Advance Wars UPick!--Game Over..?

[orcinus_theoriginal]

Vote for me then. Jesus.

You want a wagon on you even more than I do!

[orcinus_theoriginal]

Why do I need specific answers to this? The wagon on him could be informative, if he flips scum it could lead to associative tells and I don't know what else. I just feel like I'll be able to make more sense of things with a flip that I've been involved with at this point.

Here’s lynx’s iso (http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... er_sort=Go)
Tell me what a town flip might indicate, and what a scum flip might indicate.

You need specific answers to this because I don’t think a lynx flip would solidify any reads.

i mean i am as "ok" with a lynx wagon as the next guy. i just don't think we're lynching lynx for information, we're lynching lynx + replacement for being lurksacks and for being scummy

[orcinus_theoriginal]

you retreated back by saying you were trying to get a reaction and to forget about it.

can you tell me how this post went more specifically?

[Cheetory6]

Here’s lynx’s iso (viewtopic.php?t=59714&f=3&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&user_select%5B%5D=24437&user_select%5B%5D=0&user_select%5B%5D=0&user_sort=Go)
Tell me what a town flip might indicate, and what a scum flip might indicate.

You need specific answers to this because I don’t think a lynx flip would solidify any reads.

I don't have any specific answers for associative tells and I'm not going to fake them. Would likely look at how people were talking about Lynx rather than how Lynx was talking about people. I stand by the act of making a wagon on someone as policylynchy as Lynx being informative. How people get on it or stay off it can be informative.

i mean i am as "ok" with a lynx wagon as the next guy. i just don't think we're lynching lynx for information, we're lynching lynx + replacement for being lurksacks and for being scummy

Game needs to progress. I was scumreading Lynx for a few reasons, but really I just care more about progressing the state of the game at this point.

How can that not be construed as trying to see what people are thinking of you?

Again, it's a focus on trying to start conversation. I'm saying there's a lot of material on me so people should be able to talk about me.

I mean sure but then this brings us back to the question where both of us self-meta’d, and you called me scum for it when it’s something you do in the same situation as town.

How? I already said I didn't call you scummy for this.

So you’re telling me you haven’t seen any angles to pursue this game?

ABR, Mara, SSK and Lynx have been angles. Had angle on you and it didn't pan out.

[Bookitty]

@Cheetory:

Okay, in your Post 2570, SMP didn't say that. I REMEMBER that because Orcinus said it to ME after I did a whole bunch of work on meta-ing SMP. So that doesn't follow either.

[Cheetory6]

Okay, in your Post 2570, SMP didn't say that.

Fucked up the owner of the quotes. Was saying that I thought SMP was following the logic from quote A to quote B. EG: someone was commenting on something relating to flubber and then SMP said something that I thought was related to that.

[SMP]

you retreated back by saying you were trying to get a reaction and to forget about it.

can you tell me how this post went more specifically?

Flubber doesn't talk D1 other than a hello post. Beginning of D2 some conversation occurs which Flubber doesn't participate in. This is when I first brought up the possibility that Flubber is scum. A day or 2 later he calls out someone as being scum. They say that isn't true. Flubber says they are scum by POE from his point of view. I call him out on it, saying that there could be the possibility that we're all town, or that Flubber himself is scum. Next post he says that he obviously knows he isn't scum and that a scum accusation would get more out of this person. Some more posts by the accused, then Flubber says the scum callout was a bad spook attempt and is now a moot point.

[SMP]

Okay, in your Post 2570, SMP didn't say that.

Fucked up the owner of the quotes. Was saying that I thought SMP was following the logic from quote A to quote B. EG: someone was commenting on something relating to flubber and then SMP said something that I thought was related to that.

How did you fuck up the quotes? You have too erase the original quoted person's post reference and add my name to it.

[fferyllt]

Okay, in your Post 2570, SMP didn't say that.

Fucked up the owner of the quotes. Was saying that I thought SMP was following the logic from quote A to quote B. EG: someone was commenting on something relating to flubber and then SMP said something that I thought was related to that.

How did you fuck up the quotes? You have too erase the original quoted person's post reference and add my name to it.

sometimes the highlight and quote feature makes that almost a one-click operation if you're not paying attention.

[orcinus_theoriginal]

Here are the wagons that I would be ok with happening today: lynx, flubber, cheetory

I'm leaning toward the first two because i feel like we have enough markers for cheetory to be able to develop a pretty accurate read d3

between lynx + flubber, i feel good about flubber for being a nonsensical nuisance and less good about lynx being a nonentity

plus it's a replacement slot which is really annoying

VOTE: lynx

[Cephrir]

VOTE: Lynx

Yeah I'm not parsing through this shit right now and Lynx never stopped being scum.

[Hostile Intent]

COME ON, GUYS.

UNVOTE: Cheetory6
VOTE: LynxKuroneko

[Bookitty]

DedicatedScribe replaces LynxKuroneko.

Fix that, guys.

I'm okay with this, especially given the one post from the replacement:

This game is pretty elaborate.

VOTE: DedicatedScribe

[orcinus_theoriginal]

ABR, Mara, SSK and Lynx have been angles. Had angle on you and it didn't pan out.

So I mean since the original point was that you haven't been pursuing answers as aggressively. Is there a reason for this?

I follow up on specific questions pretty hard when I see an angle I want to pursue. If I like answers to things or don't see it going anywhere then I move on to something else. You telling me that I don't do that in my towngames?

Like this is great and all but it doesn't address the point that you've been letting people ignore your questions, which is not something you usually do.

[quote="In post 2573, orcinus_theoriginal"

I'm self-centered.

I don’t follow[/quote]
Still a thing.

How? I already said I didn't call you scummy for this.

But you told me to stop self-metaing. Which is something you do. So..????

pedit i'm sure nati will fix it for us

[Bookitty]

Cool, then. I'm out until tomorrow morning

[Hostile Intent]

VOTE: DedicatedScribe

If it makes a difference.

[Cephrir]

COME ON, GUYS.

UNVOTE: Cheetory6
VOTE: LynxKuroneko

???

[Hostile Intent]

We haven't the time for so many flip-flops. And I actually got scum-motivation from Cheeto's posts.

[orcinus_theoriginal]

I'll go here for now.

VOTE: Lynx

UNVOTE: Lynx
VOTE: Albert B. Rampage

Am I missing something else here? You're saying you can't vig scum?

I legit missed the unvote, which makes Lynx's ISO make more sense.

Ah, fuck. Idk how I forgot about reading that re: ABR. Disregard the disappearance mention.

UNVOTE: Albert B. Rampage
VOTE: Cheetory6

COME ON, GUYS.

UNVOTE: Cheetory6
VOTE: LynxKuroneko

We haven't the time for so many flip-flops

. And I actually got scum-motivation from Cheeto's posts.

???

[Hostile Intent]

I'm trying to form reads and assist in an actual lynch. You understand how its worse on a whole versus one player. I mean ffs we still have people voting/pushing new cases that don't stand a chance at becoming even a rival wagon, much less a lynch. Doesn't make sense to me, as a whole, given our time limit.

[orcinus_theoriginal]

I mean ffs we still have people voting/pushing new cases that don't stand a chance at becoming even a rival wagon, much less a lynch.

like whom...?

[notscience]

Time for a true display of skill

[orcinus_theoriginal]

Time for a true display of skill

Spoiler: ns

hey ns

nobody finds this kind of shit amusing

literally nobody

i don't know what you're trying to achieve or what you're trying to do with spam like this but it's the dullest thing and accomplishes nothing except paints you as a desperate attention-seeking asshole

from our talk the other night you seem like a fun guy. please treat the game seriously because the rest of us do as well

[notscience]

I actually have a method behind my madness, believe it or not

[notscience]

I'm looking differently at this game than I normally do

Because normally I wouldn't really commit a read on cabd as either alignment because last time I tried to commit one as scum on him it was terribly transparent and as town I frankly never have the confidence in reading him, it's like the same paranoia I get re: nacho but I actually do really like my stance behind him

I'm trying to play ambivalent deity in my hood because I don't particularly trust hoods but I know after xmen I need to partially suspend that and not isolate anyone in the QT so it's a shift but it doesn't particularly matter as almost noone posted in D1