In post 218, Baezu wrote:Personally I wasn't so comfortable with Slandaar putting future at L-1 so quickly after nacho's vote. It may be nothing but if future flips town....
Please finish your sentence, I'm very curious what those 4 dots represent.
In post 218, Baezu wrote:Personally I wasn't so comfortable with Slandaar putting future at L-1 so quickly after nacho's vote. It may be nothing but if future flips town....
I find this a very wishywoshy post. It's impossible to distill your opinion from this.In post 221, Ztife wrote:This.In post 218, Baezu wrote:Personally I wasn't so comfortable with Slandaar putting future at L-1 so quickly after nacho's vote. It may be nothing but if future flips town....
Then again, I never quite gotten understanding slandaar and his voting and explainations in a couple of games anyway.
Does it make much sense as town?In post 214, Darthe wrote:I get why people have issue with future, but his play doesn't make sense as mafia even in ISO. It would be incredibly poor mafia play.
Now that the unvote is done, I honestly agree w/ Grim on the whole inactivity thing. People don't post nearly as often as expected. Be that as it may, lynching because the game is stalled is silly, at best! We must lynch scum, and even tho Future's absence is scummy at the very least, to hurry-lynch him because the game is kinda stalled is NOT the way to go. Grim's one of the towniest reads I have, but this that he suggested is not proper town behavior. If Future turns out to be innocent... It's bad for everyone, even if we lose a player that wasn't as active as he should be.In post 232, Grimgroove wrote:Normally I don't think inactivity says something about alignment (luckily, if not pretty much all of you would be scum), but in this case I can't help but feel Future's sudden absence is scummy. He never adressed the issues laid before him, and left off in a hurried fury.
I realize it's rarely a good idea to lynch without a claim, but I don't think even a claim would convince me in this case, and I don't feel like sitting here idly for something tohappen. This game desperately needs a CPR shock in its current state, half of the playing field doesn't give a shit about what goes on here, and don't evenr ead half of people's posts.
I think a lynch on Future might at least provide some clearer basis for discussion, and will get use one lynched scum as an added bonus.
Hammertime!
Lets look at this wagonIn post 223, ac1983fan wrote:Future (6) - grimgroove, chernobylcitybus, BP, Baezu, Nachomamma8, Slandaar (L-1)
Ahhh I see where you are taking it. You want to set me up for a chain saw. Well, if you think by not attacking the person you are attacking = protection then I am. I'm disinterested by the future wagon, that is my official stance.
You are a stick in the wind that will change direction to look town.In post 229, BP wrote: If you think NL is bad and give me a lesson about it, how is changing to a voting stance (which is not the same to a lynching stance) scummy as well?
??? This type of stuff irks me about you. IT doesn't make sense.
This is fair. BP, I do not think it is lynching to push activity, I think it is lynching to get progress.In post 232, Grimgroove wrote:Normally I don't think inactivity says something about alignment (luckily, if not pretty much all of you would be scum), but in this case I can't help but feel Future's sudden absence is scummy. He never adressed the issues laid before him, and left off in a hurried fury.
I realize it's rarely a good idea to lynch without a claim, but I don't think even a claim would convince me in this case, and I don't feel like sitting here idly for something tohappen. This game desperately needs a CPR shock in its current state, half of the playing field doesn't give a shit about what goes on here, and don't evenr ead half of people's posts.
I think a lynch on Future might at least provide some clearer basis for discussion, and will get use one lynched scum as an added bonus.
Hammertime!
Good point..In post 227, Grimgroove wrote:Does it make much sense as town?In post 214, Darthe wrote:I get why people have issue with future, but his play doesn't make sense as mafia even in ISO. It would be incredibly poor mafia play.
I think a "concern for life" would be something scum has more than town.In post 166, Darthe wrote:Didn't like you until here, but this post is townie as it gets, not because of the defense but because of the tone and concern for life.In post 137, Baezu wrote:You guys need to listen to Slandaar. I am TOWN. I swear to you. The reason that I want to lynch BP is because he just seems to me to REEK of scum so why not continue to try to push for someone that I feel is scum? That is also the reason I was not willing to move my vote. But, since people obviously cannot be convinced by my words I will just have to wait for the mafia to NK me n1 to show you my role PM. Maybe there is a doctor out there who is willing to protect me because as I said before, I am TOWN. Also, when I get killed will you please vote for BP. That is my dying wish. For now, I will vote with those who are more experienced and take their word that future is indeed scum. Hopefully you guys are right.
VOTE: Future
I feel like you aren't interacting with anyone in this game. You mention posts that seem off and that's it. You don't defend yourself, ask questions, or reply to people who think you are scummy. You just pop in, comment on something, and leave.In post 167, thegooner wrote:This post has my mafia sensors blaring in my head. It's a combination of all CAPS words, frustration, and also some semi-surrendering ("I will just have to wait for the mafia to NK me n1 to show you my role PM"). In my experience, bringing up PM info to avoid being lynched is usually scummy. Also, in a 13 man game where the pool is already small, why not just shut up and die? Why fight so hard on Day 1 to not be lynched? Usually if I'm civ and getting FOS'd by people early in games, I put my head down and work twice as hard to find mafia. It does no good to overly defend early in games because that's what mafia wants. The longer a round goes with suspicion and discussions pointed towards a civ, the easier it is for mafia to hide. A civ death can be extremely helpful for civs in the long run.In post 137, Baezu wrote:You guys need to listen to Slandaar. I am TOWN. I swear to you. The reason that I want to lynch BP is because he just seems to me to REEK of scum so why not continue to try to push for someone that I feel is scum? That is also the reason I was not willing to move my vote. But, since people obviously cannot be convinced by my words I will just have to wait for the mafia to NK me n1 to show you my role PM. Maybe there is a doctor out there who is willing to protect me because as I said before, I am TOWN. Also, when I get killed will you please vote for BP. That is my dying wish. For now, I will vote with those who are more experienced and take their word that future is indeed scum. Hopefully you guys are right.
VOTE: Future
VOTE: Baezu
I'm sorry but this is really dumb.In post 168, Grimgroove wrote:Funny how interpretations of this post are diametrical with for instance thegooner.In post 166, Darthe wrote:Didn't like you until here, but this post is townie as it gets, not because of the defense but because of the tone and concern for life.In post 137, Baezu wrote:You guys need to listen to Slandaar. I am TOWN.I swear to you.The reason that I want to lynch BP is because he just seems to me to REEK of scum so why not continue to try to push for someone that I feel is scum? That is also the reason I was not willing to move my vote. But, since people obviously cannot be convinced by my words I will just have to wait for the mafia to NK me n1 to show you my role PM. Maybe there is a doctor out there who is willing to protect me because as I said before, I am TOWN. Also, when I get killed will you please vote for BP. That is my dying wish. For now, I will vote with those who are more experienced and take their word that future is indeed scum. Hopefully you guys are right.
VOTE: Future
I find it townie. I'm not sure in how far swearing is actually allowed, and some people take it more seriously than others, but the thing in bold has got me convinced.
I can see this, but the gooner hasn't offered up any defense at all.In post 180, Baezu wrote:@BP yes. Currently I feel future us scummier than you. That's why I changed my vote over to him. Why do I feel he's scummier than the gooner? Because of the fact that his only defense is an ongoing game and he has nothing else to say for himself.
How so?In post 211, Red Dragon wrote:Incorrect. No lynch is better than a mis-lynch for scum.In post 206, PeregrineV wrote:Scum doesn't argue for No lynches, because they want to mislynch instead.
Maybe because he thinks you're scum?In post 212, BP wrote:Y U focus on me so much?In post 211, Red Dragon wrote:I mean, he isn't the worst d1 lynch. But I think bp is miles better.In post 204, Grimgroove wrote:What is your read on Future, Red Dragon
And what about you Ztife? How do you feel about the wagon behind his name and the people on it?
Really? Once again nothing.
Future's buddy found.In post 214, Darthe wrote:I get why people have issue with future, but his play doesn't make sense as mafia even in ISO. It would be incredibly poor mafia play.
Explain this. I actually don't understand this at all.In post 222, Darthe wrote:I can't decide if the push here is to let a townie hammer for info or to stall the hammer from the mafia's perspective. In either case it doesn't look to me like a scum lynch still, but that could just be because of D1's practically infoless nature. BP just had some bad whyme fryme, and I like Ztife's post above as well as the quote from Baezu.
Oooh I was ok with your no-lynch-but-still-vote shenanigans but now this is going back and forth. Now that ONE person who is already voting Future wants a hammer, you're so scared that you jump off? I don't like that one bit. Also, no one will hammer without a claim, and no one off the wagon has shown intent to hammer. It seems like you really don't want to be associated with this wagon.