yet voteless,In post 1599, RadiantCowbells wrote:Malak is correct.
buddy aaaaaaaaaaaaaalert.
I was going to go through every post of evilpacman18's and make up some bullshit tell on everything he said, hoping it'd get him lynched. Instead, I decided to point out the one post that I actually found scummy. Hence the "honestly".In post 1598, Malakittens wrote:VOTE: NIKIn post 1592, Nikanor wrote:Honestly, the one thing that got me looking at evilpacman18 was this:This post is written at a time when sthar is already taking a lot of heat, but only has three votes on him. And the entire post is bullshit! "Intentional dissonance," REALLY? evilpacman18 doesn't even vote sthar until two other people hop on the wagon, making this post even worse, since sthar didn't post a single thing in that time.I don't like sthar. He posted a read list "in the interest of transparency" meaning he's more concerned with peoples' perceptions of him than posting reads because they convict him into lynching/defending certain people, etc.
Also he's got like a third of the playerlist chalked up to VI (including myself, which I can't remember playing with him but whatever) which normally indicates a town read (it is a VILLAGE idiot, after all), but in the case of someone like fish, who he says he doesn't really believe the claim, meaning he's reading him as scum, it's either a mislabeled null-read or intentional dissonance. Either way, his dismissal of so many players as VI is some indication that, again, he's more interested in looking actively engaged than being so. zekrom's 959 is more typically dull posting from him but I think he accidentally tripped over the discovery that sthar doesn't actually have much at all and for a full playerlist reads post, it leaves me at least still quite unsure of what sthar thinks.
last time someone said 'honestly' during a post they were scum. Sayin 'honestly' is a classic scum tell because if you were already honest about it you didn't need to emphasize honestly
LolIn post 1601, Nikanor wrote:I was going to go through every post of evilpacman18's and make up some bullshit tell on everything he said, hoping it'd get him lynched. Instead, I decided to point out the one post that I actually found scummy. Hence the "honestly".In post 1598, Malakittens wrote:VOTE: NIKIn post 1592, Nikanor wrote:Honestly, the one thing that got me looking at evilpacman18 was this:This post is written at a time when sthar is already taking a lot of heat, but only has three votes on him. And the entire post is bullshit! "Intentional dissonance," REALLY? evilpacman18 doesn't even vote sthar until two other people hop on the wagon, making this post even worse, since sthar didn't post a single thing in that time.I don't like sthar. He posted a read list "in the interest of transparency" meaning he's more concerned with peoples' perceptions of him than posting reads because they convict him into lynching/defending certain people, etc.
Also he's got like a third of the playerlist chalked up to VI (including myself, which I can't remember playing with him but whatever) which normally indicates a town read (it is a VILLAGE idiot, after all), but in the case of someone like fish, who he says he doesn't really believe the claim, meaning he's reading him as scum, it's either a mislabeled null-read or intentional dissonance. Either way, his dismissal of so many players as VI is some indication that, again, he's more interested in looking actively engaged than being so. zekrom's 959 is more typically dull posting from him but I think he accidentally tripped over the discovery that sthar doesn't actually have much at all and for a full playerlist reads post, it leaves me at least still quite unsure of what sthar thinks.
last time someone said 'honestly' during a post they were scum. Sayin 'honestly' is a classic scum tell because if you were already honest about it you didn't need to emphasize honestly
Instead of asking this dumb question, why don't you respond to his case on you?In post 1602, evilpacman18 wrote:You're voting me based on one post?
x2In post 1605, Elyse wrote:I actually think epm could be scum but that response by Nikanor was horribad.
Nope. You know my town-game, so you know I'm not going to immediately yell about having you lynched, particularly given that my read was based on just skimming the first and last few pages. I don't recall Cabd saying anything about me, and I never said I wanted an alternative to lynching Zek, just that I wouldn't have been entirely surprised had he flipped scum, because there were some inconsistencies in Cabd's claim (and guess what? Cabd wasn't being entirely truthful...)In post 1594, pirate mollie wrote:I will answer this real quick.In post 1587, Nikanor wrote:guys, this isn't assassins in the palace. you CAN give reasoning for your votes.
it has to do with perception and masking/mimicking that allows them to recreate and blend in.
sera has seen my scum game so I would expect him to be all like "ARGGGGGHHHHHH MOLLIE IS SCUM FUCKING LYNCH HER!!1!" but his push was weak especially since there was no appetite for it and this:
without providing an alternative feels hollow. plus cabd had him as scum and cabd is a player that I respect so part of it also is sheeping his dead read.In post 1554, serrapaladin wrote:Watch him flip town...
it might not be the best but it is what I am going with for now altho I am gonna look at the vote jumps after zekrom scumclaimed (now that I am free of cabd paranoia) cos that would be a good time to bus.
Yeap!In post 1602, evilpacman18 wrote:You're voting me based on one post?
this post is so full of hedge we need a freaking gardener to trim the overgrown bushes.In post 1608, serrapaladin wrote:Nope. You know my town-game, so you know I'm not going to immediately yell about having you lynched, particularly given that my read was based on just skimming the first and last few pages. I don't recall Cabd saying anything about me, and I never said I wanted an alternative to lynching Zek, just that I wouldn't have been entirely surprised had he flipped scum, because there were some inconsistencies in Cabd's claim (and guess what? Cabd wasn't being entirely truthful...)
mollie is definitely being odd, I don't think she's scum though.
Marquis is totally town.
pacman-scum is quite possible. His reaction to zek's scumclaim was a bit awkward. Yates and Elyse are other good candidates for scum.
Yatesy is doing that thing he does as scum where he's focusing on calling things bad/weird/wrong rather than making alignment judgements. Most of his comments have no value in finding out the alignment of the person he's interacting with.
Ythan and DN are town from interactions with zek. mollie perhaps too.
If this happens, would be happy with making a PeregrineV vote.In post 1618, Untrod Tripod wrote:I'm still pretty happy with lynching from Cabd's scum list
This is how I read that.In post 1601, Nikanor wrote:I was going to go through every post of evilpacman18's and make up some bullshit tell on everything he said, hoping it'd get him lynched. Instead, I decided to point out the one post that I actually found scummy. Hence the "honestly".In post 1598, Malakittens wrote:VOTE: NIKIn post 1592, Nikanor wrote:Honestly, the one thing that got me looking at evilpacman18 was this:This post is written at a time when sthar is already taking a lot of heat, but only has three votes on him. And the entire post is bullshit! "Intentional dissonance," REALLY? evilpacman18 doesn't even vote sthar until two other people hop on the wagon, making this post even worse, since sthar didn't post a single thing in that time.I don't like sthar. He posted a read list "in the interest of transparency" meaning he's more concerned with peoples' perceptions of him than posting reads because they convict him into lynching/defending certain people, etc.
Also he's got like a third of the playerlist chalked up to VI (including myself, which I can't remember playing with him but whatever) which normally indicates a town read (it is a VILLAGE idiot, after all), but in the case of someone like fish, who he says he doesn't really believe the claim, meaning he's reading him as scum, it's either a mislabeled null-read or intentional dissonance. Either way, his dismissal of so many players as VI is some indication that, again, he's more interested in looking actively engaged than being so. zekrom's 959 is more typically dull posting from him but I think he accidentally tripped over the discovery that sthar doesn't actually have much at all and for a full playerlist reads post, it leaves me at least still quite unsure of what sthar thinks.
last time someone said 'honestly' during a post they were scum. Sayin 'honestly' is a classic scum tell because if you were already honest about it you didn't need to emphasize honestly
I call bullshit. You were mod in one of my Town games. You should know what this play means. Hint: it isn't scum. You also have the benefit of knowing this isn't for show on the off chance you would just happen to replace in. Finally, you've been my victim how many times now? When have I ever done that as scum?In post 1608, serrapaladin wrote:Yatesy is doing that thing he does as scum where he's focusing on calling things bad/weird/wrong rather than making alignment judgements.
In post 1161, Yates wrote:Is this serious? I'm not going to read the whole game. Spare me the drama and tell me.
Both times, actually, and in your town games, there was significantly less content which was just filler calling people wrong without saying anything about their alignment.In post 1621, Yates wrote:Since it appears we're not getting our posts back...
I call bullshit. You were mod in one of my Town games. You should know what this play means. Hint: it isn't scum. You also have the benefit of knowing this isn't for show on the off chance you would just happen to replace in. Finally, you've been my victim how many times now?In post 1608, serrapaladin wrote:Yatesy is doing that thing he does as scum where he's focusing on calling things bad/weird/wrong rather than making alignment judgements.When have I ever done that as scum?
Fake meta is fake.
FOS - serra