Open 701: Pick Yer Power X/Y Game Over!

Viomi · Post Post #675 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:37 am

In post 673, Viomi wrote:
In post 671, Chip Butty wrote:You jnow, there are six people voting you right now...
Yes, and none of them have given any reasons for their vote that I have yet to respond to.

Because again, almost all of you are braindead sheep or scum who's happy to get an easy mislynch.

Viomi · Post Post #676 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:38 am

In post 674, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 669, Viomi wrote:
In post 667, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 664, Viomi wrote:Um, accepting my pocket like happy scum and then making a side comment on how you'd be fine lynching me without any reasons attached? I fail to see how my post is bad, you gave the scummiest reaction possible.
Reall? I needed to actually put a "/sarcasm" tag when "accepting" your pocket attempt?
Ohh? So now you're claiming you originally thought my pocket was scummy, but reacted as if you didn't for some reason?
Just mentioning that i am aware of is a pocket is enough to establish i wasn't accepting it. You are reacting like caught scum who is angry because you misread me as accepting your pocket attempt.

I'm angry because I hate dealing with morons who won't use their fucking heads.

wilky · Post Post #677 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:38 am

In post 627, Viomi wrote:
In post 610, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 577, Viomi wrote:Hey guys, when I inevitably get mislynched or NK'd and going through my ISO, remember this: Chip Butty is definitely town.
Consider me pocketed!

In post 618, Chip Butty wrote:I could do a viomi wagon...
Just the reaction I was looking for~
VOTE: Chip

Damn, letting people sheep without reasoning, guys? We're not going to let scum walk over us like that, are we?

Also lmao at CommKnight's OMGUS on me

What's scummy about his response then?

Viomi · Post Post #678 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:39 am

In post 677, wilky wrote:
In post 627, Viomi wrote:
In post 610, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 577, Viomi wrote:Hey guys, when I inevitably get mislynched or NK'd and going through my ISO, remember this: Chip Butty is definitely town.
Consider me pocketed!

In post 618, Chip Butty wrote:I could do a viomi wagon...
Just the reaction I was looking for~
VOTE: Chip

Damn, letting people sheep without reasoning, guys? We're not going to let scum walk over us like that, are we?

Also lmao at CommKnight's OMGUS on me

What's scummy about his response then?

Read. My. Posts.

Viomi · Post Post #679 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:42 am

In post 676, Viomi wrote:
In post 674, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 669, Viomi wrote:
In post 667, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 664, Viomi wrote:Um, accepting my pocket like happy scum and then making a side comment on how you'd be fine lynching me without any reasons attached? I fail to see how my post is bad, you gave the scummiest reaction possible.
Reall? I needed to actually put a "/sarcasm" tag when "accepting" your pocket attempt?
Ohh? So now you're claiming you originally thought my pocket was scummy, but reacted as if you didn't for some reason?
Just mentioning that i am aware of is a pocket is enough to establish i wasn't accepting it. You are reacting like caught scum who is angry because you misread me as accepting your pocket attempt.
I'm angry because I hate dealing with morons who won't use their fucking heads.

Oh, and by the way, no, mentioning the pocket does not express that you are against it in any way.

texcat · Post Post #680 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:43 am

In post 626, mutantdevle wrote:It concerns me how quickly lynches come together in this town. All it seems to take is a small push and then the sheep come flooding in. May I ask to everyone voting Viomi, where were you yesterday when concerns with Viomi were originally raised? You had the perfect opportunity to express your distrust of her then yet it is now that everyone is flocking on to her.

Where was

I

yesterday? Voting for Viomi. And his ad hominem argument calling us morons for lynching him is not really convincing me that he's town.

Chip Butty wrote:Tbh I'd rather be lynching Creature...and I'm a bit worried I'm on the same wagon as CK...

Yeah, Creature's on my scum list too, but let's resolve the 1 picks.

Some of the reads below are POE. For example, I have a town read on Aster because I don't think Aster and Viomi can both be scum.

Texcat - 2

Northsidegal - 3

Assemblerotws - 4

CommKnight - 6
Mutantdevle - 8

MisaTange - 30

CityElectric - 5

Chip Butty - 5

Wilky - 7

Creature - 7

Lalendra - 7

Aster - 1

Pisskop - 1

Viomi - 1

Viomi · Post Post #681 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:44 am

In post 680, texcat wrote:
In post 626, mutantdevle wrote:It concerns me how quickly lynches come together in this town. All it seems to take is a small push and then the sheep come flooding in. May I ask to everyone voting Viomi, where were you yesterday when concerns with Viomi were originally raised? You had the perfect opportunity to express your distrust of her then yet it is now that everyone is flocking on to her.
Where was
I
yesterday? Voting for Viomi. And his ad hominem argument calling us morons for lynching him is not really convincing me that he's town.

Chip Butty wrote:Tbh I'd rather be lynching Creature...and I'm a bit worried I'm on the same wagon as CK...
Yeah, Creature's on my scum list too, but let's resolve the 1 picks.

Some of the reads below are POE. For example, I have a town read on Aster because I don't think Aster and Viomi can both be scum.

Texcat - 2

Northsidegal - 3

Assemblerotws - 4

CommKnight - 6
Mutantdevle - 8

MisaTange - 30

CityElectric - 5

Chip Butty - 5

Wilky - 7

Creature - 7

Lalendra - 7

Aster - 1

Pisskop - 1

Viomi - 1

Read my fucking posts you imbecile. You're not morons for voting me, you're morons for doing so without reasoning and for refusing to give us information or make actual cases.

Viomi · Post Post #682 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:46 am

Trying to fucking strawman me, hm?

Viomi · Post Post #683 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:47 am

Also, what the fuck do you mean by resolving the one picks? Do you think scum is likely to pick #1, and if so, why?

Chip Butty · Post Post #684 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:51 am

In post 115, Assemblerotws wrote:VOTE: Chip
You should know better than this.

In post 213, Assemblerotws wrote:I personally think Mutant is newbtown. Not sure on anyone else yet.

In post 334, Assemblerotws wrote:I would be fine with lynching either Pisskop or mutant.

In post 368, Assemblerotws wrote:UNVOTE:
North. Please share your theory.

In post 394, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 386, texcat wrote:
In post 368, Assemblerotws wrote:UNVOTE:
North. Please share your theory.
Assembler, do you have any thoughts to share? All you've said is that you thought Mutant was newbtown, but you were ok with his lynch?
I will occasionally help lynch someone whom I townread if I believe the wagon can be mined for data.

In post 481, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 477, mutantdevle wrote:
In post 428, CityElectric wrote:
In post 416, mutantdevle wrote: Also in before people now claim pisskop is also a scum buddy since he is defending my point on asking if textcat wants to role claim.
Wait, what? Where is he doing that?
Post 415.
I don't see it.

In post 538, Assemblerotws wrote:I'm willing to do it.
VOTE: Pisskop
Let this day not be wasted.

In post 555, Assemblerotws wrote:Happy birthday, Creature!
Poisoning appears to be just Elmo being creative.

In post 625, Assemblerotws wrote:VOTE: Viomi
Despite their claims, they're actually looking less knowledgeable about Pick Your Power vs. Pick Your Poison than they did at the start.

Tex, this is the entire Assembler ISO. What makes him green?

Chip Butty · Post Post #685 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:53 am

Oh, you're 95% going on draft order...

Viomi · Post Post #686 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:55 am

In post 684, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 115, Assemblerotws wrote:VOTE: Chip
You should know better than this.

In post 213, Assemblerotws wrote:I personally think Mutant is newbtown. Not sure on anyone else yet.

In post 334, Assemblerotws wrote:I would be fine with lynching either Pisskop or mutant.

In post 368, Assemblerotws wrote:UNVOTE:
North. Please share your theory.

In post 394, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 386, texcat wrote:
In post 368, Assemblerotws wrote:UNVOTE:
North. Please share your theory.
Assembler, do you have any thoughts to share? All you've said is that you thought Mutant was newbtown, but you were ok with his lynch?
I will occasionally help lynch someone whom I townread if I believe the wagon can be mined for data.

In post 481, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 477, mutantdevle wrote:
In post 428, CityElectric wrote:
In post 416, mutantdevle wrote: Also in before people now claim pisskop is also a scum buddy since he is defending my point on asking if textcat wants to role claim.
Wait, what? Where is he doing that?
Post 415.
I don't see it.

In post 538, Assemblerotws wrote:I'm willing to do it.
VOTE: Pisskop
Let this day not be wasted.

In post 555, Assemblerotws wrote:Happy birthday, Creature!
Poisoning appears to be just Elmo being creative.

In post 625, Assemblerotws wrote:VOTE: Viomi
Despite their claims, they're actually looking less knowledgeable about Pick Your Power vs. Pick Your Poison than they did at the start.
Tex, this is the entire Assembler ISO. What makes him green?

Join me for a greater cause? VOTE: Assembler
Since it seems to be I misunderstood your reaction entirely...

mutantdevle · Post Post #687 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 12:28 pm

A quick update on the data and stats I recorded in regards to the number 1.

I have data from 8/10 of the completed pick your power games on this forums (wiki says 11 games but 1 was abandoned). Of those 8 games, in 4 of them, scum chose the number 1. Since we have 2 players left who chose 1, that's technically a 1 in 4 chance that Viomi is scum if we are going on the number she chose alone.

As a counter to that though, in those 8 games, scum was never at the bottom of the draft order.

Just thought those 2 things might be relevant at this time since one of the reasons Viomi is being voted for was because she voted the number 1.

mutantdevle · Post Post #688 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 12:29 pm

Whether or not you think Viomi is scum, I don't think now is a good time to lynch her. I'd like to see Comm, Chip, Aster and maybe Creature explored at some point. Not because I think they are all scummy, but because I think it would be healthy for the town to do so and hopefully it will discourage sheeping.

mutantdevle · Post Post #689 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 12:30 pm

She chose the number 1*, not voted.

Viomi · Post Post #690 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 12:41 pm

In post 689, mutantdevle wrote:She chose the number 1*, not voted.

I mean, I picked #1 in my last PYP and was first in the draft.. also I flipped town so

mutantdevle · Post Post #691 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 1:21 pm

In post 690, Viomi wrote:
In post 689, mutantdevle wrote:She chose the number 1*, not voted.
I mean, I picked #1 in my last PYP and was first in the draft.. also I flipped town so

You said you had a different name back then, was it pieguyn?

Viomi · Post Post #692 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 1:31 pm

In post 691, mutantdevle wrote:
In post 690, Viomi wrote:
In post 689, mutantdevle wrote:She chose the number 1*, not voted.
I mean, I picked #1 in my last PYP and was first in the draft.. also I flipped town so
You said you had a different name back then, was it pieguyn?

No. It was Chrimi.

Viomi · Post Post #693 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 1:31 pm

Again, it's possible it was before the big wipe and got erased.

northsidegal · Post Post #694 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 1:57 pm

@mod the votecount is wrong, i'm not voting viomi

catching up now.

northsidegal · Post Post #695 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:07 pm

so viomi if i'm understanding this right, 576 and 577 were supposed to be reaction tests / gambits?

CommKnight · Post Post #696 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:29 pm

Yeah, no. I already gave my reason. Gunning for the top draft order is most likely to hit town PRs or at the very least out them for scum to kill. No town motivation at all to push for that D2 before we even nab one scum for a better picture on who in the top draft we should be pushing.

Viomi · Post Post #697 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:43 pm

In post 695, northsidegal wrote:so viomi if i'm understanding this right, 576 and 577 were supposed to be reaction tests / gambits?

576 was legit agreement, 577 was definitely reaction test. I misinterpreted his reaction obviously but now I realize he was being facetious.

Viomi · Post Post #698 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:47 pm

In post 696, CommKnight wrote:Yeah, no. I already gave my reason. Gunning for the top draft order is most likely to hit town PRs or at the very least out them for scum to kill. No town motivation at all to push for that D2 before we even nab one scum for a better picture on who in the top draft we should be pushing.

Oh, and where was I gunning for texcat? That's why my vote has never been on him (that I remember), right? There's

no

way you could be misrepresenting my actions or behaviors, because only scum would do that, right?

Viomi · Post Post #699 (ISO) » Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:54 pm

Oh, right, you're just touchy about lynching anyone near the top because that's where your scumbuddies are, right?

Anyways, I was asking for the reason you were voting

ME

. I wasn't the only one saying it's possibly among the top five, I wasn't even the first one. Why are you voting me over the others? I mean I already know the answer is OMGUS but I'd like to see what you come up with.