Open 620: Duck Duck Goose Game Over, Mafia Victory
-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
I don't like Burning's logic. All heads have the same wincon, so if one head is acting scummy, then the others explaining will not take away that scumminess, just as a single player can say, "Oh, people always scumread me when I do X", although you could end up scumreading one head and townreading the other (lol). Then you just have to figure out which one is genuine. I think RF3's comment was null, as all alignments wish to avoid being scumread.
On a side note, I intend to sign my posts, but if I forget it shouldn't be hard to tell us apart.
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
Whoops almost hydraslipped there. Guarantee that I'm gonna do it sooner or later.
I'm feeling honest townie frustration from RF3. To the people with townvibes on concvex, why?
In post 51, Newbie wrote:I can't see it happening on the first page of the first day phase, a time when scum tend to be extra cautious.
wifom wifom wifom wifom wifom
In post 54, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:Guys I hate the word OMGUS so much. It's one of those buzzwords that new players latch onto for just a bit too long (see also: "misrep" and "buddying")
Agree with this. I think OMGUS has a scummy connotation that shouldn't necessarily be there. It is possible to vote someone right after they vote you and have a real reason.
Concvex, what do you think of Newbie?
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 54, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:Guys I hate the word OMGUS so much. It's one of those buzzwords that new players latch onto for just a bit too long (see also: "misrep" and "buddying")
RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:If this isn't a misrep, this is looks like an attempt to discredit me.
...-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
I don't like this post at all, I thought that many of the points in that post were valid. All this is is just handwaving away that post and stepping in before your partner reacts to that post.In post 57, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:What we have here, kids, is a player attempting to invalidate my other head's thoughts. I'm in the process of deciding if that means this player is malicious or if it just means she's stubborn.
In post 60, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:
Didn't I explain that a sentence later? Let me break it down for you.
>You state my vote is OMGUS without reasoning. You vote me based off that???
>My vote on conc was because I didn't understand the townvibes there and I wanted to push, I also didn't understand why he sheeped that vote without saying much beyond it. You seem to have some sort of issue with my push.Not sure why you are trying to claim the higher ground when that is your reasoning for voting conc.
In post 56, Newbie wrote:In post 53, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:
I make my own idea on not seeing how Conc is getting townvibes and vote there and here you vote and jump on the idea that my vote was bad when I gave my thought process on it.
You don't even state how this is OMGUS.
I think it's OMGUS because you did too much with his reasoning for voting you and then voted him. It's obvious to me he saw BH's reasoning on you as scummy and decided to throw on a vote. Sorry if you don't like.
What are you talking about? My vote and reasoning on conc has nothing to do with the fact that he voted me.
It's that he sheeped over BE's thinking and I decided to push him for a better read.
And when is something too much? I'm going based off of what I see and think. You, however - seem to think that I'm basing this all around the fact that I "don't like" it? This doesn't make any sense...
How is my vote less valid than his?
You're also focusing to much on the idea that my vote is based only on concs thinking with BE - which is wrong. For reasons I've stated.
I'll agree that this early in a game getting hung up about a vote is just kinda dumb,
In post 56, Newbie wrote:In post 53, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:
In post 43, Newbie wrote:conc and Mathilda are giving me townvibes so far. I need more people to post before I really get into it. I know that's hypocritical coming from the person with only 2 posts, but I don't have much to work with.
You even could have explained why you had townvibes then, but you sheep-voted out of what BE said - and saw that as a reason to see conc-townvibe?:
Mathilda - Because of post #40. It looks like a person engaging genuinely, trying to figure things out.
conc - Already explained this.
These two reads aren't set in stone, and truthfully, I would like to see more from both.
Well this doesn't tell me anything I didn't know....Why are you complaining about someone answering your question? This post was exactly what you were asking
In post 56, Newbie wrote:In post 53, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:
In post 49, Newbie wrote:In post 14, concvex wrote:People should sheep my vote, it's quite a good vote.
I can't see scum making a post like this. Even if it was just a joke, I'd expect a bit more self consciousness. I also understand how concvex could've found what BE pointed out about RF3 as scummy.
And scum can easily make posts like town. The principle about this is, to you - it isn't self-conscious to ask for sheeping, yet based on what BE said - 1 of my heads saying they wouldn't sign at the scummiest moment - you say this is reason enough to vote.
So - even jokingly - saying you're doing a scummy thing is self-conscious compared to just stating that someone should sheep?
I'm not going to talk about frivolous literal crap if that's the basis of the votes on me. But your logic seems a bit skewed.
I'm not even sure how to respond.
.....
BE's reasoning on his vote against me - in part - is about how the posts in page 1 were self-conscious. Basically one of my heads saying openly that they'd forget to sign at the scummiest moment - Did people really take this seriously, btw? Or self-conscious?
Conc's vote is based around someone elses reasoning - and in part of me not understanding the townvibes on him - made me wonder around peoples thoughts on him.
Again, your response doesn't provide anything to go off of. I don't even know why you're voting me other than that you're creating some sort of dichotomy and then discrediting my thoughts revolved around a push.
Everyone is discrediting everyone else's thoughts, that generally is how d1/RVS is played. I
In post 56, Newbie wrote:
Geez, I wonder why? Does it have anything to do with me voting you and not seeing conc, your top suspect, as scum?
If this isn't a misrep, this is looks like an attempt to discredit me.
I never mentioned that I got scumvibes from you because of you voting me. It's the fact that these posts so far are of you not entirely explaining yourself, while you say you understand someone else, but finding fault whenever I push against them.
You go as far as to say things like "Sorry if you don't like" or "Is it because I'm not doing what you want" to make it a point to go against what I'm doing. This is seriously unhelpful, and not town-motivated.
Please I'm not asking people to vote or think remotely the same as I do, but your posts do not make any sense in the perspective that as town - we should figure out the game and actively working to take in info. in achieving that.
This part of the post is fairly bad however, the newbie post was general goading, combined with the only reason you have given for your scum suspicions ie not understanding the cerb town vibe
~Taly
In post 61, Something Pip wrote:In post 54, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:Guys I hate the word OMGUS so much. It's one of those buzzwords that new players latch onto for just a bit too long (see also: "misrep" and "buddying")
RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:If this isn't a misrep, this is looks like an attempt to discredit me.
...
^this was smart ICYWW
-pip-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 67, Newbie wrote:In post 65, Burning_Earth wrote:In post 49, Newbie wrote:In post 14, concvex wrote:People should sheep my vote, it's quite a good vote.
I can't see scum making a post like this. Even if it was just a joke, I'd expect a bit more self consciousness. I also understand how concvex could've found what BE pointed out about RF3 as scummy.
What the hell are you talking about? Everyone makes posts like this, all the time.
This is just one of those things that I'll have to agree to disagree.
Scum joking about avote wagonon thefirstpage? Nah. Can't see it.
Really? People say that thing all the time, as any alignment in my experience. I really hope you aren't thinking that convex is confTown for this
-pip-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 67, Newbie wrote:In post 65, Burning_Earth wrote:In post 49, Newbie wrote:In post 14, concvex wrote:People should sheep my vote, it's quite a good vote.
I can't see scum making a post like this. Even if it was just a joke, I'd expect a bit more self consciousness. I also understand how concvex could've found what BE pointed out about RF3 as scummy.
What the hell are you talking about? Everyone makes posts like this, all the time.
This is just one of those things that I'll have to agree to disagree.
Scum joking about avote wagonon thefirstpage? Nah. Can't see it.
STOP THE WIFOMMMMMMMMM
Burning_Earth wrote:Newbie and concvex look like possible scumbuddies to me.
Burning, I disagree. If Newbie was scum with concvex then associating with him would be a bad move. But I could see either one of them being scum.
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
JF3, I know this might be a little contradictory, but slow down the posts a little, I feel like I understand both newbies and JF3 perspective here and more noise in the thread is just going to let a bunch of other people pressureless which makes me sad. Speaking of which...
In post 75, Mathilda wrote:I'm getting the sense that Newbie might not actually in fact be ... a newbie.
Which then suggests someone actually quite experienced at this game because they appreciate the value of being under estimated.
Why is this important? Because I like how she is scum hunting. But if she is experienced then could be this be a scum tactic to play as close to town as possible? Well there's absolutely nothing to suggest that this is the case for the moment so I am going to put her on my town pile for now.
Wait did you think newbie was a newbie because their name was newbie?
Generally you look at experience based on how many posts they have etc. not their username. I'm trying to understand why this post was made- your point seems to be
that you are townreading Newbie only if she is a new player, if not it is a scumread? Well guess what I don't think Newbie is actually new to this game. This feels like you think Newbie might get wagoned here, so it lets you say "Oh Newbie isn't a new player, I think her early game was scummy" and sneak on the wagon without having to actually worry about going after Newbie.
Also I'm not sure that reason is a good reason to scumread someone. Basically you are scumreading a player for seeming town. I would say that opens a can of WIFOM, but honestly that strategy just doesn't work. A good player might be able to look towny as scum, but they would also probably be able to look towny as town.
@JF3, that was just me trying to sort you and Newbie and failing, if you don't see any real point in answering the questions you don't have to.-
-
Something Pip
-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 91, Mathilda wrote:In post 80, Something Pip wrote:
In post 75, Mathilda wrote:I'm getting the sense that Newbie might not actually in fact be ... a newbie.
Which then suggests someone actually quite experienced at this game because they appreciate the value of being under estimated.
Why is this important? Because I like how she is scum hunting. But if she is experienced then could be this be a scum tactic to play as close to town as possible? Well there's absolutely nothing to suggest that this is the case for the moment so I am going to put her on my town pile for now.
Wait did you think newbie was a newbie because their name was newbie?
Generally you look at experience based on how many posts they have etc. not their username. I'm trying to understand why this post was made- your point seems to be
that you are townreading Newbie only if she is a new player, if not it is a scumread? Well guess what I don't think Newbie is actually new to this game. This feels like you think Newbie might get wagoned here, so it lets you say "Oh Newbie isn't a new player, I think her early game was scummy" and sneak on the wagon without having to actually worry about going after Newbie.
Also I'm not sure that reason is a good reason to scumread someone. Basically you are scumreading a player for seeming town. I would say that opens a can of WIFOM, but honestly that strategy just doesn't work. A good player might be able to look towny as scum, but they would also probably be able to look towny as town.
@JF3, that was just me trying to sort you and Newbie and failing, if you don't see any real point in answering the questions you don't have to.
Now this is a very interesting response. It's deliberately misrepresenting what I said. I'll accept that you might not quite get dry humour, especially over the medium of electronic text, but I did conclude by saying
"Well there's absolutely nothing to suggest that this is the case for the moment so I am going to put her on my town pile for now."
That was my very last sentence so you don't have a plausible excuse for thinking that I was reading newbie as scum. Of course I know that "newbie" is a name and not a status bestowed upon a player by the almighty mods of Mafia. But my point remains that the playerchoseto call themselves "newbie". She chose it for a reason.
What your posts suggests to me is that you are deliberately looking for means to cast suspicion on a player rather than looking for slips. The former is a sign of someone wanting to cause a mislynch, the latter is a sign of someone trying to discover who is scum.
VOTE: Something Pip
You do know that people's name don't affect their alignment, using someone's name as a point at any spot outside of RVS is scummy. I'm not sure where you are getting that I want to cause a mislynch. First off I'm not voting you, and right now I'm happy with my other head's vote on conc. The way I play the game d1 is to get connections for later days - like now I have you and Lowell's chainsaw of you. Also for that last sentence I had thought it had meant "since there is no evidence of newbie being an experienced player, she is on my town pile now", which I took as a scumread on newbie given that she is clearly experienced.
In general though, usernames are basically off-limits for alignment discernment, and I would like to see your opinion on everything else that has happened this game.
-pip-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 75, Mathilda wrote:I'm getting the sense that Newbie might not actually in fact be ... a newbie.
Which then suggests someone actually quite experienced at this game because they appreciate the value of being under estimated.
This is pigeon poop.
Mathilda wrote:
Why is this important? Because I like how she is scum hunting. But if she is experienced then could be this be a scum tactic to play as close to town as possible? Well there's absolutely nothing to suggest that this is the case for the moment so I am going to put her on my town pile for now.
What about the way she is scumhunting do you like?
In post 85, Lowell wrote:UNVOTE: newbie
VOTE: something pip
80 is the longest post to say nothing. Also ironically, it does what it purports to *facepalm*. Yes, 75 is pretty dumb, but Mathilda is the easy target here, and your obsession is overwrought. I get the vibe of scum happy to be able to jump in on a dumb comment and make hay with it. Way too much hay.
Oh I'm sorry if we haven't posted as much content as you. I'll agree with pip and call this a chainsaw.
In post 86, Burning_Earth wrote:In post 75, Mathilda wrote:I'm getting the sense that Newbie might not actually in fact be ... a newbie.
Which then suggests someone actually quite experienced at this game because they appreciate the value of being under estimated.
Why is this important? Because I like how she is scum hunting. But if she is experienced then could be this be a scum tactic to play as close to town as possible? Well there's absolutely nothing to suggest that this is the case for the moment so I am going to put her on my town pile for now.
This is town.
Why?
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 88, Marcrell wrote:Vote Count 1.1
Concvex: RadiantalyFarrar3, Something Pip, Sharky5x, Burning_Earth
Scorpious: Mathilda, Something Pip
RadiantalyFarrar3: Concvex, Newbie
Lowell: Scorpious
Something Pip: Lowell
Not voting: Frozen Angel, TheDominator37, TheyCallMeDirk
@Mod: yay I get to be a doublevoter now?-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 85, Lowell wrote:UNVOTE: newbie
VOTE: something pip
80 is the longest post to say nothing. Also ironically, it does what it purports to *facepalm*. Yes, 75 is pretty dumb, but Mathilda is the easy target here, and your obsession is overwrought. I get the vibe of scum happy to be able to jump in on a dumb comment and make hay with it. Way too much hay.
I don't think Sharky is scum because Lowell already claimed it. His only contribution to the thread is a chainsaw on basically what amounted to a FoS. I don't understand the vote on me being based on Mathilda being a easy mislynch bait when I'm not voting Mathilda.-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
-
-
Something Pip
-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 116, Sharky5x wrote:What are you trying to accomplish with this post, exactly? I got townvibes from the post as well, not like I was gonna explain it beyond "naive"
Let the BE/Sharky scumteam begin.
I disagree with the first statement. To me it seems more "contrived" or at the very least "irrelevant".
But the second statement... that would be either a monster slip or a daring gambit for scum to make. To me it comes across as not caring how you're perceived, which is a towntell.
TheDominator37 wrote:In post 133, Something Pip wrote:Wee that was shit. Do you have an actual reason for voting me or are you just lazy scum?
-pip
Why? Because I cought you?
Nah, I'm thinking more the other way around; I think we caught you. So unless that was a (terrible) reaction test, why don't you provide some reasoning.
Burning_Earth wrote:In post 114, Newbie wrote:In post 111, Frozen Angel wrote:In post 109, Newbie wrote:So in other words, I should play better? Got you.
Not only you I'm generally speaking.
whats your read on mathilda and Burning Earth?
Mathilda's post #75 was weird. I don't see what the point of it was, tbh. The fact that she literally didn't comment on anything else and then jumped on the pip wagon is also disturbing.
BE looks like scum trying to keep a low profile. I especially didn't like the pre-flip association he tried with me and conc.
As a matter of fact,
VOTE: BE
Youve been active, but you haven't commented about this until asked. Even after I made that post. Scum.
I like this.
-the smart head
p.s. all the unsigned ones are pip-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
I think Sharky is town because the last sentence of 116 ("Let the BE/Sharky scumteam begin") is not self-conscious enough to be scum. Nothing to do with Lowell.
Lowell's chainsaw that pip referred to is indeed 85, and I'm not voting him because I have stronger reads, I want concvex to say something, and the chainsaw could be unconscious (Lowell sees Mathilda as town and an easy target and automatically scumreads us for attacking her). I'm leaning toward voting Newbie, however.
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 152, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:In post 151, Not_Mafia wrote:
VOTE: Burning Earth
Go on
I don't like the whole "Taly stop posting so much" thing when activity is this low. We need folk to get in here.
If I cared to hijack Bells' vote I'd throw it on Newbie, but Bells is smarter than me so I'll leave it for no
Knowing Not that is going to be his only post until prod time.-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 196, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:This is why I'm not confident in my read in you.
You throw on a townread on something.
After you say something else is scum. (Lowell?)
Then you call out that Dom is 'obvscum', but do shit about it.
You then say that NM should just be policy lynched -wtf? But your votes still on conc, yet you just say that someone is bussing conc?
Seriously. Wtf are your reads. This is either hydra dissonance in picking up a lot of adversity with people, or I really don't like how it seems like you're lining up shit with your scumreads.
The only read we disagree on is Newbie. Our top two scumreads right now are conc for starting a point, then letting Newbie take all of the heat for him and dom for every post he has made this game. My experience with NM is that he will never do anything the entire game. I don't think there is any way of dealing with that besides a policy lynch at some point.-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 211, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:I mean I guess Concev could be scum
Yuck.
To everyone angry about dissonance and illogical play, our scumreads are concvex, Dom and Lowell. We're conflicted on Newbie. We are currently leading a wagon on one of our scumreads so I don't know what you expect us to be doing.
Not_Mafia is a disgrace to scummers everywhere. Just look at any of his games.
I want to hear from concvex (well, everyone who's lurking but mostly him) what his reads are on everyone. This game needs to get going.
Oh yeah and pip is the one who always forgets to sign his posts. I never forget.
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 217, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:What's remotely yuck about saying a slot with 6 posts could be scum based on what they've posted but doesn't have nearly enough content for me to want to lynch them?
Don't get me wrong, I still think you're town. But I just didn't like how you double-qualified a read on a slot that, as you pointed out, you have no reason to believe is town.
Your vote on Dom is good. But I think a vote on concvex would be better because this wagon is actually going somewhere.
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
-
-
Something Pip
-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
Taly why must you always wallpost.
I am the one scumreading Newbie, and it's because I see scum trying to fit in in every post she makes. She has a lot of equivocation, using many words to say little, defensiveness, and a general lack of scumhunting, in favor of trying to keep everybody happy.
Not sure why pip has her as town.
I only take issue with the conc quickvotes if he turns out to be scum. Because the conc wagon was gearing up and it's a good time to bus.
Like shadow's entrance. Not so much droog's.
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
Taly why must you always wallpost.
I am the one scumreading Newbie, and it's because I see scum trying to fit in in every post she makes. She has a lot of equivocation, using many words to say little, defensiveness, and a general lack of scumhunting, in favor of trying to keep everybody happy.
Not sure why pip has her as town.
I only take issue with the conc quickvotes if he turns out to be scum. Because the conc wagon was gearing up and it's a good time to bus.
Like shadow's entrance. Not so much droog's.
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip
-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 51, Newbie wrote:I can't see it happening on the first page of the first day phase, a time when scum tend to be extra cautious.
-wifon masquerading as real discussion
-equivocating on conc
In post 74, Newbie wrote:
I mean, we all have to wifom at some point, since we all have some type of scum/town tells, but whatever. I will say that I don't see anything scummy about conc at the moment, but I'd definitely like to hear more from him. Is that better?
-saying something to say nothing
-trying to make me happy
In post 216, Newbie wrote:I agree. I want to get things moving.
-see above
In post 274, Newbie wrote:I agree that Mathilda's "Newbie's not a Newbie!" thing was weird. But in the same post, she said she's reading me as town because of it, so that would be odd if she wanted to take advantage.
-agreeing with both sides
-appearing to actually be saying something but just not
In post 73, Newbie wrote:K.
-nice content
In post 83, Newbie wrote:In post 75, Mathilda wrote:I'm getting the sense that Newbie might not actually in fact be ... a newbie.
Which then suggests someone actually quite experienced at this game because they appreciate the value of being under estimated.
Why is this important? Because I like how she is scum hunting. But if she is experienced then could be this be a scum tactic to play as close to town as possible? Well there's absolutely nothing to suggest that this is the case for the moment so I am going to put her on my town pile for now.
Lol what? I've been a member here since August '13. Am I the only one you have an opinion on? What about Conc - the person with the leading wagon, RF3 - another with a wagon, Pip, BE, etc?
-saying something to say nothing
-an actual scumhunter would try to figure out why Mathilda said this instead of going "lol what"
In post 109, Newbie wrote:So in other words, I should play better? Got you.
I already said I'm not throwing conc down as 100% town. Actually, I probably sound like a broken record by now, but I want to hear more from him. All he's done so far is defend himself from RF3 and keep his vote.
This game has generally been pretty underwhelming in terms activity so far. A lot of people have taken a back seat. I especially don't like how BE throws out a vague observation every now and then before going back into the shadows.
-saying a lot to say a little
-I disagree with you on BE, reasons are questionable
In post 272, Newbie wrote:The funny thing is, I didn't even realize that was his first post. I thought this was.
In post 125, TheDominator37 wrote:In post 17, Lowell wrote:^^^ this guy is going to be fun.
The AtE is strong in you.
That's what I figured you were referring to. Still, how is he a strong town read based on any of it?
-saying something to say nothing
Every single one of Newbie's wallposts wrote:Let me quote every single bad thing anyone has said about me and explain why it's wrong.
Your walls are all way too defensive. Overall you seem so preoccupied with your townie image that you've forgotten to actually act like a townie would.
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 284, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:In post 283, Something Pip wrote:-nice content
This is a dumb point, smart head
Yeah I know I just saw that in her ISO and was like, lol
Taly I'm sorry it's nothing against you as a player it's just I usually phonepost and your posts are a pain to quote.
How is town supposed to act? Scumhunting, maybe? The accusation is very sound. Townies do towny things like scumhunting. They don't spend time keeping up their image. Newbie has focused on keeping up her image and has forgotten to do towny things like scumhunting.
Burning_Earth wrote:I agree with the smart head's case on Newbie (most of it some of the points are reaching too far)
Reasonable assessment. I tend to unintentionally twist facts to support my arguments sometimes.
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
VOTE: Lowell This really should happen, I was holding my vote on convex cause I hate when people lurk out of pressure, but I'm really liking Droog's entrance so far. Taly should keep wallposting as long as the game necessitates it, but other people's lazyiness shouldn't be a reason not to wallpost, this game is going really slow anyways.-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
Um, so Dom doesn't seem to attempt to do anything to help town, which is by definition any town. I honestly don't understand how Droog likes Dom's entrance given that it was just meaningless words under random quotes. That is why Dom is a scumread. That being said, what Lowell did was try to above the radar and explain his ideas, the problem was that they involved misrepping things and other attempts to manipulate town. So I think there is a much greater chance of Lowell being scum than Dom even though Dom has been more antitown than Lowell.-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
Happy birthday, Marcrell!
I support my other head's vote. Droog's entry was towny enough that he's no longer my top scumread. Everything pip said about Dom and Lowell I agree with, although droog does have a point in that Dom isn't afraid to make enemies.
The only head who actually remembers to sign his posts,
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 307, shaddowez wrote:
Why not? Has he done anything that might make you think he's town?In post 304, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:Why dominator at all?
I appreciate that answer. However, it leads me to two follow up questions.In post 305, Something Pip wrote:Um, so Dom doesn't seem to attempt to do anything to help town, which is by definition any town. I honestly don't understand how Droog likes Dom's entrance given that it was just meaningless words under random quotes. That is why Dom is a scumread. That being said, what Lowell did was try to above the radar and explain his ideas, the problem was that they involved misrepping things and other attempts to manipulate town. So I think there is a much greater chance of Lowell being scum than Dom even though Dom has been more antitown than Lowell.
1) You never answered what you liked about droog's entrance.
2) As your point out here, droog liked Dom's entrance with no discernible reason why. Does that change your read on droog at all?
1. He had good points generally, and I agreed with all of his reads and why he was doing them. The only thing I disagree on is the townread on Dom, but I'll agree with JF3 that we haven't seen enough from Dom to make a hard read either way.
2. Not in and of itself, but Droog does need to explain that read a lot more.-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 326, Lowell wrote:oh yeah this is the game where I've been pushing some guy for lurking and basically doing nothing. that explains the votes.
I'm sure there's some obvious scum here. Let me get back to you on Monday, as I said.
dude unless you are planning to produce the best case ever that is 1 day from deadline. If you don't want to eat a lynch today you better do stuff right now.-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 334, Karnage wrote:In post 328, Something Pip wrote:Also @Karnage, Mathilda and Lowell 90% are super duper not mafia together, so I might go over the game again to check those reads. That was a strong entrance by Karnage though.
I disagree. I don't see anything that precludes them from being scumbuddies.
85 “mathilda is an easy target”
203 “mathilda’s play is weirdly methodical”
249 “this makes him (lowell) more town in my eyes”
what am I missing?
I missed post 203 when I made that post, that made me reconsider a fair bit. Normally scum don't chainsaw their partner after the slightest inclination of a push. So 85 struck me as trying to buddy a potential mislynch to either get towncred or have an ally. However 203 is awkward distancing that doesn't fit with my WK theory, so while if Lowell flips scum Mathilda would not be my first choice of lynch, I think you made good points and he definitely isn't as off the table as I thought he was. Either way though Lowell needs to be lynched today.-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
Droog's been ok so far. Plus my three biggest scumreads are on his wagon. I don't see what you like about Mathilda however.
@Taly what are the things Newbie has done that make you think she is town? Though I agree with you that there's way too much preflip associative stuff going on.
To the best of my knowledge, our heads are in agreement that Lowell is the best lynch. I'd like to see a bigger wagon on him.
I'm confident that RF3 and BE are town, fairly confident that Karnage is as well.
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 341, Lowell wrote:In post 327, Something Pip wrote:In post 326, Lowell wrote:oh yeah this is the game where I've been pushing some guy for lurking and basically doing nothing. that explains the votes.
I'm sure there's some obvious scum here. Let me get back to you on Monday, as I said.
dude unless you are planning to produce the best case ever that is 1 day from deadline. If you don't want to eat a lynch today you better do stuff right now.
Not sure what you mean by "eat a lynch." Unless it's me leading in votes, I'm probably fine with it. I'll pretty much kill anyone.
It means getting lynched-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
Because Dom obviously doesn't care about the game and will probably be replaced.
Because, as droog pointed out, Dom wasn't afraid to make enemies.
Because Dom hasn't said enough to read properly.
Because Dom is an easy no-risk target.
Because Dom's wagon isn't going anywhere.
Because Lowell is at L-3 and wagons are good.
Because Lowell is scum.
Because Lowell's play has been crap.
Because Lowell needs to die.
Because you need to prove to me that you have an ounce of pro-town motivation in you.
Because you've done very little actual scumhunting all game.
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 344, Newbie wrote:In post 85, Lowell wrote:UNVOTE: newbie
VOTE: something pip
80 is the longest post to say nothing. Also ironically, it does what it purports to *facepalm*. Yes, 75 is pretty dumb, but Mathilda is the easy target here, and your obsession is overwrought. I get the vibe of scum happy to be able to jump in on a dumb comment and make hay with it. Way too much hay.
In post 203, Lowell wrote:Burning and RF are town. Mathilda's play is weirdly methodical. Someone kill conc.
He's goes from throwing a vote on pip for seeing Mathilda as an easier target to saying Mathilda's posts are weirdly methodical. Doesn't show any intention of putting pressure on Mathilda, though. Playing his cards very close to his chest.
In post 179, Lowell wrote:UNVOTE: whoever
VOTE: conc
To add pressure. This looks like the kind of game where we just wagon everyone to get them to wake up. Wake me when it's my turn.
*yawns*
I agree that this vote does look horribly apathetic.
Conclusion:I'd be willing to vote Lowellalong with Dom and droog.
In post 356, Newbie wrote:In post 352, droog wrote:In post 350, Newbie wrote:@droog Dom has made less of an effort to respond every time he's here, but he doesn't seem be getting as much attention as Lowell.
loweell wasnt getting any attention until me
the only vote was a rand from scorp
whcih means you believe scum is on the loweell wagon
ok
sell me on that
who is scummy on the loweell wagon
The underlined is where I sit on scum.
In post 316, Marcrell wrote:Vote Count 1.6
Droog: Sharky5x, Lowell, Newbie, Mathilda
Lowell: Scorpious, RadiantalyFarrar3, Something Pip,Droog
Something Pip:TheDominator37
Newbie:Burning_Earth
Burning_Earth: Not_Mafia
TheDominator37: shaddowez
With 12 alive it takes 7 to lynch.
(expired on 2016-01-14 15:25:34)
Funny that you should be willing to vote Lowell, given he's apparently a townread.
344 is the LITERAL DEFINITION of distancing.
Their only other interaction ever is Lowell's RVS "vote him he's a newb" and Newbie's "dude I'm a female" which now that I think about it seems like a perfect staged interaction.
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
-
-
Something Pip Goon
-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
Mathilda can you make a case for why Newbie is town? 'Cause I'm not seeing it. And you should go ahead and vote Lowell because that's the lynch that's happening today.
Can also the people scumreading droog explain that too?
Right now, these are my feelings:
Town: BE, RF3, Karnage, droog
Null: NM, shaddow, Scorpious
Null leaning scum: Dom
Scum: Newbie, Lowell, Mathilda
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 394, shaddowez wrote:In post 389, Something Pip wrote:Mathilda can you make a case for why Newbie is town? 'Cause I'm not seeing it. And you should go ahead and vote Lowell because that's the lynch that's happening today.
Can also the people scumreading droog explain that too?
Right now, these are my feelings:
Town: BE, RF3, Karnage, droog, shaddow
Null: NM, Scorpious
Null leaning scum: Dom
Scum: Newbie, Lowell, Mathilda
-the smart head
FTFY
Ugh. Assuming that I'll townread you for agreeing with me? That's called buddying. Sorry but you are staying at null for me.
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 401, shaddowez wrote:In post 397, Something Pip wrote:Ugh. Assuming that I'll townread you for agreeing with me? That's called buddying. Sorry but you are staying at null for me.
-the smart head
Nope, not assuming anything, and don't really care if you think I'm trying to buddy you or not. It's interesting that you call me out and not droog for doing basically the same thing, though.
All Droog said is that all of our reads are awesome. But since we are objectively awesome it doesn't count as buddying FYI. What you did was kinda sus as it looks like distancing from Lowell though
-pip-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 410, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:The fuck you guys doing? I veto this.
VOTE: Droog
I'll follow you onto Dom if you'd prefer that, Mathilda.
Why are you supporting a vanity wagon 2 days before deadline? Like the only case is that sharky lurked out in a game where half the town has lurked out is weird at best.-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
Radiant, please don't screw this up. We're nearing deadline, and Lowell is by far the best lynch.
In post 418, Lowell wrote:@droog- I voted you originally because the slot was absent, then I got bloodthirsty, it was the only active wagon, nothing else was happening, so I thought "why not? he could be scum."
In post 419, Lowell wrote:which is more or less what I still think. I don't have a strong read on you one way or the other, but I'm game for lynching most people on D1.
Seriously. How can this be town?
I will never settle for any other lynch. Tomorrow we can judge droog based on his interactions with Lowell (whose alignment we will know). Lynching droog here is a bad move. Vote Lowell 2016.
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
I don't understand why this day hasn't ended yet. Not one person has produced any convincing reason to believe that Lowell is town. And for those who wonder who is scum on Lowell's wagon, my belief is that there aren't any (scum = Lowell, Newbie, Mathilda) but if there are then it's Scorpious or shaddow.
We can either sit here arguing our way to a no lynch, or we can lynch Lowell and, at the very worst, gain information from the flip. (At best of course we will lynch one scum, with another [Newbie] soon to follow.) If Lowell flips town then several people have some explaining to do, and likewise if he flips scum. The fact that the discussion has switched to "who on the wagon is scum?" means that our focus has shifted away from Lowell himself and toward how people have interacted with him. This discussion will only yield anything once he flips.
So, to summarize:
1. Nobody has any compelling reason to believe he is town. (Nor any compelling reason to keep him alive, given that he has contributed basically nothing thus far.)
2. We don't have enough time to discuss and organize another lynch that is better than this one. (Even droog: for those who want to lynch droog, at least wait until Lowell flips.)
3. We're trying to draw information about the wagon, without knowing if the wagon is on scum. Worst case, he flips town and gives us things to talk about tomorrow.
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
@MrTrow:
I see you agree with me basically across the board. And I'm pretty in line with a Newbie lynch tomorrow (certainly if Lowell flips scum, very possibly if he flips town too). But it seems like you don't look favorably on Lowell, and that's the only wagon that might realistically happen today. So at least if nobody else intends to I think you should consider hammering (unless I miscounted, Lowell is at L-1).
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
hahahahahahaha
Mathilda that is LITERALLY the scummiest thing I have ever read. That's defending your partner, chainsawing his attackers, AND pushing no-lynch. Hey I've done that before...as scum.A5)3
Okay. Lowell is scummy duein partto the fact that he is antitown. He is also using random and unjustified attacks and read swings, promoting apathy, using AtE, being willing to lynch anybody who isn't him, and putting words in people's mouths.
With that out of the way, let me just take a moment to laugh at the person pushing no-lynch (no other lynch can realistically happen today) and callingusantitown.
Let's see... "Generates little information" is a lie. If Lowell flips scum we have basically caught the scumteam.
"Worried about a mislynch"-who said I wasn't? But going around saying "oh but what if he's town" up until the end is whiteknighting. You don't win by having doubts.
As for your point about bussing- hey look, 1 scum is on (Newbie) and 1 is off (you).
Overall, your premises are just wrong, your attacks baseless, your methods scummy, and your conclusion misleading. GG Newbie-Lowell-Mathilda scumteam found.
-the smart head-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 458, Mathilda wrote:In post 443, Something Pip wrote:I don't understand why this day hasn't ended yet. Not one person has produced any convincing reason to believe that Lowell is town.
Obviously the people pushing for a Lowell lynch have not made a convincing enough argument that he is scum.Or it could be the fact that we have had 3-4 lurking slots and still brought a wagon to l-1 twicePeople are all guilty until proved innocent in a Mafia game but we only have one lynch which means that we go for the best case on one person to be lynched. We can't rely on PoE on Day 1.No one has made a better case, and the case on lowell isn't PoE
In post 443, Something Pip wrote:
And for those who wonder who is scum on Lowell's wagon, my belief is that there aren't any (scum = Lowell, Newbie, Mathilda) but if there are then it's Scorpious or shaddow.
And this makes me suspicious of you as well. Maybe I was right with my initial impression of you.
In post 443, Something Pip wrote:
We can either sit here arguing our way to a no lynch, or we can lynch Lowell and, at the very worst, gain information from the flip.
We're gaining information now by seeing who is pushing for a Lowell lynch with very little information to go on and who don't bother making a good case for doing so, but telling people that it should be a default action to lynch him.
, we can only use that information if we know the alignment of Lowell. As scum you might already know their alignment, but since we don't we need to flip them.
In post 443, Something Pip wrote:
(At best of course we will lynch one scum, with another [Newbie] soon to follow.) If Lowell flips town then several people have some explaining to do, and likewise if he flips scum.
The same could be said for lynching anyone in this game. You and me included. Tell us why Lowell is thebestcandidate for lynching today.
Because he has been the scummiest by far, has had very odd interactions with multiple people that seem to indicate Lowell scum, and people have the strongest opinions about Lowell so we get the most information by flipping him. If someone like scorp got lynched and flipped scum we would basically just be in a 9 v 2 world tomorrow.
In post 443, Something Pip wrote:
The fact that the discussion has switched to "who on the wagon is scum?" means that our focus has shifted away from Lowell himself and toward how people have interacted with him. This discussion will only yield anything once he flips.
This is scum motivation here, not town. Town are worried about mislynching but want to generate information. Scum just want a mislynch.Alrighty then, explain to me how you can do wagon analysis on someone you don't know the alignment of? Take the early wagon on conc, I could not analyze that wagon unless conc flipped since I don't know his alignment, this reads somewhat scumslipping and I have a feeling that you will be the wagon tomorrow
I'm reading you as scum now.ooh scary
So to answer Droog's question, that's both Droog and sPip as scum on the Lowell lynch wagon, which then means that it's more likely that Lowell is town and just an inactive player. I shall now be voting for him. Find someone else to finish your lynch wagon."I think Lowell is town, so the people on his wagon are scummy, so he is town", yeah that makes sense. Not circular at all whatsoever
In post 459, Mathilda wrote:In post 447, Lowell wrote:The fact that a lot of people are talking about who is or isn't town on my wagon makes me think a lot of people think I'm not actually scum."The people defending me are asking about who might be scum on my wagon, so therefore no one thinks I'm scum".
Keep up. It's me talking about scum on your wagon with Droog and sPip saying scum are the ones not voting. It's comments like these from you which are suspicious, but for me it's Droog and sPip defence of their push to lynch you that's even more suspicious.
This is why I am reading you as anti town and not scum.Again, "if I assume that you are town, then spip and droog are pushing a mislynch and therefore scum, and then lowell is probably town" great reasoning there
In post 460, Mathilda wrote:In post 443, Something Pip wrote:(scum = Lowell, Newbie, Mathilda)
Another thing. Isn't it more likely that scum would be throwing their scum buddies under a bus the moment a definite lynch wagon developed on one of them? If I was a scum buddy with Lowell I would most certainly be voting for him right now. I wouldn't be sticking my neck out arguing with those wanting to lynch him. That's because I would know that he was scum and likely to be lynched and that I would be next in line.
Yes there is WIFOM and all that, but it's still best to stay away from suspicion if you can as scum. This is why your scum read is flawed at best.So by your logic in the world where droog was lynched today and flipped scum, we would be confTown since we are too closely related to be scum? Also Lowell being scum is an independent read, so your and newbie's alignment doesn't affect me wanting to lynch lowell here so this defense is meaningless
In post 463, Mathilda wrote:In post 461, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:
In post 458, Mathilda wrote:Obviously the people pushing for a Lowell lynch have not made a convincing enough argument that he is scum.
I need you to look at post 215 and tell me how it isn't the scummiest post in the game.
Actually hold up I have more problems with Hildy's posts so I'm gonna dedicate a post to it
I would argue that it's not so much scummy as someone who isn't engaged in the game or cares what happens in it. The key sentence here is "This game is going nowhere." Even noob scum, assuming that they are interested in winning, would be stating that Concv is scum and that we should vote for him rather than come out with such an apathetic response.
For reference the post in question:
So the post was too scummy to be scum?
In post 215, Lowell wrote:In post 211, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:I mean I guess Concev could be scum, but there's no where near enough content from the slot.
Very true. Vote him anyway. This game is going nowhere.
In post 464, Mathilda wrote:In post 462, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:In post 458, Mathilda wrote:
In post 443, Something Pip wrote:
And for those who wonder who is scum on Lowell's wagon, my belief is that there aren't any (scum = Lowell, Newbie, Mathilda) but if there are then it's Scorpious or shaddow.
And this makes me suspicious of you as well. Maybe I was right with my initial impression of you.
Why? Do you suspect everyone who disagrees with/suspects you?
Not at all.
As I stated, I am suspicious of people unwilling to entertain the idea that there are scum on the Lowell lynch wagon.
How do you even do wagon analysis on an unflipped player, the whole initial question was ridiculously dumb and is really not a solid point in any scum read or defense right now. The honest answer is we have no idea because Lowell could flip town and then we have to reevaluate the whole game.
In post 462, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:
In post 458, Mathilda wrote:
In post 443, Something Pip wrote:
We can either sit here arguing our way to a no lynch, or we can lynch Lowell and, at the very worst, gain information from the flip.
We're gaining information now by seeing who is pushing for a Lowell lynch with very little information to go on and who don't bother making a good case for doing so, but telling people that it should be a default action to lynch him.
Are you confident enough in Lowell-town to act on that information? If so, why? If not, what the fuck are you talking about?
I am not confident that Lowell is town, but I am getting scummier vibes from sPip and Droog. They could be bussing their scum buddy as far as I know.
- Anti-town is not the same as scum play but even more so from town play. He has done nothing to advance the town in any way.
- Lowell is anti-town because of his apathy. Droog and sPip are actively pushing for anti-town action.Only true if you somehow knew that Lowell was town.
- How do you tell the difference between an apathetic town player and scum?It is really hard, which is why apathetic players make good d1 lynches anyway. However in Lowell's case you can since the posts that are supposed to relate to the game are scummy
- Lynching an apathetic anti-town player does not help town because it generates very little information.Really not true, because everyone has commented on the Lowell wagon it gives us the most information
- Town are generally more worried about mislynching because they lack information, especially on day 1. Droog and sPip don't seem worried about not having the necessary information to avoid a mislynch yet they don't ever state a clear cut case against Lowell.We aren't worried about a mislynch since Lowell is the best lynch and there is no way that we could know 100% d1 that we weren't going to mislynch. What is your point here, you shouldn't lynch apathetic player that you think are super scummy unless you know 100% of the time they will flip scum, wtf.
- Lowell may well be scum, or he may be an easy lynch because of his apathy and anti-town play, but regardless I don't want to do what scum wants me to do.
Yes because us and droog are so confScum if you assume that Lowell is town and that only scum ever push mislynches.-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
All amber text is pip btw.
In post 466, Mathilda wrote:In post 465, Something Pip wrote:hahahahahahaha
Mathilda that is LITERALLY the scummiest thing I have ever read.
LITERALLY? As in being literal? You mean my post was the scummiest post that you have ever read in your entire history of playing Mafia?
And the overly exaggerated laugh 'hahahahahaha'?
It's obvious that you are trying to cajole me. Have you considered using a or ? Because that always works in convincing people.
In post 465, Something Pip wrote:
That's defending your partner, chainsawing his attackers, AND pushing no-lynch. Hey I've done that before...as scum.A5)3
Maybe you just suck as scum.That game was a perfect scum victory
In post 465, Something Pip wrote:
Okay. Lowell is scummy duein partto the fact that he is antitown. He is also using random and unjustified attacks and read swings, promoting apathy, using AtE, being willing to lynch anybody who isn't him, and putting words in people's mouths.
If that is all you were pushing then I would have been far less suspicious. Why all the cajoling and being absolutely sure about who scum is and that none of them are on the Lowell lynch wagon?Reaction testing.
In post 465, Something Pip wrote:
With that out of the way, let me just take a moment to laugh at the person pushing no-lynch (no other lynch can realistically happen today) and callingusantitown.
Yes let's all laugh at someone pushing for a no-lynch. Who is that again? I don't know. No one ever has. Where did I ever push for a no-lynch? Like Droog you're misrepresenting what I have said. This is scummy behaviour.
Yes, because you can organize a full counterwagon who half the town townread in 1 day.
In post 465, Something Pip wrote:
Let's see... "Generates little information" is a lie. If Lowell flips scum we have basically caught the scumteam.
And as pointed out to you before, you can say the same thing about everyone.
Let's lynch you instead. If you flip scum then we have basically caught the scum team.That doesn't work because you case on us is just a chainsaw. If you had an actual case and it wasn't right before the deadline, then this conversation would be very different.
Because you are sure that Lowell is scum and are laughing at anyone who questions your push.
We actually have had a few discussions in our hydra PT about what happens if Lowell flips town. We decided that it is unlikely enough that we would get there when we get there.
In post 465, Something Pip wrote:
But going around saying "oh but what if he's town" up until the end is whiteknighting.
Only if the other person is scum and an extremely poor player. I am neither.Trust me my scum game isn't just pushing mislynch fodder, so this works both ways. Also being a good player doesn't mean you don't defend your partner. There are numerous really good scum players that nearly never bus.
Are you seriously trying to tell me that town don't also have doubts about whether the person about to be lynched is also town? Because if so I can point you to times when this has happened.
But again, in your fantasy world, scum play simplistically it seems. They never lynch a scum buddy and always come to each other's defence. You seem a much better player than to believe that tripe which is why I have you down as scum.
Scum certainly don't.Yeah they totally can. They just waffle reads and then push counterwagons in the deadline, get no lynches and then use NKs to win.-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 470, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:If I could call people scum because I could criticize their logic half this game might as well have selfvoted by now.
But the underlying reason for the bad logic is her pushing a counter wagon in deadline on my scum read-
-
Something Pip Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 132
- Joined: December 11, 2015
In post 477, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:IF Lowell flips scum you might have a case.
I'd still be inclined to think Mathilda town, but you might have a case.
He hasn't. I don't think he's going to.
You and Mathilda are on droog's wagon. There are 6 people on Lowell's wagon who you probably aren't going to convince, meaning you need to convince every other player in the game in 27 hours to vote for Droog if you don't want a no lynch, 2 of which are being prodded. Saying that right now Mathilda is aiming for a droog lynch is inaccurate, Mathilda right now is aiming for a no-lynch by pushing a droog wagon. Droog absolutely will not be lynched today.
Now unless you think town gains more information by not lynching today, I don't see how what you two are doing is not anti town.
-
-
-
-