Post not cut mustardIn post 961, Lalendra wrote:This is true.In post 940, Quick wrote:I'm not completely sold on Lalendra. I need more of a case than this. I will say that she isn't really explaining... well, anything really, but that's her meta IIRC.I will explain a little bit here. Being a newer player, I have very little confidence in my reads, and I am easily manipulated. As a result, I try not to post long drawn-out analyses of everyone's play, because in doing so I frequently open myself up to manipulation by scum. I also have a track record of being FOSed when I post these drawn-out analyses and change my reads later (even though that should be the natural progression of the game, but whatever). So, to avoid drawing too much attention or being manipulated, I tend to just sheep the people that I trust, and don't push hard unless something REALLY seems off to me. This game has been difficult for me to sort, which is why I'm taking a backseat.In post 944, Aubrey wrote:Real talk, you say explaining/doing little to nothing is Lalendra's meta (which is lynch-able regardless IMO).UghIn post 959, Aubrey wrote:*Waits for Jamiet's replace out commentary*
Bad excuse for no scum hunts
Suspicious finger