secret shitler V: why is the marathon forum still open [7/7]

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #225 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:41 am

In post 214, RadiantCowbells wrote:Here's a quick comment for those who are actually playing to win this game: Skitter neined this government. Skitter knows she's not playing. Skitter knows it's passing and if it doesn't Pooky plays who she calls scum. There is no reason to nein that as liberal. The only reason to nein that is as fascist who wants to look good when it reds with the knowledge that a fasc is in gov.

This is a hard resign from skitter btw

Andante · Post Post #226 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:41 am

In post 217, skitter30 wrote:Because we know from the failed andante/peta one that one of enchant/dwelee is fasc, probably fwlee

Its dwlee/rc/pooky

andan/peta did not fail

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #227 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:41 am

No you never invest in conflict

That just adds to the conflict

skitter30 · Post Post #228 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:41 am

In post 220, Dwlee99 wrote:Yea skitter why did you nein me/enchant when you said pooky fasc?

I dont have to like either option ....

Its not like i know that there has to be an L in dwlee/pooky?

Pooky i'm very confident is f, and there's probably an f in you/dwlee

Dwlee99 · Post Post #229 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:42 am

In post 221, petapan wrote:
In post 216, Dwlee99 wrote:regarding peta: But he voted no on me/rc snapnom and then voted yes on rc/pooky when that makes no sense if he doesn't trust me/rc to trust rc/pooky.

2f
i had a feeling and went with it where as f i have no reason to make myself stand out

Okay that's a lie lol

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #230 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:42 am

The invest is dwlee because he's chance go

Enchant · Post Post #231 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:42 am

Check Dwlee

skitter30 · Post Post #232 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:42 am

In post 224, Dwlee99 wrote:is it worth using investigation to clear the skitter/rc conflict?

Knock yourself out

skitter30 · Post Post #233 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:42 am

In post 226, Andante wrote:
In post 217, skitter30 wrote:Because we know from the failed andante/peta one that one of enchant/dwelee is fasc, probably fwlee

Its dwlee/rc/pooky
andan/peta did not fail

I thought it did ?

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #234 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:42 am

ok i have good news and bad news

there are only liberal policies left in the deck if nobody lied so we can just start failing governments to topdeck.

the bad news is i suspect you're probably all lying facist scum

skitter30 · Post Post #235 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:43 am

In post 227, RadiantCowbells wrote:No you never invest in conflict

That just adds to the conflict

Of course you should, wut?

petapan · Post Post #236 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:43 am

In post 229, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 221, petapan wrote:
In post 216, Dwlee99 wrote:regarding peta: But he voted no on me/rc snapnom and then voted yes on rc/pooky when that makes no sense if he doesn't trust me/rc to trust rc/pooky.

2f
i had a feeling and went with it where as f i have no reason to make myself stand out
Okay that's a lie lol

you can continue to be salted and throw the game over a meaningless vote in round 1 or you can look at the mechanical evidence presented for who is more likely to be liberal

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #237 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:43 am

In post 232, skitter30 wrote:
In post 224, Dwlee99 wrote:is it worth using investigation to clear the skitter/rc conflict?
Knock yourself out

Skitter doesn't need it explained why this is a bad idea btw she's not completely devoid of mechanical understanding. Someone who invests in us isn't confirmed liberal so the result becomes worthless

Andante · Post Post #238 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:43 am

In post 233, skitter30 wrote:
In post 226, Andante wrote:
In post 217, skitter30 wrote:Because we know from the failed andante/peta one that one of enchant/dwelee is fasc, probably fwlee

Its dwlee/rc/pooky
andan/peta did not fail
I thought it did ?

we passed liberal laws, so unless you're saying you're not liberal?

Enchant · Post Post #239 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:43 am

So anyway Dwlee is Lib

Dwlee99 · Post Post #240 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:43 am

I saw 2f, enchant had to be lying about 3f I think? I think andante also lying about 2f 1 l

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #241 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:43 am

Ok Pooky takes gov if it reds we SE Dwlee

Datisi · Post Post #242 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:43 am

pooky is the presidential candidate.

also looking for a replacement for enchant...

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #243 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:43 am

the p-value of 5 liberal policies on the bottom of the deck btw is 0.01%

Andante · Post Post #244 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:44 am

In post 240, Dwlee99 wrote:I saw 2f, enchant had to be lying about 3f I think? I think andante also lying about 2f 1 l

why is the conclusion I'm lying? I had 2f 1l

skitter30 · Post Post #245 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:44 am

In post 238, Andante wrote:
In post 233, skitter30 wrote:
In post 226, Andante wrote:
In post 217, skitter30 wrote:Because we know from the failed andante/peta one that one of enchant/dwelee is fasc, probably fwlee

Its dwlee/rc/pooky
andan/peta did not fail
I thought it did ?
we passed liberal laws, so unless you're saying you're not liberal?

Which is the one that failed then ... ?
Whatever i'm talking about the one that failed that rc/pooky/enchant/dwlee neined

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #246 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:44 am

It's ok Pooky you're mathematically the most liberal player on table already

Andante · Post Post #247 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:44 am

POOKY LET ME RUN WITH YOU!!!

ISO · Post Post #248 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:44 am

IM IN THIS GAME NOW

Dwlee99 · Post Post #249 (ISO) » Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:44 am

The odds of 5 lib at bottom are basically none