Mafia 83 - Game Ended Scum Win!

Xtoxm · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:55 am

Lol. Good luck

Mana_Ku · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:57 am

Don't worry. I know how to handle guys. (he's a guy right?)

Xtoxm · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:59 am

Yes, I believe so.

This is sexual, right?

Mana_Ku · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:04 am

What do you mean with 'this is sexual, right'?

Xtoxm · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:06 am

It was a joke.

Mana_Ku · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:10 am

I know, don't worry about it. At least we're not lurking although our posts are not making sense at all. But I still agree that K7 should join us. Three are always better than two. Besides more ppl is always better. And thanks to us, we don't need to get into it.

Reclusion · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:58 am

Mana_Ku wrote:But Reclusion, don't pay that much attention to BM. I've heard that he is quite stubborn and besides he has the longest pregame history as record as far as I know. He also likes mocking those who don't agree with him.

I'm familiar with Battle Mage's method of play but that doesn't mean he just gets a free pass does it? His playstyle might be guaranteed but his alignment is not.

So, Xtoxm, do you have any comments about anyone yet? Any positions on issues you'd like to take?

Mana_Ku · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:00 am

Of course, it doesn't mean he gets a free pass. Why should he? Everyone should be looked at.

Xtoxm · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:05 am

So, Xtoxm, do you have any comments about anyone yet? Any positions on issues you'd like to take?

Not really that I haven't said already. What are you looking for?

Reclusion · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:21 am

Xtoxm wrote:
So, Xtoxm, do you have any comments about anyone yet? Any positions on issues you'd like to take?
Not really that I haven't said already. What are you looking for?

I dunno. Your posts just seem kinda... blah, so far. Answering questions and what-not but not really asking any scum-hunting types of questions or anything along those lines to try and generate discussion.

Xtoxm · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:12 am

I wouldn't disagree with that.

But also not much is really happening yet...The only thing really is the lurker thing. I am generally pro attacking lurkers, but recently I've been through a phase where i've been lurking myself, for various reasons. There's a difference between lurking and not contributing...K7 generally falls into the latter category, in my experience. But my vote still doesn't have anything behind it, really.

hasdgfas · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:21 am

unvote, vote alvinz

Any reason for voting BM?

Yaw · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:36 am

Speaking of counting posts, Jebus and Netman haven't posted since Sunday, and both have posted only once. The latter in particular felt like he was following along, so in combination with the lurking,

Unvote

,

Vote: Netman

.

(I usually have better first bandwagons. I'm disappointed in the quality of discussion. Hopefully this will at least pick things up a bit.)

Mana_Ku · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:48 am

The problem is that many players have only 1 or 2 posts. And some have more posts, but almost no content in it (guess who I'm talking about

). Even BM is quiet

.
But I hope the discussion starts soon. And that the more quiet persons will give their opinion as well. Otherwise we won't go any further.

Xtoxm · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:50 am

It's the same for almost everyone...

killa seven · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:06 am

Bm usually acts crazy and posts alo, ive seen him flip town and act like this. Unless he does something overly scummy i wont jump on his wagon.

Xtoxm ive never seen you that active, you seem to be active here so thats good.
( i hope your not still mad that i rallied that lynch on you in that one game)

Why is iamusername voting me?

Games that start out slow tend to be painfull, maybe stricter posting rules.

Xtoxm · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:12 am

Lol, it took me a few seconds to realise what you were talking about. That game had a poor mod. And I wasn't really ever annoyed at you, I just thought you were scum. I was very frustrated by the cop's play, though. But that's not really related to this.

Games that start out slow tend to be painfull

Mm, yeh.

Maybe MK can pull this off...

Jebus · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:57 am

@Yaw: I've read the topic once or twice since my last post, I've just had nothing to say. And yeah, I agree, this discussion is a failure -.-

Battle Mage · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:32 am

Unvote, Vote: Alvinz

Reclusion is playing the game.

BM

alvinz95 · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:55 am

hasdgfas wrote:
unvote, vote alvinz

Any reason for voting BM?

No reason. Random.

hasdgfas · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:58 am

alvinz95 wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
unvote, vote alvinz

Any reason for voting BM?
No reason. Random.

you do realize we had actually started a little bit of talking and random voting there wasn't really useful at all, right?

Jebus · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:59 am

Random voting in a non-random voting stage stirs up controversy since it's abnormal.

We need something like that to spark discussion. -.-

alvinz95 · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:40 pm

hasdgfas wrote:
alvinz95 wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
unvote, vote alvinz

Any reason for voting BM?
No reason. Random.
you do realize we had actually started a little bit of talking and random voting there wasn't really useful at all, right?

No, I'm sorry, I didn't realize that, because I didn't bother to reread yet. =/

Yaw · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:15 pm

Or notice we were on page 3?

Reclusion · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:14 pm

Jebus wrote:Random voting in a non-random voting stage stirs up controversy since it's abnormal.

We need something like that to spark discussion. -.-

We now have something like that now with alvinz95. So... how about that discussion?

Vote: alvinz95

So, alvinz95, did you at least check the vote count before placing your vote to see how many votes Battle Mage had before placing yours? You also mention you didn't "bother to

reread

yet". Does this imply that you had an initial read?