In post 21, iamausername wrote:Question for all; would you rather lynch a wolf or a mafia today?
Cobblerfone wrote:You're begining to make me think your doing this on purpose as scum.
What exactly do you mean by this? What is he 'doing on purpose'?
VOTE: TheOtherFiction
Why did you take so long to confirm?
Hmm well as I said I looked at the example games and I explained how it went there. werewolf lynched first then the mafia won in their only example. And most, not all werewolf games won with a maf lynch first.
Which I guess makes sense to an extent.
I think it would be natural for us to want to kill wolves as quick as possible to get rid of the NK so if the seer survived up until that point he/she can reveal (as maf wont be able to NK, unless I misunderstand and they gain NK after wolves all die?) that way town can rely on them and no lynch (if we still have numbers) to force a win through. Otherwise if the seer dies then *blah* so many variables...
But the mafia have the numbers and organisation and can if left unchecked quickly control the vote.
Its hard and I assume thats how the game was designed. We could aim for the wolves and not be careless and perhaps be lucky?
Asking meta related questions that don't tell us anything about the player's playstyle or anything that they would have to take their alignment into consideration for. Scum would want to do this because again, they wouldn't need to take their alignment into consideration for the conversation while making it seem like they're posting a lot
I already explained my logic for questions above. I was mistaken on the level one can ask (and I should reconsider some of my actions elsewhere because of this) about other games and past games? I was trying to get the people to talk on a variety of areas so we get a feel for each other beyond who we RVS and what joke we threw in with it, I just thought the last game we all played might be an easy start that doesnt sound as far left as say *Who do you want to win the Rugby World Cup?"