Micro 393: 2012 Primary Mafia (Game Over)

SleepyKrew · Post Post #4 (isolation #0) » Fri Sep 19, 2014 12:46 pm

FLAVOR CLAIM GOGOGO
RICK SANTORUM
I LOVE THE RNG

SleepyKrew · Post Post #6 (isolation #1) » Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:12 pm

There's no flavor claim there. What are you hiding?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #7 (isolation #2) » Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:12 pm

And the odds are 1/9...

SleepyKrew · Post Post #11 (isolation #3) » Fri Sep 19, 2014 4:27 pm

Please never make a post like that again
Also there are no drawbacks to flavor claiming and there are potential benefits (which I will explain after everyone does it because explaining beforehand would defeat the purpose)

SleepyKrew · Post Post #12 (isolation #4) » Fri Sep 19, 2014 4:28 pm

Are you concerned about me being at L-2, Axl?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #14 (isolation #5) » Fri Sep 19, 2014 4:52 pm

Oh well if you wanna be like that 1:8 also where's your claim

SleepyKrew · Post Post #17 (isolation #6) » Fri Sep 19, 2014 4:57 pm

VOTE: Whooch
That was a really transparent attempt.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #18 (isolation #7) » Fri Sep 19, 2014 4:58 pm

For those that don't see it, they invited someone to vote me (put me at "L-1") when their vote actually put me at L-1.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #21 (isolation #8) » Fri Sep 19, 2014 5:02 pm

Last I checked, 1+1+1+1=4
Check your facts before acting stuck up

SleepyKrew · Post Post #22 (isolation #9) » Fri Sep 19, 2014 5:03 pm

But of course you already knew that

SleepyKrew · Post Post #30 (isolation #10) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 4:56 am

In post 24, Aronis wrote:
In post 11, SleepyKrew wrote:Please never make a post like that again
Also there are no drawbacks to flavor claiming and there are potential benefits (which I will explain after everyone does it because explaining beforehand would defeat the purpose)

Ill give you a hint. My picture isnt in the main post. [Sexist mod]

Did Palin run in 2012?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #31 (isolation #11) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 4:59 am

In post 26, AxleGreaser wrote:
In post 12, SleepyKrew wrote:Are you concerned about me being at L-2, Axl?

considering that I put you there, no.

Good answer.

In post 27, AxleGreaser wrote:
In post 15, Whooch wrote:Do not fear, for ho is here!

VOTE: SleepyKrew

Does anyone want to put him at L-1?

but I am concerned by misleading posts

unvote: SleepyKrew

This post is missing a vote.

In post 28, ArcAngel9 wrote:morning guys...
VOTE: theaceofspades. Miss you dear

Read the thread.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #33 (isolation #12) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:16 am

What else caught your eye?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #35 (isolation #13) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:22 am

What about that post caught your eye?

Yup.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #38 (isolation #14) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:42 am

I took on a Rick Santorum persona for a while during the last election. That's why I'm so excited that I got him.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #39 (isolation #15) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:42 am

And I still bring it back every now and then.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #42 (isolation #16) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:59 am

Jon Hunstman (top right corner in OP picture) seemed alright, though maybe that was just compared to his competition. The Republican party now is even shittier than two years ago.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #43 (isolation #17) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 7:00 am

Oh Ron Paul (bottom left corner) is fun to listen to. He's an oddball, but doesn't seem to be filled with the hate and vitriol that his colleagues are.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #45 (isolation #18) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 7:16 am

Aronis you troll

SleepyKrew · Post Post #50 (isolation #19) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 7:57 am

Top left is Michelle Bachmann, not Palin.
I'm really unsure if Aronis is trolling or has a very different ideology than me.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #52 (isolation #20) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:13 am

...
Hang on a sec

SleepyKrew · Post Post #54 (isolation #21) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:25 am

I'M DOING OTHER THINGS TOO SCUMFUCK

SleepyKrew · Post Post #57 (isolation #22) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:33 am

I think Aronis just scumslipped? I believe he is Sarah Palin, with a Michelle Bachmann fakeclaim. I just checked and found that Palin decided not to run in 2012. I originally guessed that the scum were going to be dirty liberals, but it looks like it's Republicans that didn't run.
Now, why do I think Aronis scumslipped?
Aronis originally said that his role isn't pictured. That leads me to believe that his actual role is Sarah Palin. However, he then says the Bachmann pic is of Palin. So he's essentially saying he's Bachmann? I don't think Bachmann and Palin look alike, but maybe that's because I know who they are. I guess someone not familiar with them could get them confused. But Aronis has clearly demonstrated that he is familiar with these people! If you can tell Romney apart from Perry apart from Huntsman, you can tell Palin and Bachmann apart. This leads me to believe that he got his real role and fakeclaim accidentally mixed up, and is now trying to cover that up.
Also his little ad hom attempt now is amusing. Is it scum trying to deflect? idk I think it's scummy but that's confirmation bias.
Whooch is still my pick for partner, but slip > read.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Aronis

SleepyKrew · Post Post #59 (isolation #23) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 9:48 am

Because Palin isn't pictured (because she didn't run).

SleepyKrew · Post Post #62 (isolation #24) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 10:02 am

In post 61, TierShift wrote:
In post 59, SleepyKrew wrote:Because Palin isn't pictured (because she didn't run).

Why Palin specifically?

Because Aronis specifically named her?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #64 (isolation #25) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 10:11 am

That's what I'm getting at, yes. I don't think he would make that mistake without being Palin with a Bachmann fakeclaim, because he's already proven that he's familiar with the Republicans.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #66 (isolation #26) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 10:12 am

In post 44, Aronis wrote:
In post 41, TierShift wrote:There are many bad ways to spend 53 seconds of one's life.

Listening to Rick Santorum qualifies.

Ugghh yuck. But I feel sorry for him cos he had a stillborn child and one daughter with edward's syndrome.

Can someone give me a current republican party member who is not completely shit? I want to listen to their views without their words being brought upon me by some repulsive person.

Rick Perry. The governor of the Texas [the best state by a long shot].

Newt Gingrich [spelling?] isn't too horrible either.

In post 46, Aronis wrote:
In post 40, TierShift wrote:Aha. I have close to zero flavour knowledge. Of all the portraits I only recognise two and I wouldn't even know their names.

Guess I'm the only non-american here?

Top row, left to right- Sarah Palin[alaska governor, I think. McCain's choice for vp in '08], Herman Cain[got hammered with false accusations], Newt Gingrich
, Jon Huntsman[Idk much about him, seemed alright though].

Bottom row, left to right- Ron Paul[He belongs in an insane asylum], Rick Perry[the best one], Mitt Romney[kinda a liberal, mormon (their a bunch of idiots), got nominated, lost.], and Rick Santorum[dunno much about him, didnt care for him though].

SleepyKrew · Post Post #68 (isolation #27) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 10:13 am

In post 57, SleepyKrew wrote:If you can tell Romney apart from Perry apart from Huntsman, you can tell Palin and Bachmann apart.

And like I said
PEDIT: Not if you know who they are.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #70 (isolation #28) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 10:28 am

In post 30, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 24, Aronis wrote:
In post 11, SleepyKrew wrote:Please never make a post like that again
Also there are no drawbacks to flavor claiming and there are potential benefits (which I will explain after everyone does it because explaining beforehand would defeat the purpose)

Ill give you a hint. My picture isnt in the main post. [Sexist mod]

Did Palin run in 2012?

He never refuted this.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #72 (isolation #29) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 12:19 pm

Mhm right

SleepyKrew · Post Post #75 (isolation #30) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 12:28 pm

You got a Bachmann pic with your PM and still thought that was Palin in the OP? Yeah right.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #76 (isolation #31) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 12:28 pm

In post 74, Aronis wrote:Besides, what makes you think scum have fake claims? Are two of the politicians really that evil?

Elaborate

SleepyKrew · Post Post #85 (isolation #32) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:11 pm

In post 79, Aronis wrote:

In post 76, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 74, Aronis wrote:Besides, what makes you think scum have fake claims? Are two of the politicians really that evil?

Elaborate

You're certainty is alarming. I wouldnt be surprised if you were scum, considering your accusations.

I meant elaborate on the second question.
And of course I'm certain. It's a fucking scumslip. Yet I'm still engaging in discourse with you because ???

SleepyKrew · Post Post #86 (isolation #33) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:11 pm

In post 82, Flubbernugget wrote:Is there any reason
at all
for a fake flavor claim? How is that in any way a useful gambit?

Meh. Fuck that. Let's just abuse lynch all liars to the letter instead of its intention.
That's the true Republican way!!

Do you have any idea what's going on

SleepyKrew · Post Post #87 (isolation #34) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:12 pm

Because I can't figure out what that post is trying to say at all

SleepyKrew · Post Post #90 (isolation #35) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:17 pm

It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"

SleepyKrew · Post Post #92 (isolation #36) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:18 pm

In post 89, Flubbernugget wrote:So they scumslipped because they fucked up which politician they are? Did I miss somewhere that certain politicians are confirmed scum?

Reread my argument, and don't ignore the word "fakeclaim" this time.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #93 (isolation #37) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:19 pm

In post 91, Aronis wrote:
In post 90, SleepyKrew wrote:It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"

How do you know Sarah Palin or bachmann is scum?

Oh wait, your buddy is Palin! Sorry about that NvM.

So you're gonna stop trying to justify the mix up? Sweet.
Palin cannot be a town role because she didn't run. Republicans that didn't run make sense as scum.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #94 (isolation #38) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:20 pm

Is Aronis even voting me

SleepyKrew · Post Post #97 (isolation #39) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:29 pm

In post 96, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 93, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 91, Aronis wrote:
In post 90, SleepyKrew wrote:It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"

How do you know Sarah Palin or bachmann is scum?

Oh wait, your buddy is Palin! Sorry about that NvM.

So you're gonna stop trying to justify the mix up? Sweet.
Palin cannot be a town role because she didn't run. Republicans that didn't run make sense as scum.

Just when I thought I was getting on the same page as you.....

Yeah I'm sure that was happening

SleepyKrew · Post Post #98 (isolation #40) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:30 pm

In post 95, Aronis wrote:
In post 93, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 91, Aronis wrote:
In post 90, SleepyKrew wrote:It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"

How do you know Sarah Palin or bachmann is scum?

Oh wait, your buddy is Palin! Sorry about that NvM.

So you're gonna stop trying to justify the mix up? Sweet.
Palin cannot be a town role because she didn't run. Republicans that didn't run make sense as scum.

Words cannot do your stupidity justice.

"I can't come up with more bullshit."

SleepyKrew · Post Post #99 (isolation #41) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:31 pm

At least taos gets it.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #101 (isolation #42) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:36 pm

I agree!
Not sure which one though

SleepyKrew · Post Post #103 (isolation #43) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:42 pm

Talk me through how you reached your conclusion.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #105 (isolation #44) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:47 pm

Two more ^_^

SleepyKrew · Post Post #107 (isolation #45) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:55 pm

Are you saying I changed my story in 93? How so?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #109 (isolation #46) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 2:00 pm

In post 108, Flubbernugget wrote:You're adding stuff into it that is so out in left field it comes off as desperate.

Are you talking about me saying that someone who didn't run doesn't make sense as town but does make sense as scum?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #111 (isolation #47) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 2:01 pm

phok I wanted to do it

SleepyKrew · Post Post #118 (isolation #48) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 3:19 pm

Okay I'll try to clear this up in one go:
I originally expected the scum to not be Republicans.
I then saw Aronis slip and believe him to be Palin.
Palin as town doesn't make sense, because she didn't run.
This led me to believe that scum are Republicans that didn't run.

Still confused?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #120 (isolation #49) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 3:50 pm

No, you clearly still don't get it. I'm speculating on the setup because Aronis SCUMSLIPPED.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #122 (isolation #50) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 3:58 pm

No. I am pushing him because he scumslipped. I began my setup spec about fakeclaims

after

he scumslipped,

because

he scumslipped.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #129 (isolation #51) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 4:18 pm

In post 127, Flubbernugget wrote:Please don't tell me that was all for naught -_-

? He can link to literally any picture he wants. I'm not really sure what his plan was with posting the picture in the first place. Seemed like desperation.
I just hope my effort on you wasn't for naught.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #130 (isolation #52) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 4:18 pm

phok I appreciate your help

SleepyKrew · Post Post #134 (isolation #53) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 4:21 pm

Well see the difference between a scumslip and a regular read is that a scumslip doesn't leave room for doubt
Therefore, I will view anything and everything you do as scum-motivated

SleepyKrew · Post Post #135 (isolation #54) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 4:22 pm

In post 133, Aronis wrote:
In post 125, theaceofspades wrote:i'm not a republican. Just saying.

The democrats are still worse.

scummiest thing all game

SleepyKrew · Post Post #137 (isolation #55) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:29 pm

Dude you started it.
(Originally I was a little bothered by it but then I decided that your buddying was just saying what I was obviously going to say anyway, and as such was not bad)

SleepyKrew · Post Post #152 (isolation #56) » Sun Sep 21, 2014 5:25 am

In post 138, TierShift wrote:Aronis is terribly defensive and doesn't scumhunt because he's being attacked.

Phok is filling in for SK but SK is buddying him in return.
Taos found an awful reason to be on the wagon.
Whooch was stupid early game.

Guys I heard mildly bastard not 5 scum

Okay so you're probably his partner instead of Whooch cool

In post 139, AxleGreaser wrote:Not sure if I am worried by this.

One Sequence of events

In post 118, SleepyKrew wrote:Okay I'll try to clear this up in one go:

[Event 1]
I originally expected the scum to not be Republicans.

[Event 2]
I then saw Aronis slip and believe him to be Palin.
Palin as town doesn't make sense, because she didn't run.
This led me to believe that scum are Republicans that didn't run.

Still confused?

A different sequence of events.

In post 122, SleepyKrew wrote:No. I am pushing him because he scumslipped.
[Event 2]
I began my setup spec about fakeclaims
after

[Event 1]
he scumslipped,
because
he scumslipped.

I dont mind mistakes. Being wrong, or even making an error, does not make you scum.

Being wrong about I did A
because
B is slightly more worrying as town you ought be an expert in why you do things.

@SleepyKrew
Care to comment or clarify?

I thought to myself that the scum wouldn't be Republicans. I didn't start speculating in thread until the slip

Oh shit I somehow forgot about Whooch's L-1 thing. So is TS just being bad?
Really liking Axle.
Looks like Flub only voted because of Axle. Do not like.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #153 (isolation #57) » Sun Sep 21, 2014 5:26 am

The only thing I disagree with about Axle is that the Aronis case is weak. It's a

scumslip

for Reagan's sake.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #156 (isolation #58) » Sun Sep 21, 2014 8:25 am

Is your partner Flub or Whooch?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #158 (isolation #59) » Sun Sep 21, 2014 8:47 am

Okay so it's one of those two.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #164 (isolation #60) » Sun Sep 21, 2014 11:21 am

Oh I forgot I called you his partner too
But it's probably Whooch or Flub.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #167 (isolation #61) » Sun Sep 21, 2014 11:24 am

I think Whooch's L-1 thing was scummy as fuck.
Flub because he only voted Aronis to appease Axle.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #171 (isolation #62) » Sun Sep 21, 2014 11:40 am

I don't see why they wouldn't.

Neither of those two are pinging me (or the others, including you).

SleepyKrew · Post Post #180 (isolation #63) » Tue Sep 23, 2014 3:43 pm

Okay I'm going to look at my notes and reads and stuff later but first

Did anyone block or redirect me? If so, claim it

now

.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #182 (isolation #64) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:00 am

Okay, so anyone that was against the flavorclaim (sorry) is pretty much guaranteed town. People that sheeped me onto Aronis for the fakeclaim are highly likely town as well, because I don't think scum would bus on a faulty premise like that.

People who were actually opposed to the flavorclaim (meaning they didn't just not comment on it):
Axle
... and no one else bothered commenting except Aronis? Dammit.

People that sheeped my logic for voting Aronis:
taos

In post 73, TierShift wrote:Aronis flavorclaim pls.

What did you hope to accomplish with this?

Flub's reaction makes a lot of sense from someone going "wtf why is my partner being voted for fakeclaim slipping when we don't have fakeclaims??"
Also Flub's false dichotomy about me/Aronis makes no sense at all. I didn't notice that yesterday because I was too busy being cheeky (<_<) but I think someone else pointed that out so thank you.

In post 149, Flubbernugget wrote:Axle I'm phone posting, not trying to ignore you.

But Aronis's response to the slip accusation is to just throw a fit, so VOTE: Aronis

Yeah, this vote was definitely to appease Axle.

phok, why did you vote Aronis?

Whooch is still bothering me for doing absolutely nothing yesterday except the scummy as fuck vote on me. This includes them ignoring Axle's attempt to interact with them.

But
VOTE: Flub

SleepyKrew · Post Post #185 (isolation #65) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 6:28 am

Going to class now so I'll respond properly later, but I'm gonna call you dumb in this post so I don't have to do it then.
U dumb

SleepyKrew · Post Post #189 (isolation #66) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:10 am

In post 183, TierShift wrote:
In post 182, SleepyKrew wrote:Okay, so anyone that was against the flavorclaim (sorry) is pretty much guaranteed town.

Nope, why?

Look at Aronis's flip. Ask gm for clarification if you need it.

In post 183, TierShift wrote:
People that sheeped me onto Aronis for the fakeclaim are highly likely town as well, because I don't think scum would bus on a faulty premise like that.

Nope again. I think scum could very well be in phok or taos and you think it might be flub, so you're more or less invalidating your own reasoning.

First off, I just said taos, not phok. Second, Flub didn't sheep me.

In post 183, TierShift wrote:I wanted to see if he was indeed claiming to be either palin or bachmann.

And what were you going to do with the claim?

In post 186, TierShift wrote:I don't think I like playing with you, SK. You're pushing faulty ideas bullheadedly. You're just lucky to have caught scum with it.

Did you miss the part where I called my reasoning for Aronis faulty? I'm not tooting my own horn; I'm well aware that I got lucky.
As for "bullheadedly", lolwut? I'm not being stubborn. Present me with a good alternative.
Also, since I'm back to relying on reads instead of slips ("slips"), a lot of my confidence is going to be faked ^_^

SleepyKrew · Post Post #190 (isolation #67) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:13 am

In post 188, TierShift wrote:Why is there only self-defence and not reads?

What are

your

reads?

In post 187, Flubbernugget wrote:I still have no idea why I'm being accused of stating a false dichotomy. Yes, Aronis and SK could both have been scum. They also both could also both have been town. But I had no evidence to promote either of those scenarios.

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I really hope I don't need to explain to anyone how fucking bad that is.

In post 187, Flubbernugget wrote:When Aronis decided to respond to SK's accusation by completely losing his shit I voted for him.

Aronis behaved the way he'd been behaving for a while before Axle talked to you.

In post 187, Flubbernugget wrote:Am I correct then in saying the primary scum read on me then is based on my reaction of the wagon forming on Aronis?

It's based on your vote (which I pointed out yesterday) and your false dichotomy (which Axle pointed out yesterday).

In post 187, Flubbernugget wrote:As for appeasing Axle, by the time I would have had an opportunity to not phone post the thread was already locked.

That has to do with my accusation of appeasement... how?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #193 (isolation #68) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:28 am

In post 191, TierShift wrote:Phok didn't just sheep you? I think he did.

He didn't state why he voted when he did. I'm not going to give him credit for sheeping now even if he says he did, because it's after the fact and easy to lie about.

In post 191, TierShift wrote:I was hoping to see aronis either convincingly claim something else, reluctantly claim something else or just claim to be bachmann. All of those could affect my read on him.

So what did the Bachmann claim do for you? Feel free to quote something if you already said it.

In post 191, TierShift wrote:I don't see why scum wouldn't sheep a dumb attack on their buddy temporarily just to create some skrt of distance. With unvoting later in mind, though, but not having been able to do that in this case.

Do you think this happened, or are you just presenting it as a possibility?

In post 191, TierShift wrote:P-edit: I'm waiting for people to claim a roleblock or ascetic before outing my reads. I'm assuming your Night Action was blocked as well as mine and that both you a d flub are claiming not to be ascetic/having RB'd me. Please confirm, SK.

I was blocked or redirected or something, hence my first post today.

In post 192, phokdapolees wrote:
In post 182, SleepyKrew wrote:phok, why did you vote Aronis?
Partially because of the "slip", partially because of the bullshit he used to defend himself after

If you agreed with me that it was a slip, why wasn't that enough to warrant a vote on its own? Elaborate on how the bullshit he used to defend himself was scummy?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #194 (isolation #69) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:28 am

Also phok why are you voting Whooch instead of Flub?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #196 (isolation #70) » Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:50 am

In post 195, TierShift wrote:I'm presenting it as a possibility. You seem to be auto-disregarding this possibility, for reasons I do not know and I'm reminding you not to hand out townreads based on stuff that isn't necessarily worth a townread.

I think it's unlikely that scum would bus by sheeping something they knew to be incorrect. I don't think it's impossible. But really unlikely. I'm struggling to put into words why I think this. Remind me later and I'll try again.
However, even if you were to disregard my belief that scum (probably) wouldn't have sheeped me there, it would still take a mountain range of convincing to get me to vote taos (or even phok).

SleepyKrew · Post Post #205 (isolation #71) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:11 am

shit I got hit with the super lazies
probably because I expected my first class today to be cancelled and it wasn't and I somehow made it on time because God smiled down on me
So probably not gonna do anything here today
And I'm busy tomorrow/Saturday because CHICAGO
idk about Sunday
Not gonna go V/LA because I'll still have access and probably will post but just letting y'all know

SleepyKrew · Post Post #209 (isolation #72) » Fri Sep 26, 2014 10:11 pm

SleepyKrew · Post Post #211 (isolation #73) » Sat Sep 27, 2014 5:13 am

I bumped the thread
It also counted as a post for me

SleepyKrew · Post Post #220 (isolation #74) » Sun Sep 28, 2014 12:53 pm

TOMORROW

SleepyKrew · Post Post #236 (isolation #75) » Tue Sep 30, 2014 6:12 am

TODAY IS THE DAY

SleepyKrew · Post Post #239 (isolation #76) » Wed Oct 01, 2014 1:23 am

I disappear, and so does Flub...
(actual content later
I know I said I'd do it yesterday sorry)

SleepyKrew · Post Post #241 (isolation #77) » Wed Oct 01, 2014 3:42 am

Day I was going to get back into the game (it didn't happen).
As for phok votes, you could try reading?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #243 (isolation #78) » Wed Oct 01, 2014 5:55 am

Holy fuck when did that happen
I'll try to drum up some support for a Flub wagon. Sheeping you (TS) onto a compromise isn't the worst thing in the world but Whooch's vote is really icky.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #247 (isolation #79) » Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:06 am

In post 246, phokdapolees wrote:
In post 228, Whooch wrote:
In post 227, Cho wrote:VOTE: phokdapolees

Reason: 223 is the best post I've seen yet.
Do you guys not see this shit

Whooch has done nothing this whole game and is now coasting with this sheep

See this is why I'd rather lynch Whooch over phok (and I'd rather lynch Flub over Whooch)

SleepyKrew · Post Post #251 (isolation #80) » Wed Oct 01, 2014 10:39 am

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Whooch
I'll hammer if I need to but can we do this instead. I think they're lying about their role. I'll go into more detail after class.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #253 (isolation #81) » Wed Oct 01, 2014 12:45 pm

Dammit I have to hang out with my dad (ugh).
I'm okay giving Whooch a night so
UNVOTE:
VOTE: phok

SleepyKrew · Post Post #259 (isolation #82) » Sat Oct 04, 2014 6:14 am

What
The
Fuuuuuuuuuuck
I guess I'll explain more when it's my turn?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #263 (isolation #83) » Sun Oct 05, 2014 10:23 am

Goddamn paranoia

SleepyKrew · Post Post #266 (isolation #84) » Sun Oct 05, 2014 10:29 am

In post 262, ArcAngel9 wrote:oh god... are we in lylo?

Like why in the world would you think there are 2 scum still
And how is that all you have to say
You've done

nothing

SleepyKrew · Post Post #268 (isolation #85) » Sun Oct 05, 2014 12:23 pm

Commuting makes you immune to night actions
I see you're not popcorning, so AA9 next? I think that's what TS said and I agree.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #271 (isolation #86) » Mon Oct 06, 2014 8:24 am

AA9 I see you posting

SleepyKrew · Post Post #275 (isolation #87) » Mon Oct 06, 2014 11:55 am

VOTE: AA9

SleepyKrew · Post Post #279 (isolation #88) » Mon Oct 06, 2014 12:03 pm

FULL CLAIM
yes I'm taking advantage of the opportunity you presented by clearly not being prepared to claim

SleepyKrew · Post Post #280 (isolation #89) » Mon Oct 06, 2014 12:04 pm

Am I scum for being opportunistic, or do you just want to say a buzzword before going back to doing absolutely nothing?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #283 (isolation #90) » Mon Oct 06, 2014 12:11 pm

lol
Not even voting me
Let's do this

SleepyKrew · Post Post #284 (isolation #91) » Mon Oct 06, 2014 12:12 pm

After we finish the massclaim ofc

SleepyKrew · Post Post #305 (isolation #92) » Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:21 pm

In post 302, TierShift wrote:It makes no fucking sense for scum to CC here with one day from LyLo, that's all.

This is one of the arguments I hate the most. Scum can make mistakes. Scum do make mistakes. AA9 is hella flailing right now. She hasn't even claimed any results. Her claim seems nothing more than desperate bullshit. I can't speak to her mindset because I don't know how she reacted to the Aronis lynch or if she's even been paying attention, but I can tell you based on what little I've seen that I wouldn't rule out idiotic scum play.

My sweater vest of love is a jailkeeper. I tried to protect Axle N1. I tried to use it offensively on Whooch N2. Part of the reason my scumread on Whooch jumped up was because they seemed to go "oh yeah we got blocked too!!"
It's bothering me that there are apparently three blocking roles. I'm wondering if that has something to do with the bastard mechanic.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #306 (isolation #93) » Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:22 pm

Flub is the only one left, right?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #307 (isolation #94) » Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:24 pm

In post 203, ArcAngel9 wrote:the game kind of rushed in last day phase..... but getting scum is an awesome thing..though it was fluke..it worked well for us.. So that leaves only 1 scum left in the game...
I gotta catch up this game first though..

In post 262, ArcAngel9 wrote:oh god... are we in lylo?

"There's only one scum left
LOL WAIT ARE THERE TWO OMG"
Yeah this isn't inherently scummy but it has scum motivation

SleepyKrew · Post Post #319 (isolation #95) » Tue Oct 07, 2014 5:19 am

In post 313, Flubbernugget wrote:TAOS isn't protected when he goes to the moon right?

In post 268, SleepyKrew wrote:Commuting makes you immune to night actions

^including kills

SleepyKrew · Post Post #320 (isolation #96) » Tue Oct 07, 2014 5:20 am

In post 314, TierShift wrote:My secret power #1 was recruit (into town). I recruited flub last night.

I think this ability is a dud.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #321 (isolation #97) » Tue Oct 07, 2014 5:21 am

Oh right
VOTE: AA9

SleepyKrew · Post Post #323 (isolation #98) » Tue Oct 07, 2014 5:24 am

In post 315, TierShift wrote:
In post 11, SleepyKrew wrote:Also there are no drawbacks to flavor claiming and there are potential benefits (which I will explain after everyone does it because explaining beforehand would defeat the purpose)

Now would be the perfect time to explain.

Sometimes flavor makes roles obvious. This is not one of those times. However, flavor and role are still related, so claiming flavor early limits fakeclaim options later. Sometimes you can catch someone on an inconsistency. The chances of this actually being useful are slim, but they exist, and I didn't see any harm it could cause (lol).

SleepyKrew · Post Post #324 (isolation #99) » Tue Oct 07, 2014 5:25 am

Oh I thought I unvoted to finish the massclaim
No actually I'm a doublevoter. Quick Tier hammer now

Also could you calm down a bit?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #326 (isolation #100) » Tue Oct 07, 2014 5:29 am

"How dare you vote me for claiming COP" is already a bad argument because lol scum can fakeclaim, but you're also saying "vote Tier because he claimed COP"

SleepyKrew · Post Post #333 (isolation #101) » Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:45 am

In post 330, theaceofspades wrote:Also arc honey, your behavior is concerning. Don't make me lynch you. Because I am *this* close.

Less fence please

SleepyKrew · Post Post #334 (isolation #102) » Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:46 am

TS I'm sorry for ever doubting you

SleepyKrew · Post Post #337 (isolation #103) » Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:50 am

So now there are two scum left again

PEDIT: seriously calm down

SleepyKrew · Post Post #338 (isolation #104) » Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:51 am

Wait why did you call him a noob
What does lack of experience have to do with the fact that you claimed cop and he has a cop ability?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #342 (isolation #105) » Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:03 am

Yeah I'm not going to engage with you anymore until you tone it down.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #347 (isolation #106) » Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:16 am

Yes when I think of perverted scummers, TierShift is the first and only person that comes to mind.

AA9, if you're going to act like a child, I'm going to treat you like one.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #349 (isolation #107) » Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:29 am

"mature"
"You're letting him lick your butt hole"
Anyway I think the reason townTier would "risk" voting you is because he wants to lynch you.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #351 (isolation #108) » Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:30 am

Dammit I'm engaging anyway

SleepyKrew · Post Post #354 (isolation #109) » Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:45 am

So you're giving intent instead of voting so that she can get out any last thoughts, or something else?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #357 (isolation #110) » Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:57 am

How can he lick my butt hole if his head is in his own ass?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #362 (isolation #111) » Tue Oct 07, 2014 9:31 am

What did you expect?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #374 (isolation #112) » Thu Oct 09, 2014 6:00 pm

I jailkept Flub
VOTE: taos

SleepyKrew · Post Post #376 (isolation #113) » Thu Oct 09, 2014 6:10 pm

In post 375, theaceofspades wrote:SK has to be scum, because i am not.

Did you reach this supposed conclusion before or after my post?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #390 (isolation #114) » Fri Oct 10, 2014 7:57 am

Yay!
Sorry to Aronis and gm. I wanted to try a ridiculous balls to the wall scumgame and picked this one to do it.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #393 (isolation #115) » Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:18 am

Of course you were right about me when you said I was either town or scum

SleepyKrew · Fri Oct 10, 2014 12:58 pm

You expressed no suspicion of me whatever before the massclaim, and the suspicion you developed once I began pushing you (you were an easy target ^_^) went away as soon as Tier claimed.

SleepyKrew · Fri Oct 10, 2014 12:58 pm

whatsoever*

SleepyKrew · Post Post #412 (isolation #118) » Fri Oct 10, 2014 1:13 pm

In post 404, ArcAngel9 wrote:
In post 402, SleepyKrew wrote:You expressed no suspicion of me whatever before the massclaim, and the suspicion you developed once I began pushing you (you were an easy target ^_^) went away as soon as Tier claimed.

Your push on me with no case was enough for me to go on full charge.. I was so sure that you were scum until TIER came with Claim shit. Otherwise.. I would have never voted him. I lost interest on you right after his claim indicates cop role..

Yeah, my push on you came

after

massclaim started, in case your memory's a bit foggy. If we for some reason hadn't massclaimed, I'd have probably tried to lynch Flub, and you'd have probably continued being fucking useless.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #416 (isolation #119) » Fri Oct 10, 2014 6:30 pm

In post 414, Flubbernugget wrote:I need to see the scum thread to see how spontaneous that opening bus was. Well played SK.

Not planned at all. I think Aronis's rage was real.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #420 (isolation #120) » Sun Oct 12, 2014 1:53 pm

No he's right.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #422 (isolation #121) » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:39 pm

Oh was dead thread released?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #423 (isolation #122) » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:45 pm

Found it.