In post 390, Akane Kurashiki wrote:378:Can you elaborate on why you only think Bins can be scum with Reck?
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your question, but I said if Bins is scum, I can only really see Reck as her partner and his claim makes me doubt even that. If Reck is scum, there's maybe 2-3 people I'd be inclined to rule out, would have to look at when the claim came.
In post 390, Akane Kurashiki wrote:I think y'all are cutting Reck way too much slack based on the claim and are gonna be kicking yourselves when we have to kill him tomorrow anyway. But I guess we'll see.
I look at it this way, if Reck is scum he'll be here tomorrow and will have to out his partner to evade a lynch. If he's town we've lynched a claimed friendly neighbour.
In post 391, Grib wrote:It's not so confirmable that I feel comfortable slotting him as a townfirm. The role leaves a lot of wiggle room for scum. Besides, fake townfirms are a thing (not likely though).
There's not really wiggle room, either he get's lynched tomorrow, or he has to use his scumpartner to 'confirm' himself.
In post 391, Grib wrote:It's not so confirmable that I feel comfortable slotting him as a townfirm. The role leaves a lot of wiggle room for scum. Besides, fake townfirms are a thing (not likely though).In post 369, Not_Mafia wrote:Scum won't be anti-town? Scum can't flake? I'm honestly not following this argument at all. Seems like you're trying to force a townread on Reck for town points, I don't see what the point of this whole thing is otherwise.
And your Akane case has a couple of good points, but is largely just dragging out everything someone could find slightly objectionable but ultimately non-alignment indicative stuff like her RVS vote switch and her doors thing
I think it's a fair assumption to make for Day 1, at the absolute least. Town!Reck is my read here, not yours. I stated it, I'm not pushing or forcing it. Why would I want to push a weak read? The point is I was asked about it so I gave my reason. That's it, w/r/t Reck.
Well, what do you know. My reasons aren't infallible. Who would have thought. Point out the good/bad points for me.
It was Quilford case that drew attention to him though, and then the rage and insults came, which is apparently characteristic of him. And I don't see what the relevance of you pushing it is, it was the timing of it I hated. But apparently Akane asked you for it.
I'm not criticising it for the sake of it, it looked to me like throwing out anything and everything and seeing what stuck
In post 362, Grib wrote:In post 373, Not_Mafia wrote:What I mean is, his readflip comes conveniently follows Reck's claim and not even due to "well he isn't confirmed yet but I don't think scum would claim a confirmable role as if they're lying it will only buy them one more day" or something similar. It's just, oh look I have a towncase on Reck now he's claimed a confirmable role.
PEdit: Indeed
It's almost like I went back through the thread and read the game from a town!Reck perspective. Wow.
And it's not a case, it's a weak read.
Well I'd call any standalone justification of a read a case, but that's semantics, and I'd forgotten/hadn't realised Akane had asked you for the read
In post 386, Not_Mafia wrote:It's also because his reads list and Rack case achieved nothing and I don't know why he did them them other than "he felt like it" and
In post 362, Grib wrote:For reactions. For questions. For content.
Which is just the boilerplate generic answer that really means nothing, that's what everything you post should be doing and we just got finished discussing why we shouldn't be making our top town reads so explicit
In post 362, Grib wrote:There seems to be a divide in the members here on whether or not sharing townreads is a good thing. That's your own opinion.
I shared my reads because I felt like it and we're all posting and using our brains and junk. Sulk about it if you really want to.
I could quickhammer Yoncé right now because I feel like it, it doesn't stop it anti-town, you say we have a different opinion but I don't know why you think it's a good thing and it came just after we finished discussing why we weren't making our townreads so explicit
In post 403, Grib wrote:Well, I do it every game. I'd make an exception for the rest of the game, but I wouldn't want to summon the wrath of NM the Knowledgeable.
I prefer NM the Righteous
In post 412, Akane Kurashiki wrote:Whoops. Yeah, the rest of his iso is reading very much like townie that can't handle pressure to me now.
This is a pretty stark turnaround. Why do you think you didn't see what you're seeing now at the time?
In post 414, Jackel98 wrote:Sorry for not posting more, but half of the time I don't know what to post. Most of your posts are directed are directed at specific people, and anything I want to point out is ninja'd. That combined with Real Life makes it hard to post as much as I want to.
It's better you post something and not just oh lol beaten to it, sheeping is a crappy tell anyway
In post 474, xRECKONERx wrote:I really don't fucking buy that there's a VT in this setup... I mean, maybe, but this seems like the place where Pie would put a bunch of cool power roles that interact with the room mechanic. Hmm.
That early claim is really bad, and also pretty noobtown though, I don't think newbscum fakeclaims VT that early with no danger of a lynch.
Well the only way you can believe both of these things is if you think he's lying town, so if it's not that which one is it?
And a role madness Micro sounds excessively hard to balance, especcially with the door mechanics. I'm inclined to believe the claim.
Pedit: Okay just saw Yonce's self hammer, has to be scum, self hammering as town when we haven't agreed on doors or self hammering as town at all? No