In post 937, Mathdino wrote:wgeurts: why the fuck did i call him town (note to self: go find out why)
i was expecting to write a towncase on him
goddammit
134 was a sketchy unvote that seemed concerned about people's perception of him. Then he called Flubber's vote on Amy opportunistic. But then I did a thing and ctrl+F'd "Amy" in his ISO. Guess what? I found a whole lot of him talking about Amy's wagon and votes on Amy but NOT ONCE did he give a single read on her. And then in 763 he encourages votes on Amy but still gives no thoughts on her.
What's your read on Amy? Not her replacement, what's your read on her?
This overconfidence on Siveure is exactly the thing I was seeing in his scum game. And then his response to my argument in 379... even if his misconception was true, it's still the strangest thing to scumread and it's pretty opportunistic. His conception was essentially "You call me town and are buddying me but you say I'm scum no matter what Siv flips." Like these are fundamentally incompatible and there's no scum motivation in doing those things in the first place.
In 441 he gives his top scumreads: {Siveure, Romitelli, Adrien}. The first 2 are town, haven't read Adrien so idk about that. Then in 445 he follows up on his earlier reads list with some meta on Flubber, Siv, Romi, and Adrien. A lot of it was without substance honestly and was entirely unconvincing. Seems more for the purpose of justifying wgeurts's reads than for presenting said reads to the thread.
Then his comments on me weird me out: "Damn it dino, don't make us lynch you in my third(?) game with you." "You're doing a good job of making people suspicious, I think it's however incorrect. The amount of effort you're putting in would be odd as scum."
His unvote and vote of Siveure actually ring pretty town to me. No one voted Siveure in between, and all that really did happen to influence that was Siveure wagon hopping. So it DOES make sense from a town POV.
D2 play: I have no idea what the fuck he's doing. Like almost every single post is bad or scummy in some way. I can expand on this if anyone likes but his D2 play is material that'd make me go for the "too scummy to be scum" argument. I'm not sure what to think. So I'll keep my vote on Ankamius and leave wgeurts as actually way scummier than I thought he was.
1. Self conscious early behaviour.
2. Incredibly sketchy behaviour toward Amy and her wagon, seemed to spend more time talking about votes on her than Amy herself.
3. Overconfidence meta.
4. Opportunism.
5. Repeatedly talking about all the meta he'd eventually go drudge up for people... ends up coming up with one or two sentences on each with no evidence nor compelling arguments.
6. Weirdness surrounding me in late D1 (and his misconception of me after my draft order spec post).
7. Literally all of his D2 play. ISO it. It's crap.