Open 463: Black Flag Nightless (Game Over)
-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
Haven't had a chance to talk to Tammy yet about pgs. 2-3, but I'm gonna...
VOTE: absta101
I think he's bullshitting his Equinox townread in #48. Equinox never explained her sudden vote switch onto him in #26 at the time he unvoted (which is the time he presumably would have picked up the read) so I really don't see how he's townreading her just off of that.
Piggy wagon is fine. Her reaction to getting voted in #16 is awkward and her answer to Thor's question about why she brought up the V/LA in the first place (#23) is contrived and the fact that she over-explains the answer to what seems to me a simple question reads a bit like panicked defensiveness to me. #39 is also a pretty awkward reaction.
The early back-and-forth between Voided and Thor struck me as off but apparently Voided making RVS banter is his thing so nevermind.
I think N is town mostly for his meta reference line of questioning of Piggy on page 1 and the way he breaks down Piggy's logic in #23.
More to come~-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 58, Thor665 wrote:Are you familiar at all with Piggy's town game?
Our Piggy meta research is still ongoing. We've read two of her scum games (namely this one and this one) and they suggest she's playing to her scum meta here (re: the awkwardness in her posting/reactions), but she has a recently finished town game I want to dig into.
Voided, do you have any thoughts on the Piggy wagon thus far? It's kind of weird that you comment on absta but not that Piggy wagon you essentially kick started.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 65, Thor665 wrote:
Remind me how by reading only scum games you become aware of someone's scum meta.
I slept through that part of class.
That's why I said that the games so farsuggestshe's playing to her scum meta, i.e, it's not fully conclusive and the research is still ongoing.
Did you sleep through the part of class where they taught you how to read?
P-Edit: lmao-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
I'm in agreement with my other head that N looks town based on his piggy questioning. I don't agree with Thor that it was a misrep, a misinterpretation maybe but his motivation looked like genuinely trying to determine piggy's thought process.
Also piggy's Post 23 did come off contrived and a bit over explained for such a simple question; however a game piggy and I were in together just finished this morning, so now I know that piggy has a tendency to start her town games a bit awkwardly. Empire and I had looked at piggy's scum games, as I had been loosely following along with reversed anyway, and had read the game she was nominated for. But what I cared most about was the game that ended this morning. Post 20 reads really genuine though.
I hate the "for now" in absta's Post 25 . Trying to determine if it's personality though. Don't like how he unvotes without revoting, but his "what" in Post 35 reads fairly genuine.
Thor - Did you not notice that other head said she had a recently completed town game that he wanted to read of piggy's? That game just ended this afternoon.
Voided - you say there have Ben no attempts to find the scum on her wagon, but piggy did say in Post 16 who was scum on her wagon and why. It might be a little flimsy but it's still an attempt.
Thor - if you don't learn how to play nicely, I will sit you two on opposite sides of the room and take your hammer away from you. You say that my other head was reactively offensive to you, but you fail to acknowledge that you claimed that you were fitting him with a dunce cap. Thor, I expect more from you, you have two scummies and should know better
Also Thor regarding your question to piggy in Post 75 would you say your playstyle is largely different as town than scum?
Sixty - who made the case in Post 79 ? Please and thank you.
Strongest town read remains N. Leaning town on Piggy and Thorbut he has two scummies so I can't be sure.
I really want to vote sixty right now as that case they just made looks pretty contrived and pushing for an easy mislynch. I need to talk to the other head about that though.
~Tammy-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 83, Thor665 wrote:
In post 82, Cerulean wrote:Thor - if you don't learn how to play nicely, I will sit you two on opposite sides of the room and take your hammer away from you. You say that my other head was reactively offensive to you, but you fail to acknowledge that you claimed that you were fitting him with a dunce cap. Thor, I expect more from you, you have two scummies and should know better
There is a difference between offense 'giving insult' and offense 'attacking' last I checked.
Are you denying the immediate attack to an otherwise normal question?
I see someone who said they had read scum meta and had a town game they wanted to dig into, then you claim they weren't doing things properly because they were only reading scum games (even though they said they were going to read a town game) and that you were fitting them with a dunce cap. You were a bit insulting, and people don't like to be insulted. I see him reacting to that.
It wasn't a normal question, and I think if you read it objectively you'll see how you provoked him and how he responded to you in kind. You were being a bit condescending, you know you were, if you're honest with yourself.
Thor wrote:
In post 82, Cerulean wrote:Also Thor regarding your question to piggy in Post 75 would you say your playstyle is largely different as town than scum?
Since I actively try to emulate my town play as scum - none that I am aware of...also none that anyone has ever been able to show me, because then I would have adjusted. I've never had to adjust.
Then what's the point of the question?
And you prove once again that you're not reading entire posts. In the beginning I agreed with my other head about his line of questioning to piggy. It reads to us as genuinely trying to determine her thought process.
What do you think a out sixty's case on piggy?-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
I'm going to respond here cuz it's easier.
Don't care if you're condescending to me...your big ego can talk to my big ego and have a party. I do know what he was saying because he talked to me about it. He read her scum meta, we both did, and he said it was similar. I told him that it was possible a game we were just in together was about to end and that she behaved similarly there too. It did end today, which is the game he wants to read, in which she was town.
Did you read what he said? It is why he said "suggests" because even though it was similar, I had pointed out a possible town game that showed a similarity of her behavior.
So, would you like to go back and read the part of the post you missed? Namely that he's planning on completing the task your chiding him for not doing and tht he made that clear?
If you believe your town and sum game are indistinguishable I'd like to know what purpose it serves to ask someone if they think you're playing any differently than you did in your other game.
Did you miss the part where I'm leaning town on you?
Because it did. Read genuine to me. Lots of people jumped on the wagon, but he seemed to try to determine her thought process.
Oh no, I read, I was hoping you'd go into a bit more detail about what you actually liked about it.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 88, Voidedmafia wrote:In post 82, Cerulean wrote:Voided - you say there have Ben no attempts to find the scum on her wagon, but piggy did say in Post 16 who was scum on her wagon and why. It might be a little flimsy but it's still an attempt.
Fine, there was an attempt in the early stages, but as I said, that's pretty much all she tries prior to me saying she hasn't done anything. Now, I'm not trying to say that my attack in that regard spurred her to post (though it'd be slightly funny and more incriminating for her if that's true), but any good analysis (or attempted analysis) is still hard to find there.
You seem a little more uptight than I'm used to.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 90, Soul2277 wrote:
Cerulean why meta search piggy, but not absta who you're voting right now? Artemis Fowl micro would be a start. It'd also show similar play in just acting.i
Piggy was a topic of conversation because we'd both read a scum game of hers and had eh feelings about her early posts. I'd also played with piggy in the game that just ended, which is the only type of meta I really take seriously. But I'm sure other head will research absta's meta in time.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
I didn't know her alignment in that game until this afternoon. We were not spoiled in the qt, so I couldn't be sure she was town. So, while we discussed this game and talked about piggy, I told him that there was a possibility it was matching her town game but wouldn't know for sure until this game ended.
~Tammy (it's been Tammy since my first signed post this evening.)-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 95, Thor665 wrote:In post 87, Cerulean wrote:Did you read what he said? It is why he said "suggests" because even though it was similar, I had pointed out a possible town game that showed a similarity of her behavior.
I personally think you're trying to get me to put more meaning into that 'suggests' than there really is.
Counter question, if by 'suggests' he means 'We have yet to have done anything to make the read legit' why even mention it at all?
So, would you like to go back and read the part of the post you missed? Namely that he's planning on completing the task your chiding him for not doing and tht he made that clear?
Hey Thor! Hi! How ya doin? When you get done licking your little boy wounds, us grown ups are going to actually be looking for scum. Care to join us?
Thor wrote:
In post 87, Cerulean wrote:If you believe your town and sum game are indistinguishable I'd like to know what purpose it serves to ask someone if they think you're playing any differently than you did in your other game.
I already answered this - what part didn't you grok?
I thought it was a stupid question? If you think you're town and scum game are indistinguishable its leading and u productive. You're trying to jump on someone, howl and whine. That's obvious. I want you to stop doing it because it doesn't help town.
Thor wrote:
In post 87, Cerulean wrote:Did you miss the part where I'm leaning town on you?
And less than N, yes.
So, your ego is fractured? You may not remember but you've fooled me before. I read you town as hell when you replaced into experimental; I don't easily forget being duped. I'm reading you different enough that you're leaning town, but most town...he'll no.
Thor wrote:
In post 87, Cerulean wrote:Oh no, I read, I was hoping you'd go into a bit more detail about what you actually liked about it.
I actually accused him of sheeping me slightly, so...?
I realize that you like being sheeped...take off your Sheeping blinders and tell me what you think of their case.-
-
Cerulean
-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 99, Thor665 wrote:Link the game pl0x.
The game that ended today? http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p4471519-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 100, Soul2277 wrote:
One other question to ceru being why argue so much with thor who's a town lean like that?
Thors a lean town read. I get my best reads from interaction, and thors fooled me before. I'm leaning town on him, but we can argue to make sure. Besides once he realizes we're town, if he's town as I think, it will make it that much easier for town to work together and win.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
Empire didn't like at all voided's banter with thor in the beginning of the game, but I linked him to kingdom hearts which I had played with voided and he interacted in a similar way, so ithi he just likes rvs. But he's got a rather uptight play.
And we both are wary of equinox.
Right now my biggest suspects are equinox/voided/sixty-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
Meh your read on voided was fine. I didn't like how uptight he felt in Post 88.
I have little experience with equinox but empire left me a message that equinox was his backpocket scum read. She just feels off.
But sixty...read that case.
Actually I'm not waiting...
VOTE: sixty.
This is a righteousness wagon.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 114, Soul2277 wrote:
And ceru os is v/la so what does that actually mean? I won't vote til he shows up since I want to hear from him first.
~Mehdi
It means that I'm leaning town on your slot, but I cant wait for Oversoul to start posting to be sure. I've played with Oversoul and we were team mafia teammates, so I feel like once he starts posting I can get a more solid read of your slot.
~tammy-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 119, Soul2277 wrote:
P-edit: It's a secondary reason for absta. Do you think both scum bussing is likely in a white flag set up (well with the extra black rules).i
Probably not. Well, we only have to find two if them. If I have time tomorrow, I'll see if I can find what someone posted in the team mafia white flag game for strategy. I feel like there was something. Oversoul played I. That game though so he might remember.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
I'm not sure what you're asking. Are you saying that since people are pushing absta it makes him more likely town?
Idk...it's late and I should probably go to bed.
But everyone should read that sixty case on piggy and vote sixty afterward. We've got back rubs and vodka and cookies and cake and wine aboard the sixty train. All aboard!!!-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 132, Soul2277 wrote:I'm saying his way of responding to me on absta feels town and basically asking what you think there.
~Mehdi
Are you referring to equinox? If you are, other head left me a message that her responses remind him of their town game together that she referenced and doesn't suspect her anymore. I also agree that her responses seem to come from a town mindset.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 135, Thor665 wrote:In post 103, Cerulean wrote:In post 95, Thor665 wrote:Counter question, if by 'suggests' he means 'We have yet to have done anything to make the read legit' why even mention it at all?
Because it was on his mind? I don't know. Some people are more transparent and show their work more than others, and the piggy situation was the one thing that we had really discussed.
Thor wrote:
In post 103, Cerulean wrote:I thought it was a stupid question? If you think you're town and scum game are indistinguishable its leading and u productive. You're trying to jump on someone, howl and whine. That's obvious. I want you to stop doing it because it doesn't help town.
I don't know how else to explain to you that it's not an attack to howl and whine (because, let's be honest, I'd admit it if all I wanted to do was make the other player feel derp) but rather a question to seek motivation.
Why is this so hard for you?
Why can you understand other motivation questions but not this one?
Well I know. You'd be calling it derp derp derp until smurfette knocked on your door, but it didn't look to me like a motivation question.
It's not hard for me to understand at all, and I didn't mean to derail your conversation with piggy, but I was trying to understand your motivation for a question which didn't seem like it would have a useful conversation given that I don't think (and you don't either) that your scum and town games are all that different.
Thor wrote:
In post 103, Cerulean wrote:So, your ego is fractured? You may not remember but you've fooled me before. I read you town as hell when you replaced into experimental; I don't easily forget being duped. I'm reading you different enough that you're leaning town, but most town...he'll no.
So I'm a lesser town read than N because, even though I'm doing more townish things I concern you more?
OBVIOUSLY!!!you have two scummies. Why does it matter that you're not gold star town in my eyes? Especially when I've said more than once that I don't think your town and scum game is all that different and you've fooled me as scum before? (if I'm right here, there is a slight difference I've noted). But it doesn't matter if you've done more townish things when you say, essentially, you'd do these things as scum. I'm not ready to lynch you over it, but I'm going to be a little extra cautious considering I've been duped before and all.
Thor wrote:
In post 103, Cerulean wrote:I realize that you like being sheeped...take off your Sheeping blinders and tell me what you think of their case.
You've asked me this before.
I LIKE THE BULK OF THE CASE.
Does it sink through now?
I know you liked the case. I wanted to know what about it made you like it. I wanted a little more detail.
~tammy-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 136, Thor665 wrote:Hurm. Looking over stuff Cerulean is actually obv. town unless Piggy is scum.
Cerulean can still answer my questions though because the slot strikes me as pedantic and it will amuse me.
Pedantic? PFFT. I'm not sure if i prefer being thought of as pedantic or an overbearing, crazy bitch.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 178, Thor665 wrote:I feel like I'm talking to a wall here.
In post 175, Cerulean wrote:Well I know. You'd be calling it derp derp derp until smurfette knocked on your door, but it didn't look to me like a motivation question.
It's not hard for me to understand at all, and I didn't mean to derail your conversation with piggy, but I was trying to understand your motivation for a question which didn't seem like it would have a useful conversation given that I don't think (and you don't either) that your scum and town games are all that different.
1. I've even flat out explained the motivation behind the question.
2. I've also flat out explained how whether or not I think there's a difference in my meta doesn't change the purpose of the question.
3. Get your other head to look at it, if they can't grok it either then I'll bother to explain it again.
So, you have...my bad
Thor wrote:
In post 175, Cerulean wrote:I know you liked the case. I wanted to know what about it made you like it. I wanted a little more detail.
I'll try again.
I said the case was a sheep of mine for the most part and that I liked it. I'm not sure how much clearer I can get then by saying I felt the case was sheepy to where I was going...I mean, that's a pretty intense call.
For anything else you better ask a more pointed and specific question.
I don't think I've ever called you overbearing.
You're assuredly pedantic.
Bleh...I don't like the case. I think it reads intensely shallow, but I'm going to comment on it specifically in a bit, and I wanted you to say something more than "seems cool Brainy smurf". As I was trying to round out my read on you as well.
No you havent called me overbearing, someone's whose posts you'll fall asleep while reading, but not overbearing. Though I have been called overbearing. I was just determining what matter of insult I preferred.
What is the newcomer going on about?-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 141, Voidedmafia wrote:
P-edit: It's a secondary reason for absta. Do you think both scum bussing is likely in a white flag set up (well with the extra black rules).
Not to me, I don't think, but I'd wager that its still likely that scum would bus. If there are people who have a history of hard bussing in the 5p Vengefuls, I think its entirely possible they'd do the same in this game since Lylo is basically like a vengeful where both scum are the GF.
."
Who do you think is bussing right now?-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 142, absta101 wrote:
I'm not confident in my Voided read at all. I've been so wrong about him before.
How do you go from being not confident to being confident enough to vote him by his 5th post in ISo a few posts later?-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 155, JesseSheffield wrote:
In post 112, Equinox wrote:I don't really care for the argument between Cerulean and Thor665, as it looks more to be out of ego than alignment.
Noting this for now.
You should! I'm sure it will be useful for the future.
Jesse wrote:
In post 121, Equinox wrote:
Liked how Thor665 pressured PiggyGal15 earlier. There's also some notion about Thor665 maybe not getting into an ego war because why take offense at someone doing something silly when it doesn't concern him and those posts didn't come off contrived, but I think I need to verify that I'm not doing bogus psychoanalysis first.
Cerulean why didn't you respond to this answer to your question?
Oh gosh! I forgot my manners. Thank you equinox for answering my question.
Why are you asking me this question? Did you think it needed further probing? Did you not think the answer to the question was sufficient? Did you not understand the motivation for the question? Help me out here.
Why aren't you asking better questions? And why in this entire wall post did you not mention anything about sixty?-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 161, PiggyGal15 wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Jesse
That post was just... horrid. Really really horrid. So there's 7 pages now, and all you're doing is reiterating what's already been said, just phrased slightly differently?
Love how you bring up me talking about RVS out of RVS almost double the posts later - while we've been out of RVS for quite some time. Very very interesting indeed.
That whole post looks like you're trying to be active while not really doing anything at all.
p-edit - the fact that you're still not saying what's worth noting in that quote just makes me all the more sure you just posted that to make yourself look busy and active.
This post owns.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 167, JesseSheffield wrote:In post 161, PiggyGal15 wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Jesse
That post was just... horrid. Really really horrid. So there's 7 pages now, and all you're doing is reiterating what's already been said, just phrased slightly differently?
Love how you bring up me talking about RVS out of RVS almost double the posts later - while we've been out of RVS for quite some time. Very very interesting indeed.
That whole post looks like you're trying to be active while not really doing anything at all.
p-edit - the fact that you're still not saying what's worth noting in that quote just makes me all the more sure you just posted that to make yourself look busy and active.
Actually they were pretty specific questions that I'd love to get the answer to. And I just had to point out how disingenuous you were being about wanting to get out of RVS so bad and trying to get out of it and never look back. As for me, I don't care either way. Active lurking blah blah blah... like three posts into this game. Chill.
She didn't accuse you of active lurking. She accused you of trying to appear active while actually contributing nothing of importance. There's a difference.
Jesse wrote:
In post 162, Soul2277 wrote:In post 120, Cerulean wrote:Equinox - why are you townreading Thor?
In post 106, Cerulean wrote:In post 100, Soul2277 wrote:
One other question to ceru being why argue so much with thor who's a town lean like that?
Thors a lean town read. I get my best reads from interaction, and thors fooled me before. I'm leaning town on him, but we can argue to make sure. Besides once he realizes we're town, if he's town as I think, it will make it that much easier for town to work together and win.
I think that answers her own question fine.
Okay that's pretty much what I thought, you didn't really follow that.
In post 120 Cerulean asked Equinox why he had a town read on Thor, when really he said:
In post 112, Equinox wrote:I don't really care for the argument between Cerulean and Thor665, as it looks more to be out of ego than alignment. The Empire head sounds like town; I might dig deeper to see if he has any scum games, but his posts so far are reminiscent of Micro 53, which is good. Thor665 might be town, but take that with a grain of salt. Actually, now that I think about it, it might be worth a look to see if Thor665 gets into ego wars as scum. Agree that N's probably town.
which
1. Is a null read not a town read.
2. Is a really good way of throwing in his opinion that the Cerulean/Thor argument is town/town without explicitly saying so. And which is a really good way of covering a scum buddy's back when they're getting attacked without explicitly doing it. And which is a really good way of going back and saying oh hey we weren't buddies because I just said he sooounds like town, not that he is town... without explicitly stating that.
So then Equinox answered Cerulean's inquiry about why he had a town read on Thor, but Cerulean never acknowledged Equinox's explanation (even though he specifically probed for it). Which in my opinion is a great way of prodding a scum buddy to maybe explain something a little bit that they think they might be missing or looking bad on. And not answering that commentary is a good way of getting it out there and dropping it without buddying up. Considering its about Thor, who in my opinion is pretty much the "lead town" player, it would be great for both Cerulean and Equinox if they were scum to look and get that player on their side. Or at least not against them. And also considering Cerulean's been doing quite a bit of playing nice with Thor.
Wow...are you a runner? Cuz if you are, you can probably run twice your normal distance after that stretch.
Also, when I'm playing nice with someone they don't usually call me pedantic.
I feel like there's a buzzword for what you're doing here whatisitcalled? Whatisitcalled? Whatisitcalled?
Also, have you comments on sixty Yet? If not, why not?-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 179, JesseSheffield wrote:Thor: That's more of a commentary on the style of play he's exhibiting, which ties into why I think he's clueless.
Vote: Cerulean
Wondering if Cerulean will actually respond now...
Probably not until the point in time of the game that I get to your question.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 181, Thor665 wrote:
@Cerulean - of course the case is shallow, it's built off RVS, how magical and deep can it really get? What does it being shallow have to do with anything? The question is whether or not it makes sense and shows scumhunting motivation from Sixty and scummy motivation from Piggy.
Shallow means I don't think they were actually assessing piggy's motivations. Why would you build a case so son out of rvs without actually trying to determine alignment? Cases make sense all the time, but the case doesn't show Scumhunting motivation from my point of view, rather it shows determination to appear as if scumhunting.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 185, JesseSheffield wrote:In post 180, Cerulean wrote:What is the newcomer going on about?
I see you're going to be fun to play with. Although I can't possibly understand the superiority complex you seem to have taken upon yourself given your play so far in this game.
I'malmostalways fun to play with. But you know what? You're cute. Tell you what...867-5309...shhh...don't tell anyone.
I don't have a superiority complex, but hmmm, let's *looks at the votes* you're not really one to talk when you're vote's sitting on town...for demonstrating a superiority complex? K.
What are your thoughts on sixty? Why did your catchup post avoid making any comments on most of the players?-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 196, Sixty wrote:In post 135, Thor665 wrote:In post 134, Sixty wrote:
This weCerulean 180 wrote:Bleh...I don't like the case. I think it reads intensely shallow, but I'm going to comment on it specifically in a bit, and I wanted you to say something more than "seems cool Brainy smurf". As I was trying to round out my read on you as well.mustsee. ...eventually, after you’re done stirring up enmityponies.
I'm not spreading enmity. Why is it every time a girl shows some assertiveness it gets twisted to hostility?
Hey, weCerulean 176 wrote:I'm not sure if i prefer being thought of as pedantic or an overbearing, crazy bitch.resemblethat remark.
-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 202, Sixty wrote:Tammy: Stop bitching at others please and thank you. Between Thor and Jesse, you're already making this game a painful drag. It's one thing to try and rile people up to figure out alignments, but at this stage it feels like you're pointlessly hamming it up.
You're so awesome.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 79, Sixty wrote:In post 16, PiggyGal15 wrote:Did you see that v/la post[from Soul2277]? Holy crap guys! Scum has seriously been caught!
(jk UNVOTE: )
I understand N bandwagoning, he likes bandwagons, but Equinox didn't even put a silly sentance in there to make me feel better about being brought to L-2 on page 1
VOTE: Equinox
Clearly a lazy band-wagoning scum looking for an easy lynch.
Here we see that the V/LA thing was a joke (she was voting Soul2277 as RVS), and she shifts to Equinox.In post 20, PiggyGal15 wrote:Because going v/la is a null tell, so I was joking about it being a scummy-as-hell tell ^.^
(seriously though, votes on Equinox are good votes)
This no longer sounds like a joke; she changed her story. If it was a joke, why a) so much explanation and b) is she trying to make others comfortable? There is no Town motivation in helping others find their feet during RVS.In post 23, PiggyGal15 wrote:I brought up the v/la as a means to end my RVS while letting things stay in RVS because I know things are going to stay in RVS even when things actually get serious. It happens. It's why I don't like RVS, because even when it obviously come to an end, new players that haven't posted yet still look to RVS to join in the conversation - so it was a way to let the other 5ish people come in without feeling the need to awkwardly stay in RVS - call my logic flawed, but when you know something is inevitable, it's best just to give in and join their side - which I get a feeling will become my lynch very soon :/
Where is the scum motivation. I mean I hate to be a drag and make this game a pain in the ass, and bitch at you about it, but this is really weak.
tiercepuppy wrote:
In post 39, PiggyGal15 wrote:D'aw <3 L-1 already? I feel da loves <3
No analysis; calling one scum on the wagon and not bothering to deconstruct it is a lazy attempt to show work. She is hoping the pressure will go away if she seems disinterested on the wagon, but she is not trying to scumhunt. This continues here:In post 46, PiggyGal15 wrote:My wagon is wonderful <3 I think there's at least one scum on it
1) PiggyGal's description of her own meta is false. Meta was one of the main tools we used to read her as scum in xudeR aifaM esreveR. This might be obliviousness to her own meta, but we have trouble believing she really thinks her Town/scum meta is indistinguishable when she just came out of a game where she was pinned accurately as scum on meta.In post 72, PiggyGal15 wrote:Lawl, don't worry bout my meta, seriously, I can self meta for you right here - I'm a lazy-troll as town and a slightly-inclined-but-still-lazy-troll as scum, basically, there's no difference in my play (as of recent) and meta'ing me is just a waste of time.
[snip]
Voided's town, Thor's scaring me with his laid-backness, absta is just being scummy, and I still don't like dogs.
2) absta101 is scummy, yet deserves no vote. She sees him gather suspicion, but is more concerned elsewhere. The question is where, which leads to:
3) Where is Equinox in this post?
4) Note that she is not analyzing her own wagon:
She starts with Voidedmafia and Thor, ignores N and Equinox, mentions absta and does nothing about it, and we are scummy in some undisclosed form. Why those four players in particular?In post 71, callforjudgement wrote:
Okay, so here is where I really start to have a big problem with this case. You say that meta was a part of your case. I'm assuming you're referring to reversed mafia are you not? I followed that game and re-red your case when you brought it up. In that case you said that piggy was not competent at either alignment. So, you acknowledge that as town she's not competent, and then you chide her for not deconstructing her wagon immediately, which is something that I've only rarely seen in a game, even though she did single out one person for being scum on her wagon and give a reason why. As I said to voided, it was flimsy, but it was still a reason. You're acting like there is none, and that you're familiar with her meta, which according to you is incompetent but then expecting her to be competent.
It looks to me like you are going for an easy mislynch. Your entire case is weak and I'm wondering why you made a case so early in the game, especially before you tried to ascertain motivations. To me it looks like you are trying to assign an alignment to piggy rather than find out what her true alignment is.
Feel free to bitch at me all you want and make it perfectly clear how much you'd prefer it if I weren't in the game. It's not going to change my opinion of your alignment. Seeing you act like town, interested in finding mafia, is what I'm looking for. That I'm not seeing.
Tiercepuppy wrote:
No word on Equinox and no effective action regarding absta101 or us.In post 74, PiggyGal15 wrote:[Thor's]laid backness scares me because since when are you so lax? o.O In fact, UNVOTE:
VOTE: Thor
call me paranoid, but you're posts are giving me scum chills.
Unvote: absta101(L-1)
Vote: PiggyGal15
I don't get the point. What is the scum motivation to give a scum read to Thor?-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 209, Sixty wrote:(Did we really say that fifth sentence?)
Yes, you did.
More from me later. Still doing stuff.
~Empire.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 202, Sixty wrote:Tammy: Stop bitching at others please and thank you. Between Thor and Jesse, you're already making this game a painful drag. It's one thing to try and rile people up to figure out alignments, but at this stage it feels like you're pointlessly hamming it up.
So, did you really just stop in here to toss a little insult my way, and not actually do anything with the game itself. It really sucks you drew a scum pm this game. (I suppose the response to the case could be you, but you have a good memory and would remember writing something in a case so I'm guessing not.). There was no town purpose to this post at all, no matter what way you try to dress it up.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
Tierce, I already talked to Tammy about trying not to get into fights. I'm with you 100% that all it does is bog the thread down in meaningless bullshit. That's a part of why I backed off from this thread for a bit -- Thor's comments really pissed me off because I hate being condescended to. I didn't want to get into a spar with him because it was going to cloud my abilities for this game and, even worse, cloud the thread.
I didn't come here for any bullshit drama. I came here to play mafia with what I believe to be a great roster. So let's just cut this out now.
(I still think you're scum, though.)
~Empire.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 217, Sixty wrote:Tammy, let's see if I can get my point across.
You came into this game and started being hostile toward Thor and toward Jesse. You were not being assertive, you were being insulting, which becomes even more jarring when you explain your hydra partner's reaction to an insult as a natural reaction. As I said before, it's one thing to try and rile players up for reactions. But scum will also be offended over matters that have nothing to do with alignment. If you call someone stupid, if you act condescendingly toward someone--people will be irked no matter their alignment. As scumhunting tools go, it's quite flawed and damages the game in general because it tends to spill all over the thread.
I didn't say anything as you pushed first Thor and then Jesse, because I know that's what you do and that it can help you read people. However, I also know that you can put up an hostile front as scum, whether or not it's real anger. My issue is that I don't see you taking any definite conclusions from these back and forths. I see you arguing just to argue, and that is a scummy behavior and makes the game unfun for everyone.
I've been restraining myself. My hydra partner is one of my favorite players, and it's fun to play the puppy persona, so I'm trying to focus on the positive aspects of this game. There was no word on my feelings about playing with you, so why do you feel the need to bring that up?
I'm not trying to be hostile, I'm trying to get you to please tone it down. SpyreX asked this of you on Maf.Maiden, you kept doing it--I don't know how effective this request is, but I know youcanand have done it before, so please try to be less argumentative for argument's sake.
Actually I'm not even being hostile. I'm fine; am I asking questions and pushing some buttons, yeah. You bring up mafia behind the maiden and that was a very different game in a very different time in my life. I probably shouldn't have played mafia this summer as much of the crap that had been going on bled into the game. It resolved itself near the end of the game.
Did I push back with Thor? Yes, it's pretty much the only way you can try to determine his alignment. If you let him he'll just run you over and tell you what he wants you to believe his alignment is and what you should think about everyone. I have a leaning town read on Thor from our interaction. I think our interaction was mostly continued as he was trying to get a read on me.
Jesse is, well, Jesse's special. I had a scum read on him for his first post, but then he wrote about feeling salty about Thor lynching him day one when Thor was scum. That read town to Empire, so I'm not sure. I also was a bit swayed by his start date, but then I looked at his number of posts and he only has 342, which means he's not as experienced as I originally thought, so the jury's out. He seems like he's trying, but I'll have to see what he brings next. He didn't answer my question though about why I didn't respond to a question that was answered sufficiently, which just reads weird considering he came up with a long drawn out theory for why I asked a question and didn't follow up.
Let's see if I can illustrate what I'm talking about:
tierce wrote:
In post 103, Cerulean wrote:Hey Thor! Hi! How ya doin? When you get done licking your little boy wounds, us grown ups are going to actually be looking for scum. Care to join us?
These two cross a line. Yes, they are not as aggressive as some other players, and they are not breaking any rules, but it's not helping. You're being demeaning.In post 180, Cerulean wrote:What is the newcomer going on about?
Thor seemed insulted I wasn't considering him the towniest person here.
Jesse had just shown up today and voted me for not answering a question or something like that. I had no idea what he was talking about.
tierce wrote:
This seems out of line, as I've seen you note things and make quote walls for future reference. Why does Jesse deserve this level of sarcasm?In post 192, Cerulean wrote:
You should! I'm sure it will be useful for the future.In post 155, JesseSheffield wrote:
Noting this for now.In post 112, Equinox wrote:I don't really care for the argument between Cerulean and Thor665, as it looks more to be out of ego than alignment.
Okay maybe this is. Struck me as odd.
tierce wrote:
In post 192, Cerulean wrote:
Oh gosh! I forgot my manners. Thank you equinox for answering my question.In post 155, JesseSheffield wrote:
Cerulean why didn't you respond to this answer to your question?In post 121, Equinox wrote:Liked how Thor665 pressured PiggyGal15 earlier. There's also some notion about Thor665 maybe not getting into an ego war because why take offense at someone doing something silly when it doesn't concern him and those posts didn't come off contrived, but I think I need to verify that I'm not doing bogus psychoanalysis first.
Why are you being like this? It seems you have some sort of vendetta against Jesse. You've been demeaning toward him from the moment he started posting.In post 200, Cerulean wrote:
I'mIn post 185, JesseSheffield wrote:
I see you're going to be fun to play with. Although I can't possibly understand the superiority complex you seem to have taken upon yourself given your play so far in this game.In post 180, Cerulean wrote:What is the newcomer going on about?almostalways fun to play with. But you know what? You're cute. Tell you what...867-5309...shhh...don't tell anyone.
I don't have a superiority complex, but hmmm, let's *looks at the votes* you're not really one to talk when you're vote's sitting on town...for demonstrating a superiority complex? K.
He was demeaning to me and I responded with a joke. I don't know Jesse; I don't have a vendetta towards anyone.
Why are you buddying Jesse?
Oh my strong town read on N is gone. I saw him posting today elsewhere and he didn't show up here.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 232, JesseSheffield wrote:In post 227, Cerulean wrote:Jesse is, well, Jesse's special. I had a scum read on him for his first post, but then he wrote about feeling salty about Thor lynching him day one when Thor was scum. That read town to Empire, so I'm not sure. I also was a bit swayed by his start date, but then I looked at his number of posts and he only has 342, which means he's not as experienced as I originally thought, so the jury's out. He seems like he's trying, but I'll have to see what he brings next. He didn't answer my question though about why I didn't respond to a question that was answered sufficiently, which just reads weird considering he came up with a long drawn out theory for why I asked a question and didn't follow up.
Whoops, wrong. If you’d looked a little deeper you’d have realized I’ve never played with Thor on this account which means I played him on an alt. I’ve got three other alts and I’ve been here since 2008 sooo... that just got awkward. And if you’re going to act like an ass to me what do you really think the chances are I’m going to answer a non-serious question. Also, point out where I got demeaning towards you first... because that definitely never happened. You can't act like that and then expect anyone who's been here for a while be like "oh wtf I've never run across anyone act like this before this is outrageous and I'm going to throw a temper tantrum and play to his game". It doesn't work like that.
Getting a scum read off someone from their very first post... that sounds like a really solid strategy and if you have no idea what I’m talking about maybe you can go read a little harder because it didn’t seem like anyone else had any difficulty understanding.
Wow. Okay, so you are not new. Then what's with you expecting a sort of kumbaya game? And how come you're not actually reading people's alignments.
My question was 100% serious, so what was the point of your question to me then?
If you got offended because I asked the newcomer thing, I really have no clue. You voted for me for not answering a question. I had no idea what you were going on about. And now that I am through the thread, I'm even more flabbergasted. It was quite obvious I was responding to things as going along and you tried to make it look like I was ignoring you.
You're acting all butthurt because I wondered what the person whose posts I hadn't read yet was going on about by voting for me because I hadn't responded to something I hadn't read yet? You insulted my play, you might want to remember that.
Now you're behaving badly. I never insulted you. Was I a bit snarky, sure. A little rude, maybe. But I didn't insult you. Sure it's possible to get a scum read on someone from their first post, just like its possible to get a town read. I don't know where the problem is there.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
In post 231, Thor665 wrote:In post 182, Soul2277 wrote:
In post 194, Cerulean wrote:Also, when I'm playing nice with someone they don't usually call me pedantic.
What does me being rude do to affect a claim that you're playing nice?
It seems an odd claim to make. If you're playing nice with someone, you tend not to do things that will warrant you getting called things like pedantic as it demonstrates you're doing things to get on the persons nerves or making them not think well of you, which is kind of the opposite thing you're going for when playing nice.
[/quote]Thor wrote:
In post 199, Cerulean wrote:Shallow means I don't think they were actually assessing piggy's motivations. Why would you build a case so son out of rvs without actually trying to determine alignment? Cases make sense all the time, but the case doesn't show Scumhunting motivation from my point of view, rather it shows determination to appear as if scumhunting.
How does it show the appearance of scumhunting but not scumhunting?
It doesn't look to be assessing motivations or alignment. It's more here's what this post says and it's scummy, but not does this post demonstrate scum or scum motivation.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
Thor, Tammy's out all day today, so unfortunately we haven't been able to get together and mull over your question but we will as soon as she comes back.
Anyway, regarding Voided, it's no secret we've had a scumread on him for a while now as I believe Tammy mentioned earlier. Rereading his ISO, this post stood out for me the most. He basically tries to cast his net wide, shedding suspicion on a number of people while taking no actual affirmative stance on anything. It's something I've seen scum do relatively often to give their reads an air of legitimacy while at the same time opportunistically opening themselves up to the possibility of jumping on any one of a number of wagons (hey Vi and Tierce, remember this post?). Might definitely want to consider moving our vote there.
#82 is kind of shitty too as it reads like he's really reaching for reasons to FoS Piggy.
~Empire.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
Erm, Tammy calls a Voided/you/Equinox scumteam #108. Equinox posts her reads list in #112 that reminded us of Micro 53 and makes us realize she might be town here. Jesse comes in during post #155 and posts what we believe to be a really bad and scummy post. So now the scum team has become Voided/you/Jesse at that point in the game. I don't really see the problem in her pushing all three of those lynches.
PS: Vi, you're doing it again now.
~Empire.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
Well, you're talking to someone who once read through and linked to 5 of someone's games to get mafia lynched. So yeah.
Be assured, this storm is coming for you too.
~Empire.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
Ok Jesse, here's why your #155 sucked ass. Your question regarding Voided was terrible and it seemed like you were cherry picking only a single statement and ignoring the rest of his comments. The Piggy point, at the time, just seemed like a parroting of what Sixty had said earlier. Mentioning that you were "noting" Equinox's one statement publicly was completely superfluous. Your question towards us was also bad -- there was nothing to be said regarding Equinox's answer. We got the answer and that was it. It read to us at the time like you were also looking to create a phantom link between our slot and Equinox, which you ended up actually doing in #167.
However, there are certain comments you've made throughout the game that seem pretty genuine. Your paranoia regarding Thor in #210 and the constant frustration you've had against my other head seem real, especially context with your stances regarding the more calm/logical players in posts like #206 and the aforementioned #210.
Is that satisfactory?
(By the bye, way to ignore the thrust of the post you're quoting.)
~Empire.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
Saying and doing are very different things. I'm extremely lazy as mafia (as the Black Mask game should show you if you've read it). The fact that I've earned "creepy stalker points" by reading and linking you to one of your posts from one of your recent scum games that suggest you are constructing your reads similarly is something that would never, ever, ever come from me as scum (PS: at the risk of tipping my hand early, Tierce's case against PiggyGal is also reminding me of her play in Abarat 2 and Doctor Who.
Also, I'm not from Westeros. I'm from EM (which is where I know Regfan and everyone from Mini 1373). MS is my first experience with forum mafia and I joined fairly recently, which is why I have so few completed games. Meta was extremely important to me over there, too, but unfortunately, more difficult to do since the games move faster on EM and people cannot access other past games during a game.
~Empire.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
Jesse, I get where you're coming from and I hear that argument all the time when I discuss theory with others but two things:
1) You're assuming that I am a skilled player (I'm not).
2) It's not as easy as you think. In my experience, people either conform to the set of characteristics/playstyle that defines their meta or will awkwardly try to change it in a way that come across as forced or unnatural.
~Empire.-
-
Cerulean Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: November 8, 2012
I apologize for the incoming wall that's about to happen, but etc.
There are a few things I'd like to address and if you haven't realized yet that the puppy is scum, I want to show you more for why they are.
First - Thor - we wont be knocking our heads together yet as our schedules for this part of the week don't mesh all that well. But we are both in complete agreement that the puppies are mafia.
Second - saw the question about whether other head played at westeros and meta research. It actually wouldn't matter. And no the games are not easy to identify who is who. The alts are constantly changing and we wo have played in the games have a hard time finding things when we try to go back. It wouldn't matter anyway because meta research is something that isn't allowed to be used as part of a case against someone, which is probably why this head doesn't do it.
Third - the situation with Jesse. And I could just get into a wall off I suppose, but I'm not on my computer which makes quote striping near impossible. I know, sadness abounds right? I'm trying to make sense of the reaction to me. I realize at times I'm a difficult person to play with, but I don't know exactly where you got that I have a superiority complex. I can assure you that I actually dont. I'm a decent Scumhunter most games, but the thing I'm best at is looking town when I'm town. I am, however, a bit temperamental with a tendency to be a bit sarcastic/condescending to those I think are scum or exhibiting scummy behavior. So, when you voted me in Post 179 for not responding when I hadn't made it to that part of he thread yet, that part of my reaction kicked in. Maybe some of it was unwarranted, who knows. Nothing was intentionally insulting.
I'm not sure in Post 206 why you're bringing in my question about piggy's case as scummy. My other head thinks that some things you brought up read genuine and town, so I'm going to go with that, and try not to view it as a mischaracterization of my interaction with Thor. I made it clear that I was trying to get a rea on Thor. Said more than once that he has fooled me in the past so I was going to interact with him to try o get a read on him. I have a scum read on sixty. My question to Thor about sixty's case on piggy was both to help me round out my read on thor and to get perspective on piggy/sixty. As far as my Post 106 that has nothing to do with pandering. He had recently voted us, but I was sure in time he'd realize we were town, and we'd be able to work together instead of against each other. I realize you don't know me, but thors not the type of player that I'd argue with and potentially provoke as scum. Well maybe one day, but I'm very insecure about my scum game, and would have gone a very different route to try to get on thors good side. Yeah I know self meta is useless.
Regarding Post 232 I do get early reads on people from their first posts and sometimes I've been really right. I'm not stuck in my reads though and they fluctuate so sometimes I'll get a scum read and later posts will tell me I've been wrong, but you have to start somewhere.
I'm confused about Post 244 because you're not taking into account the whole picture. There was no we were soft attacking piggy. Both of us had read a couple games with piggy!scum and her first couple of posts did look similar. However when we talked about it, I had said that she also reminded me of a game we were currently playing in (I was dead in though) they had just lynched the day before but the mod hadn't posted the flip. I told him it was possible the game would be ending soon I'd they lynched correctly, in which case she would be town and playing similarly there as here. There is no we are waiting to attack piggy later as I have a town read on her based on the game we played together, which is the type of meta this head focuses mostly on. In Post 82 I said I was leaning town on piggy.
I believe other head voted absta's for unvoting without re-voting. I in post 82 said another post by absta's felt genuine and that I wanted to vote for sixty but needed to talk to empire. When we talked about being a hydra we agreed that we would be unified on our votes, and I was respecting that.
I'll focus on the sixty piggy case, maybe tonight probably tomorrow it's getting late, but you asked about how scum reacted to piggy so I went back and looked at the game we just finished. I'm horrible at paying attention to wagons and just said she was a mislynch I wouldn't lose any tears over in that game, but at one point three out of four scum had jumped aboard the piggy wagon as the early mislynch.
You are, I'd you are town, misinterpreting my questions concerning piggy. I think piggy is likely town; I think sixty is mafia. My questions to people about sixty and their case on piggy was to pin down opinions on sixty. I am in no way trying to push others to do my dirty work. I think the case on piggy is bad and I want others opinions on it/them. Cases exist to tell you as much if not more about the case maker than the person the case is on?
I don't like the way you say "finally" like I took weeks to say something instead of a day. It is these types of things that make me doubt my other heads reading of you as genuine. For instance when you voted us for not responding although it should have been clear I was making my way through the thread and responding to things as they came.
I don't feel stuck with the sixty wagon. I have a scum read there. I'm perfectly happy with my vote where it is and will eat a bag full of top hats if they come back town here.
The only person I have argued with is Thor. And I made it clear that I was trying to get a read on him as well. Did we talk around each other a bit? Sure. I feel like an idiot that I missed his answer about piggy and the Thor meta question. I don't think he caught what I was pointing out about my other head and the meta research until the end, and we're only starting to get somewhere on the debate over the sixty piggy case (not to mention what my read is on him), But beyond that I've posed questions to equinox, who I had a scum read, and to you, who I had a scum read on, and to voided, who I have a scum read on. (and to be fair the only people I showed real attitude/snarkiness/condescension to were you and Thor)
Foruth N - regarding your town read. It didn't have anything to do with your meta talk though the way you questioned her kniwledge of you band wagoning felt natural enough. Where we got out town read of you was your Post 24 where you were like "let me get this straight...". Felt really town.
And fifth - the reponse to sixty will come later. This wall is long enough and I have a couple other things I have to do tonight. I'll try to come back to this tonight but it might be tomorrow.
~tammy
-