Mini 1991: Taking Justice Into Our Own Hands (Town Win)

[Beefster]

Official Vote Count 1-2

Lexa

(4): havingfitz, northsidegal, Mumble, Alexcellent

Cedrick

(2): rb, numberQ

Havo

(2): Guy_Named_Riggs, Papa Zito

Alexcellent

(1): Lexa

numberQ

(1): Awoo

Not Voting

(3): Luca Blight, Havo, Cedrick

With 13 players alive, it takes 7 to lynch

Deadline

: (expired on 2018-02-23 09:00:00)

[rb]

"speedwagon"?

wagon move very fast got many vote quick speed !!!!

Oh wait for some reason i thought lexa had 5 votes already and mine would be L-1 vote. what happens

well i want cedrick anyway

[Beefster]

Note to all: I would appreciate it if votes were put at the beginning of the line by themselves or put in vote tags. If not using vote tags, be sure to capitalize VOTE and put it on a line by itself.

I'm still ironing out some issues my own vote counter script. I'm transitioning over from the one most mods use. Mine looks out for @mod and buried hammer votes, but it misses some things that the other counter gets.

[Luca Blight]

A few reads following my skim through.

Papa Zito - I quite liked his early push on Havo. He can have a town-lean for now.

Cedrick - His opening is generally Ok, but saying he doesn't want to vote Havo but will hammer if he goes to L-1? Perhaps this is just bluster, but I can't really understand that stance.

rb - very surface level posting. Not liking what I'm seeing so far.

Awoo - I liked his push on Q. The 'towniness being shoved down one's face' line really aligned with how I felt while I was reading through.

Havo - I'm just going to dismiss his OP as NAI. In fact, his entire opening seems NAI so far - basically stock responses to suspicions.

NSG - I like her opening. I'm not sure if she's correct regarding the 'off-siter' observation, but it's displaying the right kind of thought-process. An early townread.

Mumble - Scum-lean. He wants to enter aggressively, but I didn't get the impression he was actually trying to sort Lexa during that petty argument.

Q - He looks pretty good on the surface, but a bit LAMIST.

Lexa - didn't like her opening but haven't particularly scumread much else she's posted. Need to ISO again.

[Cedrick]

ok why is the lexa wagon getting so much momentum but my Q vote & minicase went nowhere

did I hit scum or something?

I didn’t find your mini case that convincing.

ok why is the lexa wagon getting so much momentum but my Q vote & minicase went nowhere

did I hit scum or something?

It was a post that happened an hour or so ago, and pointed out that you naked voted me after I voted you, thus pointing out the OMGUS-factor.

But why do you keep saying omgus? You keep saying it like it means something. Omgus isn’t scummy nor does it only come from scum. I feel you are hiding behind a buzz word. I don’t find Lexa voting you strange. If anything I find your aggression fake and scummy.

Yes?

Lol no it isn’t. (This is about omgus being scummy)

VOTE: mumbles

mumbles push looks bad to me and omgus isn’t scummy. Mumbles did something mildly suspicious and got voted for it and it looks like he tried to put a townie spin on it. He should have known a reasonless vote hop on somebody was going to generate that kind of reaction. Lexa’s Reaction imo is normal

[Cedrick]

but I can't really understand that stance.

I’ve already explained my stance. What’s not to understand?

[Cedrick]

no one has played with me before" implies "not an alt"

Just want to clear up that I am actually an alt. Nobody has played with me on this account was what I meant.

[Cedrick]

Don't like his tone
- Asking a lot of unnecessary questions 34, seems like the only purpose of that is to """be town""" or show concern for the game
- 43 wtf
- What north said too
- Doesnt understand that im going to win the game 31
- 71 [talking about self voting] [Also, why are we arguing the merits of self-voting?] more useless posts why??
- 72 @Q ok what do you make of this? is it AI? because there are votes on lexa, so what do you think of that?
-74 - doing it again "look at me ive been asking those questions and analyzing" - you shouldnt have to bring this up. your ""townyness"" is being shoved in my face so much that I am forced to question your motivations!

Let’s tackle this shall we?

I personally don’t see 34 as unnecessary. He’s clarifying what I’ve just said. Sure he could be trying to appear townie but he could actually be town. How can you tell the difference?

I’ll agree 43 is kind of wtf. How he can be so sure this early is strange but people do weird things sometimes.

I don’t like 71 either. I also don’t agree with it. There is never a time where a townie should vote themselves.

72 isn’t anything

74 does seem a little lamist to me.

I can see why you are suspicious of him, but I honestly don’t see anything truly lynch worthy. Tbh I’d be more suspicious of north and maybe rb. I feel like he should have attempted to find out if I was an alt or off-siter first before throwing out the conspiracy theory. Rb seemingly agreeing with him is also suspicious. North hasn’t been on this site that long, rb has though. For us to be scum together we’d have to have had a conversation before the game started (which we don’t know is possible) and since I wasn’t allowed to post due to a site glitch, I clearly wouldn’t have been able to coordinate anything in that small window. Plus there is the small fact that I’m not scum but clearly nobody is going to take my word for it.

[Awoo]

Im actually going to make this public knowledge so no one can "townslip" this:

My first game was scum, and I was unable to post in the game due to the whole "alt detection" thing, but I was able to post in the scum PT pregame despite it.

[havingfitz]

V/la till Monday morning.

Noted

[rb]

Why are you defending another slot Cedrick?

[rb]

Watch me now

[northsidegal]

I can see why you are suspicious of him, but I honestly don’t see anything truly lynch worthy. Tbh I’d be more suspicious of north and maybe rb. I feel like he should have attempted to find out if I was an alt or off-siter first before throwing out the conspiracy theory.

what difference would it make and how does that make me scummy?

Rb seemingly agreeing with him is also suspicious. North hasn’t been on this site that long, rb has though. For us to be scum together we’d have to have had a conversation before the game started (which we don’t know is possible) and since I wasn’t allowed to post due to a site glitch, I clearly wouldn’t have been able to coordinate anything in that small window. Plus there is the small fact that I’m not scum but clearly nobody is going to take my word for it.

how old is your main account? this is very important.

also, *her. "gal" is in my name!

[rb]

EBWOP: disregard my last re: post timing, thought you were referring to a different post

As for voting reasons, they are what I said. You entered the game by jumping on a wagon without any game advancing content. That gets a vote everytime.

My defense is faltering! Grasps for straws, ensign!

So me and Alex did the same thing. Why not vote him. It gets a vote everytime.

"why me" defence, mumbles scumlean

[rb]

Of being made the leading wagon?

See, this is basic psychology, something that I said or did struck a nerve. I'm inclined to think it was me voting you and making you the leading wagon. It's why you didn't really react strongly to NSG or rb, but you did to me.

I've got to do the dishes. Be back soon. Much love, Lexa.

oh more "why me" defence

we can lynch mumbles anytime

(yes im backreading the thread in reverse chronological order)

[rb]

@northsidesegal I don't think I understand the position where your vote on me is coming from so I'm going to ignore that for now

What are your thoughts on users: fitz and riggs, specifically the vote to content pattern of the former and the tone of post #26 for the latter

scum caught for wrong reason, trying to be cooperative

[northsidegal]

i think it's more of a "pointing out an inconsistency" than "why me defense".

[rb]

How is the age of an account important

Lots of people are new and good, lots of people are veterans and awful. bad metric never use

[rb]

sure, except its self-oriented in both cases.

not figuring out the game, but instead trying to manage self-appearance

[rb]

VOTE: MUMBLES

[northsidegal]

How is the age of an account important

Lots of people are new and good, lots of people are veterans and awful. bad metric never use

if that's directed towards me, it answers a very pressing question. i assume it's directed towards cedrick, though.

[rb]

No its towards you.

[rb]

why does the age of his account matter?

[rb]

im going to bed in 3 minutes

pls respond

[rb]

do you like daggers?