In post 1816, Creature wrote:This isn't how town!Majiffy plays.
This is how I expect scum!Thor to play.
Your only experience with town!Majiffy was me tunneling you.
Unless maybe I was scum that game. I don't remember.
I'm specifically trying to refrain from tunneling you because now I know your obnoxiously bad playstyle is just who you are as a person. But you're not making it easy on me.
And I assure you that scum!Thor and town!Thor are nearly indistinguishable.
Probably because half the playerlist was invited personally by me.
The question you should be asking yourself is why the much more viable -
and still with as of yet unrefuted arguments against him
- wagon on LUV "kept failing and failing" until it eventually collapsed into a speed wagon on CMM.
Neither. Try again.
The latter part of your statement seems to be a qualifier for the former part.
Why can't Alisae be scum who is frustrated with site meta?
In post 1849, Thor665 wrote: In post 1847, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:How is having expectations of your play alignment indicative? Do you believe he’s intentionally lying?
I know he's lying, I'm trying to figure out if it's intentional.
I have hunted for a Creature lynch over 3 days when he was intentionally caught lying, called out on it, and then
continued to lie
about what he was called out on.
He flipped town.
In post 1852, Thor665 wrote: In post 1851, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I don’t think you know for sure.
He could’ve talked to people who’ve played with you the most on here. He could have studied your previous games.
He could be misinformed. He could also not just have a good understanding of your play style. None of that makes him scummy
Yes - and if he's lying it does make him scummy.
So why shouldn't I investigate to figure out which is which exactly?
To note, this is the second time LUV has interjected when Creature starts getting questioned this game.
In post 1866, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I think he said it because he genuinely believes he has an understanding of how you play as town and feel this isn’t it. There’s nothing wrong about that. Now solely pushing you because of that is and I don’t think that’s mainly why he thinks you’re scum. If it is, I would need him to show some work.
*cough*wk*cough*
In post 1903, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I don’t like Majiffy’s or Thor’s interactions with Creature. Just don’t trust town here.
Fucking lol
I don't want to break your heart but planned scum theatre happens very, very rarely.
As in, I've seen it less than 10 times in the 10+ years I've been playing mafia on multiple websites.
Dope burn
In post 1916, Creature wrote:Maybe if we end doing Group A I'd lynch one of {Bulbazak, EddieFenix} first.
Your reads are just so objectively bad I feel like I need to take you out for an ice cream cone with sprinkles.
In post 1919, Creature wrote:A real beetlejuice is the one that appears only when mentioned, does almost nothing and then leaves the same way as appears.
Another terrible assumption about scum behavior that simply doesn't pan out in reality.
I have that effect on both sexes, tbqh
It's probably the dad bod and luscious beard.
Yes. And it's also one of the few playstyles that I have seen reliably hit at a greater-than-random rate. So, there's that.
I have this festering notion that you're scum.
In post 1948, Bulbazak wrote:Also, I'll be cross-referencing today's B wagon with yesterday's Mick wagon. Just fyi.
I was thinking about this in the shower and frankly I don't think VCA is going to be too effective until very late-game with a third of the playerlist missing in each lynch. Gonna need at least 5 or 6 good wagons to parse anything about anyone.
