Open 701: Pick Yer Power X/Y Game Over!

[sheepsaysmeep]

newbscum go into a game with the intentions of getting townread and pushing mislynches
most newbscum with no experience dont see benefit in having townreads

pagetop?

[sheepsaysmeep]

oh creature beat me to it

[Creature]

How do you explain sheep and Viomi push on Aster then, Creature?

???

Viomi's push on Aster seemed pretty justified.

sheep is sheep.

[sheepsaysmeep]

luv is townlean
his push on me seems natural

[Lil Uzi Vert]

Claim: Town Neighborizer

since scum already knows this, after all I targeted Aster N1 and I've been chatting with them in our own thread ever since.

They've been super distant and the only

real

response I could get out of them was trying to tell me town probably wouldn't lynch texcat and other excuses why I shouldn't go after texcat sooooo

How does this justify the vote? tex doesn’t have a guilty on her. tex didn’t flip.

[Lil Uzi Vert]

sheep is sheep does not explain the basis of the Aster push being bull.

[Creature]

Claim: Town Neighborizer

since scum already knows this, after all I targeted Aster N1 and I've been chatting with them in our own thread ever since.

They've been super distant and the only

real

response I could get out of them was trying to tell me town probably wouldn't lynch texcat and other excuses why I shouldn't go after texcat sooooo

How does this justify the vote? tex doesn’t have a guilty on her. tex didn’t flip.

I mean the super distant part.

[Creature]

sheep is sheep does not explain the basis of the Aster push being bull.

sheep is sheep aka what I expect from sheep.

[Creature]

creature's laying way too low

Check activity overview, see who has posted the most and repeat that, please.

[Lil Uzi Vert]

Being distant doesn’t mean anything.

[Creature]

Or that thing with PK.

Fun fact: Some players still think it's pisskop's fault he got mislynched.

[Creature]

why havent we lynched tex or aster yet

Because northsidegal is still alive.

[Creature]

Smells like a policy lynch.

Yeah, there's a policy to lynch scum.

[Lil Uzi Vert]

If I write off sheep and Viomi, that just leaves me with Kid and I don’t feel confident about him.

[Lil Uzi Vert]

If I write off sheep and Viomi, that just leaves me with Kid and I don’t feel confident about him.

tex as well.

[Lil Uzi Vert]

Nah PK wa obvious town.

[Creature]

he's the first one to pretend that putting out only scumreads is scummy

I think only having scumreads and no townreads is scummy.

[Lil Uzi Vert]

But why?

I can see the average person having a hard time getting town reads when the majority of the site plays scummy.

[Lil Uzi Vert]

I’ll be honest. The only thing I haven’t liked from Aster is how flexible he’s been or seems to be.

[Aster]

ok in my mind i remembered there being more than half of the posts having lists
i didnt notice a whole lot of his posts throughout my readthrough i guess
i never said that i read ALL his posts, and i am explicitly clarifying that i did not

And this is the curious part to me. How did you remember

that

part? I don't think you would intentionally claim that "every" post of mine had lists if you didn't believe it to be true, so I'm wondering where that memory came from.

Clearly nowhere near the majority of my posts contain lists—only two out of ~50 do—so I guess you didn't genuinely obtain this memory from the two lists you read.

I can imagine two possibilities:

1. When asked to clarify why you were so focussed on me "posting only srs" so early, you had to make up an excuse. You remembered some of my posts making lists and faulty human memory made you think that there were way more of them than there actually were;
   
2. You already knew from Viomi that I tend to only have scumreads, so when you read the two of my lists, you immediately assumed they were commonplace, generating the faulty memory.

The first scenario implies that you are covering up and lying about where your notion that I only have SRs came from, which suggests you are scum. In the second scenario, you are directly implicated as scum.

On another note, I think

his reasoning is weak, he hadnt committed to anything until today, and his "case" is so narrow viewed

is noteworthy as well. I mean, I think I was pretty committed to getting CommKnight lynched yesterday until it after a long time became clear that lynching him was just not feasible. I also think I've been pretty clear about whomever I believe to be scum, depending on whether you'd call that "comitting".

So where does this noncommittal claim come from? The curious thing is that it's the same thing Viomi has said about me:

They've been super distant and the only real response I could get out of them was trying to tell me town probably wouldn't lynch texcat and other excuses why I shouldn't go after texcat sooooo

Although this does not prove that there is scumchat between Viomi and Sheepy, it does give me the impression that Sheepy blindly trusts everything that Viomi tells him, and that his "noncommital" claim on me is

yet another excuse that Sheepy had to make up on the spot

.

I would say that Viomi is somewhat misrepresenting me here as well. About the texcat issue: when she asked me what I thought about making town go after texcat, she was at L-1 herself and I thought that she'd probably not be able to get the town off her case and jump on somebody else when her only piece of evidence against texcat is "because she's a lurker". I'd also like to clarify that texcat is not the only person talked about and I do for example think that my following statement about CheekyTeeky (who she asked me about shortly after I started my CommKnight campaign) constitutes a real answer:

I don't like Cheeky. I didn't like wilky either, but Cheeky isn't making her position any better.

Post 826 luckily accomplished nothing, but it is remarkable that after reading to page 6 she decided to vote already, and just

happened

to vote the guy who was at L-1. It does seem like a rare scenario to happen coincidentally. I wonder whether she actually knew you were at L-1 but missed that the slot she replaced was already voting you, and tried to sneak in a hammer without having to go through the intent process?

In post 940 she tries, just like CommKnight, to declare certain numbers as "numbers scum would be attracted to". It looks like an attempt to lynch people without needing to consider their posts. I think that unless somebody has done mutant-style statistical analysis of past games, they have no business saying which numbers scum would pick and which scum wouldn't.

In post 948 she proposes to lynch Assembler merely to "test out a theory" (what theory anway?). This frankly, sounds like an unjustifyable waste of a lynch. Also, she might just be scum who just picked Assembler expressedly to disprove the theory. CommKnight, whom I believe to be scum, was remarkably quick to follow her.

After I voted CommKnight, all his posts thereafter did not address my questions and were just beating around the point. In post 989 she somehow thinks that beating around the point makes CommKnight town? She's also back to Assembler for whatever reason in post 973.

There seems to be a bit of conflict between CommKnight and Cheeky, but that may be bussing as well. Especially considering how quickly Cheeky jumped off the CommKnight wagon. I think that Cheeky is scummy and I may call her out on it after I'm done with CommKnight. For now, however, I think that CommKnight is the obvious scum here and I'm focusing on him.

(In case anyone wonders, I'm off the Cheeky wagon for now while there are two far bigger fish to catch.)

[Creature]

The only thing I haven’t liked from Aster is how flexible he’s been or seems to be.

I thought he was inflexible.

[texcat]

Aster, what are your feelings on Northside?

[sheepsaysmeep]

aster
your reasoning/evidence for me/viomi just isnt there
it's all confbias
fucking come to that realization and move on and look for actual scum

[sheepsaysmeep]

tex while youre here
do you have actual reads with actual reasoning
can you post them if you do

[sheepsaysmeep]

no one else will have this pagetop