, what does my gut add? How about being on the right track 9 times out of 10. What have you added so far in figuring anyone out besides scumreading town players who are scumming it up because you can't read them worth a lick and are taking the easy route out. I can actually talk about my last game since it finished not too long ago and guess what. Town kept going for the easy mislynches when I kept saying to them it wasn't those people. But am I ever listened to when I'm town? No. But when I'm mafia it's like everyone listens to me and I don't need to do diddly squat all then. But games like this where I'm town, I'm just stuck with a bunch of "why" people.
When my reads start flipping how I told you they would flip and we talk about it post-game, then you can ask yourself "Why didn't I listen to Comm, he's odd but he's a brilliant mofo when it comes to solving who scum are and scum probably should've killed him N1 unless they want to be outed by the time D3 rolls around, because by then he has the whole puzzle together. His D1's are a bit sketchy and he might not have zeroed in properly, but gee golly, his late-game play is like something out of the holy mafia scripture. I sure wish I could be just like him when I grow up."
You know what will help me get more solid reads? Flips. Flips. Flips. And the dumbass remarks people tend to make after them to distance themselves from it. I'm fine with being wrong once or twice, but based on how others react to my pushes when those pushes are flipped, it sure as hell paints a clear picture on what they are.
Now then, I'm going for my nightly nap. My brain is constantly running 19/7 with 5 hours of sleep max each night. My morning class is cancelled so I'm sleeping the **** in for an extra 3-4 hours. Just work on your townreading game of me and you're guaranteed to win 9 times out of 10 with believing in my gut.
VOTE: Comm-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
This is where I first started thinking a lot of you posts are just really low impact. Like given the conversation around you bringing up "don't lynch Masons" and then (I think) Aubrey saying "OK how do we do that" and then you respond like this here... its just kinda Scumm because it looks like you are trying to be helpful without really adding anything.In post 286, Quick wrote:In post 252, Jamiet99uk wrote:In post 240, Epic Fial wrote:
What steps shall we take to keep the masons alive?In post 102, Jamiet99uk wrote:I'm thinking about our Masons. Important we keep them alive if we can. They effectively have a 1-shot copscan.
Let's try not to lynch them.
Mostly for posts like this that make it look like you are doing more than you really are:In post 345, Jamiet99uk wrote:@Quick: Why are you voting me? Why am I scum?
In post 307, Jamiet99uk wrote:@Aubrey - Okay sorry, I really had just missed your question there... kinda buried in a big block of text and not directly addressing me.
I think you are right that since my vote is still on Awoo it would be prudentbto re-read her. Give me a little time to do that.In post 314, Jamiet99uk wrote:Dammit this game is packed with quitters.
That's like the 5th replacement in a 13 player game. Is that normal here?In post 316, Jamiet99uk wrote:@CommKnight:
Do you trust your gut enough to stake your own neck on it?In post 320, Jamiet99uk wrote:Assemble tells us to follow CommKnight's gut / Assemble's vote is not on the same target as CommKnight....
Hmm.In post 340, Jamiet99uk wrote:Because if that's normal here, I probably just need to leave this website.In post 342, Jamiet99uk wrote:@CommKnight: While I'm still playing: So, do you agree to the following?
- If I sheep your vote this turn, and (y)our target is lynched, and flips TOWN, then you agree that YOU will be the lynch tomorrow, and to that ens, will vote for yourself tomorrow in those circumstances?
It just seems like you are spreading your posts out too much at the least and alternatively I can see you doing this on purpose to make it look like you are having a bigger impact on the game than you really are. Like, your content just doesn't really go that deep, no offence. It just looks Scummy because this game is pretty dense with detailed stuff to talk about and it looks like you are still asking surface level questions.In post 343, Jamiet99uk wrote:@Awoo
I'm not quitting. I just don't see the point in this website if the games are so shit that half the players quit during the course of an average game like CommKnight has suggested. This game has already had what I'd regard as a worryingly high level of replacements...-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
In post 345, Jamiet99uk wrote:@Quick: Why are you voting me? Why am I scum?
Would you give me a chance to answer, Jesus Christ.In post 346, Jamiet99uk wrote:VOTE: Quick for literally admitting that his vote on me is lazy. What a pile of shit.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
You asked for a reason, then you didn't wait to see if I would provide one before voting me.In post 358, Jamiet99uk wrote:
You voted me without explanation, and said "sorry for being lazy"... You don't expect me to call you on that?In post 356, Quick wrote:In post 345, Jamiet99uk wrote:@Quick: Why are you voting me? Why am I scum?
Would you give me a chance to answer, Jesus Christ.In post 346, Jamiet99uk wrote:VOTE: Quick for literally admitting that his vote on me is lazy. What a pile of shit.
smh-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
You asked for a reason. I usually try and provide that if I am asked. If you were me, what would you have done?In post 362, Jamiet99uk wrote:I didn't think you were going to. I thought you were going to go off and attend to your other games, and be lazy about this one, as your post implied.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Just throwing this out there, but what if you are Scum?In post 368, CommKnight wrote:Like it's sad because I'm wondering about his reading comprehension/memory skills right now. I've said that my D1's are usually worse. I've said flips help me piece together the puzzle better. I've said that expecting me to gamethrow is a bad idea (and right now is one of the primary reasons I am voting him, I refuse to back down because someone wants to pull that kind of shit). Even more, I've said I can be wrong.
But I'm pretty much always onto something in each of my games. It's easier to see where I fucked up at the end when the flips are better revealed, but in every one of my games the scum end up in the radar. When they leave the radar is more often than not when someone (like you) does something worse that gains all of my attention.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Why did you out your alt?
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Its about the avatars isn't it?In post 402, Flavor Leaf wrote:It's already been outed on site before. I actively play different throughout my accounts, with different playstyles.
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
What changed? I saw in your ISO you really only had like 1 post from Cheeky quoted and it was from the beginning of the game. Basically, I am Town reading you and Scum reading Cheeky and I'm trying to figure out why you switched to cheeky.In post 408, Maki Harukawa wrote:VOTE: Cheeky
I have a lot of townreads and I think this is where I wanna vote right now I prob should've not tried to catch up at 4am when my brain feels like jello and words blend together but whatever if you got questions go ahead and ask em-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
So... was that thing where you told people not to lynch the masons the same type of thing?In post 410, Jamiet99uk wrote:Excellent.
The reaction to my challenge to CommKnight was very interesting. Everyone who said it was a bad idea is entirely correct. Of course I don't want CommKnight to commit to suiciding if he's town and gets his D1 read wrong. That would be a waste.
My intention in proposing this apparently mad idea was twofold. First of all, to dissuade CommKnight from being too cocky about his gut, and anyone else from just slavishly following him. Secondly, I wanted too see people's reactions. I'm going to spend some time assessing those later today.
For the record I do stand by my assertion that a VT should not be afraid to die. A VT dying is not as good as scum dying, for sure - but it's way better than a PR dying. Plus, flips are informative. A lot of people have interacted with me today and if I died, those interactions could provide many clues.
That said, all things considered I'd prefer to stay alive, and I'm definitely town, so if you've got a good scumread, go for them - and tell us why. It's time to start bringing this phase home, my fellow townsfolk.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Hmm... OK.In post 415, Maki Harukawa wrote:
It was more what others did then Cheeky herself now consider everyone starts at 50 rating and goes up and down based on towny/scummy I had her as an early scumread and I have townreads on a lot of other people that are not her and the few other scumreads I do have I would feel less confident on.In post 409, Quick wrote:
What changed? I saw in your ISO you really only had like 1 post from Cheeky quoted and it was from the beginning of the game. Basically, I am Town reading you and Scum reading Cheeky and I'm trying to figure out why you switched to cheeky.In post 408, Maki Harukawa wrote:VOTE: Cheeky
I have a lot of townreads and I think this is where I wanna vote right now I prob should've not tried to catch up at 4am when my brain feels like jello and words blend together but whatever if you got questions go ahead and ask em-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Why are you Scum reading me? Why did you pick me out of the other Scum reads you have? Why not vote with Jamie, your Town read and vote Lalendra?In post 459, CheekyTeeky wrote:Ok up to page 13
Reads to that point are:
Awoo, Jamie, Comm
NSG, Aubrey, Chisa
Fial, Assemble,
Quick, Maki, Lalendra, Lucca
VOTE: Quick
I think this is like one of Jamies first games here. He's not PL material. This is bad and I am not going to start looking at you a lot more seriously.In post 468, Awoo wrote:Jamie is becoming a policy lynch.
A policy lynch that I support.
VOTE: jamiet99uk
Because otherwise it's too obvious who's getting mason'd, and that's bad. At least when we remove this from the game there is a good layer of ambiguity who the copshot lands on.
Is it bad if I think this slot isn't reaaaaaaly going to flip scum? I don't think this lynch is terrible for town as we also get some info on who's on wagons and stuff, who pushed him throughout the day, etc. But I don't reaaaly think it's going to flip scum.
A lot of my scumreads are on this wagon and I feel bad in that regard but read above.
I THINK THIS IS L-1-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017