you know thisEPM wrote:Both seem to be playing differently from their extant newbie games as scum.
after like 1-2 posts?
Come on EPM.
Work it.
There is a lot you can tell from these kinds of response. How the correct response works will remain secret until he posts, but these can work and they can fail. They're not trustable for a lynch but definitely for pressure.Smashboard wrote:Weird that you ask McStab specifically, why?
EPM is probably doing it for jokes/reaction testing everyone else(aka you)
YknowPMy wrote:I'll give out my scumreads on Page 6 afterward
I know you've gotten a decently bad reputation--but I don't care about reputations until I play with the said person.
But please.
Never ever plan out something like that.
Right...McStab wrote:Therefore, pressuring PM pays dividends. It is not an RVS.
your plan is so brilliant that it can't possibly have any flawsMcStab wrote: I want him pressured; if he starts to fall apart, he's scum.
it even sounds too good to be true
like
it's coming from scum
if anyone needs pressure
it's mcstab fyi
Okay, but actually you can't use those tells now.EPM wrote: I got town vibes from McStab's answer this time.
Why?
Well, this snippet.
Smashboard wrote:But seriously, the only two answers you could possibly get from asking "Are you scum" are the obvious "No" or a sarcastic "totally". You gain nothing from such a question.
That basically gave McStab a free ticket out to be sarcastic.
I'm not saying that if McStab didn't have that post he would've been super serious or sarcastic--but you can't really apply it if nothing happened.
Anyway, your tells are wrong as well. It varies from person to person and the two spectrums are answering the question and not answering the question rather than how the person answers the question. If the person gives a straightforward answer (ala yes, no, simple one word stuff) then the person has a
Also, reminding the person about the question invalidates most of this stuff as well. This is a tad bit overkill for something very minor in the end.
He actually had a decent point, thanks.In post 31, evilpacman18 wrote:^ scum #1.
And while I won't validate it as a point (lol hiraki is trying to front on me when he won't even approve of the point), he's more town than scum for saying that.
Nowtheomoaner wrote:How are you managing to hunt scum in post 3 with only two playes posted?
Let's go over the facts, theomoaner.
It's Page 1. You're correct. There's very little evidence to go off on, so how is this possible? Is it possible?
Could he perhaps be *GASP*
or perhaps *GASP*
Either point doesn't matter because you
oh....right...
we thought this one out.
In addition,
Which means "I'm going to say I'm scumhunting, but I really can't but I promise I'll have reads by Page 6"PMy wrote:I plan on bringing up conversation by thinking about someone over 5 pages and I'll give out my scum reads on Page 6 afterward.
Note: PMysterious will not have reads by Page 6.
Yes, my buddy from last game, you were perfectly clear! Flawless! It'd be impossible that someone would have a different view than us!EPM wrote:You were perfectly clear. He's forcing maligned intent into your posts.
Seriously. What the fuck. Stop this pretty obvious buddying to McStab being a god.
Why do I smell compromise on Page 1?Smashbird wrote:I still think it's rather pointless to do a pressure wagon when it's blatantly obvious that the wagon isn't serious. But I'll bite for now.