Also i really want to read eiralox up more on depth as soon as i can. Same for bingle. Will make a good decision easier. Maybe if i find time in the next days.
In post 2450, ZZZX wrote:
Also i really want to read eiralox up more on depth as soon as i can. Same for bingle. Will make a good decision easier. Maybe if i find time in the next days.
if you vote me and you're scum and someone hammers without me claiming then town have the exact poe of bingle/itenerants>probably zzzx to follow so either way i'm not concerned.
In post 2448, Eiralox wrote:
3. try and get bingle and itenerants to commit to reads, preferably on zzzx, titus and elements(bingle's recent switch to elements means they're townspewed anyway lol i still think it's probably zzzx but fringe cases titus maybe maybe, gamma lesser probability. elements has open eyes i feel, same with koba)
Z feels like detached town, Titus' vote on me doesn't make sense and is super sketch, elements clearly doesn't care who the lim is/has no interest in solving and is likely SK/Survivor type role. I'm also scumreading Eiralox and Itenerants and townreading Gamma. I've not really been hiding my reads at all. I'd bet a pretty penny all scum is in Eiralox/Elements/Itenerants/Titus and that there is more than one scum team remaining. I'd bet 1-2 mafia, 1-2 other groupscum, 1 malevolent 3p.
In post 2378, Eiralox wrote:
well i have claimed. scum just had enchant in pt and enchant has seen me claim vt as pr so i suspect at least that might be the origin of the idea.
Eiralox inherited the VT claim.
Meg is the one who brought it up after both eir and I replaced in N1.
lie? yeah?
In post 2143, Bingle wrote:
but eir doesn’t even pretend to want to solve the game.
In post 1864, Bingle wrote:
NM, Eiralox: what roles did you submit that got vetoed?
lole
Does it matter? Overall I have little reason to interact with you beyond what I've already said. I haven't felt you approach my slot in good faith or with any depth, you've basically done nothing today, blah blah blah i'm sort of tired so if don't end it here i'll rant on and on. And N_M already shared all his picks.
Yeah, so… really easy to claim a role you don’t actually have, and no associated risk. Really hard to claim a role that is believably gamebreaking but not gamebreaking enough that you wouldn’t send it in the first place, especially when someone else might actually HAVE that role.
In post 1746, Eiralox wrote:
This doesn't say much. Yay or nay on Itinerants?
You vastly overestimate my "knowing who the fuck that is" stat. It was my dumpstat. I put everything into "Spite".
lole
-----------------
MegA in terms of lies ignore the pebble and hear the rockslide. im too tired too see where itenerants have lied and i guess i might have guessed a few from bingle not feeling into this game rn
In post 2454, Bingle wrote:
Titus' vote on me doesn't make sense and is super sketch,
possible to probable villager
In post 2454, Bingle wrote:
elements clearly doesn't care who the lim is/has no interest in solving and is likely SK/Survivor type role. I'm also scumreading Eiralox
probable villager? day 2 gut koba felt like a clear
In post 2454, Bingle wrote:
I'd bet 1-2 mafia, 1-2 other groupscum, 1 malevolent 3p.
it's probably just 4 scums or 3:1 and they hope they have a chance cos they killed koba
and
Cook is villager 100 percent
BlueBingleSnake scum
------
imean just look at my colorful d2 readslist basically just changed in that elements feels town, gamma and titus did as well. and remember my poe it's easy game
---------------
In post 2463, Gamma Emerald wrote:
The continued refusal to claim your veto’d role bothers me and the other claims make me skeptical, and the backtrack on being VT doesn’t feel right
ok so basically fallen for the bingle trap card got ya. any idea why i would choose not to hammer bingle twice and then tell the truth about my role? because i'm starting to regret it as a waste of my time.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
In post 2378, Eiralox wrote:
well i have claimed. scum just had enchant in pt and enchant has seen me claim vt as pr so i suspect at least that might be the origin of the idea.
Eiralox inherited the VT claim.
Meg is the one who brought it up after both eir and I replaced in N1.
lie? yeah?
In post 2143, Bingle wrote:
but eir doesn’t even pretend to want to solve the game.
In post 1864, Bingle wrote:
NM, Eiralox: what roles did you submit that got vetoed?
lole
Does it matter? Overall I have little reason to interact with you beyond what I've already said. I haven't felt you approach my slot in good faith or with any depth, you've basically done nothing today, blah blah blah i'm sort of tired so if don't end it here i'll rant on and on. And N_M already shared all his picks.
Yeah, so… really easy to claim a role you don’t actually have, and no associated risk. Really hard to claim a role that is believably gamebreaking but not gamebreaking enough that you wouldn’t send it in the first place, especially when someone else might actually HAVE that role.
In post 1746, Eiralox wrote:
This doesn't say much. Yay or nay on Itinerants?
You vastly overestimate my "knowing who the fuck that is" stat. It was my dumpstat. I put everything into "Spite".
lole
-----------------
MegA in terms of lies ignore the pebble and hear the rockslide. im too tired too see where itenerants have lied and i guess i might have guessed a few from bingle not feeling into this game rn
Got a source for calling those lies? This feels like attacking random posts just to try and force a lim through without actual thought put in
honestly meGA i don't care anymore i said day 2 bingle/bluesnake should be obvious scum or third party to anyone. anyone who reads should be feeling itenerants/bingle, enchant was less of an obvious one but im glad i got it
don't feel like answering any more questions look at my prior content.
if people really feel like they want to keep voting me i might claim at some point or might not honestly doesnt matter to me anymore
just end this day probably an inventor but if it flips some kind of exe that targets only eiralox with venge then at least i wont have to struggle to set up iten elim next
and if for some reason im the lim well i wont have anything to say then
btw it should be be pretty obvious that itenerants has the stronger role by how theyve been bussing at this point.i felt that d2 now it's pretty much confirmed. as i said day 2 bingle acts as the runner to draw flak not too much but enough to keep others in the shade
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
In post 2463, Gamma Emerald wrote:
The continued refusal to claim your veto’d role bothers me and the other claims make me skeptical, and the backtrack on being VT doesn’t feel right
ok so basically fallen for the bingle trap card got ya. any idea why i would choose not to hammer bingle twice and then tell the truth about my role? because i'm starting to regret it as a waste of my time.
-_-
If it’s any consolation I kinda think an itinerants wagon might be doable, Bingle expressed interest so it seems like a possible middle path
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
