NSG on page one seems pretty towny
AD's first post is pretty neutral
Marquis' 24 feels like a cop-out from giving an actual read + passing responsibility
Dunn's 29 is blank but I'm not taking issue with it
I finally deciphered what Marquis' "lol someone's projecting" means, it's about NSG projecting her play onto Postie, idk I'm not sure about that
There's a non-zero percent chance Llamar's "Dunn - possible first page bussing yay" had informed my thoughts on Dunn early on
@Marquis re: 36, what about the reactiveness was scummy or w/e?
Marquis' representative thing might be her talking with a teammate
46 by NSG is a good response, will look out for Marquis' reply (to the reply: why must the two things be separate, they look like a continuity to me, what's wrong with that?)
NSG's 54 townpings me
@AD why do you say Marquis' postie assessment is like a cross-examination?
If Postie hadn't gotten nightkilled I'd be wondering if 62 was scum theatre
CES 68's middle section feels like silly filler, and the last part is discrediting imo
71 actually broke a rule but I won't press it, will state that the post wasn't really necessary, but if I were choosing a setup given the presence of the teams I would have gone with pure vanilla 12:3 mountainous cos I played the MU shadowhydra game and that was well balanced imo
72 + 73 are pretty good imo
That should be it, thinking the first pages indicate CES + Marquis + ? as scum