I wasn’t but even if I had why ask me about it?In post 185, rb wrote:Why are you defending another slot Cedrick?
The difference is I sort of think if you were town, you’d want to clarify first and by not clarifying you were attempting to just shade me.In post 187, northsidegal wrote:what difference would it make and how does that make me scummy?In post 182, Cedrick wrote: I can see why you are suspicious of him, but I honestly don’t see anything truly lynch worthy. Tbh I’d be more suspicious of north and maybe rb. I feel like he should have attempted to find out if I was an alt or off-siter first before throwing out the conspiracy theory.
how old is your main account? this is very important.Rb seemingly agreeing with him is also suspicious. North hasn’t been on this site that long, rb has though. For us to be scum together we’d have to have had a conversation before the game started (which we don’t know is possible) and since I wasn’t allowed to post due to a site glitch, I clearly wouldn’t have been able to coordinate anything in that small window. Plus there is the small fact that I’m not scum but clearly nobody is going to take my word for it.
also, *her. "gal" is in my name!
The age of my account doesn’t actually answer any pressing questions. It’s irrelevant to this game so we can move on from it.In post 195, northsidegal wrote:it answers a very pressing question
Basically I’m willing to policy lynch him in the fashion that he likes to do aka hammering without asking for a claim. I think it would hopefully teach him a lesson and if not it would have been funny as hell. Its a moot point now as the rvs pressure on him is gone.In post 220, Luca Blight wrote:I mean, you don't want to vote him as you don't scumread him, but you'd want to immediately hammer him given the chance to basically teach him a lesson, regardless of what his alignment might be?
I’m actually surprised you feel that way. I’ve seen way more townies act like that instead of scum. Scum try to remain calm where as townies typically act based on emotions. That seemed like an emotional reaction to me.In post 218, numberQ wrote:That's not my interpretation. I see it the exact opposite, that Lexa did something suspicious and is trying to put a townie spin on it. Particularly the poorly reasoned hop to Alex felt like scum with bad intentions.
i'm literally telling you right now that it does. in fact, i'm done being coy about this. Townslip denied.In post 226, Cedrick wrote:The age of my account doesn’t actually answer any pressing questions. It’s irrelevant to this game so we can move on from it.
You quite clearly have enough experience to know that scum get pregame chat in every game, or at the very least all normal games. I don't buy this.In post 182, Cedrick wrote:I can see why you are suspicious of him, but I honestly don’t see anything truly lynch worthy. Tbh I’d be more suspicious of north and maybe rb. I feel like he should have attempted to find out if I was an alt or off-siter first before throwing out the conspiracy theory. Rb seemingly agreeing with him is also suspicious. North hasn’t been on this site that long, rb has though. For us to be scum togetherand since I wasn’t allowed to post due to a site glitch, I clearly wouldn’t have been able to coordinate anything in that small window. Plus there is the small fact that I’m not scum but clearly nobody is going to take my word for it.we’d have to have had a conversation before the game started (which we don’t know is possible)
It’s up to the mod and I’ve played games where I didn’t have pregame chat. Nice tryIn post 229, northsidegal wrote:You quite clearly have enough experience to know that scum get pregame chat in every game, or at the very least all normal games. I don't buy this.
Well your whole point is irrelevant. I guess I’ll have to find games that don’t include my main where prechat wasn’t allowed.In post 230, northsidegal wrote:not sure why people purport to know what is and isn't relevant when they don't even know what i'm talking about, but it gets me slightly, perhaps irrationally angry.
If she’s town I agree.In post 233, Awoo wrote:nsg i have higher expectations of you
So explain it.In post 230, northsidegal wrote:not sure why people purport to know what is and isn't relevant when they don't even know what i'm talking about, but it gets me slightly, perhaps irrationally angry.
Why is it a fake townslip and not a real one, do experienced players not make mistakes?In post 239, northsidegal wrote:The reason i was citing was entirely game relevant. i was asking about your experience level to determine if the comment came from genuine inexperience or a fake attempt at a townslip.
I did explain it.In post 241, rb wrote:So explain it.In post 230, northsidegal wrote:not sure why people purport to know what is and isn't relevant when they don't even know what i'm talking about, but it gets me slightly, perhaps irrationally angry.
This seems an absurd reaction to the chain of events, and since Cedrick is denying any revealing how old his account is, you can just say what you were going for.
It's not a mistake, it's a comment that I don't think an experienced player makes genuinely.In post 242, rb wrote:Why is it a fake townslip and not a real one, do experienced players not make mistakes?In post 239, northsidegal wrote:The reason i was citing was entirely game relevant. i was asking about your experience level to determine if the comment came from genuine inexperience or a fake attempt at a townslip.
This is awful lol
I think the knee jerk reaction for anyone is too vote me when I post that Disclaimer. Because it’s basically an open invitation to vote me.
Care to expand on “a couple others”?In post 227, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:VOTE: Mumble
So far, mumble, as well as a couple others, have been rubbing me the wrong way reading their posts. Not sure on a lot of things at the moment, but this seems like a better idea than havo at the moment