Way too easy.In post 17, Kthxbye wrote:/sigh...too easy
Do this instead.
It's such a good feeling...
Way too easy.In post 17, Kthxbye wrote:/sigh...too easy
That's some funny horse shit, right there. Just because Wagons are common in the RVS does not mean they don't say anything. RVS Wagons say quite a bit, both of the Wagonee and the Wagoners. And that doesn't even speak to the fact that the Wagons built at the timeIn post 31, gameplay506 wrote:Rvs wagons are really common. They don't say anything tho
Please point out where I'm making a big deal about it. I asked a question and pointed out that those Voting on the Wagons are seemingly doing so for legitimate reasons. Now I'm making a big deal about it, for your info.And why exactly are you making such a big deal out of it?
You're not Voting d3x, you're Voting Kthx. Note to self- gp and Kthx are not Scum together.My vote on dex isn't as serious as my kater stage votes, but yet not pure RVS.
I was refering to the VotesIn post 36, LynxKuroneko wrote:d3x - I don't see Tunnel's 'seemingly legitimate votes' to be legitimate, see question directly above (and that Tunnel's first vote was an RSV).
This.In post 44, Konowa wrote:Konowa would also like to note that this answer sidestepped dex's question.
Oh the lies. They make me smile. Read over the interaction. You Voted Kthx while asking a question. I answered for him and asked for your thoughts on the Wagons. How is that being aggro? And how can you possibly attach the reasoning to your Vote? Seriously, if you're going to lie, at least make it a good one. This is bush league shit.In post 82, gameplay506 wrote:You started asking questions, being aggressive just because I vote someone.
Again I ask you, where have I made a "big deal" out of the page 1 Wagons? Why do you continue to avoid this question. There are 2 {or 3} players now pointing out your sidestep.Now you are saying you haven't made a big deal out of it.
I'm really happy for you. Your dodging, hand waving, inflating my "aggression", and most importantly lying don't feel like Town to me. And it's more solid than anything I'm currently getting from the hiplop Wagon. {I'm also not too keen on the easy L-2}Your early aggression here doesn't feel like town aggression.
No, you're just using a lot of words. You're keeping you post count pretty middle of the road. You're keeping your word count excessively high. You're keeping your game related content at minimum levels. I'd say that in the 6 words BE has used in his only game related post, he's contributed about as much as you have. The problem is, you're writing prose when it's not needed. You're fluffing the shit out of your posts and they are ultimately lacking in any meat. There is little to no point in what you're actually saying, but you're using a ton of words to say it. That's a problem and it will only get worse if you continue to fluff post. To flip a phrase, as you seem so want to do... Brevity is the soul of Mafia.In post 85, LynxKuroneko wrote:I'm using a lot of words because they'll inspire us all.snipMuch like your entire post was doing, no?
That makes even less sense. Why did you think Kthx Vote wasn't legit when he gave reasons for it that were game related. I don't care if you didn't agree with the reasons, the fact that heYou misunderstood; I too was referring to the votes on TunnelMates.
Why? You either think I'm Scum or I'm Town. If I'm leaving you with scummy vibes, why would you 'want to like me'?I want like to like you, I really do.
Do you thus agree with his assessment of the situation? That I went aggro on him before p31? That I "made a big deal of it" before p62?Gameplay506 might not approve of your early aggression
The fact of the matter is that you cannot explain the earliest instance of your misrep and now you're backpedalling by lying and saying that I'm denying anything that has happened after the fact.In post 115, gameplay506 wrote:D3x agggressive? Nope.
This is directly the issue. I am not, nor have I ever said that. What I have said {and again, you have still failed to answer} is how this interaction is legit...I never said the aggression I am voting you for is located just in your first post concerning me. That is why calling me a liar isn't correct here.
In post 26, d3x wrote:Thoughts on the 2 building Wagons, gp?
In post 27, gameplay506 wrote:I see only the Hiplop wagon. It's and RVS wagon so nothing there now.
In post 28, d3x wrote:So you're just hand waving the early Votes b/c it's the RVS?
Ansuz {both heads} has said that they find hiplop scummy.
Tunnel has 2 seemingly legitimate Votes.
Is your Vote on Kthx just RVS?
If you consider p28 post 'aggressive' or 'making a big deal' out of anything, I don't know how you've made it 5 months on this site lol...
Your accusation occurs before p62. I left it out because you're not a freaking clairvoyant. This is particularly important to note in terms of Lynx. I asked him the specific timing to see if he would read the interaction or just blindly follow you. Looks like we have a Sheep.Actually it is really interesting how you ignore your post 62. Why exactly did thought that I was talking only about post 28?
It is not exaggeration to think there is someone else interested in the issue. I didn't feel like rereading the 5 pages of thread at midnight to find a potentially 5 word question or support for a question. For the record, Ansuz mentions that post here and Kthx does it here. Whether they agree with my or Konowa's sentiments is their's to say.Ugh I think there are just 2. You and Konowa (unless I missed someone; if so point me to him). Why did you feel like exaggerating right here?
This is really funny. You are actually suggesting that the 'big deal about Day 1 Wagons' that you pointed out in post 31 occurred an entire page later. Let that sink in. You are justifying yourself with 'evidence' that hadn't happened yet. I guess I'm wrong. Maybe you are clairvoyant.Oh and the big deal about day 1 wagons is where you call some part of my post "horse shit" , just so you know.
A Strawman isn't as effective if you include the points you've ignored in your quote. There are 4 distinct and completely seperate issues that are causing me to Vote you. You're handwaving {again} and saying that dodging a question can be from lazy Town. Lol...I'm really happy for you. Your dodging, hand waving, inflating my "aggression", and most importantly lying don't feel like Town to me. And it's more solid than anything I'm currently getting from the hiplop Wagon. {I'm also not too keen on the easy L-2}
So you are voting me for not answering where your aggression came from? So are scum more likely to do that? Have you heard of lazy town? Oh and if you are basing your vote on me not answering your questions ( lying as you call it), but seeing I already answered it, what do you have against me now? And this vote on me just seems like an OMGUS vote so hard.
You do know that Kthx and I are 2 different people, right? I'm not trying to make sense of TM. I'm trying my damndest to ignore them. Kthx is trying to make sense of them.In post 118, LynxKuroneko wrote:I'm not sure why you're trying to make sense of the TunnelMates discussion
What part of any of this has to do with being defensive over TM? And how on God's green Earth are you saying that people's VotesSo why are you so defensive when it comes to TM, when the votes on them were *clearly* meaningless?
So... Fucking... What? How does a post number haveYou stated in post #28 that "Ansuz said they find hiplop scummy". Read that number again; post 28.
And? I've played with 1/2 of TM before and I don't care for his playstyle. He's obv spending a large portion of time shitposting and cluttering the thread. As I've told Kthx, you shouldn't feed the troll, so I'm just ignoring them until/unless I see something legitimately scummy come from them. You, on the other hand, were fluffing the shit out of your posts and trying to push them as game relevant, all while accusing Mantis of Active Lurking. That's some funny shit, right there.Let's go over this again. You're insisting that MY posts are fluffy, but please go back and check out TM's cotton candy boxes.
You're one of the players under fire, so you've found a way to redirect that at me, it seems.
Hm no sorry. I am not the only one under fire.
I can't possibly see what' scummy about listing those who place suspicion on me, but I gave my reasons why.
So whoever scumreads you automatically gets into your scum list?
While I definitely don't have you anywhere near a ScumRead, what is this about? You usually TownRead me until the Day's almost out. Then you go all paranoid apeshit in the last few hours of Daylight.In post 159, Kthxbye wrote:d3x, surprisingly, is reading town to me atm.
Lol... Konowa has been Voting you for freakingIn post 163, gameplay506 wrote:@Konowa if you think I am scum vote me.
Based on what?In post 189, Mantisdreamz wrote:gameplay seems town.
Meh. I don't really have anything against Lynching any of those chumps, but I don't really have a hard on for any of them swinging. I'd pry rate them as such...In post 210, Kthxbye wrote:Out of the list of TM, HS, geraintm, Lynx, and hiplop; Who would you be willing to vote (can be more than 1) and which do you think is most likely to flip scum and why?
He clearly has a post restriction, dude. Stop being annoying.In post 226, gameplay506 wrote:How about Konowa stops talking like this?
Wait, what? Where was I defending TM?In post 238, LynxKuroneko wrote:I was voting d3x because his reasons for defending TunnelMates didn't seem right to me.
It reads like he's told that he was shot, not who shot him. Also, there's something like a 0% chance that he's getting DayKilled. I don't believe him anyway. Moar Votes, pl0x.In post 321, Kthxbye wrote:Also, it's not exactly a BP claim, more like vengful townie + cop or something.
...is not the same as...In post 317, gameplay506 wrote:Once somebody tries to kill me, I am told and I won't die until the end of the same die. In the end of the day I die.
One seems to talk about DayKills and living until the End of theIn post 324, gameplay506 wrote:Then instead of dying right away during the night, I die in the end of the day.
Are those your words or are they not? Did you or did you not say that you'd die at the end of the same Day phase as the Kill attempt? Then did you or did you not say that you would die at the end of the following Day phase as the Night Kill attempt?In post 334, gameplay506 wrote:You are trying as hard as you can to make my claim look fake.
In post 317, gameplay506 wrote:Once somebody tries to kill me, I am told and I won't die until the end of the same day.
I won't die until the end of the same day.
end of the same day.
same day.
Really? You want to know which of the 3 'current targets' I'd Vote for? You want to know about my strong ScumRead? You're doubting my committment to the game? Have you actually read any of my posts?In post 430, LynxKuroneko wrote:Though I'd like to hear more from everyone else, specifically...snip...d3x. Of the three current targets, who would you vote for? (gameplay506, HighShroomish, myself). Do you guys have stronger reads from anyone else? Is anyone actually playing this game?
This made me so freaking hard...In post 400, gameplay506 wrote:Oh scum reading everyone even slightly suspecting him ( extreme OMGUS)
In post 313, gameplay506 wrote:I am pretty sure all scum are on my wagon.
In post 328, gameplay506 wrote:I told you go ahead and lynch. Then look at the mad pushes on my wagon. Lynch scum. GG
In post 334, gameplay506 wrote:You are trying as hard as you can to make my claim look fake. Be, osseus and some people attempted this too. If I get lynched I suggest people look at those players first.
In post 384, Konowa wrote:please say who is scum
In post 385, gameplay506 wrote:Everyone still pushing my wagon.
Not much has actually happened, imo. There is an appalling lack of content in the last 4-5 pages. There's been a shit ton of people requesting gp to provide content and him posting an equal shit ton saying jack all.In post 450, LynxKuroneko wrote:You're the only one still voting gameplay506 now, and quite a bit has transpired since.
I'm fine with HS Swinging, but my opinion hasn't changed from the last time I spoke about not Lynching gp.I'd like to hear if you agree with the HighShroomish wagon, as you're one of few who ARE committing to this game.
This.In post 527, Osseus pseudotripodis wrote:I'm most happy with hiplop or gameplay as today's lynch
This just feelsIn post 481, hiplop wrote:Is it better to get rid of an anti-town town player (who may be scum) or a IMO better chance at a scum player?
In post 510, Osseus pseudotripodis wrote:Might as well lessen all interaction with Lynx too, because he's getting pretty unproductive under pressure. I'll write that off as him being new, as I still lean town on him. (but not as much as the beginning of the day)
What do you consider the most important information that you got from supporting this Wagon?In post 615, LynxKuroneko wrote:I openly supported this wagon with the intention of getting a response from hiplop.
Then you will never Lynch someone. There isI won't consciously lynch someone unless I'm 100% sure it'll benefit my personal agenda.
The amount of time left has 0 bearing on the scumminess of a player and should not be used as a justification for Lynching/not Lynching.We've four days left, and I'm not in a rush to kill.
No. That's not how this game works.If he's scum, then that makes me prime suspect, doesn't it?
This isn't Survivor, it's Mafia. Who the fuck cares if something makes you look bad? Unless you're 3rd party, your survival has no bearing on your WinCon.But if he's town and I lynch, it'll look bad on my part. I'm not putting myself in that position.
In post 721, Mantisdreamz wrote:(sorry guys... i can make cases, eventually). but am just wanting to get firmer views
Which of Konowa's thoughts exactly do you like?In post 717, Kthxbye wrote:In post 712, Konowa wrote:So Konowa is being lazy and likes either Ansuz or HighShroomish votes since Konowa thinks the likelihood of Ansuz and HighShroomish being scum together is high.
Vote: Ansuz
For posterity, building on Tunnel's earlier post about Ansuz, distinction between hiplop and HighShroomish equals a big fat zero.
I like your thoughts, but due to geraintm being on the Ansuz wagon, I'll have no part. HS on the other hand is a wonderful D2 lynch idea.
VOTE: HighShroomish
Eh... While hiplop has no extra information, his opinion is 'pure'. Ignoring information and ConfTown's opinions is poor play. It doesn't mean that he was right, but it also doesn't mean we should immediately discount his thoughts just because he didn't have an Investigation result. This particular post left a bit of a bad taste in my mouth.In post 654, Osseus pseudotripodis wrote:What does hiplop's words have to do with anything? He was a VT with no extra information.
I am truly sorry, but it's the way I'm reading you atm. I know you've responded to my case, but I haven't really read it yet. We'll pry engage more once I get there.In post 666, Mantisdreamz wrote:this makes me sad dex
If it's his 1st game, does that change your opinion? Does his presumed lack of knowledge about Roles, etc not enter into it?In post 676, Osseus pseudotripodis wrote:your mind going right to protective role is p scum-mindset
I'm not following you. I'm saying that in your 2 ReadsLists, hiplop had gone from Not Scum to Scum without posting or getting mentioned by you. I'd like to know what changed your mind.In post 746, Mantisdreamz wrote:remember post, 363 of mine? i didn't have hiplop as a town read.
In post 835, d3x wrote:The evolution of the hiplop Wagon...
VC 1.8 hiplop (1): d3x
VC 1.9 hiplop (4): d3x, Mantisdreamz, Burning_Earth, LynxKuroneko
VC 1.10 hiplop (6): d3x, Mantisdreamz, Burning_Earth, LynxKuroneko, Osseus pseudotripodis TunnelMates
VC1.11 hiplop (7): d3x, Mantisdreamz, Burning_Earth, Osseus pseudotripodis, TunnelMates, Ansuz, LynxKuroneko
-I Vote without spilling the beans on my reasoning.
-Mantis Votes after casually asking for a hiplop Wagon. Outside of 2 ReadsLists {previously linked}, she hasn't mentioned hiplop aside from asking TM why he's a ScumRead.
-BE Votes with a seeming appeasement Sheep. There has been light prodding, but nothing substansive regarding a Read since he originally pushed the early hiplop Wagon.
-Lynx Votes to push the Wagon as admitted later. His previous interactions/Reads feel genuine. He has hiplop middling on the Scum-Town List and expresses doubt numerous times.
-OP Votes "balls deep". They stated previously that hiplop's playstyle as Town gets Lurkish under pressure and that they warrant pressure. Their next few hiplop references follow this train of thought.
-TM Votes L-1 based off of tone. They previously had him as a ScumRead with no reasoning and did not mention him again until the Vote. Whether serious or not, they state that their ReadsList was randomly generated.
-note-
No case had been presented on hiplop until my p571. He had reached L-1 and then dropped back to L-2 with Lynx's UnVote.
-Ansuz Votes after being made aware that the Wagon is no longer L-1. They are the only players to post a case {or reasoning} aside from me. Built/pushed an early Wagon on hiplop. Questioned other's Reads on him. Consistantly held the Read on him throughout D1.
-Lynx Hammers after debating the merits thereof.
gp & Konowa listed TownReads on hiplop.
Kthx & geri posted support for the Lynch without being on it. Kthx rescinded his support based on the Wagoners and geri posted support after the Wagon had already reached L-1.
HS never mentioned hiplop and hadn't posted between the beginning of the Wagon and the Lynch.
I wanted to get all of this IIoA posted and I'll look into it tonorrow. My initial knee-jerk reaction to the raw data is that Mantis, BE, and TM look the scummiest out of the batch. I'm going to...
UnVote
...until I can evaluate this a bit more.
I considered it, but I'm a capitalist at heart. Competition should prove fruitful.In post 973, Konowa wrote:d3x should should the larger Burning_Earth wagon then.
To be fair, I didn't ask you to switch. Nor did I attempt to drum up any support, but there were multiple Vote changes and positions taken. With the flip, we'll get some really good information. I'm going to be on whichever Wagon {Josh or BE} is closer come deadline.In post 1023, Konowa wrote:Konowa asks d3x to join Burning_Earth wagon, d3x graciously denies.
Konowa joins the Josh_B wagon, d3x votes Burning_Earth.
In post 983, d3x wrote:@Kthx- I'm not sure why you would choose Thor over someone that's high on your ScumList. Verifying Town is fine, but eliminating Scum {or clearing them} is optimal, imo. A Cop result on Town is decent, but a Cop result on Scum is freaking awesome. Think of it this way, if you Hide behind Scum and die, you've outted Scum, proven your Claim, and thus 100% cleared me. If you Hide behind a Scum suspect and live, you've cleared an easy MisLynch for us. If the Scum Team then decides to off them b/c they're cleared... well, easy MisLynches usually aren't that helpful anyway. And you're still around.