You're entitled to the accusation as your slot wasn't in the game and the very first contribution of your slot was accusing me so naturally my suspicion on you would come after.
Despite your entitlement, invoking it is still disingenuous. My scumread on you has nothing to do with your read on me. I see how your reads could develop from town.
My scumread on you has everything to do with your content, with a side of hypocrisy.
This is another instance of being disingenuous. I specifically marked
476 as a side-tangent: off-topic. Not game related. I had some musings I wanted to air out about my playstyle, but those thoughts were explicitly not game-related. I marked them as such.
In post 483, DragonEater70 wrote:Actually let me correct that, I'm scumleaning Porkens due to tone because honestly tone is more important than content for my reads.
This is a huge part of my scumread.
Porkens's content could be either alignment. Hypocrisy is (sadly) not
inherently
a scumtell. Being disingenuous is (sadly) not a scumtell. Having random takes which largely feel out of touch is not a scumtell. The main reason I feel Porkens is scum is he seems "off". His approach is heavyhanded, forced, and feels entirely artificial.
His content could come from either alignment.
The tone behind it makes me feel it's +scum.
{Doctor Drew, Botanical Rat, Empathice, TemporalLich, DragonEater70}
{KawaiiKame, Kyoko Kirigiri}
{Gimli, Flea The Magician}
{Save The Dragons}
{imaginality, Enchant}
{Clone}
{Morning Tweet, MegAzumarill}
{Porkens}
(More to say from this page, but deserves separate post.)