Page 55 of 143

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:06 am
by Varsoon
...mustang?

-V

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:08 am
by ProFlavor
In post 1338, Varsoon wrote:I'm around, too, Mew.
I have a really hard time reading your posts for some reason
Like it is difficult for me to maintain focus on them for any amount of time

-V
This is also more indicative of town than scum, imo.

Scum can easily explain what they’re saying because they have to explain it to themselves.

Townies have to figure it out, and try to put it into words. Mewtaph’s town.

~Leaf

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:09 am
by Mewtaph
Tibor and Lumia - IDK, kind of decreased presence recently and I'm not sure how to interpret that. They've had a decent presence so I can probably form a read there with a little push with flip info later days

Taly - town, if scum then I'll just take the bullet

Michael Scott - Kind of scummy? I just might not like meta arguments but the vote on NicoRobin and "a scum flip would be helpful there anyway" kind of bothered me

pinturicchio - I think their approach is townie and they're town, feels a bit like a future ML setup and I'm just not very excited about it

Almost Chara - they can be a town lean for now. I think I jumped on them too hard for being scum without much reason

Kokichi Oma - his presence is kind of hit or miss, isn't it? I mean, I really don't know but it's not a lynch target given what I know about him

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:12 am
by Varsoon
Yeah, no doubt about it, Mewtaph's town. There's definitely this sense of trying to figure things out and of reads coming from an uninformed space.

Thanks for the reads, too, Mew. It helps in case you do get lynched, regardless of flip. Dunno if you'd be able to provide them all like that in the next 48 if the wagon swings hard on you. I don't think it should, though, 'cus the case for STW scum is way better, imo, and I don't know that enough of those 6 slots would be willing to vote you over STW.


-V

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:13 am
by Mewtaph
Np

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:16 am
by Varsoon
Plus, compare Mew's parsing of things out to STW's "This is so obviously scum! Lynch it!" approach, y'know?
It's night and day to me.

-V

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:55 am
by Krazy
Jjh927 replaces NicoRobin

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 11:10 am
by Krazy
Votecount 1.13

Shoshin the worst(4)
~ (7), (169), (45), (74)

Mewtaph(4)
~ (68), (231), (89), (215)
pinturicchio(2)
~ (89), (116)
jjh927(2)
~ (62), (99)
u r a person 2(1)
~ (45)
Almost Chara(1)
~ (14)


Not Voting (0):

With 14 alive it takes 8 to lynch.

Day 1 deadline is in (expired on 2019-01-16 22:05:17)


MOD REMINDERSDon't think any votes changed here, just confirming that my formatting for jjh replacement was correct.

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 11:12 am
by jjh927
Teleport successful

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 11:13 am
by jjh927
Wow years ago I was playing mafia in starcraft 2 and now I'm playing starcraft 2 in mafia this is trippy

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 11:14 am
by jjh927
Yeah I don't want to vote the worst

UNVOTE:

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 12:10 pm
by Varsoon
In post 1359, jjh927 wrote:Wow years ago I was playing mafia in starcraft 2 and now I'm playing starcraft 2 in mafia this is trippy
Wow yeah me too
I think that was actually legit my first mafia experience was playing Mafia on Battlenet in a Starcraft map
Wild
In post 1360, jjh927 wrote:Yeah I don't want to vote the worst

UNVOTE:
You will want to vote them after you read the game
How caught up are you?

-V

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 1:51 pm
by Mephistophanes 39
In post 1257, Mewtaph wrote:Lynch pool for being scummy: {Alchemist21, Almost Chara, Shoshin the worst}
Up for policy lynch[/b{: {Nancy}

Steamrolling with the biggest wagon that forms on any of these three + Nancy.
POLICY lynching us? For what, exactly? :lol:

Are you actually [/b]
trying
to get lynched now? Just keep accelerating that scum!meter, why don’t you? :lol:

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 1:53 pm
by Mephistophanes 39
In post 1258, Michael Scott wrote:@Mewtaph: Alchemist rebutted your attack on him, you left it at that though - why?
Rationale for STW, Almost Chara?
Why a policy lynch on Nancy?

~Jimothy
In post 1261, Mewtaph wrote:
In post 1258, Michael Scott wrote:@Mewtaph: Alchemist rebutted your attack on him, you left it at that though - why?
Rationale for STW, Almost Chara?
Why a policy lynch on Nancy?

~Jimothy
It's how scum would respond from beginning to end. Me trying to push Alchemist through here requires thread presence I don't have -
Nancy is acting as a huge obstacle to me pushing him at all and reflecting votes onto me in a very destructive manner
.

Tl;dr, the rebuttal is how a scum responds and the basis of his approach to me isn't how town thinks. I'm not responding to a hard SR
Like if I had any doubt you’re flipping red, thanks for putting my mind at ease.

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 2:18 pm
by Tibor and Lumia
In post 1363, Mephistophanes 39 wrote:
In post 1258, Michael Scott wrote:@Mewtaph: Alchemist rebutted your attack on him, you left it at that though - why?
Rationale for STW, Almost Chara?
Why a policy lynch on Nancy?

~Jimothy
In post 1261, Mewtaph wrote:
In post 1258, Michael Scott wrote:@Mewtaph: Alchemist rebutted your attack on him, you left it at that though - why?
Rationale for STW, Almost Chara?
Why a policy lynch on Nancy?

~Jimothy
It's how scum would respond from beginning to end. Me trying to push Alchemist through here requires thread presence I don't have -
Nancy is acting as a huge obstacle to me pushing him at all and reflecting votes onto me in a very destructive manner
.

Tl;dr, the rebuttal is how a scum responds and the basis of his approach to me isn't how town thinks. I'm not responding to a hard SR
Like if I had any doubt you’re flipping red, thanks for putting my mind at ease.
Are you telling Michael Scott this or the other person?

-B

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 2:43 pm
by Kokichi Oma
I'm telling you guys. Chara is scum. Meta never wrong

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 2:48 pm
by Tibor and Lumia
In post 1365, Kokichi Oma wrote:I'm telling you guys. Chara is scum. Meta never wrong
Please link the never wrong meta.

-Brrrr it's cold here

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:06 pm
by Mephistophanes 39
In post 1364, Tibor and Lumia wrote:
In post 1363, Mephistophanes 39 wrote:
In post 1258, Michael Scott wrote:@Mewtaph: Alchemist rebutted your attack on him, you left it at that though - why?
Rationale for STW, Almost Chara?
Why a policy lynch on Nancy?

~Jimothy
In post 1261, Mewtaph wrote:
In post 1258, Michael Scott wrote:@Mewtaph: Alchemist rebutted your attack on him, you left it at that though - why?
Rationale for STW, Almost Chara?
Why a policy lynch on Nancy?

~Jimothy
It's how scum would respond from beginning to end. Me trying to push Alchemist through here requires thread presence I don't have -
Nancy is acting as a huge obstacle to me pushing him at all and reflecting votes onto me in a very destructive manner
.

Tl;dr, the rebuttal is how a scum responds and the basis of his approach to me isn't how town thinks. I'm not responding to a hard SR
Like if I had any doubt you’re flipping red, thanks for putting my mind at ease.
Are you telling Michael Scott this or the other person?

-B
:lol:

Who do you think?

Mewtaph obviously.

Advocating a PL on us, like he might as well just post his role pm. :lol:

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:10 pm
by Mephistophanes 39
In post 1328, Mewtaph wrote:Following on my previous post. More specifically, it hedges on Varsoon vs STW which is a much more significant point of interest and making a strong conclusion there, while throwing out some sense of analysis that ends in Mephisto being town which is only really relevant i
n diffusing hostility between STW and Mephisto
which is much less relevant. It's misplaced focus.
Hostility? What hostility?

Are we in the same game?

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:13 pm
by Mephistophanes 39
In post 1331, Mewtaph wrote:What don't you follow in ?
Where is this “hostility” you’re referring too wrt to us and Stw, in THIS game?

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:14 pm
by Mephistophanes 39
In post 1344, Mewtaph wrote:The deadline, probably. We need to choose a lynch, may as well try to make your stake in the game state.
If I move my vote, it’s probably to Nico rn.

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:16 pm
by Mephistophanes 39
In post 1347, Varsoon wrote:Reminds me a lot of how STW proposed Mewtaph for lynch in Starcraft 1 because Mewtaph was an easy target and STW needed mislynches to win there.

-V
Mewtaph seems very different here though and the whole PL thing is just whack.

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:17 pm
by Mephistophanes 39
In post 1348, ProFlavor wrote:On top of that, Varsoon is townVarsoon here. I know what that tunneling Varsoon feels like and looks like. On top of that, both Nancy and Mustang have a tendency to tunnel onto towniesbpretty relentlessly (albeit in different ways) is the fact they are the first 2 on the Mewtaph wagon makes it more likely that they are tunneling onto town which is why it got near lynch.

This is regardless of Nancy/Mustang alignments.

~Leaf
Who is Mustang?

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:19 pm
by Mephistophanes 39
In post 1365, Kokichi Oma wrote:I'm telling you guys. Chara is scum.
Meta never wrong
Why?

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:43 pm
by Shoshin the worst
In post 1307, Mewtaph wrote:This is not town. This is not how town approaches the game. Alchemist is not town.
Could you respond to any of the things I asked you?
At all?

I don't see how you're town approaching this right now.