In post 1177, wilky wrote: In post 1176, gameplay506 wrote:I am not twisting this for my own agenda because I still think activity is not AI. What I am saying is that you are having double standards when using that activity argument - it applies for some but not for others for whom it would be even more appropriate if you believe in such a thing as lurking=scum.
I didn't scum-read you for lurking. It was because you refused to share those reads giving the reason that the votes were in your head so yes you are twisting it for your own agenda.
VOTE: Gameplay for twisting things to suit himself.
I am not twisting shit. You are just getting more and more caught into your bullshit. A minute ago you were even saying that I was town being quickhammered. I mean what else is there to say.
In post 1179, Apple Jack wrote: In post 1176, gameplay506 wrote:I am not twisting this for my own agenda because I still think activity is not AI. What I am saying is that you are having double standards when using that activity argument - it applies for some but not for others for whom it would be even more appropriate if you believe in such a thing as lurking=scum.
Ignore the activity. You’ve done less to help town than anyone else alive.
Now argue how that’s not AI. I’d love to hear that.
I am supposed to play the detective and question people when I see no need to just to "help town"?
I form my own reads and I draw my own conclusions. If you guys were handicapped, sure I would gladly give in depth explanations but since you are not there is just no need for me to play that role. Try to fit that into your head - lurking, making short posts, not giving explanations doesn't make someone scum. The motivation and logic behind one's posts is what matters and my motivation and logic have never been off this game.
Can't say the same for north/wilky.