In post 3166, goodmorning wrote:dammit
i should have quickhammered him while i had the chance
fucking what
Yeah you should have
VOTE: good morning
In post 3166, goodmorning wrote:dammit
i should have quickhammered him while i had the chance
fucking what
In post 3214, Albert B. Rampage wrote:After this colossal disaster, I don't know what to say, really. Sometimes, you're wrong. Sometimes you're odds of winning a hand are 96% and the 4% card comes out on the river. It happens. I'm not beating myself up about it.
In post 3248, MathBlade wrote:On ABR
Me (3232)
Kitz (3097)
Wake88 (3099)
Aeronaut (3103)
SilverWolf (3015)
Cheetory6 (3108)
Dragonspawn (3135)
Any other votes irrelevant.
In post 3315, elusive wrote:please unvote ffs
In post 3405, MathBlade wrote:And scums dying would be great. However I think it is best to lynch me.
In post 3482, SilverWolf wrote:In post 3481, dragonspawn wrote:In post 3475, SilverWolf wrote:I'm a doctor, full BP, vigilante, tracker yo.
knew you were town
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I also am a wolf-horse.
In post 3483, MathBlade wrote:You mean how VF couldn't be told he was protected because it was against site meta?
Three investigative roles are against site meta?
Are we really going to go against site meta or are we going to use our brains here?
ABR IS NOT A GOOD LYNCH TODAY OR ANY DAY!
In post 3489, T S O wrote:I think MathBlade -did- get tracked to Ellie last night. I think she doesn't want ABR to flip because she knows this is an actual result and if ABR flips Tracker she's dead the next day.
In post 3497, MathBlade wrote:Ellie if you are watching this for the love of all that is holy I hate this role.
The RNG gods have their reward.
Please don't do this. I have no argument other than knowing ABR and what he is doing and why that makes him town. I would rather not lynch any town but if we have to lynch a town it should be me.
In post 3603, elusive wrote:@WAKE
ABR's play to get the claimed cop killed by fake claiming does not make sense from a scum perspective, what benefit does it give him in terms of the long game and also if he were scum why would he fake claim to get VF lynched when he couldn't be sure to his claim being true or false and most likely would know it to be false, why not do something like mafia roleblock since this seems like a role heavy game, so therefore he is either extremely bad anti-town town or third party but I doubt he's scum especially since VF was roleblocked on his first night therefore there was no need to kill him in that public spectacle fashion.
dragonspawn, why don't you stop making stupid suggestions.
In post 3603, elusive wrote:@WAKE
ABR's play to get the claimed cop killed by fake claiming does not make sense from a scum perspective, what benefit does it give him in terms of the long game and also if he were scum why would he fake claim to get VF lynched when he couldn't be sure to his claim being true or false and most likely would know it to be false, why not do something like mafia roleblock since this seems like a role heavy game, so therefore he is either extremely bad anti-town town or third party but I doubt he's scum especially since VF was roleblocked on his first night therefore there was no need to kill him in that public spectacle fashion.
dragonspawn, why don't you stop making stupid suggestions.
In post 3635, elusive wrote:In post 3633, dragonspawn wrote:Hey elusive can you explain how the scum could have role blocked Viking after their rb was dead
No, but the doctor is dead so they would have a better shot at him yeah?
In post 3640, elusive wrote:Ok SW. I can't think anymore.
Sweet dreams and all.
MB, vanilla with caramel syrup and gummi bears for you
Dragon, I may or may not be the second doc non consecutive. I may just be an ice cold strawberry lemonade. I want one so badly right now.
HYPO THETICALLY
THETICALLY HYPE
In post 3728, Aeronaut wrote:@ Dragonspawn, what's your read on NJ
@ NJ, what's your read on Dragon?
In post 3849, SilverWolf wrote:In post 3837, Nobody Special wrote:In post 3826, Aeronaut wrote:Ika can we get a vc
I am trying to pin down a motivation for this post.
I am not succeeding.
Why do you think asking for a vc is alignment indicative in the least?
In post 3873, Aeronaut wrote:Don't know why that whole thing was quoted :/
Anyway, dragon, please answer this.
In post 3688, dragonspawn wrote:Our town sucks this game. Too many people lying.
now wake is replacing out, not sure what to think of that.
I'm still not liking NJ and good morning still seems like gloating scum who just so happens to vote for me when I was calling him on his scumminess yesterday.
I'm going to watch a bit before voting.
Can you clarify what you mean by Boasting Scum? Why wouldn't scum be trying to look depressed at a mislyched, instead of boasting and looking happy?
In post 3903, Cheetory6 wrote:This game is boring.
I don't miss the fucking trainwreck that this game was a few cycles ago, but did we really have to slip onto the other end of the spectrum into watching paint dry territory?
Hi Dragon, tell me about GM. Is it just the gloating bit that you were talking about that made you feel like she's scum or is there more to it than that?
In post 3968, elusive wrote:I never said I want to kill NS. TSO said that. I am against due to in-thread reasons unless I'm making a huge Fail which I hope not. I want TSO to respond to what I asked him.
SilverWolf, I'm the closest thing to confirmed town in this game right now. So yeah.
In post 4034, Kitz wrote:Somewhat "intend to hammer". If all agrees to lynch but lacks a last vote and the rest doesn't vote, then sure, hammer.
For now, let everyone talk.
We have like a whole week, aye? But it'll be stupid to waste that week with absolutely no needed or constructive discussion.
In post 4115, goodmorning wrote:In post 4108, dragonspawn wrote:
because his posts feel genuinely annoyed with the towns bad play. Scum wouldn't be genuine in the least.
Seriously? There's nothing fun about winning a game because the Town imploded.
In post 4198, T S O wrote:I'm going to say exactly what I said in Completely Ridiculous: one scum lynch. That's all we need. The game will fall open if we get it.
I choked in Completely Ridiculous like fuck and I'd dearly love to redeem myself for that fuck-up.
In post 4325, SilverWolf wrote:In post 4323, goodmorning wrote:In post 4317, Kitz wrote:Quick ISO with " NS" on the search. You crumbed him, and saw him out.
So did myself and TSO.
In post 4319, T S O wrote:I am starting to doubt the authenticity of the Serial Killer as well - one night of 3 kills out of 5 nights has me skeptical.
I agree. 1-Shot Vig maybe? But then what?
Or maybe we have some sort of blocking/protecting role that's getting very lucky.
Eh. probably no mileage in speculation anyway.
I should probably do some ISOs or something. There are still too many players in this game, I swear.
I doubt there's an SK in this game with only one kill per night the last 3 nights unless the doc has been doing a fantastic job of blocking every time. I'm pretty sure if there's a vig, it's one-shot and was used N1. I can't explain the 3 kill attempts N1. I have no idea.
I find trying to outguess the mod is a waste of time. I do it a lot but it never works so..........................No idea.
In post 4331, goodmorning wrote:In post 4328, Kitz wrote:In post 4324, SilverWolf wrote:It's not uncommon for the doc not to reveal if they healed anyone or not. That info. isn't revealed until post game or if the doc claims for some reason. Doc's playing scummy is not unusual either.
Red flag. A Doctor should reveal at that point if all he managed to heal are still alive. It would aid us in finding Scum, and do a process of elemination.
None had claimed to be healed. What's a good doctor if he can only heal to prolong but not aid in the slightest towards finding Scum? Continous mislynches outweights outing self in order to find multiple scum.
Unpopular opinion there.
SilverWolf retains the popular opinion, actually.
Doctors are more useful alive than dead, and when in a potentially multiball game with who-knows-what blocking roles or other protective ones, outing their protects doesn't serve to clear anyone as Town (could be Scum targeted by Wolf, kill could have been stopped by someone not the Doctor, etc). So all a Doc claiming would do is get him killed.
UTR stands for 'under the radar.'
NS saidTWOnon-consecutive Docs. Only one had flipped. He very plainly meant that he was the other.
In post 4338, SilverWolf wrote:Ummm dragon? GM is not the only one who picked up on that. Several of us did. How on Earth does that make her scum?
Kitz-I'll answer it later and yeah, I need to save things somewhere else before posting if they are long-have lots of quotes in them.
In post 4357, T S O wrote:In post 4354, dragonspawn wrote:Voting for scum.
Nothing has changed since yesterday other than the fact that it's obvious she knew ns was a doc.
What's ridiculous is that town lynched fa when it was obvious by the end that he was town. And now we ignore scum that rubs it in our faces.
This is very true - she did know NS was a Doctor. What doesn't make sense is why she thought it would be a good idea to delay killing him for 3 days while he potentially blocked her team's kills.
In post 4358, T S O wrote:I want to spontaneously lynch Aeronaut I just do
In post 4365, T S O wrote:Scum are usually a lot more rational than they're given credit for.
I would bet a significant amount of money goodmorning got that crumb.
In post 4370, SilverWolf wrote:Interesting how you suddenly unvoted GM after trying to lynch her for days dragon.
Did you sense resistance and give up? How much conviction did you have in the first place?
In post 4372, Aeronaut wrote:Wouldn't that mean that GM was more likely to be scum in your eyes, since there's more resistance?