Rocky Horror Picture Show - players suck, game over

[Creature]

Like the way I don't have a wincon in my role PM.

[Creature]

Okay, Almost50, I guess I got you.

[Almost50]

Unless they recruit them before immunity gets majority vote.

Hoo-Waa

[Creature]

Still weirded about town faction being called neutral survivor faction.

[Chickadee]

Like the way I don't have a wincon in my role PM.

I dont either, which is why I was confused about Gamma's statement

[Almost50]

Actually, If I was the Vig I'd shoot you first because you always have extra-terrible reads (by your own admission), so you're a liability.

I just won't give reads then

OR.. you give your reads naturally and we use your readlist upside down!

[Creature]

So it's basically three cults (with one of them having a public recruit mechanism) that must recruit neutral survivors?

[Chickadee]

[Chickadee]

We explicitly know there are two cults.

[Almost50]

Okay, Almost50, I guess I got you.

Actions resolve in the pause phase, so whatever I sent you must be still stuck in the mailbox.

[mutantdevle]

OR.. you give your reads naturally and we use your readlist upside down!

I thought about just believing the opposite of my own reads but I don't think I'm THAT off. I've found my gut reads are usually more accurate but, obviously, I can never pursue them due to little substance. Tbh though I often feel like my reads are no more accurate than an RNG.

[Almost50]

We explicitly know there are two cults.

VOTE: Chickadee

We explicitly know you're available for recruitment, so I'm gonna stop that from happening.

@All: This little innocent girl needs to be saved from the evils of satanic natures. May God help us all.

[Almost50]

@Chicka: Vote me back. Let's 1v1 right here and now.

[Chickadee]

Ok

VOTE: Almost50

[Venmar]

Unless they recruit them before immunity gets majority vote.

I too would expect that the immunity vote would resolve first, since cults could then just exclusively recruit our targets without us knowing, nullifying our main tool of keeping people immune for the entire game.

I also expect that a big tactic later in the game will be for newly-recruited recruits to try and get the immunity votes on themselves to waste it for that dayphase and we need to keep an eye out for that.

[Venmar]

Most of this game so far = piles of garbage and fluff.

Keep up the good work comrades.

[Creature]

Should neutral survivors townside?

[mutantdevle]

I too would expect that the immunity vote would resolve first, since cults could then just exclusively recruit our targets without us knowing, nullifying our main tool of keeping people immune for the entire game.

If both cult leaders want to recruit our targets then one of them is going to fail to recruit meaning our numbers stay larger for longer. It also puts pressure on the cult leaders as they are in a WIFOM situation where the cult that recruits the earliest is the one that gains the extra member whilst the other does not. However, the earlier they recruit, the more chance they risk that the wagon will fail and a different target will be chosen.

[Venmar]

Not much of that made sense for me. Still avoiding the fact that such a resolution of actions makes our immunity vote worthless since just ONE cult leader recruiting our target makes it worthless, ergo hindering our only tool during the day, and making our wincondition very hard to achieve.

Are you implying that cult leaders have to commit to a choice and cannot switch their targets at some point before the day ends? I don't know that that's how their role works. How would you?

I vote that we don't make mutant immune like ever.

[Cerberus v666]

Somewhere in the mods posts they said that actions, once submitted, can't be changed. Another post used the specific example of the cult recruiting someone one minute before the "hammer" vote is placed to grant them immunity, and said in that situation the cults recruit would resolve before the immunity occurred.

So, to answer your questions Venmar: Yes, and because the mod said so in one of the rules posts.

Post #2 to be exact.

[Gamma Emerald]

Not much of that made sense for me. Still avoiding the fact that such a resolution of actions makes our immunity vote worthless since just ONE cult leader recruiting our target makes it worthless, ergo hindering our only tool during the day, and making our wincondition very hard to achieve.

Are you implying that cult leaders have to commit to a choice and cannot switch their targets at some point before the day ends? I don't know that that's how their role works. How would you?

I vote that we don't make mutant immune like ever.

Actually he's making sense to me

[Venmar]

I literally just read that. I am peached it's not in the actual ruleset, ergo risking me missing it, and that it's further down. Seems quite important.

Mod can you put all of that in the same post and ruleset? This game is as vague and confusing as is.

[Venmar]

I
AM
PEACHED

[Venmar]

W/e, disregard my dumbass, but in all seriousness, can we talk about how useless our immunity vote is?

[NicoRobin]

Did someone say 'Impeached'?

Aye-aye.

^^