In post 2965, seCret hYdra wrote:i'd prefer having *more* then 1 game, but I don't. All i have with you is that 1 game. I'm a very gut/feelings kind of player, and I just don't see the scum!you in this game. Your push on us feels off, but i've properly read your case on hYdra now and I can see where you coming from even if it's mistaken.In post 2962, petapan wrote:i get wary because a vague explanation off a limited meta sample can easily be lazy reasoning from scum where typically i'd expect town to be wary, but i have to set aside, people have gotten it right beforeIn post 2956, seCret hYdra wrote:gut is telling me that BB slot is actively looking for justification in their push on me
i'm not quite sure about peta - I wanna hang on to my earlier townread of him which is still based on meta experience with scum!him and this just doesn't sound like scum!him
-seCret
can you elaborate on this? i felt like 1 game shouldn't give you that confidence but i wanted someone else to ask about it because i felt asking about it woud be too ego-driven, and i've screwed up before thinking people shouldn't be townreading me when they did. however, since no one has asked i will do it: what led you to that conclusion, because that's a strong read to have off of a single game worth of experience
-seCret
i was perfectly content to let you slide despite some prior misgivings because of that stuff with shirou, and then gx started posting in a way i'd expect from him as scum. i'm a little worried about your backtracking here when you got called on it, but eh, let's call a truce for nowIn post 2967, seCret hYdra wrote:@peta
another argument (use it as u will)
you have seen how i treat scumpartners first hand
you have seen how i am someone who, as scum, will try to divert attention away from scumpartners
you can't honestly believe i was pulling that shit with shirou as s/s
which means you can only conclude we are the SK
without actual proof of there being a SK
datisi already properly explained why it's also highly unlikely we are a SK
which is why I thought your conclusion was lackluster and off
i get you being pinged by gypyx posting, but take it into the full picture and I think you'll come to the right conclusion here
-seCret
