In post 1322, The Rufflig wrote:No one is making any allegations against either of us
![Face, Meet Palm :facepalm:](./images/smilies/icon_facepalm.gif)
In post 1322, The Rufflig wrote:No one is making any allegations against either of us
My point has nothing about a claim. My point is that going after a slot that is getting replaced is rather cheap. I can understand why you are doing so, since you've been pushing the Yates-scum wagon for the longest time, but those that jumped on after Yates asked for replacement have a lot of explaining to do. Overall, I'd rather not lynch there today.In post 1318, Nero Cain wrote:@ Everyone that's saying the reason they won't vote Yates 'cause he can't claim-dl is in 14 hours, lets say we run Ruffles up and get a claim...what is the point 'cause I don't think we'll have time to rewagon and then the onlt viable wagon after Ruffling is Yates so....what is the point in getting a claim?
In post 1319, Squirrel Girl wrote:I really don't see anything in what he said that supports that belief.In post 1301, BulbaFenix wrote:Seeing as how he's asking for you to provide evidence that showed how your read on Displaced changed, I think he's referring to you talking to other people in the game, i.e. was the read change part of a conversation.
He asked where you said it and asked if you were talking to people in the DP (day phase) when you said it. I don't see anything about day talk here. This looks like asking for clarification for when you switched your reads.In post 1132, Josh_B wrote:WHERE ARE THE CLEAR COMMENTS? I WANT YOU TO SHOW THEM TO ME! nacIn post 1117, Squirrel Girl wrote:In this post I discuss 8 people who I gave reads on already.In post 1066, Josh_B wrote:Wow! SqG, this post totally flipped my read on you... except I can't find where you called any of those people scum. Can you link to it? Because...
You point out that 3 of them were not clearly stated...and are not actually even correct, I had a number of flat out clear comments that you just didn't even find, making me not even sure you even managed to show that I didn't...and I'm not sure what it shows even if you did. Mostly I think you're scum though.
I specifically asked you about displaced earlier and you called him Null. Now all of a sudden he's scum and you've called him scum before. Were you talking to people in the DP when you said it? cause you have people on you right now saying that your reads post is bogus.
Seriously! Why isn't this dead yet?In post 1322, The Rufflig wrote:Hey, cool! I'll go tell the mod I'm replacing out. Want to know something? It won't change a damn thing. No one is making any allegations against either of us and haven't for quite some time. The town and scum are both being lazy. They are both comfortable where the votes are heading. Me? I don't like the leading wagons.In post 1267, BulbaFenix wrote:I would prefer a Rufflig lynch over Yates, primarily since that slot is getting replaced. Pushes against such slots unnerve me, since there's no one there to defend against any allegations. It would be an easy lynch for scum to push at this point.
VOTE: Chandra
I totes get it. My point is that with such little time a claim from Ruffling is basically doing shit all 'cause I don't we'd have time to put together a wagon if he claimed and folks didn't want to lynch him for his claim so we'd be pretty much just lynching Ruffling period or no lynching. So this "hey Yates isn't here to claim!" is so head desk.In post 1326, BulbaFenix wrote:My point has nothing about a claim. My point is that going after a slot that is getting replaced is rather cheap. I can understand why you are doing so, since you've been pushing the Yates-scum wagon for the longest time, but those that jumped on after Yates asked for replacement have a lot of explaining to do. Overall, I'd rather not lynch there today.
Or right, you had a problem with 1 post that I made back around 350??? Your problem with Yates was that he used the wrong name in one post. YaY! Strong cases to refute!!! In the case of Yates, you were town reading him up until that point.In post 1325, Nero Cain wrote:In post 1322, The Rufflig wrote:No one is making any allegations against either of us
Because I've been contributing to the game and scum hunting. Something you can't say about a lot of the players on the top wagons. I get accused of "sneaking" onto wagons that I push. Ha! Then I get suspicions thrown my way when I drop the same wagon because it doesn't seem so likely to be scum any more. Take a look at the players voting the top two wagons. How many of them have contributed anything toIn post 1326, BulbaFenix wrote:Seriously! Why isn't this dead yet?
If you think this then you are obviously not reading the thread.In post 1329, The Rufflig wrote:Or right, you had a problem with 1 post that I made back around 350??? Your problem with Yates was that he used the wrong name in one post. YaY! Strong cases to refute!!! In the case of Yates, you were town reading him up until that point.In post 1325, Nero Cain wrote:In post 1322, The Rufflig wrote:No one is making any allegations against either of us
In post 1329, The Rufflig wrote:Or right, you had a problem with 1 post that I made back around 350??? Your problem with Yates was that he used the wrong name in one post. YaY! Strong cases to refute!!! In the case of Yates, you were town reading him up until that point.In post 1325, Nero Cain wrote:In post 1322, The Rufflig wrote:No one is making any allegations against either of us
At least you knew we were trying to find scum. You can't say that about all of the contribute nothings in this game.
Because I've been contributing to the game and scum hunting. Something you can't say about a lot of the players on the top wagons. I get accused of "sneaking" onto wagons that I push. Ha! Then I get suspicions thrown my way when I drop the same wagon because it doesn't seem so likely to be scum any more. Take a look at the players voting the top two wagons. How many of them have contributed anything toIn post 1326, BulbaFenix wrote:Seriously! Why isn't this dead yet?eitherany wagon besides a simple vote and that they are oh all so sorry to have to place on someone due to deadline crunch. Damn few. I bet they won't be looked at on day 2 either. So, hey! Have fun lynching the townies and helping scum to victory!
So, Bulba, do me a favor. Take off the blinders after I've been lynched and give pidgey and Chandra another look see. You'll find out that I was spot on about them.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p5861209In post 1334, Metal Sonic wrote:oh by the way i have to announce this again
if you are a protective role (doctor, jailkeeper etc) please defend me tonight!
thanks ^o^
Yeah, and Ruffling is another fucking horrible choice, but he is at least here. And if you ask me to rank, Ruffling is stronger townread than Yates.In post 1333, Nero Cain wrote:Weren't you arguing that Yates was a bad lynch 'cause he couldn't claim? Him and Ruffling were the only viable options at that point.
Consider a vig with a shot. I use my vote the same way. I apply it towards those I think may be scum and never towards those I feel are town. Unlike a vig, I need the cooperation of the town, so I may have to settle for a 2nd or third choice of those I feel may be scum, but I never use it against someone I think is town. Like a vig, I am ultimately responsible for my choices.In post 1330, Nero Cain wrote:Though explain to me why sidelining your vote instead of voting Yates to save yourself?
Are you implying that I am not scumhunting?In post 1335, PeregrineV wrote:http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p5861209In post 1334, Metal Sonic wrote:oh by the way i have to announce this again
if you are a protective role (doctor, jailkeeper etc) please defend me tonight!
thanks ^o^
I'll look into Unfriendly Neighbors. How about that?In post 1329, The Rufflig wrote:Because I've been contributing to the game and scum hunting. Something you can't say about a lot of the players on the top wagons. I get accused of "sneaking" onto wagons that I push. Ha! Then I get suspicions thrown my way when I drop the same wagon because it doesn't seem so likely to be scum any more. Take a look at the players voting the top two wagons. How many of them have contributed anything toIn post 1326, BulbaFenix wrote:Seriously! Why isn't this dead yet?eitherany wagon besides a simple vote and that they are oh all so sorry to have to place on someone due to deadline crunch. Damn few. I bet they won't be looked at on day 2 either. So, hey! Have fun lynching the townies and helping scum to victory!
So, Bulba, do me a favor. Take off the blinders after I've been lynched and give pidgey and Chandra another look see. You'll find out that I was spot on about them.