In post 45, Save The Dragons wrote: Go go go
Dragons never move this fast.In post 46, Save The Dragons wrote: Hurry hurry hurry
Nor does std
VOTE: std
In post 45, Save The Dragons wrote: Go go go
Dragons never move this fast.In post 46, Save The Dragons wrote: Hurry hurry hurry
Drew has been scum in 100% of the games played with T-Bone up to this point.In post 83, T-Bone wrote: Next person to make the most convincing scum case explaining why Drew is scum gets my vote for the rest of the day
Why not? You have tried before when I wasn't scum.In post 86, usesPython wrote:Pro tip: you cantIn post 83, T-Bone wrote: Next person to make the most convincing scum case explaining why Drew is scum gets my vote for the rest of the day
I was wondering if someone would twist the wording I used lol.In post 91, light_ganski wrote:So you're scum now?In post 88, Doctor Drew wrote:Why not? You have tried before when I wasn't scum.In post 86, usesPython wrote:Pro tip: you cantIn post 83, T-Bone wrote: Next person to make the most convincing scum case explaining why Drew is scum gets my vote for the rest of the day
Ahhh!
Tunnely Black feels like townBlack I think?In post 304, Black wrote:If he's LHF then why am I the only one pushing himIn post 298, Naerys wrote: fluffy pink balloon feels like LHF to me a bit
Elaborate on why not.In post 368, gob wrote:ElaborateIn post 365, Ausuka wrote: Tbh I think ranger/light/python is 3 town right now
I think I underestimated the effects of the time constraints here, gun to my head you, python, Ranger are town......Nae and std for scumIn post 371, davesaz wrote:Any other reads, keeping in mind shorter deadlines?In post 369, Doctor Drew wrote:Elaborate on why not.In post 368, gob wrote:ElaborateIn post 365, Ausuka wrote: Tbh I think ranger/light/python is 3 town right now
Ftr, I do town read python.....but no real read so far on the other two.
So the more info the better
What's your threshold?
Should I grab food on the way home or cook something is my main thought right now.
In post 373, Save The Dragons wrote:This post might be just too wacky to come from scumIn post 369, Doctor Drew wrote:Elaborate on why not.In post 368, gob wrote:ElaborateIn post 365, Ausuka wrote: Tbh I think ranger/light/python is 3 town right now
Ftr, I do town read python.....but no real read so far on the other two.
So the more info the better
Ya seriously, figured std would know I am capable of way more wackiness as scumIn post 374, usesPython wrote: That post is a 0 on the Drewmometer, where's the wack
Also, didn't really sink in until I read this again after I posted
Ok fair enough, I meant the post more for gob to explain things and giving my town read on python was an aside lolIn post 379, light_ganski wrote:Townread on pythonIn post 377, Doctor Drew wrote:
But, what thoughts exactly did I give?
This seems a bit like posting to post.
Would definitely go you over PythonIn post 381, gob wrote: im thinking we lim python
Tbf I am not trying to lurk, just find that this time of the day is when I can mafia the most.In post 387, Ranger wrote:I agree, tentatively. I think a scum-Drew would be more inclined to effort, not lurk.In post 373, Save The Dragons wrote:This post might be just too wacky to come from scumIn post 369, Doctor Drew wrote:Elaborate on why not. Ftr, I do town read python.....but no real read so far on the other two. So the more info the better
Hi5In post 389, usesPython wrote:Wow same here we'd also lim gob over ourselvesIn post 385, Doctor Drew wrote:Would definitely go you over PythonIn post 381, gob wrote: im thinking we lim python
I have a few minutes, but are you really taking T-Bone going a bit into list mod mode and commenting on the v/la stuff.......as a scum tell?In post 468, gob wrote:I feel like Dannflors analysis said it wel enough. For me i have sorta ruled out a lot of others, but python consistently does moves that i feel are anti-town.In post 467, Save The Dragons wrote: why python
i dont feel as strongly on anyone, except maybe T-bone as their is a contrast in how T-bone was talking about the V/LA stuff and how T-bone talked about everything else. Feels like scum
Also I will allow an Ausuka vote, but thanks for thinking of me.In post 469, T-Bone wrote: Oh please elaborate I can't wait
You can tell me to fuck off all you want if that helps T-Bone get his groove back.In post 477, T-Bone wrote:Well, not even listmod mode. Questioning v/la has always been a pet peeve of mine.In post 472, Doctor Drew wrote:I have a few minutes, but are you really taking T-Bone going a bit into list mod mode and commenting on the v/la stuff.......as a scum tell?In post 468, gob wrote:I feel like Dannflors analysis said it wel enough. For me i have sorta ruled out a lot of others, but python consistently does moves that i feel are anti-town.In post 467, Save The Dragons wrote: why python
i dont feel as strongly on anyone, except maybe T-bone as their is a contrast in how T-bone was talking about the V/LA stuff and how T-bone talked about everything else. Feels like scum
Python, scale of 1-10, how high is this on the Drew Post Meter(or DPM for short)?
But also I was pretty snarky about Black so was that post really different from the rest of my snark? Am I losing my edge? Who do I need to call a coward to get it back?
Thank you for reminding me of the contradictionIn post 504, davesaz wrote:In post 363, gob wrote:wtf mindmeld with nairysIn post 361, Naerys wrote: Scum team might be ranger+light+pythonIn post 498, gob wrote:Nice. Ive found you towny btw idk why others havent. no offense but i think sometimes you can be lhf typeStrange how gob seems to TR Naerys but then suggests her as an alternative to voting him instead of suggesting a SR of his.In post 502, gob wrote: why vote me instead of naerys who is top wagon?
In post 505, Black wrote:I think gob has a point though. LG went from the top wagon to a vanity wagon this late into D1 even though they are her bottom two scumreads. I haven't had the chance to look at the case yet but I saw the readslistIn post 504, davesaz wrote:In post 363, gob wrote:wtf mindmeld with nairysIn post 361, Naerys wrote: Scum team might be ranger+light+pythonIn post 498, gob wrote:Nice. Ive found you towny btw idk why others havent. no offense but i think sometimes you can be lhf typeStrange how gob seems to TR Naerys but then suggests her as an alternative to voting him instead of suggesting a SR of his.In post 502, gob wrote: why vote me instead of naerys who is top wagon?
I expected to be passed out drunk by now, but drank to much coffee beforehand, so here I amIn post 509, Black wrote:Oh hi. I hope your pseudo-V/LA is going well. I'm here for 5 min before I pass tf outIn post 506, Doctor Drew wrote:Thank you for reminding me of the contradictionIn post 504, davesaz wrote:In post 363, gob wrote:wtf mindmeld with nairysIn post 361, Naerys wrote: Scum team might be ranger+light+pythonIn post 498, gob wrote:Nice. Ive found you towny btw idk why others havent. no offense but i think sometimes you can be lhf typeStrange how gob seems to TR Naerys but then suggests her as an alternative to voting him instead of suggesting a SR of his.In post 502, gob wrote: why vote me instead of naerys who is top wagon?
VOTE: Gob
Your defense of Gob is worthy of itIn post 510, Black wrote: Don't yellow M&M me
Why would scum not ride the bigger wagon so close to eod? Especially when they scum read them......unless are buddiesIn post 514, Black wrote:I wouldn't say I'm defending him, I just see where he's coming from with the questionIn post 512, Doctor Drew wrote:Your defense of Gob is worthy of itIn post 510, Black wrote: Don't yellow M&M me
In post 660, davesaz wrote: Drew's vote for gob felt pretty opportunistic. His iso shades gob a fair amount so it could be legit, but I'm not a big fan of the vote post itself or the posting about it after.
You immediately attack my vote on Gob when I voted them, Dann then calls me scum(and makes an associative so loosely goosey with light, who is also on the Gob wagon).In post 684, davesaz wrote: That holds regardless of gob's alignment.
I honestly missed your vote on gob, I did get the timing of it all wrong(in regards to you at least).In post 689, davesaz wrote:What's your definition of immediately?In post 687, Doctor Drew wrote: You immediately attack my vote on Gob when I voted them
I voted gob after you, then switched to Python, didn't like that wagon given its composition and went to T-bone I think?
Some time later I decided to check if you had a position on gob before you voted.
I suppose it's plausible you might think of all that as a short time if you weren't here for it, but if you look at timestamps it was clearly not immediate, not to mention I even voted with you before rethinking...
Less the actual defense, then the why of the defense.In post 698, JacksonVirgo wrote:Do you consider it unreasonable to defend gob here?In post 677, Doctor Drew wrote: Why are there multiple people lowkey(and not so lowkey) defending gob??
Wut?In post 706, JacksonVirgo wrote:What do you mean exactly by "the why of the defense" it feels clear to me you just dislike that people are defending gob at all, rather than you asking why people are defending. "Why are there multiple" instead of "why are multiple".In post 704, Doctor Drew wrote:Less the actual defense, then the why of the defense.In post 698, JacksonVirgo wrote:Do you consider it unreasonable to defend gob here?In post 677, Doctor Drew wrote: Why are there multiple people lowkey(and not so lowkey) defending gob??
I agree with you that the last post feels like townGob, I feel like at least one of (Dann, Dave, Ranger) is scum trying to use my vote/case on gob to push me.
Ranger really isn't, and would be way more nuanced as scum since she is on the wagon, but keeps pushing Light, who as I said Dann already called me buddies with them.
Dave didn't have an issue with my vote on gob until Dann really started to push me more.
I am starting to think gob was just a pawn(most likely not scum here), and Dann is the connecting lynchpin here
VOTE: Dann
I have some unfortunate news for you(or possibly what you are looking for) as wellIn post 749, Dannflor wrote:bad news for youIn post 747, JacksonVirgo wrote: I don't hate drew but that would mean I would have to pretend I can ever be wrong on my GTH solve
In post 752, T-Bone wrote: I'M AFRAID I HAVE SOME BAD NEWS
But, you are ok with basically limming anyone?In post 752, T-Bone wrote: I'M AFRAID I HAVE SOME BAD NEWS
Maybe I should have......used python(I don't even know if that joke even works here lol)In post 761, usesPython wrote:image tag wrapped in a url tag that doesn't lead to the same domain is cursed as hell
Also, fuck you python, it was just a pic to reference what Bone posted, which he clearly got the reference.In post 764, JacksonVirgo wrote:In post 763, Doctor Drew wrote: Maybe I should have......used python(I don't even know if that joke even works here lol)
Reminds me of the good ol' joke
"I like to use large fancy words so I can sound more photosynthesis"
In post 766, JacksonVirgo wrote: I should change my username from JacksonVirgo to
usesRust or usesTypescript for sure
T-Bone can you do this for me? hehehe
Everyone likes to useDrew thoughIn post 767, usesPython wrote: This game ain't big enough for two uses
I mean, not sure what you mean there......but I am all for Dann(clearly)
And yet here I am back there.In post 790, JacksonVirgo wrote:The other two aren't happening, Drew dropped off of a Dann read (who was my third in my hero solve) which made me want to be there even more just because it felt offIn post 787, humaneatingmonkey wrote: then why vote Dannflor, that's insane
I wasn't gonna vote python yesterday, they are someone who appears towning to me, until they don't. So I didn't see them as scum on Day 1, therefore I didn't vote them, simple as that.In post 1204, gob wrote: VOTE: Doctor Drew
Let's see where this leads. Drew never voted for python yesterday... quite strange. Unlike Ranger who you can make the argument did an anti-wolf play as Jackson just did. Then JV themself, who also did not vote for Python. However there was a replacement and you can make the case that JV was working on his own solve with Black and stuff.
Then you have T-Bone, who I think looks scummy on the surface, but in actuality is pretty towny and has been solving. It's weird T-bone didn't vote Python but the content is solid enough.
Also, I almost always will buss my buddy in a scenario like D1.In post 1215, gob wrote:Well if we're looking off, i think we can shrink that to people who never voted python. Taking yourself out, its T-Bone/Dr.Drew/Ranger. Ranger is (objectively imo) a 50/50. Could be TWTBAWing.In post 1212, JacksonVirgo wrote: That's to say I think one is off and one is on
T-bone as i explained before feeling pretty towny.
So its Drew/Ranger imo, and I think a lot of people r feeling Ranger is towny.
Do you agree with this logic? If so, why not?
Listen, I definitely do not get all the town reading of Gob.In post 1247, humaneatingmonkey wrote:In post 823, DragonEater70 wrote:Why would Python say this? I didn't even townread gob.In post 836, usesPython wrote: The saddest part about this day is we're probably dead here anyways cause the only viable CW is gob and that only gets to 6 votes with light/Black/Ranger/Python/Drew/Dave since gob/Naerys/Dann/HEM/STD/T-Bone/JV all townread gob
Then JV and Python started the Black counterwagon - with daveas.
Why won't they just do gob - if scum? Is gob scum?
Why is Python so sad?
I need someone with triple-digit IQ to weigh in on this.
Wait till you find out what I scored on the SAT's!In post 1249, humaneatingmonkey wrote: > Triple-digit IQ
> Doctor
checks out.
Look worse, how? What's your take on the game so far?In post 1248, Doctor Drew wrote: But wouldn't this analysis of yours make JV and Dave look worse?
Imo, no Gob isn't.....this is why I don't get what you are trying to say here with python's post.In post 1255, humaneatingmonkey wrote: Is Gob implicated, in your opinion?
Because I'm presenting the votecount, the scum's very indicative post, and questions. I don't think they necessarily implicate gob, moreso bringing up valid questions on why it happened the way it did. If people townreading gob see this, and chime in, then we'll learn what they think about it.
So, do you think JV and Dave look bad here? What's your take on that?
In fact, and I think python and I are similar in this regard as scum, we both would read the tea leaves that we could be the lim and do whatever we can to make someone else seem like our buddy......at least on a very surface level.In post 1256, Doctor Drew wrote:Imo, no Gob isn't.....this is why I don't get what you are trying to say here with python's post.In post 1255, humaneatingmonkey wrote: Is Gob implicated, in your opinion?
Because I'm presenting the votecount, the scum's very indicative post, and questions. I don't think they necessarily implicate gob, moreso bringing up valid questions on why it happened the way it did. If people townreading gob see this, and chime in, then we'll learn what they think about it.
So, do you think JV and Dave look bad here? What's your take on that?
I think the way you are presenting things as far as the cw on Black, do make JV and Dave look bad(and I have been one of the few to think Dave isn't as townie as people think........and JV has been one to call Dave super townie).
Again, I think it is a real possibility that Gob is being used by scum, python isn't a dummy and I don't think they would kinda soft defend a buddy in the way you think they are.
Moreso, as I said, I almost guarantee it was to promote the discussion we are having now.In post 1260, JacksonVirgo wrote: Is it possible they exaggerated to act defeated/defeatist to try and gather sympathy?
Python would know how it would look if they took the initiative to push Gob first, they wanted someone else to take the initiative.In post 1264, humaneatingmonkey wrote: But if there's a tiny glimmer that gob could have been the elimination (AND NOT HIM), then i think they should have played that hand. It means the hand wasn't available to be played.
I don't......but I am kinda low key not liking this under the radar push of Gob by HumanIn post 1270, JacksonVirgo wrote: I hope so, I like gob a lot
Well, then what was your goal when making a post that makes gob look bad......and then asking for help to figure it out?In post 1273, humaneatingmonkey wrote: Keep saying that until it's true, Dr Drew
I literally said I don't like how you are trying to push gob, yet acting like you are not pushing gob.In post 1275, humaneatingmonkey wrote: To ask for help to figure it out? As we did? That's the entire point.
Let's say that I really am pushing for gob, so what? Why are you not liking it?
Yet you are trying toIn post 1277, humaneatingmonkey wrote: I am not pushing gob. How does that make you feel?
Oh finally real emotion instead of these closed off responses you have been giving lol.In post 1279, humaneatingmonkey wrote: Well, I'm never thrilled to be gaslit in front of my fucking face. But I can cope.
Legit not trying to piss you off.In post 1281, humaneatingmonkey wrote: Okay buddy.
Wait, this is what started the suspicions of python? No wonder I didn't pick up on anything lol.In post 1407, Naerys wrote:?In post 1406, Ranger wrote:Exactly the issue.In post 1284, Naerys wrote:WTF I Was wary of python since beginning
python was pretty obvious sus with their vote switching in rvs
Are you always so certain on D1?In post 1410, Naerys wrote:In post 1408, Ranger wrote:You sticking to Python is precisely the giveaway.In post 1294, Naerys wrote:Me sticking to limming python beats any scum points you may try to throw at me
Town players often have doubts.
Not always. Sometimes the scum is so clear that no doubts are needed.
This is kinda the same issue I had with HEM, using one tool to find scum yet kinda putting the blinders on to ignore other issues.In post 1438, Ranger wrote:Nice try.In post 1407, Naerys wrote:python was pretty obvious sus with their vote switching in rvs
Dannflor did exactly the same. 6 to 9 to 12.
Yet you dropped the push on him, and kept it on usesPython.
Yes, a lot of talk of these receipts.In post 1449, gob wrote:Let's see em. I wasn't paying attention i will admit.In post 1448, Ranger wrote:Yes. We talked to each other and said one thing, yet meant another.
Again. I have receipts. You’ll be surprised how obvious they were in hindsight, you just weren’t looking.
Well we definitely dodged that bulletIn post 1545, DragonEater70 wrote:nvm, I have made an error and put JacksonVirgo on replacement before the prod expired, and they are back now, so they keep the slot.
Apologies for the inconvenience for all involved.