In post 1024, SirCakez wrote:
I'm even more suspicious as Luke has claimed he found yet another PR, which, two millers, another visiting PR, Luke and my role seems absurd. We should probably mass claim, someone in the PR claims is lying.
Why were you not questioning the lack of a protective role here, but now thinking the set up needs one?
In post 1188, Lukewarm wrote:
I think the only way I live to tomorrow (to bring my second result) is if dunn is town, and 2-shot, and lied about being 1 shot in order to bait the kill into me.
Which is honestly the smart way for him to play being 2 shot.
And kind of smarter then a 1-shot dunn true claiming being 1-shot. (Actually 1-shot dunn should have claimed x-shot).
And dunn should probably not react to this post either.
I don't think Dunn is a gambity sort of player?
I might be wrong but the way Dunn's been playing makes me think it's unlikely he's 2-shot.
At best, we can hope Cakez is town and has not yet used his rb.
"I hope one day I can openly play as wolfy as Pooky and get zero pressure for it grumble grumble."
-MariaR
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
"I hope one day I can openly play as wolfy as Pooky and get zero pressure for it grumble grumble."
-MariaR
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
"I hope one day I can openly play as wolfy as Pooky and get zero pressure for it grumble grumble."
-MariaR
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
What is the Rule of Law? It's not easy to define, though it's incapsulated by phrases like "A nation of laws, not men". The rights to be represented by a lawyer in court, to have a fair and speedy trial, to not be forced to make self-incriminating statements in court, and to be tried before a jury of one's peers are all part of the US Rule of Law, but don't completely encompass it.
In post 1184, Meuh wrote:
Town does not have the thought of "millers are mislimmable on day 1 here"
GL is scum playing against 2 town millers he didn't feel like he could mislim
I think this perspective kinda unpairs Cakez/GL since wasn't Cakez one of the people who was sticking to not limming a miller day 1? His perspective (as town) would affect GL's view of a miller mislim (as scum)
I don't understand this post
Dunn asked what is wrong with a micro with 3 PRs + 2 millers, so I explained why there can't be 3 PRs + 2 millers
"scum perspective" is required to explain why a theoretical set up is unbalanced for scum
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
Do you thing scum rb cakez would choose to not roleblock me night 1 after I claimed tracker day 1?
I think if it's Cakez + one of the miller claims then yes, as a claimed miller could safely make a kill
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
@Luke am I crazy? why does it feel like I'm the only person saying both Cakez and Dunn cannot be town
I guess Meuh also said the same thing but called me scum for saying it
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
I think his evolution from "this set up doesn't make sense there are too many PR claims" to believing all the PRs once claimed is a tactical pivot, I am having a hard time coming up with a town explanation for his 180 on his suspicion on Luke/Dunn
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 1217, GuiltyLion wrote:
@Luke am I crazy? why does it feel like I'm the only person saying both Cakez and Dunn cannot be town
If you ignore the existence of the millers, I think that 2S Tracker + XS Doc + 1S RB can all fit in this game. But with the 2 miller claims added on top, I am less sure.
But I am not sure if that means scum in dunn/cakez or if that means scum in the millers.
In post 1205, RH9 wrote:
I don't think Dunn is a gambity sort of player?
I might be wrong but the way Dunn's been playing makes me think it's unlikely he's 2-shot.
At best, we can hope Cakez is town and has not yet used his rb.
While, this is an anti-town thing for RH to say, I think that if he were scum, this is a post RH would have made in the scum chat and not the main thread.
I have RH down as town currently, and am not interested in his elimination.
I am generally debating between GL/Cakez/Meuh -- but really feel like I need to re-read this game. But I have had family in town, so it just has not happened yet.
