Mini 1991: Taking Justice Into Our Own Hands (Town Win)

Awoo · Post Post #651 (ISO) » Thu Feb 15, 2018 3:48 pm

thats a bad rxn btw xD

Awoo · Post Post #652 (ISO) » Thu Feb 15, 2018 3:54 pm

sry for the tripple post but GNR are you still there? question for you but i need you to answer it LIVE

Guy_Named_Riggs · Post Post #653 (ISO) » Thu Feb 15, 2018 4:07 pm

In post 652, Awoo wrote:sry for the tripple post but GNR are you still there? question for you but i need you to answer it LIVE

Go

Awoo · Post Post #654 (ISO) » Thu Feb 15, 2018 4:12 pm

so i have no idea what you think of this game based on what you posted so thats freaking bad at this point..

POST A READ LIST OF EVERY1 IN THE GAME IN IT IN UNDER 2 MINUTES OR UR DEAD DUDE

Guy_Named_Riggs · Post Post #655 (ISO) » Thu Feb 15, 2018 4:13 pm

i'll post a read list, but it aint in 2 mins

Awoo · Post Post #656 (ISO) » Thu Feb 15, 2018 4:14 pm

but you have thoughrts dont you

Awoo · Post Post #657 (ISO) » Thu Feb 15, 2018 4:15 pm

what have you been DOING

Lexa · Post Post #658 (ISO) » Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:03 pm

eddie i'm not power towning for 14 day cycles lol

Luca Blight · Post Post #659 (ISO) » Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:12 pm

In post 655, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:i'll post a read list, but it aint in 2 mins

It's been an hour. Are you still working on it?

Luca Blight · Post Post #660 (ISO) » Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:54 pm

In post 658, Lexa wrote:eddie i'm not power towning for 14 day cycles lol

Now that the dust has settled and you've had a chance to cool down, how are you feeling? Still convinced Mumble is scum?

Papa Zito · Post Post #661 (ISO) » Thu Feb 15, 2018 6:01 pm

In post 658, Lexa wrote:eddie i'm not power towning for 14 day cycles lol

The way you've disappeared recently is really concerning.

Lexa · Post Post #662 (ISO) » Thu Feb 15, 2018 6:03 pm

@luca 100%

@zito was dealing with other shit today

Lexa · Post Post #663 (ISO) » Thu Feb 15, 2018 6:10 pm

i'll devote some time tomorrow to looking at shit in more detail but in the meantime if people aren't willing to follow through on mumbles i would support a riggs wagon, will take another look at fitz too to see if cedrick's case holds weight

Eddie Cane · Post Post #664 (ISO) » Thu Feb 15, 2018 8:35 pm

crashed my car so add that to the list of shit I have to do this weekend, vla til mon

rb · Post Post #665 (ISO) » Thu Feb 15, 2018 10:00 pm

In post 591, Papa Zito wrote:skldfj;alskdjf ;asldkjf sdlakfj

im townreading this post

rb · Post Post #666 (ISO) » Thu Feb 15, 2018 10:01 pm

In post 633, Luca Blight wrote:I didn't say he wasn't a good alternative; I said there is no 'clear' alternative, as in a lot of players are currently undecided on what to do next.

I'm generally fine with a Fitz lynch; I disagree with his stance and think he's a decent bet for scum, although I'm not convinced he would be quite so brash as scum on D1. This is what's giving me pause on Fitz.

and after this post

rb · Post Post #667 (ISO) » Thu Feb 15, 2018 10:01 pm

In post 648, Awoo wrote:VOTE: guy_named_riggs hi )

Awoo moves his vote here

Awoo you're scum aren't you

Awoo · Post Post #668 (ISO) » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:05 am

dw im a doublevoter in spirit

havingfitz · Post Post #669 (ISO) » Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:39 am

In post 603, Eddie Cane wrote:actually, here. rank these in order of likelihood please

1) svs
2) the
3/4) each one scum other town

Assuming #2 is tvt...

4) Lexa scum Mumble town
1) svs

3) Mumble scum Lexa town
2) tvt

In post 603, Eddie Cane wrote: it isn't too late to shove a lexa lynch through, btw.

Works for me!

havingfitz · Post Post #670 (ISO) » Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:42 am

In post 605, Cedrick wrote:So you are losing the argument so you decide to resort to lying?

I'm not losing shit. You're the one that keep flying the french flag and crying about not engaging me anymore.

Nice MISREP on saying I am lying.

Lexa is scum.

You have defended Lexa since your 3rd post in the game. That is a fact. And you're full of shit regardless of your alignment which IMO is scum along with Lexa.

havingfitz · Post Post #671 (ISO) » Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:48 am

In post 607, Cedrick wrote:
In post 604, havingfitz wrote:
In post 602, Eddie Cane wrote:is scum!Derrick reliant on scum!lexa? or is it an independent scumread
Cedrick could be scum regardless of Lexa flip.
So why aren’t you voting me?

If I forgot. You said you’d rather lynch a claimed Pr over me.

Carry on

There's a game concept where people vote the ones they suspect the most. I'm more sure of Lexa than you. Understand?

An odd night watcher claim means shit to me because it a useless role (your own words)...her claim was terrible (your own words)...you can't trust claims (your own words)...and they should factor into decisions (your own words). All in context IMO though. Some claims are better than others and deserve consideration. Not Lexa's IMO. A claim should automatically save a scum suspect.

How the hell does Lexa's claim indicate she is town and how in the world does it conclusively prove she is telling the truth? It doesn't and can't. She claims a lame ass no result tomorrow and you going to keep her alive until D4? No fcuking way. What if she is a powerful mafia PR? Sucks for town. What if she is a weak ass town pr that is lynched D1. Town will survive. I'm betting on scenario 1.

Don't carry on.

havingfitz · Post Post #672 (ISO) » Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:49 am

EBWOP:

and they should

not

factor into decisions (your own words).

havingfitz · Post Post #673 (ISO) » Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:51 am

In post 610, rb wrote:Derrick just seems like dumbtown to me

possssssibly......minuscule chance.

In post 611, rb wrote:Id rather do northsidegal

Not seeing this at all. Why? Any actual reasons?

havingfitz · Post Post #674 (ISO) » Fri Feb 16, 2018 3:01 am

In post 612, Cedrick wrote:Fitz has been on this site long enough

You can't use this to support a negative and at the same time dismiss my suspicions which should be enforced by the same token by "on this site long enough." This is an example of the point I made where you use the same action/comment/opinion as a positive or negative to support you flawed points (aka defenses of Lexa).

In post 612, Cedrick wrote:P.edit please don’t call me dumb.

This is hilarious given your propensity, iirc, for ad-homing players.