In post 900, Untrod Tripod wrote:do I need to put this in webcomic format for you to understand it
![Death :dead:](./images/smilies/icon_skull.gif)
In post 900, Untrod Tripod wrote:do I need to put this in webcomic format for you to understand it
quoting this til someone gets itIn post 875, The Bulge wrote:isn't the whole point of tunneling to end up with a bore?In post 791, notscience wrote:Bottom line is your read is off and your tunneling whoever scumreads you is a bore.
why are you trying to deter me using meta in the pt?In post 941, notscience wrote:I’m using meta but I know it won’t deter most of you it’s why I’m not actively fighting it
Why isn't gamma going to happen?In post 946, Untrod Tripod wrote:okay but I don't think it's gonna happenIn post 943, AGar wrote:Of the four, I find Gamma's sustained behavior most likely to come from scum
isn't it wild how some of the people actually up for yeeting today want us to spend all of our time talking about people we can't yeet, our reads on whom will depend on today's flip?
really make u think
Because you’ve played with me enough to know that’s what you’re going to get and won’t just reply with “meta is trash”In post 952, The Bulge wrote:why are you trying to deter me using meta in the pt?In post 941, notscience wrote:I’m using meta but I know it won’t deter most of you it’s why I’m not actively fighting it
Nah our PT is mostly either games or just us using it as a bootleg notes PT. We’ve not talked game there at all except for one point where he responded to a question I’d put in there for him that was meant to be included in the quote wall.In post 915, VP Baltar wrote:Eh, it wasn't like it was that or gamma died. I don't understand townreading noraa over pooky here. Unless there is something more in the PT that is tripping him up.In post 912, Untrod Tripod wrote:so what your issue boils down to here is that Gamma made an effort post, then made a utilitarian vote? idgi. that tracks, for me.
You reacted to Noraa potentially challenging you by calling it “anti town”In post 921, SirCakez wrote:I don't understand the connection between what you quoted and what you said
Misrep. Have not tried to lim Noraa at all here.
Maybe it’s because the lim pool is not the only people you should have to form reads onIn post 946, Untrod Tripod wrote:okay but I don't think it's gonna happenIn post 943, AGar wrote:Of the four, I find Gamma's sustained behavior most likely to come from scum
isn't it wild how some of the people actually up for yeeting today want us to spend all of our time talking about people we can't yeet, our reads on whom will depend on today's flip?
really make u think
I got itIn post 951, The Bulge wrote:quoting this til someone gets itIn post 875, The Bulge wrote:isn't the whole point of tunneling to end up with a bore?In post 791, notscience wrote:Bottom line is your read is off and your tunneling whoever scumreads you is a bore.
fairIn post 954, notscience wrote:Because you’ve played with me enough to know that’s what you’re going to get and won’t just reply with “meta is trash”In post 952, The Bulge wrote:why are you trying to deter me using meta in the pt?In post 941, notscience wrote:I’m using meta but I know it won’t deter most of you it’s why I’m not actively fighting it
okokok how'sIn post 960, Gamma Emerald wrote:I got itIn post 951, The Bulge wrote:quoting this til someone gets itIn post 875, The Bulge wrote:isn't the whole point of tunneling to end up with a bore?In post 791, notscience wrote:Bottom line is your read is off and your tunneling whoever scumreads you is a bore.
Just didn’t feel like responding because it’s lame, and kinda a stretch
Ultimatums are lame. I don't deal with them IRL nor will I be threatened with them while playing a game for fun. I didn't plan to have 8 days of work with one day off and then back to it this morning for another 5 or 6, but I'm doing the best I can. I'm not sure why you feel like you can act this way and be a bully, but it's not endearing or warranted. I've thought you're town this entire time so far, but I'm starting to question my read and whether I sorted you correctly. You've been hella rude to me for no reason while being one of the few who just keep populating the thread with more and more pages every time I come back to it. Thus, making it harder to stay current. Then you have the gall to tell me something is "non negotiable"? How is that even a town mindset?In post 667, Gamma Emerald wrote:Take that up with the people who want this challenge to be over with. I'm willing to let you have that time butit's not negotiablethat I won't look favorably on you if you fail to deliver before this bubble bursts, whenever that is.
I'm not feeling anything odd about him either. For me, it just seems like Noraa is lashing out at anyone who remotely suspects her.In post 670, lilith2013 wrote:.. don't really get the scumreads on cakes. Is noraa calling him scum because he's not scummy enough? What is this logic?
In post 682, Noraa wrote:I don't flail as scum until lylo unless there are large amounts of pressure on me.
Self-meta, like regular meta, is trash. You've been flailing all through this day.In post 683, Noraa wrote:Saying stupid things isn't exactly AI for me.
Being defensive isn't AI for me.
Being scummy is however.
I never die day 1 as scum. Not once.
Half my town games however end on day 1 for me.
That's not really how it works.....In post 702, Noraa wrote:Well I don't trust anyone so there won't be full transparency from me.
+1 millionIn post 703, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:um the point of full transparency is for the rest of us to trust you...
She did, though. "Anyone who isn't her."In post 725, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:um u still havent answered who u want to yeet noraa
I've been feeling it, too. The Activity Overview is gross.In post 732, Untrod Tripod wrote:nope! it's just wild to me to see someone else saying itIn post 728, notscience wrote:Am I wrong UT? I’m normally a much higher post count player but I’ve been able to reign it in to let the game breathe. Do you disagree with that analysis?
And that's leaving off how he felt you were "exploiting" Noraa's naivete. Basically, blaming you for "tricking" her or some such. I'm not quite sure if his quick turn around to my call out of that is genuine, but time will tell. He could have been a lot more defensive towards me with his response and he wasn't. So that's something.In post 743, VP Baltar wrote:Notsci seems to be cruising for path of least resistance yeet today. Remember when I said scum would use Pooky's insta-challenge as a way to take no responsibility for their actions today? Notsci is like the epitomy of that. He said he's willing to hammer anyone. I also feel like he's not trying to solve. I don't have a case at the moment because I tend to just keep impressions of each player in my head, and then later if I feel super strongly someone is scum, I'll re-iso them to see if their posting matches up with the impression I have or not. More often than not, I get bad feelings about someone for a good reason.In post 739, Gamma Emerald wrote:why?In post 712, VP Baltar wrote:I agree on notsci being scum most likely. I don't agree so much on cakez
Agreed. I've been trying to figure out her hyperfocus on you, but I got nada. And of course, right after this, she shades you and notsci for not voting her? I just don't get it.In post 770, SirCakez wrote:Noraa's push on me is so bad regardless of alignment here and everything she posts feels manufactured
He's not wrong, though. This whole day has been The Noraa Show.In post 790, Noraa wrote:quite an overstatement and extremely shady of u to say that to discredit my reads.In post 789, notscience wrote:dramatic toxic blowout
And he's not wrong #2.In post 792, Noraa wrote:I haven't tunneled everyone that SRs me. Don't discredit lol.In post 791, notscience wrote:Say what you want. Bottom line is your read is off and your tunneling whoever scumreads you is a bore. I’ve already volunteered to be in the challenge tomorrow should town decide they want me to go.
Having a weak/null-ish read doesn't not equal "scum feelings," though. I think you're hardcore misrepping UT right now. Like this push would make sense re:Reck, but not UT.In post 899, Gamma Emerald wrote:He says it's "weak, and therefore useless"
I disagree with that sentiment, but he essentially is unwilling to vote VP despite having scum feelings from him
Why? If he has a weak read, he's going to work to sort VPB and the conclusion might be opposite of his initial feelings due to the evolution of his read. It's literally what anyone should do on Day 1. Everyone works through their sorting differently and it seems like you're just mad because he didn't do it your way.In post 904, Gamma Emerald wrote:would it not do to shore that read up though? It's the same issue I brought up regarding baltar where the solving is not present imo
I don't appreciate this statement at all. He wasn't saying anything against newbies and you are clearly putting words in his mouth/misrepping him with this. Not to mention that leaning back on your join date, when you seem to have played a ton of games since being on site, is pretty gross and wholly unfair to VPB. I'm saying that as someone who has played with him since *I* was a newbie.In post 926, Noraa wrote:dunno what else you except from someone with a 3 month join date but if ur solution is just "PL all newbies", ur the silly one.
I'm still sorry about Weakest Link btw, which (for anyone reading) is a prime example of a pissed off Townie Cakez getting miselimmed D1. Even if he wrongly tunneled on me.In post 929, SirCakez wrote:when I'm not being fuckwagoned to elim on day 1 then yeah I don't get pissy lolIn post 928, Noraa wrote:Town!cake doesn't act this calm and composed. It just doesn't happen.In post 921, SirCakez wrote:you're so confibiased it's unreal
maybe instead of doing mental gymnastics to somehow confirm to yourself that I'm scum why not just look at the obvious and realize I'm not voting you because I'm not scum and I'm not scumreading you
I am not a meta expert but when someone is far out of their town range, I can see it.
So why mention it, other than as an attempt to make him feel bad? I'm pretty annoyed with this tactic and don't think it comes from a town mindset at all.In post 932, Noraa wrote:I don't think the newbie card does much for me considering I've never won a game solely because of it.
Ummmmmmmmmmm................yeah. About that.In post 938, Noraa wrote:they don't need much evidence. After all they are entirely based on feeling/vibes.
ok but an insta challenge just immediately limits our elim options for the dayIn post 957, Gamma Emerald wrote:You reacted to Noraa potentially challenging you by calling it “anti town”In post 921, SirCakez wrote:I don't understand the connection between what you quoted and what you said
If Lilith ends up flipping scum from that would that not actually be pro town iyo?