In post 1078, Looker wrote: It would take too much work to drive a new wagon on town, so you're just going to rest on what's already on the votecount, lol. All those pages you've "read" and the only thing you could come up with is "Looker's first post was scummy" lmao
looker saw this too
In post 1093, AaronFrost wrote:Okay I lied my brain is too fried rn to do a proper reread. If we're not doing bugs!slot today then I think I want this
VOTE: Looker
This is were bugs/chemist wagon got derailed. Aaron doesn't go into the 'why' of why bugs isn't being lynched, just assumes because replacement? Doesn't seem to want to make any statement larger then this. If bugs/chemist is scum, this is +partner equity
In post 1097, Datisi wrote:... I need GL and Mena's thoughts on this.
In the meantime.
VOTE: Looker
This is the second vote to hop off. Datisi, what do you mean by any of this? I think I made my questions and doubts pretty evident?
Bugs was being lined up. Chemist reps in. All of a sudden ya'll are ok with not pushing that slot anymore?
Because?? Why were you on it in the first place?
Chemist did absolutely nothing to warrant a townread on him. His only major statement on Looker was literally 'wow this opening is so bad, congrats to my predecessor for having a GREAT vote!'