In post 27, House wrote:Do you think people will townread you for asking dumb questions?
You really ARE House...
In post 27, House wrote:Do you think people will townread you for asking dumb questions?
In post 37, SIR CYANIDE wrote:In post 34, Riabi wrote:In post 30, SIR CYANIDE wrote:
In post 24, deathfisaro wrote:Okay someone who is not Drezi, Victor, or croboss give me a good town reason to build a half lynch wagon on the first page.
I can see how scum can benefit from such actionsbut hard to find a reason for me join in.
How can scum possibly benefit from it? Serious question.
Scum benefit if the wagon is on a townie. Because wagoning/potentially lynching a townie is obviously good for scum.
I really don't think anyone is going to wagon someone in rvs to the extent where it could lead to a hammer outside of policy lynches (do these even happen anymore?) and newbie games. We don't really have any information, wagoning on someone may give us more information so I think it's pro-town.
In post 42, SIR CYANIDE wrote:When have you ever seen a quicklynch outside of newbie games? They don't happen. People say they do, but they don't. Give mequicklynches that happened outside of newbie games and marathon games in the past 3 years. What you're saying with the 'not worth it' line is that on a risk/reward equivalent base you think the risk is higher than the reward on average but seeing as the odds for a quicklynch happening are so astronomical I have to disagree.two
Additionally, if someone hammers you can make a very strong point for them being scum if the person who's hammered flips town. Trading 1 town for an almost-certain-scum is still worth it in my book.
In post 49, SIR CYANIDE wrote:Worse, you may not get shot for it because you're more likely to be vanilla town if you mispredicted the set-up. You stated 'innocent child, tracker, 20/80 something/something', guess what if there is no tracker?
In post 49, SIR CYANIDE wrote:I went through more open games (about 7 I think?) in addition to the ones I already went through and literally all of them have IC so I think that's a safe assumption to make.
In post 112, SIR CYANIDE wrote:Well, now we do heavily suspect the set-up to have an IC, right? Does anyone actually disagree with this? If there is anyone who thinks it's unlikely for this game to have an IC, please speak up and give your reasoning.
In post 113, House wrote:In post 112, SIR CYANIDE wrote:
There's no direct impact but I think we should devote some posts to discuss what optimal IC strategy is. The IC may not directly know what his/her optimal play is, so I feel we should discuss the protocol for the IC's claim. Why are people against this?
This is ridiculous. It's not like the IC has any actual abilities outside of becoming confirmed town.
The strategy for IC is pants-shittingly obvious. Play a town game and don't claim unless run up, because an IC is instant NK bait & nothing more than a named townie once outed.
You harping on about something so simplistic makes me think you're just trying to look invested without actually being productive at all.
In post 117, Drezi wrote:In post 114, SIR CYANIDE wrote:Hammerer: claim
IC: I'm IC
Hammerer: pm to mods so we know you are IC
Wagonners: yeah go pm the mods
IC: no, I'll do it first thing next day
Hammerer: no, you have to pm the mod or you're getting a hammer
IC: I'll do it the first thing next day, we're not in LyLo, if I don't do it the next day you can still lynch me, blahblahblah
Hammerer&Wagonners: *more discussion ensues*
Wagonners: unvote: IC
Wagonners: vote Player2 (L-1)
Player2: actually I'm IC
...
Player3: no, actually I'm IC
In post 124, SIR CYANIDE wrote:
True (and wifom'ish but nearly everything is wifom'ish so whatever), but it is unlikely that the mafia predicted that there would be such an elaborate amount of discussion about the set-up and may have concluded that the value they gain from having an inferior PR (or at least deemed inferior by popular opinion) outweighs the value they lose from being predictable.
In post 151, deathfisaro wrote:
You're being overly obsessed with IC when there's no reason to. I'm sorry if there's IC in this game that I find IC the most disposable PR out of all 5.
In post 172, Drezi wrote:
You're not as smart as you think you are, so do us all a favor and stop acting like a condescending jerk (or I WILL vote you ), this game is meant to be recreational and fun.
SIR CYANIDE wrote:In post 199, acryon wrote:Yes, which is ridiculous. I agree that it is silly that I came into the game for real on page 8 and had little to comment on other than a pile of setup discussion. Only scum gains from that. There should be more pushing for reactions, which town wins from.
While I have you here, do you honestly think 177 comes from scum?
I know this question is probably not directed at me, but I have rarely seen more obvscum. Lets take a look:
(you guys post wayyy too much i can hardly catch up)
Disinterested. Doesn't feel like reading all of the text and is justifying it here. You can easily catch up, it's just a matter of reading the words. It's not a difficult concept.
Who actually claimed IC?
Nobody claimed IC, which he doesn't know because he only skimmed through the topic and saw a lot of IC this IC that.
I can't find it where someone actually claimed?
Because he didn't even search, reading any post what-so-ever would tell him that. Because I'm a lazy piece of shit as well in general I know this tactic and it's one I often employ myself.
House: I feel like he knows what he's doing and is smart about it, but he's also seems authoritative and gets angered fairly easily.
A random comment, he was going to 'post his thoughts' and after all those pages this is the only thing he comes up with.
Thats the only person that really stood out to me hopefully I can dig deeper. (haha I guess I'm pretty bad at mafia)
He is not digging deeper, he is once again trying to justify his lack of investment by promising us he will 'dig deeper' (which he probably won't). He finishes it with another justification ('haha im bad at mafia'). Basically this entire post is him apologizing/trying to get away with the fact that he can't be fucked to actually read through the topic and play the god damn game.
Now, there is ancorrelation between his behavior and being scum.EXTREME
In post 221, croboss wrote:In post 217, NJAC wrote:Ok @croboss: Let's say you're not scum, who's scum then? And who do you think is town?
Also, what discussion were you expecting to generate with your vote on SC? Why exactly did you unvote him? Was the discussion you wanted already generated?
I don't know, I find myself fairly bad at determining reads.
I was expecting to create enough disccusion so I could create another post, which could then lead me to make a few more.. I unvoted because I have nothing agaisnt him. The discussion I wanted was already generated because of my earlier post where I conclude my theory.
The reason I jumped on the biggest wagon is because it is likely to produce the most discussion if you near someone that one step closer to a lynch then just randomly doing it on someone with no votes.
In post 225, House wrote:In post 204, Lalendra wrote:
I don't think he's that condescending IRL, it's just part of the online persona.
Time out... were you at TitusMeet?
In post 299, pisskop wrote:Because it's on you, and I'm not convinced that your generally erratic and abrasive town play is completely responsible. I want to see Death and Rach before I start shifting gears, too.
I liked your 258, though. When you posted it it looked too convoluted to be anything more than poor clutching, but it has its merits.
. In addition, stagnation of a game comes in large part because scum are fairly happy with the game. They would, and have fight the apathy should they stand to lose.
And I don't see a House Dooku ScumTeam. So its not all bad.
What did you mean when you said this? If you were going to be translated for somebody who had never played mafia before, what would you say
You seem much more confident than in previous games of yours. A lot of what I saw as idealism has left in favor of a more predatory flavor.
In post 255, SIR CYANIDE wrote:Especially because Riabi didn't join the IC debate.
About that debate. Do you think scum are more likely to encourage, ignore, or actively try to smush setup debates like that? It obviously helps them, but if all the world's a stage.
In post 90, Lalendra wrote:Why isn't it possible for scum to throw out misinformation? I.e., if there's no tracker, that could be VT mispredicting the setup, or scum deliberately misrepresenting the setup in an effort to feign ignorance and seem towny. Both seem equally likely. The amount of thought you're putting into this makes me uneasy, and this post reads like a setup.
A safe assumption to make, OR this is scum who knows that there is an IC and is trying to rationalize why he might know that so that when the IC is discovered, and it seems like he knew too much, he can just go "well I said right in this post here that I was just assuming based on the completed games!"
This. I was confrontation and attempts criticize SC's abstract with further abstraction. In general, the more complex the wifom, the less likely it is to be true. Her posting after suggests she hadn't meant to draw heat, and her other scum games that I know about don't quite sync up with here. She is read as nulltown at this point; and is in fact due in for a checkup.
In post 301, pisskop wrote:Lal, Croboss, and Death
-Can we get an update?
-Please share your thoughts wrt to:
. .Riabi v House
. .Count Dooku (and Drezi)
. .Victor, acyron, Rach, NJAC, Death
-Opinions of the tree leading wagons? [Croboss][House][Sir Cyanide]
In post 259, Count Dooku wrote:But I didn't understand why scum cannot fakeclaim IC.
In post 161, deathfisaro wrote:
You scumread me when I'm town. I scumread you when you're town. We have zero chemistry together (unless you're scum this game looking for an easy target). Hope next time we meet, we are of opposite alignment so both of us feel good voting each other =P
In post 340, pisskop wrote:PL
policy lynch
A lynch carried out out of principle or because you want to set an example that it is not okay to behave in a certain way. PL is 'lynch all liars' or 'lynch lurkers' or 'lynch trolls' or etc.
In post 342, NJAC wrote:In post 338, Lalendra wrote:This makes me feel icky. Why next time you meet? Why couldn’t you be of opposite alignments this game? It’s almost like you know who your teammates are or something…
This is a nice catch, you know? Maybe even a scumslip. It's worth pursuing. When we finish with croboss, let's vote fisaro. Alright?
In post 365, Count Dooku wrote:And what? It is ridiculous. Everything I say in one post have to be related?!
In post 373, Count Dooku wrote:I want to stop this pointless discussion. I don't have anything more to say about it. Vote me, lynch me, stop it.
In post 420, Count Dooku wrote:LOL
In post 436, Count Dooku wrote:434 = shitposting
In post 457, Count Dooku wrote:In post 440, Lalendra wrote:
In post 365, Count Dooku wrote:And what? It is ridiculous. Everything I say in one post have to be related?!
I mean generally, if the post is completely lacking in any sort of segue? YES. I don't buy your "It's so silly to assume that I meant JUST her" logic, this (and several subsequent posts) sounds like some serious backpedaling to me.That is your problem. That was the truth. I meant her, and others. And actually I have never done anything that would prove the opposite. It is only you trying to make me look like a scum.Mmmm...kay.
In post 373, Count Dooku wrote:I want to stop this pointless discussion. I don't have anything more to say about it. Vote me, lynch me, stop it.
This, to me, clearly says he's giving up on arguing his point and is just going for the righteous-indignation stance instead of articulating his reasoning.I have answered those silly questions sveral times, but they kept askig and asking them. It is pointless to spam pages with the same questions and answeres. But, it looks like you like to talk about the same topic again and agin and again, so if you want, I will answer all your questions about that topic. Ask them. If you want to spend more hours with that pointless discussion, then go ahead, and ask me.This is actually the first I've said about it, but thank you for the blanket generalization.
Whether it meant something to her or not is largely irrelevant, it's more about whether he INTENDED it to mean something to her.
Yes, I intended to refer to Rach. But (I hate that I have to say the same things again and again, because you are asking the same bad and pointless questions again and again) not only to her, to others too, for example deathfisaro or croboss. And I told you it several times, but it looks like there is a problem with your grasp.Again, this is the first time I've pointed it out - the problem is less with our grasp of your reasoning, and more with your inability to a) grasp our reasoning or b) defend your views with reason and logic, rather than just getting super-huffy and insulting.
In post 420, Count Dooku wrote:LOL
Again...seemingly out of arguments.My respond to House's post was explained just like the post and the scumread was explained itself.I'm actually not sure what this means so I'm going to leave it alone, I will be happy to address it if you want to clarify.
In post 436, Count Dooku wrote:434 = shitposting
And again.Thank you for showing us that you didn't even read the thread. Had you read post 439, you would have known that I was going to explain it today.
Oh I read it, but I didn't agree that it was shitposting, and I'm not a huge fan of "I don't like this and neither should you but I'm not going to explain why until later" posts.
VOTE: Count DookuNice scummy jump on the most recent wagon without stating anything real/genuine/original.Pretty sure I laid out my reasoning above, but it seems that there is a problem with your grasp.
In post 477, Count Dooku wrote:
What the hell? You want to start this stupid conversation again? What's the matter with you guys? Are you high?
In post 481, Count Dooku wrote:
I like that everyone who is voting me has valid reasons behind it. (sarcasm)
In post 508, NJAC wrote:I like acryon for town.
In post 546, Count Dooku wrote:In post 544, Riabi wrote:Why get angry at all if you aren't feeling threatened by being called out?
Because this game supposed to be entertaining. When people ask you the same stupid questions, even when you answered them, it is not fun anymore.
In post 553, Count Dooku wrote:It is funny that everyone suspects the more active players, and let the lurkers lurk.
I decided that I won't/rarely will introduce new topics in this game from now on; I think this is the only game her on ms, where everyone who talks about something new is going to be suspected.
In post 557, Count Dooku wrote:Meh, that wouldn't be fair with the town.
So
@Mod I would like to replace out.
In post 632, Reminiscence wrote:In post 627, Lalendra wrote:@Reminiscence - What do you make of your predecessor's play? Why do you think he reacted the way he did? If it had been you, what would you have done/said differently?
I haven't read the whole thing but town.
In post 632, Reminiscence wrote:I think i know the reason but I will refrain from explaining.
In post 632, Reminiscence wrote:First of all I wouldn't have let people lynch me. I am kinda glad that he didn't threw the game and replaced out.
In post 657, Sakura Hana wrote:Seems like everyone in this game is just derp so i might be wrong about pisskop, so i'll go back to acryon!
Unvote
Vote: acryon
In post 679, Metalcyanide wrote:In post 676, Sakura Hana wrote:In post 564, Metalcyanide wrote:I can see why there have been calls to kill my slot, Crosboss has played a very bad game.
Hi there Amished tell.
Unvote
Vote: Metalcyanide
Can you elaborate? Are you just implying that he is scum and has been screwed over by croboss's bad play, and that this post is proof of that? I'm not sure I read this the same way (note that I'm not saying I don't think the slot is scum, which is why my vote hasn't changed.)
In post 678, Metalcyanide wrote:Care to make a good case against one of them or are you scum that is unable to.
A good scum would be able to make a case either way - or at the very least, make it look like a good case. Solid cases for votes =/= town.
In post 702, NJAC wrote:Also, do you think acryon is town or scum, and why?
And one more question: why aren't you voting scumHana/scumfisaro?
In post 710, pisskop wrote:In post 709, Lalendra wrote:. As for Death, I'd prefer to wait and see what his replacement has to say.
Sakura Hana is Death.
Nacho is Rachmarie.
What do you think of Hana's entrance.
In post 715, Sakura Hana wrote:
I'm taking what i see from the situation, he made his post, you twist it, then convince everyone that the twisted one version is the truth, he gets fed up with the misreps and replaces out.
Where along this line have you ever considered the possibility of Town Dooku going exactly for what he explained he did as a possibility?
In post 720, House wrote:In a world that makes "bootilicious" a word, perhaps. But I live in reality land where words have meaning, and faze is an illiterate knock off of phase.
In post 733, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 710, pisskop wrote:In post 709, Lalendra wrote:. As for Death, I'd prefer to wait and see what his replacement has to say.
Sakura Hana is Death.
Nacho is Rachmarie.
What do you think of Hana's entrance.
Hi pisskop!
Sakura's entrance looks pretty town so far! Do you agree or no?
In post 827, pisskop wrote:SC was a stupid NK. Im apt to believe it was somebody who SC townread/townread him.
In post 865, Drezi wrote:@those voting ika (+Riabi included):
if ika is scum, who do you think the possible partners are?
In post 1063, Nachomamma8 wrote:I would be pretty inclined to vote Ika right now if I didn't think he had a good possibility of being the vig. I don't really know who in their right mind doesn't shoot Ika after yesterday, meaning the him = vig possibility is more likely than it should be.
In post 1377, Riabi wrote:In post 1374, Drezi wrote:Your zero logic declarations seem to have swayed Riabi, and right after he voiced doubt towards me due to simply not thinking from my POV, you jump in to tell him to vig me. I am sure you're scum, sorry.
Where do you get the impression that my view is swayed? Atm, I'm still intending to hammer ika (pending some more time) and then likely vig Lal. That said, I am finding you scummier and scummier, but it's your play that's doing that to me, and not the drivel that House is spouting.
In post 1404, Drezi wrote:TTH ABR, and Lalendra, and my townread on Nacho was based on him not hammering, but it looks like he wasn't here at all, so I'd need to rethink that especially if he happened to do it suddenly now.
In post 1418, Drezi wrote:In my opinion he's not. You can just vig ika.
In post 1444, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Vote: TTH
Pushing Nacho to hammer and then lining up a vig kill on me. Nope.
This is scum angling for endgame.
TTH is scum. Ika is as well due to his avoiding the game, but I want TTH today.
In post 1080, Albert B. Rampage wrote:In post 1045, TellTaleHeart wrote:(ika, Riabi, Nacho) or (ika, ABR, Nacho) scum teams make lots of sense, so your "PoE" is already flawed.
If Nacho was scum, you would never see it coming. This is Nacho town, I guarantee it.
In post 1118, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I can tell you it's not Nacho or Riabi who have been my town reads for even before Riabi claimed. We are still waiting on another PR to claim and that could confirm one more innocent. I don't know beyond that.
In post 1181, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I need Nacho.
In post 1112, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Lynch Lalendra or we might as well resign right here.
In post 1113, Albert B. Rampage wrote:This game has been letdown after letdown. I can't even imagine us winning this. Nobody listens. People rush to bandwagon without thinking. Just stop and think for a moment, how is Lalendra town? That vote on Riabi is scummy as hell. She's scum.
In post 1119, Albert B. Rampage wrote:TTH's slot was scummy, ika could be scum, it could be you. Lalendra is the one I'm most sure of.
In post 1168, Albert B. Rampage wrote:In post 1167, Drezi wrote:I don't even know what Lalendra is doing now, but I absolutely wouldn't want to lynch her, noone ever pushed her and now suddenly people want to lynch her, it just screams scum wanting easy mislynch.
This blows my mind on the scale of scumminess. Going after someone who has never been gone after is an easy mislynch? How does that even work in your brain?
In post 1173, Albert B. Rampage wrote:In post 1170, Drezi wrote:You never pointed a finger at her, not even a single shred of doubt, and now you're just coming up with your shit that she's scum go ahead and lynch her. She's been on the sidelines, noone has a strong feeling about her being town, so naturally it'll be easy to start making people paranoid.
I did point my finger at her, in the beginning of the day. I voted you but I said I suspected her.
In post 1233, Albert B. Rampage wrote:It's Lalendra. Are you trying to tell me like all the people who have been in the spotlight are more suspicious than all the ones that most people have forgotten are in the game?
In post 1315, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Or it could be you, Lalendra, and TTH.
In post 1318, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Lalendra should be scum, unless I'm way off about this game. What doesn't make sense about any of this is the night 1 kill. Why Sir Cyanide? He suspected Sakura Hana and TTH and I don't remember who else. He wasn't a fan of lynching dooku.
In post 1453, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Say what you want Lalendra, I still think you're scum.
In post 1496, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 1471, Lalendra wrote:Also, when confscum says they "guarantee" someone is town, it makes me raise an eyebrow.
Why is that?
In post 1528, Riabi wrote:In post 1527, Drezi wrote:In post 1526, Lalendra wrote:Obviously if I hammer nacho and he flips town,I will be shot tonight, andtown will lose.
??
Yep, I had the same thought. Assuming nacho would flip town, and assuming Lal gets shot tonight, then we'd be in 3 player LyLo. But there are a number of problems with this...
1.) The chances of Nacho and Lal both being town at this point, are, in my mind, slim.
2.) Assuming we mis-lynch today, wouldn't *I* be a far more likely NK than Lal? Being conftown and all?
Sigh... I need to re-read some things....