wagon move very fast got many vote quick speed !!!!In post 171, northsidegal wrote:"speedwagon"?
Oh wait for some reason i thought lexa had 5 votes already and mine would be L-1 vote. what happens
well i want cedrick anyway
wagon move very fast got many vote quick speed !!!!In post 171, northsidegal wrote:"speedwagon"?
I didn’t find your mini case that convincing.In post 127, Awoo wrote:ok why is the lexa wagon getting so much momentum but my Q vote & minicase went nowhere
did I hit scum or something?
In post 127, Awoo wrote:ok why is the lexa wagon getting so much momentum but my Q vote & minicase went nowhere
did I hit scum or something?
But why do you keep saying omgus? You keep saying it like it means something. Omgus isn’t scummy nor does it only come from scum. I feel you are hiding behind a buzz word. I don’t find Lexa voting you strange. If anything I find your aggression fake and scummy.In post 143, Mumble wrote:It was a post that happened an hour or so ago, and pointed out that you naked voted me after I voted you, thus pointing out the OMGUS-factor.
Lol no it isn’t. (This is about omgus being scummy)In post 154, Mumble wrote:Yes?
I’ve already explained my stance. What’s not to understand?In post 178, Luca Blight wrote:but I can't really understand that stance.
Just want to clear up that I am actually an alt. Nobody has played with me on this account was what I meant.In post 112, Awoo wrote:no one has played with me before" implies "not an alt"
Let’s tackle this shall we?In post 79, Awoo wrote:Don't like his tone
- Asking a lot of unnecessary questions 34, seems like the only purpose of that is to """be town""" or show concern for the game
- 43 wtf
- What north said too
- Doesnt understand that im going to win the game 31
- 71 [talking about self voting] [Also, why are we arguing the merits of self-voting?] more useless posts why??
- 72 @Q ok what do you make of this? is it AI? because there are votes on lexa, so what do you think of that?
-74 - doing it again "look at me ive been asking those questions and analyzing" - you shouldnt have to bring this up. your ""townyness"" is being shoved in my face so much that I am forced to question your motivations!
what difference would it make and how does that make me scummy?In post 182, Cedrick wrote: I can see why you are suspicious of him, but I honestly don’t see anything truly lynch worthy. Tbh I’d be more suspicious of north and maybe rb. I feel like he should have attempted to find out if I was an alt or off-siter first before throwing out the conspiracy theory.
how old is your main account? this is very important.Rb seemingly agreeing with him is also suspicious. North hasn’t been on this site that long, rb has though. For us to be scum together we’d have to have had a conversation before the game started (which we don’t know is possible) and since I wasn’t allowed to post due to a site glitch, I clearly wouldn’t have been able to coordinate anything in that small window. Plus there is the small fact that I’m not scum but clearly nobody is going to take my word for it.
"why me" defence, mumbles scumleanIn post 137, Mumble wrote:My defense is faltering! Grasps for straws, ensign!In post 134, Lexa wrote:EBWOP: disregard my last re: post timing, thought you were referring to a different post
As for voting reasons, they are what I said. You entered the game by jumping on a wagon without any game advancing content. That gets a vote everytime.
So me and Alex did the same thing. Why not vote him. It gets a vote everytime.
oh more "why me" defenceIn post 125, Mumble wrote:Of being made the leading wagon?
See, this is basic psychology, something that I said or did struck a nerve. I'm inclined to think it was me voting you and making you the leading wagon. It's why you didn't really react strongly to NSG or rb, but you did to me.
I've got to do the dishes. Be back soon. Much love, Lexa.
scum caught for wrong reason, trying to be cooperativeIn post 75, Lexa wrote:@northsidesegal I don't think I understand the position where your vote on me is coming from so I'm going to ignore that for now
What are your thoughts on users: fitz and riggs, specifically the vote to content pattern of the former and the tone of post #26 for the latter
if that's directed towards me, it answers a very pressing question. i assume it's directed towards cedrick, though.rb wrote:How is the age of an account important
Lots of people are new and good, lots of people are veterans and awful. bad metric never use