In post 3, PMysterious wrote:Its pretty normal for me to be voted in RVs. Guess what?
I'm hunting scum. RVs are not my style this time.
How are you managing to hunt scum in post 3 with only two playes posted?
VOTE: PMyst
In post 3, PMysterious wrote:Its pretty normal for me to be voted in RVs. Guess what?
I'm hunting scum. RVs are not my style this time.
In post 41, Hiraki wrote:
...
Nowtheomoaner wrote:How are you managing to hunt scum in post 3 with only two playes posted?thisis juicy stuff for page two.
Let's go over the facts, theomoaner.
In post 47, NJAC wrote:@EPM - Jun is an actual newb so his (her?) question about the setup is honest imo, In fact I've only played two newbie games and I do have some questions about this setup too.
In post 78, evilpacman18 wrote:oh I just realized theomoaner is scummy. ...
Wagon the Scum, people.
In post 123, Jun wrote:...
I thought it was anti town of you not to vote to help people get out of RVS. And while I don't know if you are new or not new, Thor's argument that newbie scum is "willing to bend to demands to be aggressive earlier" stuck with me. My intent was to pressure you to vote and to see if you would feel pressured to vote someone and bend to my demands in order to avert suspicion...
In post 128, theomoaner wrote:^I'm suspicious of fence sitting.
In post 131, Thurhame wrote:@theomoaner:
Jun's temporary pressure vote on evilpacman isn't a scumtell. He did the same thing in my last game.
In post 140, Thurhame wrote:...I hope it wasn't sarcasm.
In post 141, pirate mollie wrote:
I am new, telo is new (saw her in intros) and jun kind of reads as fairly new...
In post 177, Slandaar wrote:@theomoaner: How many and what games have you played on this site before? I want links to all.
"In post 208, Eleison"
In post 86, theomoaner wrote:
Did you just "realize" this or were you told to vote this way by your scumbbudies in your QT?
"In post 300, Jun"
In post 241, pirate mollie wrote:...
themoaner - didn't like how he tried to reframe my low hanging fruit thing I had going on with smash.I am not trying to paint myself as a newbif anything my confidence is probably off putting to some people.I am a newbto the site not new to mafia, but I still consider myself low hanging fruit since this is my first game on here and there is no meta. hiraki also made a good case for him making a RVP into a scumtell. I could get on board with his lynch...
In post 291, pirate mollie wrote:
okay you made a joke but your vote was sincere but you couldn't be bothered to distinguish between the 2 on a sitewhere most people's first post and first vote is typically treated as a joke/getting to know you vote?cos that sounds squiffy. and you haven't stated as to why you found mcstab scummy in the first place nor why you still wanted his lynch in almost 150 posts later.
In post 319, pirate mollie wrote:I am not understanding the contradiction here. where did I talk about fake cases.
In post 325, pirate mollie wrote:....
let's cut through the chaff.
as far I know I am the only one who brought up the low hanging fruit argument and that was not to defend myself but to say that I think it is scummy to do that and that it is also just good scum strategy to go after the people you think are the easiest to lynch and on d1 newer people tend to attract more attention. I have had to pull people off the newbs and more often than not the ones who lean the hardest and make them meltdown and out their role are usally scum so yes, I see it a scum special hunting tactic. my method of scum hunting is to point out scummy behaviour.
In post 162, pirate mollie wrote:eta: I think newbs in this settingshouldbe gone after but not for reasons like your gut is telling you that someone is bad or you don't like a playstyle. go after someone you find objectively scummy.
In post 232, pirate mollie wrote:In post 229, Slandaar wrote:Who do you think is scum Mollie?
maenara and strangely telo come to mind. I don't like the way that eleison keeps shutting down the convo but I think it is an inexperienced player who will play more like an indie than to know how to cooperate with town.
thurhame stands out by hisnot standing out.
you thinking triangulation was not a good idea clanged.
are you still on with the PM lynch. to be honest I would like to hear as to why they have a bad rep.
In post 324, Jun wrote:
And to everyone getting mad at me for saying NJAC and Thurhame are town after only playing 1 game with them: They are being consistent with their town style play which I have seen so they can be town for now. I'd rather get rid of the people I think are scummy or am unsure about before voting for them. Does that make sense?
In post 336, pirate mollie wrote:...I think going after newbs is a scumtell but I do not think that everyone who does it is scummy, town does it a lot.
...
In post 371, Smashbard wrote:Since nobody else feels it's important, I'd like to point out that Pirate Mollie is at L-2.
In post 241, pirate mollie wrote:...I am not trying to paint myself as a newb if anything my confidence is probably off putting to some people...
In post 336, pirate mollie wrote:
You name what amounts to a list of the newest players in the game here in your scummiest target list. Yet here we have a completely different list, and interestingly, two of the players on your original list haven't posted since. So just why are Telo and Thurhame not not scum anymore?
in post #241 I am clearly stating my approach to the game which is that I am starting from whom I think is town and work from there.
the people that I mentioned are not in my town pile so yes I want some engagment with them so I can get a read.also I think it is just good town play to look at the people who are not as active and are not asking to be subbed out cos you will often find scum there.
not sure what problem you are with this except that you seem to think that if I say newbs are low hanging fruit and then I soft fos a newb is a contradiction, when it isn't since I am not directly going after them, I am SOFT FOSSING THEM.
when I read posts I look for the motivation behind the posts (scum or town) and to see if it is consistent with the flow of the game.
In post 382, Smashbard wrote:
They haven't posted so why did she not still want to "engage" them? If that is the case then why have they gone from her "soft fossing" (whatever that is) or scum list?
But this part confuses me. You either are mischaracterizing the post you are quoting or you made a typo somewhere. Because here you are asking why Pirate Mollie would not want to engage Telo & Thurhame, when Pirate Mollie explicitly says that she would like to engage Telo & Thurhame to get a read. So I'm going to need some clarification here as to the kind of point you are trying to make.
In post 382, Smashbard wrote:
Do I really have to explain? I mean, I think it would be obvious. If you put someone close to a lynch it's only pro-town to let people know...
In post 387, dividizzle wrote:
- The most town-leaning point for me is that Mollie and I have had some overlap in other scum suspicions...
In post 388, Slandaar wrote:She is too sure there are 3 scum when she has the experience to not assume as such; She knows how many scum there are ie 3 at least in the main pack.
In post 99, Hiraki wrote:Once I'm done with theo, your buddy, you're next. Then Pirate and then Russian Roulette.
Everyone loves games, so let's play that one after the hard work is done.
In post 390, pirate mollie wrote:holy cow, the moaner, your whole case in post #379 falls apart when you take what you cherry picked and apply it context with what I said. "new to the site not new to mafia". this isn't the first time you have done this it is why I find you scummy. mischarecterisation and misdirection is the #1 tool of scum.
I explicitly said that I was scumhunting from who I thought was in my town pile out, telo and thurhame were on the periphereal. your weird fixation and persistent reframing of this looks scummy.
In post 232, pirate mollie wrote:In post 229, Slandaar wrote:Who do you think is scum Mollie?
maenara and strangely telo come to mind. I don't like the way that eleison keeps shutting down the convo but I think it is an inexperienced player who will play more like an indie than to know how to cooperate with town.
thurhame stands out by hisnot standing out.
you thinking triangulation was not a good idea clanged.
are you still on with the PM lynch. to be honest I would like to hear as to why they have a bad rep.
@ smash
Because you cannot say going after newbs is a scumtell is town does it a lot. A scumtell by definition, tells you this is something scum will do, and you use it as a tool to out scum when they do it.
you most certainly can cos town will drop a lot of objective scum tells too. I have met very few players who play a super clean game. scum will go after low hanging fruit but so will xenophobic town. the 2 are scummy but the motivations behind the 2 will be different. scum tend to do it more often the reason they do it is consistent with their win condition (try to get town to lynch town) so that is why it is objectively scummy.
more moaner stuff:
This is really poor reasoning, agreeing with someone is the worst possible reason for clearing them. Scum will target anyone who they can get a wagon going on, and for that they are going to look for "reasonable" overlaps and common targets.
no it isn't...
In post 401, 10506670 wrote:
That's not to say I'm going to put my vote on any of them in an attempt to "pressure" them into posting more.
In post 409, Jun wrote:
Guys, Thurhame is town. Believe me. We have bigger fish to fry at the moment. Like mollie and PMysterious.
In post 415, Hiraki wrote:Blah, Blah, Blah
In post 416, pirate mollie wrote:
wrt the bold: I answered you in post #393. who is blatantly lying now.
In post 393, pirate mollie wrote:Oh dear. Yes town can drop scumtells, how else could mislynches happen?but a scumtell is specifically something that scum are much more likely to do than town, not something that scum and town do in roughly equal measures. Otherwise what use is it for finding scum?
that is what I said.
you most certainly can cos town will drop a lot of objective scum tells too. I have met very few players who play a super clean game. scum will go after low hanging fruit but so will xenophobic town. the 2 are scummy but the motivations behind the 2 will be different.scum tend to do it more oftenthe reason they do it is consistent with their win condition (try to get town to lynch town) so that is why it is objectively scummy.
hth
In post 392, theomoaner wrote:
I explicitly said that I was scumhunting from who I thought was in my town pile out, telo and thurhame were on the periphereal. your weird fixation and persistent reframing of this looks scummy.
Wrong. I'm specificaly referring to your two posts #232 which is a direct answer to a question from Slandaar. No explicit "these are the scum who are in my town pool".
In post 392, theomoaner wrote:
And post 325, which also makes no such explicit claim, unless I missed it of course. You have now gone from contradiction to blatant lying.
In post 432, Smashbard wrote:
The problem I'm running into with with is that we'll never get guys like Hiraki, Theo, Mollie, Slandaar and Numbers (the guy with numbers for a name) to come together to agree on anything...
In post 375, NJAC wrote:Sorry about the absence, really need to reread the thread and some ISO's. I agree with the last post of dividizzle. Don't see the need to quicklynch Mollie. Of courseI'll read her ISO and come with a read on her,but it's pro-town to think things and use our votes wisely, so if someone else is going to jump on that wagon, they better think it twice and reread before voting, even more considering some players have not posted enough (I'm one of them I know) or are going to be replaced.
In post 241, pirate mollie wrote:okay. I have been nightkilled in another game cos the SK is retarded but it has moved me into hyperdrive about this game.I am about to do a 180 on some of my reads maybe that will liven things up.
Good luck with getting that into effect, you could start a campaign.In post 493, Telo wrote:
I have a very simple solution to that problem. If you're town - don't lurk.
It is.It sounds like what you're saying is that people who don't post will be safe from votes. I think that's part of the problem.
Other people are scummy, PMyst is just lurking, I'd rather lynch scum, and deal with PMyst if and when we don't have better targets. Actually I'd rather PMyst and the other lurkers be force replaced so we don't have to waste a lynches on them but that's up to Mykonian.That makes three of us maybe more yet he only has one vote. I don't get it.
You didn't, I asked the question in #480, you haven't addressed it yet.I already did.
In post 538, Slandaar wrote:Do I actually have to read through these newbie games...
In post 47, Gliffie wrote:Hey y'all. I'm Gliffie, arriving a bit late to the party. It'll be fun playing with you all
In post 40, RachMarie wrote:
Johnny are you trying to say you would play the same as town as you do as scum? Or is this a possible scumslip here?
phdjnkrnfkernk. I absolutelyhateit when people say shit like "possible scumslip?". The whole logic is pants on head retarded. Scum are the most cautious players in the game (along with the doc), so why on earth would they slip up? Yeah, it might happen, especially here in newbie games (just look at <numbers>), but more often than not it's just some scrub-a-bub townie, and I know that feel. To be honest, I feel like scum are more likely to do the whole "ooh, scumslip??" charade. At least that's how it is in my experience.
In post 1148, Thor665 wrote:In post 1143, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Thor, you did lead a few mislynches. (all of them if memory serves.)
I also lead the only correct lynch we had and jailed scum 3 out of 4 times.
So...yeah, good case.
In post 1144, TraceyLyn11 wrote:A specific example would be how long you waited to claim. It'sgood because it would draw out any scum claims, and you're teaching the newer players patience and to think for themselves.But then again, there's obviously a clear scum advantage there.
So it could be done for either a pro town or pro scum gain - you need to look at it in context at that point and figure out what I was doing it for.
At the core - this is a null tell until you do that.
In post 1144, TraceyLyn11 wrote:Another example iswhenyou claimed. You kept calling yourself confirmed town and was flaunting it. On the one hand, your Thor. I don't expect anything less. On the other hand, scum would be pretty happy if they were considered confirmed town.
I was confirmed town...so...
And flaunting is a character trait. It clearly isn't a scumtell.
In post 1144, TraceyLyn11 wrote:ANOTHER example (that doesn't have to deal with the claim), would be that half the time it seems like you're purposely trying to trip people up by constantly asking loaded questions. Again, I see the IC potential (and the Thor asshole personality), but it could also be used as a way to pin someone as scum.
It could also be taken as scumhunting and trying to force people to think.
Again, it's, at best, a null tell until you look at it in perspective. Was I using it to make people think and to get reads, or was I using it to trip people up and lynch them?
In post 1144, TraceyLyn11 wrote:And finally, you pushed the Wray wagon. While you may have actually thought she was scum, I find it hard to believe just because of how incredibly TOWNIE she was. (PEDIT: Damn it Johnny!)
Wray was not incredibly townie in my opinion - and neither was she in the opinion of 2 other town (and, for a while, yourself)
For this to be a scumtell you have to be able to show some sort of evidence that I *did* believe she was incredibly townie....and didn't care.
That would make it very scummy.
Otherwise it's called a difference of opinion (take, for example, me calling Johnny and 2139-048 obv. town - I did so early and did so correctly, and I questioned people who voted them but never used it as a case against anyone...because I understood that just because I saw them as town didn't mean everyone did. Instead I spent time trying to understand *why* people saw them as scum. aka 'scumhunting')
In post 542, pirate mollie wrote:
...
I am new to this site and my hanging back is more of me trying to get used to how you all do things on here and I figured the best way to do that is to watch and observe and not interfere with the process. <------ good town play for someone who is new but it is probably going to take a good town player to figure that out...
In post 214, pirate mollie wrote:
triangulation is when 2 players who have town reads on each other start a dialogue comapring their scum/town piles and bring in another player and form a consensus and then vote as block. they do this in order to control the lynch since town usually moves in herds. it is a very effective strategy since town's main way of eliminating scum is through a lynch.
I have only a played few untimed games so not sure if it would work in this format but I would to try it.
I want to triangulate with slandaar cos he is my strongest town right now, he is cutting through the chaff and I don't think scum would go out of their way to help a newb get out of their very wrong reasoning especially a newb that no one seems to like, lol. if he were scum, I would think that he would just let me get lynched instead of encouraging me to think in a different way.
I want to see if he will work with me and then see if we could bring hikari in since he has a town read on him and I like some of hikari's responses.
triangulation is a good strategy and I have noticed that town wins more games when they do this than not.
In post 554, Smashbard wrote:I highly doubt that theo. Mollies fighting against Numbers lynch has really made me rethink Mollies alignment. But if numbers flips town against all odds I would almost guarantee Mollie is town.
In post 173, pirate mollie wrote:lol. so what do you think of smash's scum list hiraki?
In post 175, pirate mollie wrote:
hiraki resorts to emotional manipulation. would like feedback if this is typical of him regardless of alignment.
smash is doing exactly what I expect scum to do: go after low hanging fruit. I would consider this a scum newb mistake for someone who has played a 5 to 10 timed games format. not sure how it matches up within an untimed game tbh.
also where are mcstab and pm.
pacman is engaged, not sure on him yet.
smash is whom I am going for I think.
In post 189, pirate mollie wrote:
I still think smash's list is shit. he might have one but not all 3 and certainly not me.
thanks.
Yes, that as wellIn post 562, Maenara wrote:In post 561, theomoaner wrote:I'm seeing a pattern here.
So am I. Namely, this game isn't going anywhere.
This post just stinks of near deadline panic.There's been a lot of activity already, there honestly has. It hasn't been a full Day 1 yet, but it's gotten a bit of the way. But we're stalling, because this is turning into a quagmire. So we need a target we can all agree on. Not necessarily the most scummy to any given person, but someone we can all agree that we need to remove.
That person is, of course, Shinori.
I don't want to lynch him the most. There are others who I find legitimately scummy. He's not so much one of them. But he is terrible. He has done nothing to move the game forward, what-so-ever, he has tunnelled almost solely on two players, and worst of all? He's said that he doesn't care if we lynch him.
In post 573, evilpacman18 wrote:I'm gonna hammer the first person to reach L-1 so that I can give myself time to catch up over the night.
In post 553, theomoaner wrote:
If quote mining (what ever that is) is such a huge scumtell for you then perhaps you should really be voting for me?
Another interesting thing for me, and I'm not going to use quotes here, is how you asked me to link to the bits of Numberguys newb games where scumslips and scumtells are discussed. I've done this (partially), you haven't commented on them after making an issue of it. Why?