NY139: Underground Mafia (Game over!)

[paraffin]

VOTE: nunez

that means we like him, right?

[paraffin]

VOTE: vifam for poor scumhunting

[paraffin]

xanatos, are you saying you've played with vifam before?

[paraffin]

OMGUS

[paraffin]

I'm calling him stupid what?

[paraffin]

http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Omgus

perhaps i should have included a vote for trekker to complete the meme or whatever?

Either way you're more angry/aggressive town than you are scum. UNVOTE: vifam

Nobody else making me want to jump on them at the moment, so no vote from me for now...

[paraffin]

why did you not post the name of the game? afraid of us seeing that he's right?

[paraffin]

Perhaps it's just cuz i'm new here but i don't see how that matters really.

[paraffin]

Oh I see. It makes sense I guess, but then isn't trekker breaking that rule, technically?

[paraffin]

Or, getting back on topic, VOTE: Mysterio for turning mafia into a spectator sport.

[paraffin]

Then what did you mean by this?

oh yeah

i see it

[paraffin]

ah. whatever, the whole exchange was stupid.

not so sure why you guys are so excited about this sorgster wagon though

[paraffin]

The other being: I "overreacted" which is ridiculous seeing how Sorg's reaction to TTA's vote was an "overreaction".

I hate how you are tunneling on me just because I countervoted.

Doesn't make him look good, but doesn't make him look scum. Just whiny. I don't like all this 'tunneling' talk; it's way to soon for anyone to actually be convinced by their own arguments. If anyone is actually tunneling right now (I'm getting my definition of this from http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Tunneling) they're terrible at this game.

[paraffin]

so you're sticking with your call, xanatos?

[paraffin]

sorgster: great start

[paraffin]

david, care to share a quote or something from a finished game? You're not gonna get much support without even trying to include us on your reasoning.

[paraffin]

uncle, it's called scumhunting. Allow me to demonstrate: VOTE: uncledaphne for buddying, not scumhunting, and a dumb picture.

Xanatos, I'm not going to read pages upon pages of game threads to find an example of vifam being aggressive when you probably have at least an idea of where to look and what to look for.

[paraffin]

What's more, you shouldn't expect everyone in the game to do likewise. Don't use evidence we don't have access to. Share it or stop talking about it

[paraffin]

HAH I've been refreshing page six and was getting annoyed at the sudden halt in activity. durrr

uncle, way to have a vote on me despite a town read Anyway, your list doesn't really help without explanation.

eep, good point about not enough info to meta.

xanatos, I merely wanted you to show us posts from Vifam which supported your read. Obviously it will be cherrypicked, but once I have your evidence I can then examine context and decide if it's useful. As it is I can either believe you, ignore you, or go through a lot of trouble to find relevant posts. You haven't even suggested your hunch is anything to be taken seriously so how about you stop encouraging me to waste a bunch of time and start scumhunting before we think more about voting you off the island. </rant>

[paraffin]

I don't even know what you guys are talking about. Uncle, you jumped hard on a wagon that was more of an RV than anything using what evidence? That HE was using weak reasoning to vote someone. Jeez, man...

All that said, red isn't the worst read for scum but I can't really put my finger on why...

[paraffin]

xanatos, it's a lot easier if i have somewhere to start looking. Either way, hope you are less grumpy in the morning <3

[quote = "vifam"]Nice catch.[/quote]

Always gives me an oogy feeling when people point out 'nice catches' which are a) rather obvious and b) not actually scumtells unless you take a really simplistic interpretation of the 'catch'

[paraffin]

[quote="vifam:]I SUCK COCKS[/quote]

[paraffin]

haha ok I should actually use this newfangled preview button here...

[paraffin]

I don't think the 'placeholder' vote thing is a tell.

vifam, the question daphne is asking is not 'was sorg defensive or not defensive' but rather 'was sorg "incredibly defensive" or just "defensive"'. daphne is the defensive type himself so you have each come to different conclusions about that and in the meantime have talked a lot past each other.

Anyway, my vote stands as uncle has shown more scumminess than anyone thus far.

[paraffin]

panda picture guy, i think vifam just likes pressing people so that we can actually get something useful done. If the atmosphere is such that nobody is really afraid of real suspicion then the scum can get through pretty easily, so that makes him pro-town in my book. If someone gets L-1 or L-2, then we can say hold up guys let's slow down a bit we still have a whole three weeks to get through. But if we wait to create any pressure at all before then we will surely lose.

[paraffin]

uncle, you just really don't get it, do you?

In the game of mafia you have to go with your best reads at all times. Also, the only way to be pro-town is to create pressure. Add those two together and you have wagons on page two for shit reasons because there are no better wagons to be on. if you can't understand this you are one thick mother.

That said, your stupidity is telling me to change my scum reads to stupid reads. Will have to reconsider...

Welcome, uprising!

[paraffin]

friend.

OH OH! he's buddying! SCUM! SCUM!

[paraffin]

uncle, YOU are the one acting nonsensically.

Also, where have I contradicted myself on the placeholder vote not being a scumtell thing?

panda bear guy, how about you give us some input while you're here?

[paraffin]

Uncle, please stop calling wagons and votes attempts at quicklynching. We've told you multiple times that nobody is looking for a quicklynch.

I agree that the whole Sorgster thing was a dumb idea; I never jumped on that wagon myself because I agreed with you and Sorg that TheAwesomeAll's post was rather confusing and read Sorg's reaction as confused. Vifam and redFF thought sorg was scummy because sorg misread the vote on him as a serious vote and was confused, which vifam and redFF thought was him being overly defensive.

[paraffin]

fucking sperg purger

[paraffin]

Last time I called my scum reads merely stupid reads I was wrong. I was gonna unvote uncle because i thought he was just being stupid town, but I'm actually fine with where my vote lies, I think.

[paraffin]

Also your VT claim is silly. There was no reason to VT claim; any townie would have just said that they're town. Nobody's roleclaiming yet. Yet a scared mafia would certainly specify VT to make himself seem more innocent.

[paraffin]

that he is

[paraffin]

so is eep, ftr

[paraffin]

and trekker and sorg, so we have a full list

[paraffin]

oh that's right my b

[paraffin]

sorgster, he was already called out on the townie/village thing so he didn't make the mistake a second time. Give him

some

credit, come on.