Always one person
Too many lemon-based profiles/avatars in my life.
In post 27, oddmusic wrote:Okay, fine. If it's not an RVS vote, why do you think it's being made?
In post 34, Aeronaut wrote:
Why are you speaking for other people
In post 33, eektor wrote:
Why do you think this is not an RVS vote?
In post 29, pisskop wrote:In post 27, oddmusic wrote:Okay, fine. If it's not an RVS vote, why do you think it's being made?
Chances are that IL's terrible RVS vote reasoning did that.
. It's not a bad vote. Doesn't excuse his own shenanigans, however.
In post 156, oddmusic wrote:So admitting that I'm a bit lost is a scumclaim? Because town is of course, always on top of everything and only the evil scum ever say they don't know what's going on. Because they're evil. And stuff. /sarcasm.
No, but seriously, what the fuck?
pedit: Because people sometimes read sarcastic posts seriously. And I don't feel like explaining that I'm being sarcastic after the fact. And could you be trying any harder to come up with random reasons to scumread me?
In post 253, Metalcyanide wrote:Speaking of lurkers, whats up where you been? ISOing you shows a bunch of fluff posts. I want some reads out of you.
In post 206, InsidiousLemons wrote:I don't really have a solid reason to think Aero's town. However, I don't have any solid reason to believe the reverse, either. There are better D1 lynches.
In post 255, Aquanim wrote:My argument against Aeronaut has been somewhat misrepresented as a lurker lynch; on the contrary, in the time period where Aeronaut was actively posting a fair few people made less posts than him. My concern is that with his dozen-odd posts he didn't say anything I considered useful, genuinely inquisitive or interesting.
In post 82, mykonian wrote:as in, I could explain why I dislike eektor's posts as of now, but it's small stuff and it might just be eektor being eektor. I'm in no rush
In post 176, Taly wrote:this is a very fast paced game
In post 186, Taly wrote:. I just thought mykonian was a good candidate to push to see if he wasn't town
In post 223, InsidiousLemons wrote:Radiant, I'm sorry, it's late, I'm not thinking very critically right now. At some point soon would you mind consolidating your thoughts on Aqua into one post? This janky argument style is hard for me to keep up with right now.
In post 239, Taly wrote:Is that what you wanted to know?.... I'm feeling pretty crappy at the moment.
In post 282, Metalcyanide wrote:Just get in here when you can and give us some reads.
In post 308, Metalcyanide wrote:I think Pisskop posted his notes lol.
In post 310, Aquanim wrote:@Pisskop: if you consider Taly's #239 inherently lynchable in as of itself why is he not in your top three scumreads?
In post 357, Metalcyanide wrote:@MOD I'm going to be V/LA this weekend. I'll try to check in but don't count on much from me
In post 259, Taly wrote:School is closed due to weather, I have actually slept for a night the past few days, and I’m in a better mentality for putting my thoughts across.
In post 336, TheDudeAbides wrote:Why did you assume that my claim was bs? I mean it was, but why did you assume that.
In post 375, pisskop wrote:In post 336, TheDudeAbides wrote:Why did you assume that my claim was bs? I mean it was, but why did you assume that.
Why did you make that claim?
In post 376, Boonskiies wrote:RC is freakin' town as hell.
Oddmusic and Aquanim are super scum. More on this when I get to a computer.
VOTE: Oddmusic
In post 139, Aquanim wrote:Hey dude.
Spoiler:
In post 134, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 67, eektor wrote:
Is this supposed to be an RVS vote?
Well we are out of RVS so I'm going to unvote
UNVOTE:
Nope. but are you telling me that you know he's town?
Are you telling me that you think he's scum?
In post 135, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 90, Elyse wrote:After two people told metalcyanide to stop bringing us back to RVS, why would you slap down an RVS vote?
I think the whole "bringing us back to RVS" business is bogus. I mean the game is going to progress regardless.
I agree with you up to a point, but why didn't you contribute to progressing the game at that stage?
In post 435, Aquanim wrote:Well, come on then. If you think I'm scum, let's see the case, Elyse.
In post 336, TheDudeAbides wrote:
How did I mis-rep you? I asked you a question.
Why did you assume that my claim was bs? I mean it was, but why did you assume that.
In post 375, pisskop wrote:In post 336, TheDudeAbides wrote:Why did you assume that my claim was bs? I mean it was, but why did you assume that.
Why did you make that claim?
In post 450, pisskop wrote:TDA stated an opinion, not asked a question.
304 was my notes sans most of my own alignment reads. A list of potentially noteable interactions and associations that will be more useful after today. I believe in pre-flip *associations* insofar as deciding who will provide the most information, and I don't like keeping notes with reads in them. When I'm inevitably wrong its harder to trace a real connection if I'm biased recording them.
In post 452, mykonian wrote:It means that your last set of posts are more there for aqua than they are there for the game. It's not particulary relevant otherwise.
In post 517, Aquanim wrote:...
Words fail me.
Can you take your second shot today, pisskop? (I kind of doubt it, but might as well ask.)
In post 554, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 438, pisskop wrote:Why would you defensively try to provoke a vote on you?
. That reads as daring somebody to call your bluff.
This just looks unbelievable - it's like scum caught for the wrong reasons gone berserk.
In post 555, TheDudeAbides wrote:Because I wanted to, and decided to before the game. I even decided I'd say it about Myk before the game, so law dee daa