Election! | GAME OVER

[BloodB0t]

I was just going to sheep the consensus

[furtiveglance]

I don't want to vote the same. I already submitted anyway

[Lady Lambdadelta]

Well, I hope people support me, lol

[furtiveglance]

I won't be too worried if I don't get the Trash Collector role and I'd advise others not to worry too much - most of us are town so we don't want to get bogged down in T/T election paranoia

[ActionDan]

Currently reading herta/LLD to make a decision.

Will also figure out who has most votes between GL and Pooky so as to prevent SK from being elected mayor.

[BloodB0t]

Has anyone endorsed GL?

Looks like mayor is between pooky and SK.

[BloodB0t]

And I was starting to think SK of voting SK just to go along with the consensus but I guess that's not a thing we're doing. Still surprised at how many votes SK is getting so that makes me want to vote SK, which is probably a dumb take.

[BloodB0t]

Meh I'm just going to save my energy and vote the following based on gut:

Treasurer: LLD
Sherriff: enchant
Mayor: SK
Council Member: meowth
Trash Collector: furtiveglance

[BloodB0t]

Seems weird to out our votes when we're not doing the consensus thing but whatever.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

I sent in

Treasurer LLD
Sherriff enchant
Council Member unowen
Trash Collector furtiveglance
Board of Election bloodb0t

[Ausuka]

I think the idea is to add risk to scum voting for themselves. Also I mean, I *hope* there's some form of disincentive for scum to not just kill the sheriff lmao I think even if we didn't do this they would have a very good guess who would be winning the election most of the time

Anyway I voted for herta/sleepykrew/unowen/furtiveglance

[SleepyKrew]

I could have done Pooky but I like your wholesome vibes

hell yeah

[SleepyKrew]

oh there’s another page
even more hell yeah except for ActionDan

[ActionDan]

Herta:

Post 184: Herta who has up till this point posted filler making this post encouraging less filler from others is a tad hypocritical which I associate with scummy behavior

Swift resolution of posts 380, 386, and 391 strike me as a bit towny.

GL said post 640 was grandstanding. I don't read it nearly as harshly or harsh at all for that matter. Herta's clearly in the out vote camp as they had already outted their votes this post makes sense for them to make. Maybe that "I think that stuff is important" is a little over the top nothing that hasn't been seen before.

I happen to like 678

706 and 820 willingness to whiplash on a read like that is more likely towny plus it wouldn't have been hard to stick with a scum Ausuka read (I do!)

End of Iso.

From posts alone Herta has a good chance of being town. I do have worries that most of the post history is filler and that Herta while clearly seeming to have reads makes a minimal effort to expand on them.

LLD:

115: This post isn't that thought through, Scum even with secret voting are just probabilistically likely to know who is what based on immediately if even 1/4 of them makes to the PR PT and/or if one through in their ring for sheriff and doesn't get it.

240: I don't understand how Pooky's question isn't benign or what advantage scum would get if it were answered/discussed

Concerning the FATE method of scumhunting into Cakez: Its the pure undistilled essence of scumhunting. 308 and 311 are good posting. The entire exchange which fizzles ~321 is just really solid town posting from LLD.

Considering the outsourcing of reads to Pooky (who I agree is probably town), question for LLD; aside from the Cakez read which I don't know if you still hold, do you have any independent reads after some 35 odd pages that you aren't sharing or are you completely not in the flow anymore?

---

I think both Herta / LLD are likely town. I think I'll be voting for LLD only because I'm a bit more confident in that.

[ActionDan]

Pooky (5): Datisi, Herta, LLD, Meowth, ActionDan

GL (2): Bingle, Nono,

SK (5): Ausuka, Bloodbot, Enchant, Furtive, Cakez

Placing Ball squarely in UNOwen's court, Enjoy!

[ActionDan]

Looking into Cakez vs Furtive

[ActionDan]

Read both isos not going to get into finer points but I think both Furtive + Cakez are +town.

Still really hate your Enchant read Furtive. Please update / fix at my convenience, which is now.

Going to compile a list of people voting for one or the other.

[ActionDan]

Cakez (6): Bingle, Datisi, GL, Herta, Nono, ActionDan

Furtive (6/7?): Ausuka, Bloodbot, Enchant, Meowth, Pooky, SK, (presumably LLD)

Voting Cakez to once again, put the decision to UNOwen.

Though here either choice is probably fine.

My votes are thus:

Treasurer: LLD
Sheriff: Datisi
Major: Pooky
Trash Collector: Cakez
Board of Elections: Bloodbot

[SirCakez]

wow the meme garbage campaign has turned into a dead heat!

[SirCakez]

I voted

Treasurer LLD
Sheriff Ausuka
Mayor SleepyKrew
For council Meowth
And obviously Board Bloodbot

I think this is scum making a point of being contrarian

???

[ActionDan]

The only people so far I don't have at least some sort of townread on are Ausuka, UNOwen, Enchant, SK, and Nono. which range from null to scummy. And I'm not worried about Nono.

[ActionDan]

And of Auskuka, UNOwen, Enchant and SK, they all vote together and 3/4 of them are likely going to be PRs despite none of them being consensus town reads. I'd like to think that's telling.

[furtiveglance]

Still really hate your Enchant read Furtive. Please update / fix at my convenience, which is now.

It's an early read. I think you're overreacting.

Treasurer LLD
Sheriff Ausuka
Mayor SleepyKrew
For council Meowth
And obviously Board Bloodbot

I think this is scum making a point of being contrarian

???

Ausuka and meowth were the picks that stood out at the time, although recently more people have voted for meowth.

1) Why are you townreading these two?

2) Did you think Ausuka had a realistic chance of being elected?

[Datisi]

why do you see cakez as scum being contratian as opposed to townie with such reads, or even town being contratian

[furtiveglance]

At the time I thought the picks were more unpopular than they apparently are/were. I was wondering why SirCakez was voting for candidates unlikely to be elected.