Open 219: Neighborhood Watch (Game Over)

[Chronopie]

O.O two week deadline. Does make a nice change.

RVS time.

Vote: Thief

I dislike scum, and with a name like that, is there any possibility of anything else?

[Chronopie]

Replacement already?

Unvote, Vote: Primate

for following me onto the Thief wagon.

--

Also: Hai pom.

[Chronopie]

If you're omniscient, who are the scum? We can have this game wrapped up right now.

[Chronopie]

Lynch all Liars!!11!!!

I found us a scum

Oh wait, you didn't actually declare me to be scum.

[Chronopie]

Uhhh, Guys. if the hider verbalises who they're hiding behind, the mafia gets a 2 for 1. And they'll only have to trade 1 goon for it, at which point a watcher has to claim to get said goon, at which point the watcher is NK'd...

So we lose a Watcher, The hider, and a VT, all for 1 goon, leaving us in 8:2 with 1 watcher, then 7:1 mountainous.

wcs: The hider hides behind a Watcher. 8:2 Mountainous.

--

@D_j: Disagree.

[Chronopie]

It is unfortunate that one of the more valuable town power roles was killed by pure chance, but I don't think we should be hasty as a result of it.

Unvote

Role cop was the least valuable of our PR's (except maybe hider).

They could only detect Watcher's and the Hider, all else investigated vanilla.

[Chronopie]

Hider announces that they're going to hide behind X (a VT), mafia Targets X, mafia kills X + Hider.

[Chronopie]

@Guy0: The vote count was edited into the post by the Mod. Not an informal VC.

[Chronopie]

Unvote, Vote: Guy0

L-1. Now's claiming time.

[Chronopie]

Unvote

It was the lack of content that made me push for a claim. Lurking is anti-town. etc. etc.

[Chronopie]

But the hider claim explains the hider discussion mechanic being so thoroughly addressed by Guy.

[Chronopie]

Lurking is anti-town. etc. etc.

This is a fairly common pressure vote reason. null-tell.

[Chronopie]

Yes I do place pressure-claim votes fairly often. Pressure votes are separate from lynch votes. Pressure is placed on someone under some suspicion, lynch is on someone I'm fairly sure is scum.

I would have left it as a lynch vote if I were unhappy with the claim, given Iso. But Hider makes sense given iso, thus the unvote.

[Chronopie]

As in, if the iso had been hider discussion heavy (it was), but he'd claimed Watcher or VT, it wouldn't have matched up so well, and I would have been more suspect.

[Chronopie]

*Be willing to leave the vote on Guy, rather than unvoting*

The depth that Guy was willing to discuss the hider issue to. iso #2, #4, and a significant part of #7, suggest that Guy has an vested interest in hider theory, so far as to debunk the ideas that would see him die N1. (i.e. pre-claiming hiding target)

[Chronopie]

Vote Count

Chronopie (3) - Thief, Empking, guy0
Pomegranate (2) - Sleepless Assassin, Primate
Sleepless Assassin (2) - OpposedForce, ConfidAnon
Primate (1) - Pomegranate
ConfidAnon (1) - Beloved Princess

Not Voting (2) - Chronopie, don_johnson

With

11

players alive, it takes

6

votes to lynch.


The deadline for Day 1 is

Monday, May 31, 2010 at 8:00:00 PM CDT

.
If no player is lynched by that time, a no lynch will occur.

Yes.

[Chronopie]

^ the above was at d_j

@Guy: 1) I wouldn't expect a VT to be

Quite

as through in Hider discussion, as the statements you made appeared (to me) to have more than a passing interest.

2) I would have been suspicious of a Watcher claim, considering 1)

3) As 1)

4) makes sense.

[Chronopie]

confused... Past tense?

Each was a reply to the same numbered point made by Guy.

[Chronopie]

@Thief: If he'd claimed VT: Yes, I would have been comfortable with a VT lynch. If he'd claimed Watcher: Probably would have provisional unvoted. i.e. "*unvote* If anyone wants to cc, now is the time".

[Chronopie]

Just meta'd Chrono. More in line with scum play than town. hm.

More in line with *the only playstyle I have* Fix'd

FYI: Vanilla

[Chronopie]

Bah. Go town. (Told ya)

/bah post