In post 2447, Surreptitious wrote:Looking for a replacement for Assemblerotws
Just need to replace vonflare now.
In post 2447, Surreptitious wrote:Looking for a replacement for Assemblerotws
We'll have to return to Group B, you know. The game of mafia is based on risks.In post 2449, Ramcius wrote:why you want lose game on the spot, if you wrong? Also, when you became so confident in your reads? In every game before i wanted PL you for coasting/lurkingIn post 2448, Creature wrote:Not if we're confident enough scum are Majiffy and Thor.In post 2415, checkersman7 wrote:even ramcius understands why a group B vote is bad
voting B is basically a scumclaim at this point
yes, i know that we have return to B, but why risk now?In post 2451, Creature wrote:We'll have to return to Group B, you know. The game of mafia is based on risks.In post 2449, Ramcius wrote:why you want lose game on the spot, if you wrong? Also, when you became so confident in your reads? In every game before i wanted PL you for coasting/lurkingIn post 2448, Creature wrote:Not if we're confident enough scum are Majiffy and Thor.In post 2415, checkersman7 wrote:even ramcius understands why a group B vote is bad
voting B is basically a scumclaim at this point
Also, I'm decently townreading LUV, momo and SnarkySnowman, so by PoE it's Majiffy and Thor665.
Yeah, it does actually. It helps us understand his thought process, which may allow us to see his point of view or even agree with it. It also helps justify whether that townread is warranted or not.In post 2319, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:If you town read him, it doesn’t matter how he got 3
All that tells me is that Assemble was nominated for lurkingIn post 2367, Creature wrote:In post 2281, Elliberetta wrote:If you link to the real post there's context prior.In post 2108, Elliberetta wrote:yeah no creature where the hell are you getting the active as scum part
Creature plz respond to this ty.In post 3625, UC Voyager wrote:Nom Assemblerotws for "Lurking as town"
This isn't a random nom. it actully is very significant. Assemble is known for lurking more as town than he does as scum. It is part of his game play. It makes it harder for people to predict his alignment, and makes him more unique than other players. Lurking is his downfall a lot of times, but when the player list has played with him, they tend to know this is normal. He actually is a really good scum. He makes good posts (sometimes) when he does make posts. I think that if there was a title for him based off his game style, this would be it!
But if he's a goon, wouldn't he just look at the PT first before jumping in here? I'm pretty sure that secret agents would be mentioned somewhere in there.In post 2395, checkersman7 wrote:I think you're goon didn't read the setup wanted to push back hard then realized I'm a bad push for scum to make so changed your read and didn't want to reopen the can by calling me on the fishing, because that woudknt go with the new appeasement strategy.
Just a reminder that this is still scum and should be a priority whenever we come back around to B.In post 2404, momo wrote:Okay, it's been 20 pages...whelp..
Anyways, Eddie, you might come after me but you will be lynching town and guaranteeing disaster. I stand by voting B but I urge you to only lynch me if you are absolutely sure as lynching B!Town would be terrible
No.In post 2407, Creature wrote:Anyone scumreads LUV here?
That's not what he said. He said it's essentially a scum claim, and I agree.In post 2425, SnarkySnowman wrote:Think we already hammered C, and actually checkers is right that going B now is a bad tactical play.
You know, I'm getting sick and tired of you disparaging me over a read I HAVEN'T EVEN GIVEN YET! I have never, at any point in this game, said I have a townread on Eddie. I've said I'm letting it simmer, aka I'm not satisfied with where my read on him is at. But since you can't seem to shut your whore mouth for just ten seconds, I might as well tell you where I'm at, since you couldn't take the time out of your self-appointed harassment campaign to actually properly play the game and actually ask what my read is and why I'm where I am with it (And don't go on about you being able to read Eddie, because all you did in TBD was buddy up to the most active player and follow down a list of 3 names that didn't contradict what he was saying. Congrats! You got lucky on the last name, dear Survivor. It just goes to show that if you don't stop to reevaluate reads and just go blindly down the list, you can have a 33% chance of hitting scum. And you wonder why I think more highly of Elli, who was nominated for Paragon, over you, who is finding himself on more and more players' blacklists because he is extremely toxic in and out of games. ).In post 2430, checkersman7 wrote:Idk the supposed 'expert' BT is completely untrustable after Xyzzy