[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 6230323 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 393: 2012 Primary Mafia (Game Over) - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #11 (isolation #3) » Fri Sep 19, 2014 4:27 pm
Postby SleepyKrew »
Please never make a post like that again
Also there are no drawbacks to flavor claiming and there are potential benefits (which I will explain after everyone does it because explaining beforehand would defeat the purpose)
In post 11, SleepyKrew wrote:Please never make a post like that again
Also there are no drawbacks to flavor claiming and there are potential benefits (which I will explain after everyone does it because explaining beforehand would defeat the purpose)
Ill give you a hint. My picture isnt in the main post. [Sexist mod]
Post
Post #42 (isolation #16) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:59 am
Postby SleepyKrew »
Jon Hunstman (top right corner in OP picture) seemed alright, though maybe that was just compared to his competition. The Republican party now is even shittier than two years ago.
Post
Post #43 (isolation #17) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 7:00 am
Postby SleepyKrew »
Oh Ron Paul (bottom left corner) is fun to listen to. He's an oddball, but doesn't seem to be filled with the hate and vitriol that his colleagues are.
Post
Post #57 (isolation #22) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:33 am
Postby SleepyKrew »
I think Aronis just scumslipped? I believe he is Sarah Palin, with a Michelle Bachmann fakeclaim. I just checked and found that Palin decided not to run in 2012. I originally guessed that the scum were going to be dirty liberals, but it looks like it's Republicans that didn't run.
Now, why do I think Aronis scumslipped?
Aronis originally said that his role isn't pictured. That leads me to believe that his actual role is Sarah Palin. However, he then says the Bachmann pic is of Palin. So he's essentially saying he's Bachmann? I don't think Bachmann and Palin look alike, but maybe that's because I know who they are. I guess someone not familiar with them could get them confused. But Aronis has clearly demonstrated that he is familiar with these people! If you can tell Romney apart from Perry apart from Huntsman, you can tell Palin and Bachmann apart. This leads me to believe that he got his real role and fakeclaim accidentally mixed up, and is now trying to cover that up.
Also his little ad hom attempt now is amusing. Is it scum trying to deflect? idk I think it's scummy but that's confirmation bias.
Whooch is still my pick for partner, but slip > read. UNVOTE: VOTE: Aronis
Post
Post #64 (isolation #25) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 10:11 am
Postby SleepyKrew »
That's what I'm getting at, yes. I don't think he would make that mistake without being Palin with a Bachmann fakeclaim, because he's already proven that he's familiar with the Republicans.
In post 41, TierShift wrote:There are many bad ways to spend 53 seconds of one's life.
Listening to Rick Santorum qualifies.
Ugghh yuck. But I feel sorry for him cos he had a stillborn child and one daughter with edward's syndrome.
Can someone give me a current republican party member who is not completely shit? I want to listen to their views without their words being brought upon me by some repulsive person.
Rick Perry. The governor of the Texas [the best state by a long shot].
Newt Gingrich [spelling?] isn't too horrible either.
In post 40, TierShift wrote:Aha. I have close to zero flavour knowledge. Of all the portraits I only recognise two and I wouldn't even know their names.
Guess I'm the only non-american here?
Top row, left to right- Sarah Palin[alaska governor, I think. McCain's choice for vp in '08], Herman Cain[got hammered with false accusations], Newt Gingrich
, Jon Huntsman[Idk much about him, seemed alright though].
Bottom row, left to right- Ron Paul[He belongs in an insane asylum], Rick Perry[the best one], Mitt Romney[kinda a liberal, mormon (their a bunch of idiots), got nominated, lost.], and Rick Santorum[dunno much about him, didnt care for him though].
In post 11, SleepyKrew wrote:Please never make a post like that again
Also there are no drawbacks to flavor claiming and there are potential benefits (which I will explain after everyone does it because explaining beforehand would defeat the purpose)
Ill give you a hint. My picture isnt in the main post. [Sexist mod]
Post
Post #90 (isolation #35) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:17 pm
Postby SleepyKrew »
It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"
Post
Post #92 (isolation #36) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:18 pm
Postby SleepyKrew »
In post 89, Flubbernugget wrote:So they scumslipped because they fucked up which politician they are? Did I miss somewhere that certain politicians are confirmed scum?
Reread my argument, and don't ignore the word "fakeclaim" this time.
In post 90, SleepyKrew wrote:It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"
How do you know Sarah Palin or bachmann is scum?
Oh wait, your buddy is Palin! Sorry about that NvM.
So you're gonna stop trying to justify the mix up? Sweet.
Palin cannot be a town role because she didn't run. Republicans that didn't run make sense as scum.
In post 90, SleepyKrew wrote:It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"
How do you know Sarah Palin or bachmann is scum?
Oh wait, your buddy is Palin! Sorry about that NvM.
So you're gonna stop trying to justify the mix up? Sweet.
Palin cannot be a town role because she didn't run. Republicans that didn't run make sense as scum.
Just when I thought I was getting on the same page as you.....
In post 90, SleepyKrew wrote:It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"
How do you know Sarah Palin or bachmann is scum?
Oh wait, your buddy is Palin! Sorry about that NvM.
So you're gonna stop trying to justify the mix up? Sweet.
Palin cannot be a town role because she didn't run. Republicans that didn't run make sense as scum.
Post
Post #118 (isolation #48) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 3:19 pm
Postby SleepyKrew »
Okay I'll try to clear this up in one go:
I originally expected the scum to not be Republicans.
I then saw Aronis slip and believe him to be Palin.
Palin as town doesn't make sense, because she didn't run.
This led me to believe that scum are Republicans that didn't run.
? He can link to literally any picture he wants. I'm not really sure what his plan was with posting the picture in the first place. Seemed like desperation.
I just hope my effort on you wasn't for naught.
Post
Post #134 (isolation #53) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 4:21 pm
Postby SleepyKrew »
Well see the difference between a scumslip and a regular read is that a scumslip doesn't leave room for doubt
Therefore, I will view anything and everything you do as scum-motivated
Post
Post #137 (isolation #55) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:29 pm
Postby SleepyKrew »
Dude you started it.
(Originally I was a little bothered by it but then I decided that your buddying was just saying what I was obviously going to say anyway, and as such was not bad)
I originally expected the scum to not be Republicans.
[Event 2]
I then saw Aronis slip and believe him to be Palin.
Palin as town doesn't make sense, because she didn't run.
This led me to believe that scum are Republicans that didn't run.
I dont mind mistakes. Being wrong, or even making an error, does not make you scum.
Being wrong about I did A
because
B is slightly more worrying as town you ought be an expert in why you do things.
@SleepyKrew
Care to comment or clarify?
I thought to myself that the scum wouldn't be Republicans. I didn't start speculating in thread until the slip
Oh shit I somehow forgot about Whooch's L-1 thing. So is TS just being bad?
Really liking Axle.
Looks like Flub only voted because of Axle. Do not like.