In post 380, Shadow1psc wrote: In post 379, Dolorous Edd wrote:Please, by all means, go on believing that makes her look town or whatever, but like Tammy said (I think?), there is not one thing that can be used as alignment indicative.
Just ftr, sucking on Day1 is not a reason for you not being lynched.
Neither is having a meta of acting scummy.
But tell me, what was your read on them before that?
Because unless you seeked council from the oracle of delphi, I really don't see how that post could've at all changed your thought at all...
Then you either didn't read it, or you've never played with Mina. Simple as that.
Actually it's not as simple as that; he's played with Mina and seen her as both alignments. I'm the one who made the statement originally he's agreeing with; Mina, herself, would probably tell you there was nothing alignment indicative in that. Anyone can say, I'm busy but I'll obvtown myself later. And, I'm not saying I disbelieve Mina as I know she has a French test coming up (Good luck Mina, by the way!), but saying it isn't alignment indicative. If she obvtowns herself, then she does, but her saying she can isn't alignment indicative.
In post 385, Plessiezarus wrote:
(Also, Hyperion is GreatJim on the Westeros site, right? Don't really understand the meta-based scum read on him, if that's the case.)
Don't know if anyone answered this, but yes, Hyperion is GreatJim. Oh wait I remember Regfan posting a link to a game they played in on site.
Regfan
- Hyperion was Olivia Dunham in the Fringe game. He was also Aviendha in the WoT game.
BB
- You "played" in the Fringe game right? Did you see Hyperion vote me because I suggested a policy lynch on someone as a very obvious joke early day one? He was the one who gave me a flow chart of scumminess when I asked him about it.
I'm not ready to give Hyperion a town read, but he's a newer player who sometimes jumps on minor things that aren't very scummy and calls them scummy and that should be taken into account. So, it's very much within his play and experience level to not realize that BB was doing a reaction test that is not scummy in and of itself, especially since that's not a typical practice at our site.
In post 394, hasdgfas wrote:Regfan wrote:I've explained the town-read on Edd already but lets put it this way; I have meta on the posting head, Tammy also has a lot of meta on that posting head, everything they've done ressembles their town play quite strongly and I really suggest you give that a lot of weight. Also their early comments about the usage of the choose is very town and the pointing out of the Feysal 'slip' is a big town-tell as is the fact that their posts and scumhunting show a lot of consideration.
From what I could see, there were about two sentences, mostly saying that Edd would do what you would do, and you liked a couple things that he did(which you repeat here). The meta argument does absolutely nothing for me without you elaborating. I could say "My meta on people posting the way Edd does makes me think he's scum" and it means absolutely nothing. I can't give weight to you saying that his meta resembles his town play because of that.
I know that Reg gives you more input on this, but here's the thing about Arthur. Arthur has a tendency to get overeager and overzealous in a way that usually garners him a bit of suspicion...well a lot here. He jumps to horrible conclusions sometimes about what makes people likely to be scum, has a tendency to not read things, and base his conclusions on that. (Once he tried to lynch me for rping during the rvs stage of a theme I enjoyed and then getting serious once we got out of it because it was scum being nervous or something.) It's frustrating as hell sometimes, and believe it or not he's getting better. He tends to spam threads and sometimes acts in a little overaggressive ways because he feels like he gets the best reads when he gets people to express anger/frustration/etc. He has a tendency to think his reads are rock solid and has a really hard time articulating why he has the reads he has though sometimes he has really good reads.
There's a way that he interacts with people when he's town from when he's scum that's a bit different. He's only been scum three times I believe, and it's been rather awkward when he has. Here's his most recent scum attempt if you like meta
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p4251258 As scum he generally goes between an overaggressiveness that is combined with a weird over angry attitude but becomes complacent immediately and backs down when called out. Basically he's very self-conscious in a way when scum that he's not when town.
I've only seen a couple of slight things that have given me slight pause when reading him which gives me a good feeling overall. That being said, his other head posted. Alek gave me far more bad feelings than Arthur did, but I still think that given time to interact with them I can get an accurate read on the entire hydra. I'm pretty sure I've been the driving force behind lynching Alek all but one of the times he's been scum when we've played together and that was mainly because I was focusing on his partner and got night killed before I could broaden my suspicions. Alek has a tendency to come across extremely suspicious though, so sometimes it's harder to get a town read on him unless he drops strong town tells.
In post 401, Shadow1psc wrote: In post 398, StefanB wrote:That not but the defence of "I am so scummy, I can't be scum" is still worst.
So beeing unhelpful und checky is now a towntell?
Shadow try another explanation?
How about the explanation of, the game isn't even 3 (real) days old and people are trying to actually use limited amount of interaction in a 28 player game to pinpoint behavior as either 'scummy' or 'town', as if the game has been going on for weeks, or some mystical mindset is able to actually tell you I am scum, much in the way I've been called out for calling Mina town (which I never actually said she was, just that she shouldn't be lynched because Mina is easy to read in later days).
I haven't even properly read the whole thread, I just find it amusing that we have MoI and others trying to throw their weight around so early when no one knows jack shit for any reason on day one. Deal with it.
Okay two things. Do you actually believe that Mina is so easy to read? Because I'm not sure where you're going with this. Mina is fairly readable, but she can play a decent scum game when she wants to. But you're acting like Mina fumbles along like an idiot when she's scum spilling so many scum tells it'll be obvious. If that were true, Plessiezarus wouldn't have added that they *think* they would have a better read of minimum if Mina started posting.
Second - I remember you in GvE having a couple of scum reads on day one. CooLDog especially, so I'm trying to figure out why you keep preaching that there's nothing to know.
And, for the record, I've been able to get some decently strong and accurate reads day one.
PFFT. Reckoner was too lazy to be scum in Scummies too...wait. Also, are you going to say you're random vote hopping as scum in the WoT game was you being active and not lazy?
In post 409, Staeg wrote:I'm mildly... not suspicious, I guess, but... troubled? by the fact that snowstorm doesn't want to read the previous games to "keep an objective PoV," when he has already played with about 1/3 of the playerlist on the Westeros forums.
I'm reading SnowStorm as scum, but I want to interject here a bit because it makes sense to me why he wouldn't. At Westeros, we always play behind alts. There are very very few times we play altless. We also have quite strict meta rules. We can't out another person's alt or our own. Sure, we have codes and things to get around some of the rules when we have meta reasons for why we read people the way we do, but we can't use that as part of our cases or arguments at all. You know how people go, "In GvE, you behaved this way, so I believe xyz here?" We can't do that there. So, because we are accustomed to play without meta - and our hilariously bad altguesses of each other has hindered games in the past - it makes perfect sense why SnowStorm wouldn't want to read any past games to get an unobjective PoV because that's how we're conditioned to play this game.
-------
WELCOME AMRUN :CARTWHEELS: