In post 6949, Yosarian2 wrote:Wait. You have ALL the fist techniques already?
I told he was not just vt
In post 6949, Yosarian2 wrote:Wait. You have ALL the fist techniques already?
In post 6958, Rylai and Lina wrote:and the things I think are naturally not a crumb of Liza but they can't be coming from another character
it was more in day 2 but there were signs from the start of his ISO.
~Rylai
In post 6994, Rylai and Lina wrote:both are likely scum
I think we can make a double lynch on them
~Rylai
In post 7007, Lowkey wrote:prodded. noted.
I'll reread. I told hindu I'd catch up if we were still alive today. I guess that means I'm on the hook.
~Lowell
ps- before I read through, if anyone has any specific questions you want me to weigh in on that would be helpful.
In post 7040, Yosarian2 wrote:Yeah, ABR just totally went off the deep end for absolutely no logical reason in the adventure chat, as I think everyone else in chat can attest to.
In post 7044, Lowkey wrote:In post 7033, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Zulfy + Yosarian + Skybird are the scum.
In post 7035, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Lowkey, DP, and TCC, I have a simple question for you. If you answer correctly, I reached a hasty conclusion. If you answer incorrectly, it will justify what I think is a slip.
What do you think Sensei's abilities are?
I don't give a crap, at all, about flavor. Not sure how this game turned out to be a game only about flavor, but it bores me. So I have no idea about sensei's abilities.
Although I've been saying yos was scum since forever. He's laying low and avoiding heat. hindu will come around on this.
~Lowell
In post 7052, Lowkey wrote:hybrid = hydra... but enough about me....
In post 7055, Albert B. Rampage wrote:In post 7040, Yosarian2 wrote:Yeah, ABR just totally went off the deep end for absolutely no logical reason in the adventure chat, as I think everyone else in chat can attest to.
You realize that Sensei suddenly claimed that you knew his role without him ever saying what abilities he had, right?
In post 7065, Sensei wrote:That's notexactlyhow it went down but yea, further discussion of this is worthless.
ABR and Yos are probably town and I was able to make my read on at least yos more confident.
In post 7066, Sensei wrote:I also didn't foresee this leaking into the thread either..
In post 7098, Yosarian2 wrote:In post 7097, Drunken Pirates wrote:@ yoyo
who do you think is scum? cos I see you clearing a lot of town but I am not seeing where you are narrowing down your choices into a scum pool. but mebbe I missed it.
In post 7071, Yosarian2 wrote: Probably leaning towards votign either Klingon or CC right now
But yeah, that's mostly based on process of elimination right now.
In post 7111, Drixx wrote:Can we slow this roll just a little bit? Cerberus has been legitimately super busy (I've barely spoken to him in the last week which is way out of the ordinary).
I want to see his evaluation of things. From that, I will feel quite comfortable in evaluating and telling you guys whether he's town or scum. We know each other that well and we both approach the game very similarly. I'd prefer not to just lynch him out of hand because he hasn't engaged yet. I've had busy times before and been lynched because of them, and that always sucks.
This is not a defense at all of the slot. I already pointed out some reasons I suspect the slot may be scum but they don't make me 100% sure. I want to actually see him evaluate the game and have the chance to give my response toit. If his analysis of the game strikes me as coming from town!Cerb and you guys want to lynch him anyway, we will at least have the benefit of having his thoughts on the game, which I think everyone will agree will help regardless of his alignment.
In post 7113, Albert B. Rampage wrote:TCC you should claim because I think they want to lynch you today.
In post 7117, Drunken Pirates wrote:In post 7113, Albert B. Rampage wrote:TCC you should claim because I think they want to lynch you today.
how about you claim whom you have protected?
I am sick to death of you rolefishing every1 while lying like a mofo I mean if you are a doc this shld not be hard to do.
In post 7138, Drixx wrote:I really think it would be wise to back off and give Cerberus some time. I would like people to unvote simply so nobody silences him and claims they didn't realize. We have a good amount of time and he shouldn't feel like he has to compromise his real life to dump hours into the game today, or else. That's just asinine, even if he rolled scum. Nobody deserves to be pushed like that, regardless of alignment, when the day phases are so long.
This is mostly an OOC post. This is the person behind the keyboard saying that not one of us would want to be put in a position of having to set aside our Real Life plans (especially on Super Bowl Sunday) or else get lynched. It's one thing if we're close to the deadline, but this isn't that.A little empathy and compassion for one another would go a long way toward making things so much more pleasant.
I'll get down off my soap box now.
In post 7202, The Cool Cucumbers wrote:Like, seriously man. How do you not understand that? It's what I spelled out? You're voting me because you don't believe me, which is bullshit. Voting me because you think 3p should die is fine, whatever. But doing it because you don't believe my claim is bs.
-Cerb
pedit: Ooh good question. I can ask Varsoon? I assumed we had to be alive at end game,but our win con literally says "We win when all killing roles have been removed from the game."
In post 7211, Drunken Pirates wrote:In post 7202, The Cool Cucumbers wrote:Like, seriously man. How do you not understand that? It's what I spelled out? You're voting me because you don't believe me, which is bullshit. Voting me because you think 3p should die is fine, whatever. But doing it because you don't believe my claim is bs.
-Cerb
pedit: Ooh good question. I can ask Varsoon? I assumed we had to be alive at end game,but our win con literally says "We win when all killing roles have been removed from the game."
how exactly does it match with this?
Oh, yeah, there are probably only 4 scum total, cause SK wants to kill everyone, and we actively wanted to ensure the death of 3 town slots, who are all dead now.
cos they read like a contradiction to me!
In post 7239, The Cool Cucumbers wrote:Fine. We don't need to stump anybody? Lol. It's not compulsive.
-Cerb
In post 7245, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I know there are people who want you to tree stump DP. So there's also that to take into consideration. There is also the possibility of tree stumping Rylai so that we know if Zulfy and Sensei are really confirmed town or not. There are too many risks. I'm not sure it's a good idea to give you free reign to ruin the game if you choose to, if you're telling the truth about your role.
In post 7251, The Cool Cucumbers wrote:KC: I'll ask you like I've asked everyone else: Do you not believe that we are legitimately third fucking party, or are you just policy lynching us because we're 3p?
oh, ABR: If Varsoon tells me that we can't win with town if we get lynched before end game, then that's something I may have left out, but it's not something I know right now. I need to get an answer from him.
-Cerb
pedit: Stumping R&L was our current plan for the night, after Zulfy's claim. It was actually our plan on N1, before they claimed the names. I figured we could stump them, and then they could hold the names in reserve to conftown the appropriate people whne the time came, instead of giving scum the opportunity to use them as fake claims, in the event they weren't scum.
pedit x2: Varsoon said he just thought we could just claim Lord Orlouge. I looked up flavor and was like mmmm that's like the main villain of the game I don't want to get autolynched for claiming to be the main villain of the game pleaes give me a fake claim.
pedit x3:BECAUSE OUR WIN CON IS REMOVE ALL KILLING ROLES AND HE HAD A KILLING ROLE.Regardless of whether he was scum or not, we HAD to remove him. At this point, I find it unlikely that there are any more killing roles, but ya know what, there may be? And ya know what else, if you don't tell us to stump them, we won't, because then we get auto lynched and potentially lose depending on what varsoon has to say.
In post 7258, The Cool Cucumbers wrote:In post 7254, Drunken Pirates wrote:In post 7245, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I know there are people who want you to tree stump DP. So there's also that to take into consideration. There is also the possibility of tree stumping Rylai so that we know if Zulfy and Sensei are really confirmed town or not. There are too many risks. I'm not sure it's a good idea to give you free reign to ruin the game if you choose to, if you're telling the truth about your role.
hey abr go back to voting cerby cos otherwise it looks like you are trying to get them to stump rylai and us!
It would look better for you if you unvoted us too, actually. Because it looks like you're just trying to force through our lynch so you don't need to worry about getting stumped.
-Cerb
In post 7264, Sensei wrote:In post 7263, Klingoncelt wrote:Leash them for now, ABR. Help us choose a Stump target.
^this still needs death
In post 7282, The Cool Cucumbers wrote:@mod: is immunity to killing actions the same as bulletproof?
In post 7285, Klingoncelt wrote:Well, at least your lynch is off the table for today.
Which brings us to the question: Who is the lynch du jour?
In post 7288, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Anyway it doesn't matter because I lied about being bulletproof. I was just WIFOMing the scum.
In post 7293, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 7290, Drunken Pirates wrote:In post 7285, Klingoncelt wrote:Well, at least your lynch is off the table for today.
Which brings us to the question: Who is the lynch du jour?
HELL THE FUCK NO
WE ARE LYNCHING THIS SHIT
Not today we aren't.
In post 7297, The Cool Cucumbers wrote:Also, DP, WHY are we "lynching this shit?" I've addressed all your reasons so far. Give me some more to address.
-Cerb
pedit: Why are you so angry now DP?
In post 7332, The Cool Cucumbers wrote:Hello mollie?
wgeurts speaking here.
Could you possibly not make us loose, I mean: think of the benefits of keeping us alive. We can take out suspects at will, and we have to hunt scum. We are a threat to the scum team!
If the game isn't over once all scum are dead lynch us. But that won't happen.
Yes this is a desperate attempt at winning you over. Realise that scum see us as a threat, and in the case we do get lynched please take a really good look at who went after us; especially after we claimed.
In post 7335, Fluminator wrote:Lol. Is copying Skype logs even legal? There's probably no faking that. Wgeurts giving me the hammer and scum reading me now makes sense. It was confusing me since it didn't make much sense for either town or scum. Third party though. Heh.
Drunken Pirates wrote:In post 7325, Fluminator wrote:Can you post the one where you target Pip?
flum i am here
Hey. Do you think we should still lynch him, or try to leash him?
In post 7356, The Cool Cucumbers wrote:In post 7353, Rylai and Lina wrote:In post 7352, The Cool Cucumbers wrote:Frozen Angel
Why can't we live?
What is the benefit of us dying?
Think people, think!
I'm not letting us get lynched stupidly after all this.
a scum tree stumper will die and town has a chance to just end this game tonight.
~Rylai
A: Not scum, we win with town or loose.
B: Wrong, as once again; not-scum.
In post 7389, Yosarian2 wrote:Yeah, I still think we lynch CC today. If he's telling the truth, he's still a quasi-SK who's win condition requires him to kill multiple townies. He says he wins with the town, but if he has to kill all the townies to find the vigs, I suspect the town still loses.
And I.don't think he's quite telling the whole truth here.
In post 7399, Skybird wrote:TCC/Cerb, you mentioned your play and Drixx' play is very similar. I was in another game with Drixx where he claimed 3rd party that can win with town. In the end, he was scum.
Everyone, I intend to vote TCC when I get home tonight if he is still alive. I'm late for work and don't have time to figure out where he is on the vote count and I don't want to accidentally hammer.
In post 7420, Yosarian2 wrote:In post 7416, Drixx wrote:
For example, at some point we'll want to confirm R&L's claim ... but having their voices still around afterward would be super helpful ... while also knowing that they were telling the truth and we know the people they cleared are conftown.
Uh. We ARE NOT going to kill R&L just to "confirn" them. And yes, from the pov of the town win condition, a tree stump is the same as dead.
If you think R&L are scum and we should kill then, make your case. At least ABR made a case against tgem. You trying to kill them just to "confirm them" is bad bad bad badbadbadbadbad.
In post 7429, Yosarian2 wrote:<snip>
In post 7454, Albert B. Rampage wrote:In post 7427, Rylai and Lina wrote:Abr reasons :
1 - Rilay's role is so good to be true!
2 - I hate Rilay's attitude! She needs to die!
3 - I hated the way she voted me last day over gale!
My defense :
1 - Fuck you!
2 - Fuck you!
3 - Fuck you
is there anymore questions?!
~Rylai
Personal insults / verbal abuse ^
In post 7480, The Cool Cucumbers wrote:In post 7477, ZZZX wrote:I will rolecop Rylia tonight. Is there ANY way to ensure I am not roleblocked?
If you guys decide to keep us alive, it's PROBABLY safer to rolecop us, than R&L, unless you go with my plan of having zulfy shut down our voting today to confirm we're not ascetic, and then having us shoot skybird and skybird roleblocks us, so no kill happens and skybirds action is locked in, so they can't roleblock you.
Also, if there are any empowers in the game to ensure you don't get roleblocked, i would recommend they *don't* claim.
-Cerb
pedit: Claiming miller doesn't make you less likely to be scum, nor does knowing the flavor of the game. Telling the truth about your adventure power is also not alignment indicative. The interactions between yourself and scum IS potentially alignment indicative, and a valid point.